« The MSM enabling Bush once more | calguy's Blog | What the Rove machine sends under the radar »

On Local Response to Katrina and the Ghost of Rudy


As horrific and chaotic as 9/11 was, we must be reminded that it affected a relatively small part of a very wealthy borough of NYC.  On the vast majority of Manhattan, the power grid and transportation systems were working effectively.  The first responders were in place to respond. Rudy could drive into or walk into the affected area, and while we can all praise his leadership, there is no question that the almostly completely intact infrastructure provided him with a base totally unavailable to Ray Nagin in submerged New Orleans. 

 I don't want to excuse Mayor Nagin or Gov. Bianco from questions--such as `Who set up the checkpoint outside the convention center?' that was prominently mentioned by Shepard Smith in the now famous Hannity and Colmes show where Hannity lost control of his reporters, or `why couldn't the school buses have been mobilized?'  At the same time, it is clear Bianco called the emergency in advance, recognised the potential for devastation, and asked for help. 

Indeed, we cannot forget that this enormous storm afected a large region of the country, and that without effective involvement of the federal government and its vast resources this disaster was inevitable.

So when the comparisons, explicit or implicit, are trotted out and the Rovian blame game thrown at local officials, I hope all of us will do our collective best to smack it down.  It is far too easy for the Lou Dobbs of the world to take pot shots, for the ``balance oriented'' media to say, well, yes maybe local officials should be looked at, and to lose focus on the fact that when this happened Bush and most of his key players were on vacation.  Don't let the media forget!
 

 


2 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Good points. I pretty much agree on all of it.


For me, the main difference between NYC and NO is that no one was keeping first responders OUT of Manhattan.


The evacuation was completely different, too. Most people walked out, or at least to the West Side and caught ferries, etc. Huge lines and chaos, but at least people could leave. They were terrified, but they could get out.


The bottom line is that NYC had the resources available to deal. New Orleans did not, and when they asked for help, they did not get any.

user-pic

There are other significant differences in 9/11 New York. 

Some are a result of the relative compactness of the problem.  You didn't have to get off Manhattan to feel safe although many could and did. 

New York had tens of thousands of first responders who were brought to bear. 

First responders were well-equipped even if the wireless systems were incompatible. 

New York didn't suddenly find itself 80% under water.

New York is not a poor city in a poor state. 

Manhattan is in the center of a huge metropolitan area with lots of opportunities for redundant infrastructure to facilitate work-arounds.

Leave a comment

calguy

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address