The Intelligent Design of ID
There are many things in this universe that can not be explained by sheer random chance. Intelligent Design has already shown how certain things in nature could not have simply happened. Could something as complex as an eye have happened on its own? Such marvels can only be explained by the existence of an underlying intelligence.
But we at the ID of ID take things a step further. We do not shy away from asking the tough questions about the intelligence behind the intelligence. Could something as great and marvelous as the designer of the universe come about simply by chance?
Certainly not! Something as complex and marvelous as that must have some intelligence behind it. We must have a theory to explain his existence - the ID of ID.
We demand that our theories be taught along side those of ID. There are many weaknesses in the theory of ID that the Discovery Institute would like to keep you from knowing. We feel both sides should be given equal time.
I have been a proponent of the ID of ID theory for many years.
I have always felt persecuted, as if it were simply me against the world of ID proponents who were against the evolution proponents.
You probably know exactly what I mean. Having to explain the theory behind a theory that explains the holes in another theory is not an easy task.
We must ban together!
The ID of ID theory MUST be taught in schools along side the ID theory and the evolution theory!!!
Everyone must realize that there are three sides to this coin!
August 29, 2005 6:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Evolution and Abiogenesis are sciences, they deal in measurements and observation of naturally occurring events in physical things, which can be quantified. It is not and never will be a systematic structure of belief. You cannot believe in Science.
There are many things in this universe that can not be explained by sheer random chance.
Agreed Science has yet to develope the tools necessary to measure and quantify many physical aspects of the Universe, so it may be equally valid to assert that the universe as we know it exists as part of the structure of a table leg in some guys basement.
Intelligent Design has already shown how certain things in nature could not have simply happened.
No, Intelligent design has pointed out that science has not been able to explain those things.
Could something as complex as an eye have happened on its own? Such marvels can only be explained by the existence of an underlying intelligence.
Another assumption based on ignorance, both by the proponents of the argument and the detractors of the argument.
Could something as great and marvelous as the designer of the universe come about simply by chance?
Since you do not understand the universe in three demensions, nor the other ten demensions excluding quantum chances of infinite demensions postulated, how will you begin to wrap your mind around the one who designed the universe, as you don't understand it?
Certainly not! Something as complex and marvelous as that must have some intelligence behind it. We must have a theory to explain his existence - the ID of ID.
We demand that our theories be taught along side those of ID. There are many weaknesses in the theory of ID that the Discovery Institute would like to keep you from knowing. We feel both sides should be given equal time.
If, We must have a theory to explain his existence - the ID of ID. then you must advance one to demand that our theories be taught along side those of ID.
You have a long way to go to catch up to ID, although you appear to be as logical. Perhaps that is why Democrats lose elections, they would rather be cute, than logical.
August 29, 2005 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink