The Man Who Saw Not Black Nor White
I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.
When I was still a boy, I went to visit my grandfather down on his small farm in Alabama. It was my first visit to the deep south, back along red dirt roads shaded thick by black oaks. My grandfather was a wonderful man. Old school. Southern baptist. Carpenter. Freemason. Hunter. He had a wonderful sense of humor and a stern, disciplinarian air about him that you dared not provoke.
Having grown up outside of the south, it was a very different experience for me. The culture there is radically different in many ways than it is elsewhere in America. There are places you can still go today in states like Alabama that look as if time passes there very slowly, maybe not at all. My family cemetery is out there, deep in the woods and framed by a growth that is constantly encroaching and yet somehow seems to respect hallowed ground. Many of the people there don't seem to know much or care much about many of the trappings of this modern life. They've been doing things their way for a long time and it hasn't failed them yet.
As my family was getting ready to leave one day, I overheard my grandfather talking to a neighbor and some of the kin. He had some very small cotton plants that lined the road up to his house and I could hear him say to the other men that he'd have to get a nigger to come pick the cotton. They all laughed loudly.
I had never really heard that sort of thing before. Not so plainly from grown, respected men. My parents would never have allowed me to talk like that about another person. You just didn't do it. Sure, I heard all kinds of things in the schoolyard growing up as I'm sure most kids do, but this was a different sort of thing. Though these men were laughing and it seemed to be a joke to them, I knew that my grandfather would not have said this sort of thing in different company. He was not a cruel man in any sense of the word, but this joke was cruel and I knew it.
I don't know whether I can say that I've ever in my life heard a politician stand up in front of the nation and speak truth like Barack Obama spoke yesterday. You can say his political back was against the wall and that's probably true, but he didn't have to do what he did. He could have given the same kind of speech that a thousand politicians before him have given. He could have equivocated. He could have distanced himself. He didn't do that. Instead, he spoke some hard, honest truths to a country that desperately needs to hear what he had to say.
There is something that is taught very frequently in philosophies from the East that is usually overlooked in Western cultures. The West has a good handle on duality. Descartes gave us a big shove in that direction. However, there is something that is taught in both buddhism and taoism that says that duality has a different nature. To focus entirely on the contrast between two halves is to miss the point. They are not one and not two. This is the meaning of Obama's statement about his grandmother and his pastor alike. Politics demands that he takes a "firm stand" and "denounce and reject", but this is so much bullshit and he has explained to us very clearly why this is so. It is the same for both of these people as it was for my grandfather and indeed for each and every one of us.
I've been waiting for a long time for someone with the constitution to put aside political expedience and bear witness to principle. I've been the cynic's cynic. All politicians are evil. None are to be trusted. No matter what they say all they want is your complacency in the face of their power.
And yet, history shows us that there are times when someone shows up who transcends this pattern. There are people who will rise that feel as we all do, that see what we see and feel what we feel, people who have not forgotten that there is something more to be strived for than mere power. Power, like all things in this universe, is impermanent. Empires fall. What remains?
Principles transcend. We live in a nation based on principles that were inspired by the Greeks some 2500 years ago. Our philosophies, our religious traditions all have ancient seeds. They come from halls and town squares, many of which have long since crumbled. Principles remain intact, not gone or turned to dust but polished like a smooth stones by the tests of time.
And I imagine that just as they will say now, so did they say back then: Nothing changes. The cynic decries the fool who seeks change. But it is the cynic who is wrong. Change is the one immutable truth of this universe. The cynic is like a precocious little child playing in the surf, suddenly filled with a sense of omniscience because he believes he has figured out the pattern of the waves. He frolics in the water, freely dancing in and out of the rhythm. But the pattern never holds. It will always turn and shift and when it does, the power cannot be denied. No cynic can withstand the immutable force of change any more than the child will be able to stand up when the surf rises high above his head.
I have heard it repeated ad infinitum that Barack Obama is empty. A sham, a charlatan, a pied piper with a silver tongue. I know who the real charlatans are. It is you who, in all confidence, proclaim that you have it all figured out. Nothing changes. All politicians are the same, all pursue the same ends and do so by the same means. But you are wrong and history has already shown this over and over. You have been lulled into thinking that your perceived reality is continuous, but this is not how nature proceeds. There are shifts, changes, punctuated equilibrium, tipping points. Nature abhors a gradient.
You have been made to think you are right because what you say is so often true, but it is only true in the spaces between. Eventually, you will be proved wrong no matter what you say.
Then there are those who will retain their cynicism in order to proclaim that Barack Obama's speech, while eloquent, did not do enough for him politically. I say that if this is indeed true, then there is nothing left in this place worth fighting for. If the best that can be hoped for is insufferable triangulation and political calculation then I say that we are already lost. If the only way to win is through capitulating to a media that demands soundbites and an electorate that refuses to think by pursuing power through a pragmatism that replaces all principle then there is nothing of value left in this nation. If pragmatism is to be our only principle then we are doomed to drown in this sea of political expedience.
There is an apocryphal story about scientist and heretic Galileo Galilei. Galileo had discovered proof that the Earth is not in fact the center of the universe and that it instead revolves around the Sun. The Church, foolish bulwark against the immutable force of change that it is, demanded that Galileo denounce his heresy. Galileo, who in many respects is the father of modern science, was made to recant his discovery, his works banned as heretical, and was placed under arrest. Legend has it that Galileo, after uttering the demanded statement of the Inquistion, was heard to say, "E pur si muove." And yet it moves.
This is what I say to those of you who have become so closely entangled with your cynicism that you can no longer see clearly the one irrefutable fact of nature. Change will come. It cannot be stopped.
These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.
When I was still a boy, I went to visit my grandfather down on his small farm in Alabama. It was my first visit to the deep south, back along red dirt roads shaded thick by black oaks. My grandfather was a wonderful man. Old school. Southern baptist. Carpenter. Freemason. Hunter. He had a wonderful sense of humor and a stern, disciplinarian air about him that you dared not provoke.
Having grown up outside of the south, it was a very different experience for me. The culture there is radically different in many ways than it is elsewhere in America. There are places you can still go today in states like Alabama that look as if time passes there very slowly, maybe not at all. My family cemetery is out there, deep in the woods and framed by a growth that is constantly encroaching and yet somehow seems to respect hallowed ground. Many of the people there don't seem to know much or care much about many of the trappings of this modern life. They've been doing things their way for a long time and it hasn't failed them yet.
As my family was getting ready to leave one day, I overheard my grandfather talking to a neighbor and some of the kin. He had some very small cotton plants that lined the road up to his house and I could hear him say to the other men that he'd have to get a nigger to come pick the cotton. They all laughed loudly.
I had never really heard that sort of thing before. Not so plainly from grown, respected men. My parents would never have allowed me to talk like that about another person. You just didn't do it. Sure, I heard all kinds of things in the schoolyard growing up as I'm sure most kids do, but this was a different sort of thing. Though these men were laughing and it seemed to be a joke to them, I knew that my grandfather would not have said this sort of thing in different company. He was not a cruel man in any sense of the word, but this joke was cruel and I knew it.
I don't know whether I can say that I've ever in my life heard a politician stand up in front of the nation and speak truth like Barack Obama spoke yesterday. You can say his political back was against the wall and that's probably true, but he didn't have to do what he did. He could have given the same kind of speech that a thousand politicians before him have given. He could have equivocated. He could have distanced himself. He didn't do that. Instead, he spoke some hard, honest truths to a country that desperately needs to hear what he had to say.
There is something that is taught very frequently in philosophies from the East that is usually overlooked in Western cultures. The West has a good handle on duality. Descartes gave us a big shove in that direction. However, there is something that is taught in both buddhism and taoism that says that duality has a different nature. To focus entirely on the contrast between two halves is to miss the point. They are not one and not two. This is the meaning of Obama's statement about his grandmother and his pastor alike. Politics demands that he takes a "firm stand" and "denounce and reject", but this is so much bullshit and he has explained to us very clearly why this is so. It is the same for both of these people as it was for my grandfather and indeed for each and every one of us.
I've been waiting for a long time for someone with the constitution to put aside political expedience and bear witness to principle. I've been the cynic's cynic. All politicians are evil. None are to be trusted. No matter what they say all they want is your complacency in the face of their power.
And yet, history shows us that there are times when someone shows up who transcends this pattern. There are people who will rise that feel as we all do, that see what we see and feel what we feel, people who have not forgotten that there is something more to be strived for than mere power. Power, like all things in this universe, is impermanent. Empires fall. What remains?
Principles transcend. We live in a nation based on principles that were inspired by the Greeks some 2500 years ago. Our philosophies, our religious traditions all have ancient seeds. They come from halls and town squares, many of which have long since crumbled. Principles remain intact, not gone or turned to dust but polished like a smooth stones by the tests of time.
And I imagine that just as they will say now, so did they say back then: Nothing changes. The cynic decries the fool who seeks change. But it is the cynic who is wrong. Change is the one immutable truth of this universe. The cynic is like a precocious little child playing in the surf, suddenly filled with a sense of omniscience because he believes he has figured out the pattern of the waves. He frolics in the water, freely dancing in and out of the rhythm. But the pattern never holds. It will always turn and shift and when it does, the power cannot be denied. No cynic can withstand the immutable force of change any more than the child will be able to stand up when the surf rises high above his head.
I have heard it repeated ad infinitum that Barack Obama is empty. A sham, a charlatan, a pied piper with a silver tongue. I know who the real charlatans are. It is you who, in all confidence, proclaim that you have it all figured out. Nothing changes. All politicians are the same, all pursue the same ends and do so by the same means. But you are wrong and history has already shown this over and over. You have been lulled into thinking that your perceived reality is continuous, but this is not how nature proceeds. There are shifts, changes, punctuated equilibrium, tipping points. Nature abhors a gradient.
You have been made to think you are right because what you say is so often true, but it is only true in the spaces between. Eventually, you will be proved wrong no matter what you say.
Then there are those who will retain their cynicism in order to proclaim that Barack Obama's speech, while eloquent, did not do enough for him politically. I say that if this is indeed true, then there is nothing left in this place worth fighting for. If the best that can be hoped for is insufferable triangulation and political calculation then I say that we are already lost. If the only way to win is through capitulating to a media that demands soundbites and an electorate that refuses to think by pursuing power through a pragmatism that replaces all principle then there is nothing of value left in this nation. If pragmatism is to be our only principle then we are doomed to drown in this sea of political expedience.
There is an apocryphal story about scientist and heretic Galileo Galilei. Galileo had discovered proof that the Earth is not in fact the center of the universe and that it instead revolves around the Sun. The Church, foolish bulwark against the immutable force of change that it is, demanded that Galileo denounce his heresy. Galileo, who in many respects is the father of modern science, was made to recant his discovery, his works banned as heretical, and was placed under arrest. Legend has it that Galileo, after uttering the demanded statement of the Inquistion, was heard to say, "E pur si muove." And yet it moves.
This is what I say to those of you who have become so closely entangled with your cynicism that you can no longer see clearly the one irrefutable fact of nature. Change will come. It cannot be stopped.
Advertisement





Bravo - excellent post.
March 19, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beautiful, DF.
I still have enough cynic in me to be worried that Obama may not be the one who can change the political system and bring this country, this world, back on track. I admit that he may be more politician than force of change.
But I also have enough dreamer in me to know that, when the force of change comes, it will sound a lot like Obama, and it will be subject to the same attacks that he has repeatedly borne.
I'd much rather risk disappointment, than risk missing out on the force of change when it arrives.
March 19, 2008 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the greatest mistake that can be made here is to fall under the illusion that he's just going to change everything himself. It's up to all of us to rise to the occasion and he appears to be calling on us to do so.
I agree with you, although I see it as less of a risk. The alternative is entirely unpalatable.
March 19, 2008 5:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I usualy detest long posts but this is worth the read.
March 19, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Larry.
March 19, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beautiful post.
This is the challenge - for people to understand the possibilities behind this candidacy, and end the cynicism. Change will happen, is happening, but how and to what end? It is up to us, the best inside all of us, to bring out the best in this country. Not the old politics of triangulation. But is this country up to it collectively?
We are the ones we've been waiting for, but will there be enough of us?
March 19, 2008 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
No df, I know you're hurting but I think you're wrong. Obama did not choose the noble path when he could have taken the easy way out. There was no way to distance himself from this. There was no denouncing or rejecting. Not even if he had tried to reject the man. He had a 20 year relationship. He had offered this man to the public as a character reference. Any rejection of the man would have been immediately spotted as the lowest form of political pandering. Its a credit to his intelligence and political acumen, or Axelrod's, that they saw this. They had to create a new narrative in which Wright was only a small piece of the story.
They are not all alike. Some years ago I read a book on the 76 election. There was an anecdote about someone on Carter's team talking to a media consultant about some advertising. The consultant asked what positions Carter stood for. He was answered, "He stands for getting elected." The consultant said, "No, where does he stand on the issues?" The answer, "Get real."
Yet look at what he did when elected. Read his "malaise" speech and think where we'd be today if he had been reelected. Look at the Camp David accords.
You have to have power to do good or bad and you have to get elected before that. Some people sell their soul to get elected. For others each compromise takes a little piece of their heart. Idealism doesn't necessarily die when cold hard pragmatism takes priority. I think we're about to see if this mature women who spent her youth working to get McGovern, a truly dedicated anti war candidate, elected still has any of that child of the 60's in her.
March 19, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll save you the suspense: She doesn't and she never did.
I'll say again: If pragmatism becomes your principle, then you are lost.
March 19, 2008 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now df. You know that there have been times here that you have deliberately lied to shill for you candidate. Did you do that for pragmatic reasons??
March 19, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, I don't know that. Put up or shut up.
Or is it that all you have left is to make unfounded accusations?
March 19, 2008 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
brutal self honesty is the only path to increased consciousness.
March 19, 2008 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hah. Excellent advice. Consider taking it seriously some day.
We both know who the liar is.
March 19, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is an interesting point, but I don't think it says what you think it does -
Real, solid pragmatism only ever leads, and CAN only ever lead, one place: paralysis. The absolutely most pragmatic decision that can be made is to change nothing until an emergency is so bad it can't be ignored. This is the legacy of the Clinton presidency - this is why many look so fondly on the Clinton years. He literally did absolutely nothing.
Consequently, idealism must always trump pragmatism, if even in the slightest measure. It requires an idea to fire purpose, and it is rarely true that purpose can include a short-term goal, particularly in the realm of policies whose effects aren't intended to be seen for a generation.
This requires a politician who is willing to say "Your problems won't be fixed now, but they will be eventually." How many politicians would ever be elected on those words? This is how childish the American electorate has become.
Personally when I look at Hillary's policies, and at her behavior, I don't see idealism in the slightest - I see policies intended to change very little, to make incremental changes without any real purpose. And I see a person willing to change her position on anything, so long as nobody looks too closely at her old position.
I'll not trot out the old 'lust for power' nugget. That's boring, and informs no judgement. But I don't see someone who can look at the incredible obstacles facing our nation now, and willing to take unconventional measures to address them.
This IS what I see in Obama. Even his speech Tuesday wasn't politically fortuitous - it seems many PA whites and Independents were insulted by it. But it was true, and it needed to be said.
March 20, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well put, Furion. I always to see you weigh in.
March 20, 2008 4:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
oceankat -
If Obama is the nominee, will you vote for him?
March 20, 2008 1:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, I thought you were talking about Stephen Colbert!
March 20, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
DF
Without a doubt one of the longest post from a non-paid blogger i've ever read. And yet, worth every darn syllable. Wonderfully stated. Thank you for your openness.
And for those who continue to tie Obama to the length of Jeremiah Wright, riddle me this.
Is a twenty year relationship with a man who has walked a different path than the overwhelming majority of those who condemn him, that much different than a 30 year marriage to someone who emotionally and physically betrayed, not just you, but a nation?
If lying and cheating and betrayal are forgivable (redeemable offenses), than why can't sermonizing of a not yet healed cultural scar, a collective pain, not matter how foolishly expressed?
I'm willing to allow Hillary to be her own person (as far as I know). She made a choice and forgave her husband and saved her marriage. I actually respect that. But those attempting to hold Barack to a different standard are disingenuous and playing the same old filthy, dumbing down the issues, political game.
And if they succeed, if distraction and deceit rule the day, then I pray for my country.
March 20, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was an excellent piece by TPM. Unfortunately, there are those that do not understand the inevitability of Change. They have been lulled into the condition of complacency and the illusion of fixation. Change is the natural order of the universe and there is never a pause in it, if ever there were the universe would collapse. Ignorant minds (not meant to be an insult) cannot digest this, and when they attempt to respond to your writing they make their ignorance apparent.
Then there are some out there that just do not for the life of them, want to see a Black man as president, even if they know in their heart of hearts he's the right candidate to help bring about the change we seek. Hell, even the KKK endorses Obama. Let's simply face it - when I read some of these blogs, I sense that people are holding on to every piece, or shred of an excuse in hopes that it would keep their consciences clear from the real reason they don't want Obama for president. A reason they cannot even admit to themselves.
March 20, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Get Real: no cold calculating female Yale Law School graduate would have married Bill Clinton and gone to Arkansas. There were far more promising career paths available.
March 20, 2008 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean like the position that awaited her there on the board of WalMart? Not that I even mentioned Clinton here.
March 20, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you DF,
Today I started out the morning pretty depressed and vowed to myself that I would keep the damn TV off. I can feel a part of myself die each day I watch CNN and MSNBC whenever anyone cuts Obama down to petty, stupid and doubtful newsbites.
I thank God he was praised for "The Speech". It was deserved and he was recognized for his brillance. But, still I woke up depressed and doubtful myself. The polls are slipping supposedly showing that not everyone is ready for his truthful and real kind of leadership. It saddens me. We have an opportunity to "go there" in this country. To lift up out of this fog we have been in for too long.
When I read articles or posts like yours I am lifted up again. I forget sometimes here in my little apartment that I am not alone in my desire for truth and integrity in our leaders. I hope beyond hope that enough of Obama's supporters like myself really fight on and show up. That we show all of the doubters that it is time and that they might as well suck it up even if they are kicking and screaming and come along. Just come along. No one is going to kill them. No one is going to hate them. Unity is not going feel bad. Actually living our Constitution is not going to feel like hell. But it is going to feel different. And eventually it is going to feel right.
Now, in reality, Obama is probably too far in the lead for Hillary to matter at this point, although she is still trying hard. I believe he will get the nomination. In fact, I know he will. Obama has run an incredible campaign and it has paid off to insure him some time and leeway. Now, its up to him and us who want the "new" to show up with force. We all have to remember that nothing in life is predetermined. We get to write our own story just as hard as those who oppose get to write theirs. As hard as this is let's not fall into the trap of believing that history only repeats itself. That change can't come this time. Everything happens when you want it to. And their too many of us that really want this this time.
March 20, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bless you, DF, for this beautiful post! I'm proud to be an American with you in it! You said it all. I can't add anything, except my admiration and a sense of solidarity.
March 20, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent post, CF. Feel welcome to write long (or even longer) posts when they are this good.
I think half of the problem is that the right wing (and some others) are pinning the "hate" label on Wright, where I think the right label is "really angry". Once they sell that he is a hater they can go after Obama's judgment or character for the 20 year association, and then they can pile on.
It is obvious to me that there has to be a lot of virtues to Trinity United that kept the Obamas as members, and that there is a lot more to Rev. Wright than the sound bites. I share your faith in Obama's character and wisdom, and hope that the electorate wil come to its senses.
March 20, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
For a sense of the virtues of Trinity United, check out http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Longer_Wright.html
It's a really wonderful, thoughtful, spiritually enriching Christmas sermon most of the way through. There's a fresh, engaging, intense take on the angels and the shepherds--which takes doing given how well most of us know that particular story. There's a drop-dead wonderful bit about how the angels said the good news was to ALL people and insisting that the whole congregation repeat the word "all" and admit that included folks they didn't like.
Then, of course, it turns to the well-known and unhelpful attack on Senator Clinton.
The thing is, though, that it's easy to imagine sermon after sermon like that one--only minus those last few unreasonable minutes. It's easy to imagine years of gaining strength and insight and grace from those other sermons. Even if some others also included big bad mistakes, it's easy to imagine feeling that, on balance, that congregation was a home where one needed to stay.
March 20, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Superb, DF. Many thanks!
March 20, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, this just fell off of the charts so I wanted to thank everyone for reading and for your comments. This actually slipped off of the new list so fast yesterday that I didn't expect to see it on the recommended list today.
March 20, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink