« Negative campaigning reflected in exit polls? | taricha's Blog | The Soundbite From Obama's Race Speech »
"Kenneth Starr" & "Monster" settle VP question
I think what the last few days of name-calling say, whether this was the intended message or not, is that America can forget about the "dream ticket." Perhaps killing the dream could have been done more gracefully, but I doubt it could have been done more thoroughly than the back and forth this week did.
From this point forward, media outlets talking about a "dream ticket" are ignoring the underlying lack of respect and trust that these two people have for each other, and merely stroking their own ratings fantasies. There is absolutely nothing in the organization and style of these two candidates that suggests they would ever consider putting themselves in a dependent situation with people they don't fully trust.
Then again, she is still married to Bill.
From this point forward, media outlets talking about a "dream ticket" are ignoring the underlying lack of respect and trust that these two people have for each other, and merely stroking their own ratings fantasies. There is absolutely nothing in the organization and style of these two candidates that suggests they would ever consider putting themselves in a dependent situation with people they don't fully trust.
Then again, she is still married to Bill.
Advertisement





But there was lots of animosity between LBJ and JFK and Johnson still accepted the VP spot. . . .
March 7, 2008 6:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary, if the nominee, would need Obama - he would be hard to replace because of his devoted following and the effective fundraising and organizing machine he has built.
Obama does not need Hillary and I don't think anyone believes she'll take it (although perhaps it will be a requirement of any final resolution to this mess).
I think that Obama is the nominee...that the DNC makes sure that it is leaked she was offered the VP spot but said no...Obama picks from a couple of women governors or Bill Richardson...Hillary gives her private and public blessing to the pick.
March 7, 2008 7:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
The premise of this post, that animosity between the two candidates, precludes the so-called "dream" ticket, simply ignores two hundred years of presidential history. For example, consider that LBJ and JFK couldn't stand each other in 1960, and also recall the animosity between George Bush Senior and Ronald Reagan in 1980. Worry not, Senator Clinton may still be willing to make Senator Obama her 2d chair. :)
March 7, 2008 8:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Willing? She can't win without him.
March 7, 2008 8:31 AM | Reply | Permalink