« The Sadness of the Ferraro Saga | DemNamedRNC's Blog | Obama: Maybe Not the Debate- But Maybe the Election »
A Return to the Power of Dreams
As readers of any of my previous posts may have surmised, I am a supporter of Barack Obama. I recognize that my views are colored by my support, and therefore have always tried to bring a reasoned dispassionate approach to my commentary. But in the spirit and tone of the day, I want to acknowledge reality and provide context.
Like many, I was quite taken by Barack Obama’s keynote address to the 2004 Democratic Convention. I was moved by his sentiments, and impressed by his skill at articulating his sentiments. I would not, however, say that I was “won over” at the time. I was impressed and wanted to learn more about Obama, but I wasn’t clamoring from that moment to see an Obama candidacy. All of that changed when, a few months later, I read his 1995 book, “Dreams from my Father.” From the time I read that book, I was overwhelmed by Obama’s voice; by his ability to reflect, with clarity, on history without being weighted down by it; by his ability to recognize, not just superficially, real grievances on all sides of potentially divisive issues; by his understanding that seeming contradictions in our society can be one of our greatest strengths rather than our most threatening flaw. It was from reading that book that I began to believe that Barack Obama could be the kind of transformational leader that we Democrats have not seen since Kennedy or Roosevelt.
I have continued to support Obama’s candidacy since then, was an early member of the networking side of his website, and was a nearly small donor. But for most of the campaign thus far, I have felt that he, and the campaign, have been harkening back to his second book, “The Audacity of Hope.” While that book is also well written and interesting, it is the writings of a politician providing a political rationale for his candidacy, not a leader laying down a vision.
Today, that changed. Today, rather than using a speech to try to diffuse a political problem, Barack Obama took the ‘audacious step’ of using a political problem as an opportunity to address major social issues. Rather than trying to gloss over or candy-coat, he acknowledged the fact that all sides have some legitimate complaints, and all sides have tried to make some illegitimate hay out of the history of race relations in America. And once again, returning to the unique voice he displayed in “Dreams from my Father,” he pointed out that acknowledging this seeming contradiction could be the source of our greatest strength in moving forward. In short, whatever the outcome of the this nomination campaign or the general election, Barack Obama has re-established himself as the truly transformational leader of this campaign.
Like many, I was quite taken by Barack Obama’s keynote address to the 2004 Democratic Convention. I was moved by his sentiments, and impressed by his skill at articulating his sentiments. I would not, however, say that I was “won over” at the time. I was impressed and wanted to learn more about Obama, but I wasn’t clamoring from that moment to see an Obama candidacy. All of that changed when, a few months later, I read his 1995 book, “Dreams from my Father.” From the time I read that book, I was overwhelmed by Obama’s voice; by his ability to reflect, with clarity, on history without being weighted down by it; by his ability to recognize, not just superficially, real grievances on all sides of potentially divisive issues; by his understanding that seeming contradictions in our society can be one of our greatest strengths rather than our most threatening flaw. It was from reading that book that I began to believe that Barack Obama could be the kind of transformational leader that we Democrats have not seen since Kennedy or Roosevelt.
I have continued to support Obama’s candidacy since then, was an early member of the networking side of his website, and was a nearly small donor. But for most of the campaign thus far, I have felt that he, and the campaign, have been harkening back to his second book, “The Audacity of Hope.” While that book is also well written and interesting, it is the writings of a politician providing a political rationale for his candidacy, not a leader laying down a vision.
Today, that changed. Today, rather than using a speech to try to diffuse a political problem, Barack Obama took the ‘audacious step’ of using a political problem as an opportunity to address major social issues. Rather than trying to gloss over or candy-coat, he acknowledged the fact that all sides have some legitimate complaints, and all sides have tried to make some illegitimate hay out of the history of race relations in America. And once again, returning to the unique voice he displayed in “Dreams from my Father,” he pointed out that acknowledging this seeming contradiction could be the source of our greatest strength in moving forward. In short, whatever the outcome of the this nomination campaign or the general election, Barack Obama has re-established himself as the truly transformational leader of this campaign.
Advertisement





Listening to his speech, you hear the professor, the teacher of Constitutional Law. You hear the person we need to address the country over and over again... to help people pull together to fix what ails us. You hear the kind of voice and logic that will be easy to listen to for 4 years and 8 years.
This is the man we need.
March 18, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
When did you hear Obama lecture on constitutional law?
March 18, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
hi TheraP --
I agree wholeheartedly, absolutely, double duty and then some!
and, not only America needs what Barack who's sane Obama is offering us here at home, but the whole world needs him to be our prez here now ...
I imagine even the angels are at it at this point -- mixing it up, struggling to decide what may prevail on earth ... determining our destiny for this human race ...
March 19, 2008 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
BevD, his previous job was Professor of Constitutional Law at the U of Chicago.
March 18, 2008 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
That doesn't answer Bved's question.
And I believe you are incorrect in saying that Obama is a Professor in Constitutional Law. I think he was lectured on Constitutional Law at U. Chicago.
March 18, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
U of C Obama loved by students
"He was not an ivory tower academic," said former student Kenworthey Bilz, who had him for the low-ranked 1997 Constitutional Law class."
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/law-students-gave-Obama121807/index.html
March 19, 2008 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
The term "professor" is an honorific. It is not legally defined or exclusive.
Students often call someone professor. Barack Obama is the only candidate who has taught Constitutional Law. He is a born teacher, can explain things in ways that people understand. U of Chicago is no small time law school. And they have the pick of lawyers - even for part-time positions. Quibbling over this is really silly. But quibble some must.
♪♪♪
March 19, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Barack Obama has re-established himself as the truly transformational leader of this campaign.
Yes, and of the party and the country as a whole. This is a movement - make way for the Dreamocrats.
March 18, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
"rather than using a speech to try to diffuse a political problem, Barack Obama took the ‘audacious step’ of using a political problem as an opportunity to address major social issues."
Kool-Aid. Honest Barack is not so honest. He was using this speech for noting but political gain. The empty suit is noting but a phony who said he said:
“The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign.”
Today the liar said:
“Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy?” Obama said. “Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely — just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.”
Of course the phony Obama, who calls himself a leader apparently did nothing when he heard the Wright comments except probably jump up and down like the rest of the congregation.
March 18, 2008 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Couldn't have said it better myself!
March 18, 2008 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Marginal,
I see that your favorite quote is
"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit."
Obviously you are using the latter strategy here.
But no one is baffled.
March 18, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would mean that it is brilliant. Good job Marginal.
March 18, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I feel sorry for readers like Marginal and Airwon who are so blinded by partisanship and/or hate that they are unable to be inspired by Obama's speech. Even Hillary said she was glad he gave it; the issues he addresses are pertinent to all of us, no matter which candidate we are rooting for.
March 18, 2008 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
With all due respect, I don't really need your sympathy beckyleeprice.
I'm just trying to lighten up the mood so you can fly higher.
Marginal likes to spice it up but I think that he raises 2 good points.
1. Obama was forced to make the speech today because he understood that Wright could be a major problem for him. It was understood that it was going to be a political speech. To his credit or discredit, depending on how you see it, he chose to expand the Wright issue into a broader issue about race relations in America. He is taking a political gamble that the speech will resonate with his base - white suburban voters and hopefully white working class voters without disenfranchising the black voters. He did a great job with that.
2. However, he opened the door to criticism. As Marginal said, Obama claimed that he was never present at a sermon when negative things were said. But in today's speech he said that he was. You can bet that this will come up again, especially if he is in the GE.
Anyway, I didn't mean to be hateful but I did mean to be partisan. Hope that doesn't hurt your feelings but it seems that everyone is partisan in here, you included.
March 18, 2008 10:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
in re-reading your post I can't tell whether you are partisan or not. So I take that part back.
March 18, 2008 11:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
TPM has recently been infected with republican trolls. These are not Hillary supporters. Draw them out and ask pointed questions of why they prefer Hillary. Then there will be no doubt.
March 19, 2008 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen, unfortunately you cannot baffle the star struck.
You cannot unsell the sold.
You cannot reason with unreason.
Just blindly follow along behind the Pied Piper.
Does anyone remember where that leads???
March 18, 2008 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, but it would be nice if you were to lay out where you think we should go, and who should lead us there.
March 19, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Clinton trolls have arrived........
see Allsburg's post today.
March 19, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think they troll for Clinton.
I think they are Busheviks. The real Kool-Aid(TM) drinkers.
March 19, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was saying that for months. But no one wanted to believe me. Now it's the all the rage. I guess I'm out of step. (looks like with that hat you could teach me to be in step!)
March 19, 2008 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink