The tales Hillary Tells
The media mob was slow to pick up the story—Sinbad jokes had been circulating for weeks on Hillary's press plane without anyone following up. But Clinton finally fell victim to what might be called "pattern coverage." For years, Hillary has had occasional problems with the truth when attacked. (The firing of the staffers who ran the White House Travel Office in 1993 was ridiculously overcovered, but an independent probe later proved she was lying when she claimed she hadn't ordered it.) All it takes is a few such incidents for the press to identify a dreaded pattern, into which it then fits subsequent stories. No pattern, no frenzy.
The Tuzla Tale has already had repercussions. Clinton was disappointed that the feeding frenzy over Obama's relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright didn't destroy his candidacy. It's her best hope of winning the nomination, so she tried to reignite the story. But her latest approach to bashing Obama only reinforced the impression that her recent setbacks have left her desperate. She stopped by for a cozy interview with billionaire publisher Richard Mellon Scaife, the right-winger who commissioned the most hate-filled anti-Clinton stories of the 1990s. For her to seek help from Scaife in publicizing Obama's supposed tolerance of hate speech sets a new standard in campaign chutzpah. Scaife wrote (or at least paid for) the book on personal destruction. It's like the bloodied kids in the new Owen Wilson movie "Drillbit Taylor" asking the bully who has tormented them to go beat up some other kid. Classy.
The coda to the Tuzla Tale was the way Hillary tried to defuse it. Where the late New York mayor Fiorello LaGuardia said amiably, "When I make a mistake, it's a beaut!" or Obama confessed to being "boneheaded" in dealing with shady donor Tony Rezko, Hillary said sarcastically: "This proves I'm human, which for some people is a revelation." It was all there—the pain, the resentment and the sense of what it would be like to spend four or eight years listening to her respond to criticism as president.
Interesting read: http://www.newsweek.com/id/129587/page/2





Bserious, thanks again. The look on her face was more frightening than the desperation of her comments, or the horrid tone of voice she used when admitting her humanity. Senator Clinton is, indeed, a whole package.
March 31, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought exactly the same thing: she's one to talk about how this is all a "cakewalk" for Obama. Wait until she actually has to make decisions that will be scrutinized and criticized and for which she'll be held accountable -- finally. If her snippy posture is what we have to look forward to.......
As was so brilliantly said here at TPM, she's great at fighting people. Pretty awful and fighting for policy. After 35 years of "experience", that's something she hasn't learned how to do.
March 31, 2008 1:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is it too much to want a president that will speak to you with honesty and integrity, like one adult to another? With Hillary it seems it's always some kind of game. She's like that kid in class who just never gets enough attention. If she's not clowning around or making up stories than she's breaking something.
March 31, 2008 2:36 AM | Reply | Permalink