« PA Governor Rendell "Probably Deserves a Pass" -- NOT!! | twirling fartknocker's Blog | McCain - Afraid of Obama's Donor Army - Calls for Obama to Use Public Financing »
Obama affirms his "commitment to the rule of law"; McCain says, "bring it on"
The Pentagon's plans for death-penalty prosecutions of six men accused of plotting the 2001 terrorist attacks were criticized by Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, who said capital punishment is appropriate for such crimes but that military tribunals are the wrong forum for the case.
The Defense Department announced murder, terrorism and conspiracy charges Monday against alleged attack mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and five other inmates of the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. It gave the leading presidential candidates a chance to show how they would balance anti-terrorism zeal and civil liberties concerns in a heated political climate.
Obama said the desire to punish the perpetrators of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, shouldn't blind people to the flaws of the military tribunals that the Bush administration established to try Guantanamo inmates.
"These trials will need to be above reproach," the Illinois senator said in a statement Monday. "These trials are too important to be held in a flawed military commission system that has failed to convict anyone of a terrorist act since the 9/11 attacks and that has been embroiled in legal challenges."
Obama said the men should be tried either in a U.S. criminal court or by military court-martial, either of which would "demonstrate our commitment to the rule of law." Both those systems are more protective of defendants' rights than military tribunals, which allow evidence obtained through coercion and hearsay.
Sen. John McCain of Arizona, front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, expressed no such reservations. "I'm sorry that it has taken so long," McCain said.
SF Chronicle, February 13, 2008
McCain, on the other hand, has almost no principles (even if I disagree with him). He's running as the hero who was tortured, who used to be against torture, but now to kow-tow to the wackadoodle right votes to support torture. Hillary took a pass on voting.
It's a very clear choice voters will face this fall should Obama win the nomination. If Hillary gets the party poo-bahs to appoint her, the choice will be less clear in November. It'll be torture vs. torture light.
Advertisement





A sentence was left out of my post after SFChron part:
I admire Obama for taking this stand in our post-9/11 world of fear, fear, fear (although I do oppose the death penalty in all cases).
McCain, on the other hand...
February 14, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
True, but Obama is brilliant in repeating that Iraq and Iran distract us from Bin Laden and the real war on terrorism. His foreign policy is not a denial of terrorism and of 911 but rather a more rational policy toward these issues.
February 14, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain has contracted a bad case of Romneyitis from Mitt.
McCain is now in favor of granting huge tax cuts for the super wealthy and for having them waterboard all mexican immigrants.
Next up he will propose that every Christen Church be required to sacrifice a gay person on their altars each Sunday to appease the devout followers of the Prince of Peace, and to gain more support in the Christo Facist wing of his party
February 14, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Respect for our Constitution. What a notion.
February 14, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good for Obama. I was wondering what position he would take on this. Pretty much as I expected & hoped.
February 15, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink