We've been closing monitoring the new charges alleging that a wealthy campaign contributor (who's also subsidized Coleman's wardrobe) funneled Coleman $75,000 through his wife. The charges are contained in two lawsuits filed last week, one in Texas and one in Delaware. And though they contain sworn statements from the accusers they're really just allegations. But one thing that has struck me as I've looked more deeply into the reporting is that the principals in the case -- the alleged briber (Coleman supporter Nasser Kazeminy), the alleged cut-out (Jim Hays) and Coleman himself -- really haven't responded in any great detail to deny the charges.

Coleman has denied it, but only at the most general level. More surprising, Kazeminy has refused all comment. And Hays, whose company the money was allegedly funneled through, has declined to respond himself, and had both his lawyer and his company issue vague and cryptic statements saying that whatever was done was legitimate.

These are extremely serious charges; they amount to bribes to a sitting United States senator. If there were nothing to it, I'd expect some clearer denials and clearer explanations of the payments in question.

Zack Roth has the details.