« New photo shows Hillary Clinton sitting with Wright | ms. hilton's Blog | Hillary Clinton: Boo Hoo, Why have you betray me? (tears) »
MSM needs to apologize for slandering Jeremiah Wright, Hypocrisy at its highest
the full sermon of that video that Fixed News broke. Please view this video and see it in its <b>unedited</b> form.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdlnzkeoyQ&feature=related
It sickens my stomach on how MSM have been pushing a false lie on Jeremiah Wright just to get a Presidential hopeful Barack Obama.
Spread this video!
Advertisement





I agree. This man has become a national scapegoat for comments that are, for the most part, echoed in prominent scholarly journals all over the world. (The AIDS-virus conspiracy theory notwithstanding.)
In anycase, it's a shame that the Clinton campaign isn't standing against this hypocrisy but using it to their advantage, and hopefully this will be the straw that breaks the donkey's back.
March 21, 2008 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
In 1990, 10% of black *believed* the AIDS-virus theory and another 20% thought it within the realm of possibility.
Sounds crazy? -- well, so did the Tuskegee Experiment, in which our Public Health Service, up to and including the Surgeon General, deliberately lied to and withheld treatment from 100s of black men, watching them die from (and infect their families with) syphllis so they could find out what the disease does to bodies. If you know, without doubt, that your government would do that .......
(The Infoplease write-up of the Tuskegee Experiment has information about the 1990 AIDS survey)
March 21, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is just UNBELIEVABLE!!!
After almost two weeks of some of the supposedly best media outlets in the country pouncing on this story one would think they would have had the decency to at least research it properly and show the entire clip so that the proper context of the remarks could be grasped. Now it turns out Wright was actually quoting a former US Ambassador and Malcom X's remarks after the death of JFK.
Just plain media laziness!!
March 21, 2008 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
please google "Tuskegee Experiment" or better yet, here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_experiment
i've copy-pasted the gist for you below:
**********************************
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male[1] also known as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Pelkola Syphilis Study, Public Health Service Syphilis Study or the Tuskegee Experiments was a clinical study, conducted between 1932 and 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama, in which 399 (plus 201 control group without syphilis) poor — and mostly illiterate — African American sharecroppers were denied treatment for Syphilis.
This study became notorious because it was conducted without due care to its subjects, and led to major changes in how patients are protected in clinical studies. Individuals enrolled in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study did not give informed consent and were not informed of their diagnosis; instead they were told they had "bad blood" and could receive free medical treatment, rides to the clinic, meals and burial insurance in case of death in return for participating.[2]
**********************************
this is how certain people in the Black community find it remotely possible that AIDS could have been set up by the government as well -- after all the CDC was in full knowledge and support of the so-called experiment, a 40-year experience of human sadism and depravity befitting only Dr. Mengele and his Nazi war crimes.
March 22, 2008 2:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're right, here's the preacher speech they should have shown instead:
Say it loud
March 22, 2008 3:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I remember seeing Harriet Washington on C SPAN speak at the Pratt Library about the subject of medical experimentation on blacks in the United States. It sent a chill up my spine.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/12/31/RVGNGN44B91.DTL
First, do no harm (to whites)
Reviewed by Alexander Zaitchik
Medical Apartheid
The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans From Colonial Times to the Present
By Harriet A. Washington
"If race is the haunted house of American history, Harriet Washington opens the door on the torture room in "Medical Apartheid," her blood-spattered history of black America's long and frequently nonconsensual relationship with experimental medicine."
March 22, 2008 3:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
"MSM needs to apologize for slandering Jeremiah Wright."
Yes. And so do the millions of Americans who are parroting the slander.
March 22, 2008 7:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I assume you're going to demand an apology from Obama, as well. He's the guy who has heard Wright preach for 20 years, and said he found what Wright said to be offensive. But I'm sure all of you have a much longer history with Wright.
March 22, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama said that the remarks were offensive because they were to the majority of Americans. Moreover, given that our media failed to cover the remarks in context, Obama could not fight against the onslaught of media voices and be heard.
His best chance was to concede that they were offensive and then go on the counteroffense to move the nation forward and to shift the focus to the larger issues at play.
Given what he had to work with he did a masterful job.
We can now come back and fill in the blanks to show how the story was trumphed up. However, had the feeding frenzy been at the same ferocious level his remarks and the truth would have still been drowned out and labelled as excuses and justifications.
Even so, Obama did not disown Wright. Now that the facts and truth are leaking out we can see even moreso why he stood up for the CHARACTER of Wright.
In the speech Obama asserted that not once had he heard Wright demean a white person or speak of them in a disrespectful or derogatory manner ...which we all know to be a far more accurate picture of the man today than what those snippets created.
Imagine the frustration of Obama knowing that the media had listended to those sermons in their entirety and willfully and deliberately decided to engage in demonizing Wright and tar Obama with the same brush nevertheless as it fit their political agenda to do so given that Hillary is the establishment candidate and is bought and paid for by the same corporate interests that own the mainstream media.
The good thing that has come out of this is that now the media is finally telling the truth about Hillarys bogus claims of experience and how she has exaggerated mightily her contribution to foreign policy agendas during her husbands administration. At long last they are reinforcing that she is MRS. Bill Clinton and not some 'experienced' political candidate.
Hillary wanted Obama vetted while she was been given a free pass all along. Think about it. It was Obama's denounciation AND rejection of Farrahkhans support at the last debate that started this firestorm courtesy of Tim Russert. Ferraro added fuel to the fire.
This Wright controversy is not over. Now that the racism spin is smoldering Wright's words are now being spun into ANTI-AMERICANISM on Obama's part for LISTENING for 20 years. As if, once again those snippets were all that was said for 20 years!!
Obama is being branded as anti-american for listening to Wright. Despite, Wright having been prominent enough to be photographed with THREE U.S. Presidents. So much for being a batty extremist.
The Clintons used Wright for their purposes to fan racism despite having known him all along to be highly influential and having served his country honorable right down to being medical personnel at the side of LBJ and negotiating for the release of Goodman under Reagan's administration and being a spiritual advisor Clinton confessed his sins to in September 19998.
How much more American can Wright be? His words about his governments transgressions against other countries is the ultimate form of patriotism yet he is being branded as an anti-american racist?
And by association so is Obama?
The Clintons are despicable and our media is complicit.
March 22, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I have a much longer history with my Mormon family and the church I grew up in. Our church didn't allow blacks to hold full membership until 1978. Lots of less-than-palatable reasons offered from the pulpit for why that might've been. Oh well. They're good folks for the most part. Just a bit misguided and ignorant. Or maybe you're suggesting they ALL should walk? How many pews would be empty if all of us decided to walk the next time we heard anything offensive from the pulpit? Plenty. Maybe that'd be a good thing. But, in any case, maybe it's not as easy an option as you suggest.
March 22, 2008 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am so glad you posted this. I am furious over the lies told on this reverend. Others are sending it through the email blaming Fox news for lying. Well Fox may have been the worst offenders, but ALL of the other media, participated in the lie and this is totally unacceptable. What can we do? The media is controlling our country. Thank God for the internet. But so many people that vote do not take the time to learn the facts like we do. They rely on the 30 minute evening news and newspapers to inform themselves. I am so upset over this.
March 22, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes ,my grandmother and Bill Clinton too.
Come on, Bill Clinton's exposure was 20 secs. Can you say 20 years?
If Clinton had shuned Wright, can you imagine the out cry, and million man marches ,that Rev's Al and Jessie would have instigated??
March 22, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Roland Martin provided a good analysis of the ENTIRE Wright sermon on CNN.com yesterday. Unfortunately, judging by some of the comments afterwards many readers were STILL convinced that Wright and Obama are racists. It made me sad that, in spite of such a great speech on Tuesday, so many people want to ignore it and, as Obama said, retreat to their old positions and point the finger.
March 22, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I watched the video and then had my husband watch. He still found the rant of the "footnote" section incredibly hard to watch but after an interesting discussion considering what the rest of the sermon meant he understood the point Pastor Wright was making. He also saw a very different and thoughtful man so different from the video clip.
For those who wonder way Obama stayed at this church for 20 years I suggest you listen to the sermon in its entirety. Wright is a pastor who asks people to think, to contemplate deeper issues carefully. In this particular sermon Wright is asking his congregation to look deep into themselves after the terrible 9-11 attacks and consider what can happens when we are caught up in a revenge mode. There may be no choice but for America to counterattack but when we get so caught up in payback that we begin to believe it is ok to, as he quotes from the bible, dash the heads of our enemy's children upon a rock, then maybe we have lost our right to be ok with God. He asks his congregation to look deep into themselves and explore what revenge can trigger. This is a man who served in the Marines. He knows what happens in war not only to innocent victims but to the perpetrators themselves no matter how just the war.
March 22, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I keep hearing that this is about Obama, not his pastor.
Ok, lets accept that (and give Obama the benefit of the doubt about everything he has said concerning the Rev)
Now if Obama really is what he has told us he is, ie. above the line, not just your normal politician...etc
Then, why did he not just come out and tell us the real reason that he cannot disavow Rev Wright?
The reality, and he well knows it, is that he would lose a large number of African-American votes, without which he can not win.
Turns out he is just another everyday politician
March 22, 2008 10:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama wrote this speach all by himself, and practiced, and practiced, and still how trouble reading from the tele-prompter, and is still trying to explain what he meant about his grandmother. If you watch closely, you see that he is starting to sound like G. Bush (trying to make a speach). Is he really after all just like us??
Is writing your own speech similar to a lawyer who has a fool for a client, or how ever the saying goes?
Trying to write my own stuff, difficult. It shows in a lot of other's comments as well .
March 22, 2008 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clearly it is difficult for you. You can't even spell "speech".
March 23, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you kindly prw. I'm still using an old underwood typewriter, without the latest rev of mechanical spell checker installed.
some say speach, some say speech, or was that tomato or whatever.
With all due respect surely you could come up with a better comment. What about punctuation? How about a sentence diagram or two.
I'm sorry, maybe you are just an angry Obama supporter, clearly unthinking at this time. Don't blame you, if I was an Obama supported, I would be angry too, How about that pass port file?
March 23, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink