Hillary, the narcotics trade, high-level bribery, Dennis Hastert, and the Turkish "deep" state
Or More Fun & Games with the Clintons
from:http://takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/2008/02/hillary-narcotics-trade-high-level.html
from:http://takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/2008/02/hillary-narcotics-trade-high-level.html
Advertisement
Got some real fear issues with Hillary, eh?
It's clear that Obamabots are afraid of a strong, experienced, and talented female running the country. They pull out all stops in their hype to get their own vapid candidate elected.
Obama stands for and has voted for nothign SUBSTANTIAL. He rakes over and over and over again that Clinton voted for the war.
Well, wake up lemmings: HE never voted for the war becauew he never VOTED against it, either. He just OPINED that he was against it.
As with his entire voting record, he avoids committing so he does not have to take a ht on his position later on.
His childish respoinse during the debate, "well, in my state voting "present" is really saying you have a problem with a bill and don't want to approve or deny it . ." Oh, Come on!
So, what he is saying is if an antislavery bill came up with a rider about higher highway taxes, he would vote 'present' because he didn't like the tax part?
The man is a shirker and most definitely NOT someone who should lead this country.
February 13, 2008 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Read more. The Chicago papers have plenty on Illinois House "present" voting.
That said, this is not a useful post. There are actual policy and electability arguments that do not depend on guilt by association.
February 13, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
bah!
February 13, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bah! was for tyrona.
Tom: I agree that there are valid policy & electability arguments. However I found it to be useful precisely because it IS relevant. It is relevant because her entire candidacy has been built on that association.
Thanks for disagreeing without being disagreeable.
February 13, 2008 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
And it is Hillary herself being discussed in the article.
February 13, 2008 10:25 PM | Reply | Permalink