Enough with the "Scalito" already
If in the course of Alito's confirmation hearings it is shown that he is indeed an ideologue whose judicial views are of an extreme nature, his nomination must be opposed. Many indications are that Alito's extremism and ideology might well make Scalia look like Sandra Day O'Connor. The democrats and the left will only be making harder for the Senate to oppose Alito's nomination if they continue to compare him to Scalia.
It would be far more instructive (and far more constructive for that matter) to contrast Alito to Scalia. If opposing Alito is to be justified (and supported by the American people), it will be incredibly difficult to do so unless he is shown to be different from Scalia.





Not that I wouldn't personally support opposing Alito if he was shown to be actually identical to Scalia. As far as I'm concerned, Scalia's originalism is to jurisprudence what creationism/intelligent design is to science: shot through with holes and nothing more than quackery.
November 4, 2005 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point, I agree with you. Not the least of which because I don't know of much evidence to show that the majority has been much outraged by the current Supreme Court. So to equate him with someone already sitting is to imply to those who don't know that much about the Supreme Court that things would remain the same. Many are not aware of or understand the radicalism of Scalia, it's too esoteric of a subject. To add the extra layer of Scalia to the Alito confirmation complicates too much if one is to be honest. Better to just talk about what the results of having the new man himself on the court could be.
November 5, 2005 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink