The consternation over the 'super' delegates is palpable. Obama supporters are worried that his candidacy will be hijacked by these delegates. There is a persuasive argument that they should follow the lead of the voters. To wit: Whoever wins the most voters should get the most super delegates.

There are some problems, however, with apportioning delegates. First, who would have the authority to order them to vote for one candidate or another? These are not just votes, they are actual people who have ranking in the Democratic party. They will not likely compelled to do anything.

The second issue revolvesaround which group of voters should be used to guide them. All voters? A dangerous precedent I should think. Many of the primaries and caucuses are open to anyone. Should Republicans be a guide as to who the delegates should select as the Democratic nominee? Even independents, especially those who have indicated McCain as their second choice behind Obama? Why should they be telling the delegates who to vote for? No, if the 'super' delegates are to be apportioned, it should be based upon the percentages of Democrats supporting each candidate.