« Wolfson Helped Emir of Dubai Take Over US Defense Plant! | richgee's Blog | Clinton: Delay the Delegate Count (Because I'll Lose) »

Calling Gore, Edwards, Richardson . . .


Where are you guys? <br><br>
What are you waiting for? <br><br>
For this to become more of a mess? For Hillary to use any tactic to smear her opponent? Richardson said that he would side with the person who had the most delegates after TX/OH - we hear NOTHING. <br><br>
Come into the light and make your intentions known. <br><br>
Am I off here? Would love your comments.

4 Comments

| Leave a comment

Perhaps Obama isn't so likeable either?

user-pic

They are holding up to be one of the Supers HEADS/LEADERS.

Personally I'm ashamed of Gore for not stepping up after hearing how Hillary plans on STEALING the election away from Obama by bribing (in some way) the elected delegates and the non-elected ones.

He should be outraged to see she's abusing the system to her advantage while damaging the Democratic Party for years to come.

I'm sure Gore IS outraged about Hillary's do-anything-say-anything campaign. He's holding back, though, knowing that he can have the most impact and credibility if he waits until the convention (or a comparable 'zero-hour') to be the power broker. It's a strategic decision, so not to worry: it's clear which side he'll fall on.

As for Edwards and Richardson, yeah, it'd be good to get them out for Obama. Richardson seems to be leaning Obama, but as for Edwards, it is anybody's guess. I tend to think he has moved in the direction of the HRC campaign but doesn't want to back a losing candidate...

Myself, I'm still waiting for Colin Powell...

I am hoping that if the Mississippi results are anything similar to the Wyoming results, something -- maybe not decisive but nudging things along a little further -- will happen later this week. Hoping. The only thing after that might be the PA polls. IF they should start looking consistently bad .... don't know if they will but if they should. I keep remembering that Lyndon Johnson got out of the 1968 race when he realized that he was going to lose _____ (some state, I forget which one, that he had been supposed to win). He got out *before* that primary so as to avoid the humiliation.

The two who could say it to her most effectively are Bill and Ed Rendell ... and they were essentially doing that before TX/OH: "you have to win both." If *they* realized that she was going to go down to a humiliating defeat in PA, she would have to listen. The problem with Gore, Richardson, Edwards or anyone along that line is that she may well see them as 'the enemy' and consider their wise counsel to be a challenge that she must, by damn!, meet. But if there is good reason for Bill and Ed Rendell to tell her it's over. They, too, are Democrats and despite loyalty to her should have some care for the party and November.

Leave a comment

richgee

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address