Isn't the "Same Stale Line" Line Getting Stale?
Barack Obama is fond of saying that his opponents are stuck in the old politics, leveling negative ads and one liners, releasing smear through surrogates, distorting his record, any number of implied sins. David Plouffe writes "This is the same stale, Washington playbook that has driven so many Americans away from the political process." Barack Obama has inarguably been on the receiving end of all these "stale" sins.
Obama's campaign and Obama himself have repeated this one liner more times in the last month than I can count. It's the attack angle of his central meme, We (I) Can Change Washington. The one liner is true and it's been working for him, working very well.
But, tell me, isn't the "Same Stale Line" line getting stale?
Obama's campaign and Obama himself have repeated this one liner more times in the last month than I can count. It's the attack angle of his central meme, We (I) Can Change Washington. The one liner is true and it's been working for him, working very well.
But, tell me, isn't the "Same Stale Line" line getting stale?
Advertisement





No, not really.
February 26, 2008 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's one vote. Thank you.
February 26, 2008 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not just a line.
It's an idea.
One that is deeply and tragically rooted in truth. It differentiates Obama's candidacy from Hillary's.
Try to remember that the media, and maybe 5% of the population has been following this campaign from state to state. Sure, we hear candidates repeat things.
But most people just aren't as tuned in as we are. I would argue that a majority of people haven't even heard Obama say it once.
February 26, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think we could be in greater agreement. The idea is strong, rooted in truth, has legs and should never be abandoned, even after he takes the oath.
But, the idea is articulated in a line, and people like us have heard it a lot. The idea isn't stale to me, but the line is starting to grate.
People like us lent legitimacy to Obama's early claims of populism, before he got all those primary wins, and in a general election it will be people like us who help keep him legitimate to people on the street. If the message gets stale to the junkies, some may stop listening and others, less loyal, MSM types, may turn on him.
Maybe I'm just projecting. I shouldn't even think like this, the punditry might get an idea for an anti-Obama narrative.
February 26, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I hope we can change that, Steven.
But during campaigns we willingly suspend laws of gravity and shelflife.
Even the Who got tired of playing Tommy and Lynyrd Skynyrd sick of Freebird, and those were real, to use a rather stale term, "rock stars". (God knows what Sinatra thought about "New York, New York" and "My Way".)
In fact, I'm old enough to remember when supermodels became supermodels, and we no longer had to go to dive bars to see bad chick bands in skimpy outfits - we could just watch fashion runway shows and cut to the chase.
But every so often, actually every 4 years, people come pounding on our doors and start expecting us to get excited about politicians, or should I say "non-politicians", like the ones bred outside of Washington.
(This is actually rather nonintuitive and even perverse, because you can kind of imagine why someone who's from Washington would get into politics, but why someone from say Kansas? Why not hitchhike to Hollywood, Baja, Bali, Puna, Peshawar, even Jonestown?)
And then once the election's over, we get back to "business as usual" in Washington. Of course "business as usual" is just as stale as the other mundane lines, but with a lot more money thrown in. Hmmmm, maybe there is a point to hitching to Washington after all.
Which kind of brings me to my point, assuming I did have one. I'm reasonably cynical about the whole process. I'm quite willing to admit, "yeah, my candidate is kinda sucky". But then the other shoe drops. "But so is yours". And I expect to start bargaining over just how sucky our candidates are. Which in a 5-person race should get to a lot of heated debate over just exactly how sucky our candidates our, and whether being down and ahead with suckiness is good or bad, and allow us to consume great amounts of alcohol.
And then someone says "My candidate doesn't suck". And I look at him with the same disdain and admiration for people who go into sewage pits to wrestle with alligators. "You said what?", meaning "The Pope had an affair with a whole troupe of *WHAT*?" "My canidate doesn't suck". And while we're slightly off the original import of your post here, you can imagine that the idea of a candidate that doesn't mostly but not completely suck is relatively common, the idea of a candidate that "doesn't suck" is about up there with a candidate that doesn't tell stale jokes (or worse, stale inspirational lines). Ohmigod, I must write my mother and thank her for sending those really cute Johnny Carson clips.
I mean, we all laugh at dumb jokes, just like we could all probably golf if someone held a gun to our heads. But I've said for a long time that we pay our politicians well, and by that I mean including the kickbacks and free dinners at The Palm, to take on the burdens of this completely stale and sucky life, to spare us from the truly irritating and depressing and might I hazard "suicide inducing" details of wonkdom. Go check out Obsidian Wings' multiple correlated variated breakdowns of the 2 remaining candidates' votes to get my drift. Aside from dedicating numerous post offices over the course of their careers, you get the candidates obsessing over numerous noble and futile initiatives that would fill ESPN with Sundays of Extreme Boredom programming, especially in light of the fact that these jackasses haven't quite realized that they've been out of power these last 7 years and that no one (in their right mind at least) reads the Congressional Record.
So, thank you for noticing that the lines have gotten a bit stale, and when you finish rolling the mannequins off the stage, please turn out the lights and make sure the security door is fully shut.
February 26, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said, Desidero. Very funny, very astute. That was the most fun fun I've had reading a comment, in a long time. Thank you.
February 26, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, it's not stale. It's only stale if you are a political junkie and can't get enough of this campaign season. For most of America they tend to tune in during their portion of the primary season (if that) and then tune out.
February 26, 2008 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're absolutely right.
I wonder if there are any political junkies reading this blog? There is certainly one writing it.
February 27, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course it is a stale line. It has been a stale line for YEATS! Every single election in modern times has been about changing how things work in Washington, and not a single winner ever has managed to do that! Obama won't manage it either. That's just how it is. If the general citizenry really cared about changing things, Bush would have been impeached by now.
Nah, it's all just politics and that isn't going to change.
February 26, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't realize Yeats used that line.
It's more like a good curve ball. As long as it keeps working, keep throwin' it.
February 27, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink