« Superdelegates: Maybe Hillary Clinton isn't telling you the whole story. | tpmgary's Blog | RE: Superdelegates: maybe Hillary isn't telling you the whole story. »

54.3, 45.8, could someone explain how that's 10% for people waking up?


Could someone explain the difference in reporting that as 10%, not 8%?

67 Comments

| Leave a comment

Money

I was wondering the same thing. There's a great psychological difference between single versus double digits. In case anyone is wondering where your figures come from:

http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/


Candidate Votes Percent
CLINTON, HILLARY (DEM)

1,234,547 54.3%
OBAMA, BARACK (DEM)

1,041,136 45.8%

several places are reporting 1258 vs 1042
54.8% vs 45.2%

Unfortunately, there is also a huge impact based on the headlines, whether or not they are correct. Just like Hillary "won" Texas, she now won PA by "10%".

Sigh.

Looks like some of our folks slept in this morning.

user-pic

ben, I read that, but I'm missing why the PA states numbers aren't being reported by the media.

Two different sets of numbers. Which one is valid?

Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 02:24 PM by WillYourVoteBCounted
Check the results at the PA SOS Website around 4 PM http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/

From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 2:03 PM
To: Educators for Obama
Subject: Re: 8 Point win NOT 10 in PA!

I just got off the phone with PA Dept of State. They stated one district reported Senator Obama winning 20,000 votes and the HC winning a few hundred. I was contested and reviewed to find a much different vote spread. They stated Senator Obama's numbers may go up because the remaining counties favor him.

She stated the official results should be up around 4 or 5pm.

I still trust the numbers from the Department of State of PA. They are the official site of election returns. I'm all for demconwatch, but they won't be the final arbiters of the election.

Desidero,

This new avatar of yours is impressively revolting, but I loved the spewing one you had a day or two ago. Why'd you change it?

user-pic

I was wondering why even TPM still shows 55-45. An 8.6% margin is just about where JMM drew his line. It isn't enough to shut down Clinton, but it doesn't really slow down Obama, either.

user-pic

CNN and FOX are both reporting with 99% in:

Hillary Clinton 1,258,245
Barack Obama 1,042,297

Rounding to the nearest whole percentage point before looking at the difference gives you 55/45 and thus 10%.

But if you do the math based on the actual votes, the difference is:
54.6934157% - 45.3065843% = 9.386831%

Man that's a lot of significant figures...

As of 9:31 it's down to 8.6%

Again

40 densely populated Philly precincts still have not reported

There is a discrepancy in Lancaster County of about 13,000 votes for Obama.

The state website:
OBAMA, BARACK 40,628
CLINTON, HILLARY 22,710

http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=12&ElectionID=27

The county website:
Barack Obama 27,126
Hillary Clinton 22,710

http://66.216.166.82/PubICE/default.asp?Category=VotesLC&Service=Totals&O=0845&Prty=Dem&Cat=F%20%20%20%20&ret=menu&rcat=F

Sure enough, you're right! Now which one is right? MSNBC has the same numbers as Lancaster county has for the election there and CNN has the same as MSNBC. I kind of feel like the SoS is correct in this case.

The State of PA website was just updated:

CLINTON, HILLARY (DEM) 1,237,696 54.3%
OBAMA, BARACK (DEM) 1,043,174 45.7%

Looks like an 8 point win to me.

user-pic

I'm math-disabled, so someone else will just have to figure all this out and tell me the bottom line.

:)

But it looks very much like she got a big ol' single digit lead on him. And that means she lost more thoroughly than she would have had she gotten a double digit lead on him.

And she was just on MSNBC trumpeting her 10-point win. It just ain't so, Hillary.

Looks like the most up-to-date tally is here. They update if fairly regularly.

As of 10:40 the margin is 9.4% with only Philly and Delaware counties remaining to be counted.

The SoS just updated. The County of Lancaster's site was correct. It is 55%-45% (rounded).

Democratic Primary


CLINTON, HILLARY (DEM)

1,237,696 54.6%
OBAMA, BARACK (DEM)

1,029,672 45.4%


This is from the PA election returns website

This is all very confusing... now JMM is saying the AP and PA State numbers don't jive because they are both receiving numbers at a different rate.

Nevertheless the AP numbers should be trusted more???

I'm checking in later to see what's happening, but all I know is the margin is under 10% now, and should go down considering 40 Philly precincts still haven't reported. It'd be nice if JMM could get a little input as to what the problem is; what precincts we're waiting on; and approximately how many voters we're looking at.

Is that too much to ask ;)

State of PA just corrected the Lancaster County numbers, so now it's at:

OBAMA, BARACK 27,126 54.4%
CLINTON, HILLARY 22,710 45.6%

8.8% difference, with 9,212 out of 9,264 Districts (99.44%) Reporting Statewide

Oh, wait, I forgot that 5 and above rounds up to 10. So 8.8 point difference rounds up to 10-point, double-digit win.

It's because the media hates Hillary so much and is absolutely in love with Obama? Remember? That's what Hillary tells me at least....you mean...the media is going out of its way to overstate Hillary's win when she in fact cannot possibly win the nomination??

http://www.thepersonalispolitical.com/2008/04/pennsylvania-results.html

NO WAY!!

Joe Scarborough, Pat Buchanan, and all of the other GOP talking heads, not to mention the GOP itself, are salivating over the thought of being able to savage Hillary in the general. It's beautiful to watch them lust for the opportunity to run against Clinton record of scandals and lies. It's great to see how terrified they are of an Obama candidacy.

I honestly think the Media's core focus is on making this race look as compelling as possible to maintain the ratings/hits bonanza this election has created for MSM and pol-websites like this. Check out the yearly data for Huff, TPM, and DailyKos here; there up 525%, 212%, and 193% respectively over the year. They all hope this primary will NEVER end.

They want it to be a horse race so more folks tune in, blog, etc., and Hill's losing now, so they need to bolster her tenuous position to make it look more exciting of a race than it actually is.

I KNOW this. As smart as everyone is here, I'm sure just about everyone KNOWS this... but the coverage still pisses me off to no end .....

It's clear the media and Hillary both need double digits to keep the horse race going. It's silly we're hashing the difference between 9.4 and 8.6.

I'm very glad to wake up to see that it's in the single digits, but I'm dismayed that this will keep going, and that the t.v. doesn't care it's in the single digits.

The revolution will not be televised.


Never ascribe malice to a motive when incompetence will do.

Faced with numbers like 54.6 - 45.4, our lazy media members with think to themselves, Ah-ha, I can't subtract, so this looks like 55 - 45, a 10 point lead, which is double digits, I think.

Then the 55-45 = 10 point lead will spread like wildfire because most reporters do not check common knowledge.

I admire their ability to estimate. But all these folks have a calculator included in their Blackberry, somewhere. But that would be work!

user-pic

Never ascribe incompetence to a motive when self interest will do.

Are you SERIOUSLY arguing % points?

I want to win the general. Obama or Hilary. That said, the "intense" Obama supporters are gonna make it a queasy moment if he's the choice.

user-pic

Could someone explain the difference

Hmmm. Do you think it's an outrage when merchants price something at $14.99 instead of $15.00? Do you really realize what it is that you're upset about, a known pyschological effect with numbers that most people don't fall for when they think about it for longer than a minute? You're upset about it, and it's about 1.5 percent, in a single primary, in a huge and long election? Get a grip; you're buying into the idea that this really is going to affect something. That's silly.

Not sure we can assume most people will think about it for a minute.

And it does make a difference -- A) in terms of what candidates can claim; B) insofar as sometimes 1.5% or less can make a profound difference, a la Fla in 2000; and perhaps most importantly C) what the inaccuracy and its perpetuation indicate about mainstream journalism.

I mean, look: there's a reason retailers call something $14.99 instead of $15.

user-pic

Why do you think merchants charge $14.99 instead of $15?

Why do you think Clinton surrogates want to claim "double digit" lead?

Why do you think Obama surrogates want to point out that it's not a "double digit" lead?

Yes, it's psychological, but it's almost as if you think that doesn't matter. Who's the target audience of this propaganda? The super-delegates. Who has the best chance of changing things right now? The super-delegates.

It matters.

If it doesn't make a difference, why is Hillary on TV today crowing about her "double-digit" win?

user-pic

Of course it matters.

There was tremendous talk in advance of the primary about how Obama would score a psychological/moral victory if he could keep his loss to single digits.

He did.

But that's not how the media or the Clinton campaign spun it.

Of course it matters. It matters for Clinton's fundraising, it matters for her perceived continuing viability, it matters for the perceived legitimacy of her remaining in the race.

Her spin, and the media's spin, has bought her all that. (She's actually also claiming now that she's ahead in the popular vote -- by counting FL and MI, by not counting "uncommitted" votes in MI as Obama votes (rumor has it they are all going to vote for Gravel in Denver), and by eliminating IA, ME, NV and WA. Breathtaking.)

The only reason it "doesn't matter", to artappraiser, is that the truth in this case favors Obama.

Just updated at the PA website:

CLINTON, HILLARY (DEM) 1,238,232 54.6%
OBAMA, BARACK (DEM) 1,030,703 45.4%

Still holding at 9.2%

I'm starting to feel like I'm in one of the submarine movies, when the walls begin to pop and ping. "She's holdin' Cap'n!"

Delaware is 100% in now. Philly is the last to finish up with 2% of precints left to report.

http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=12&ElectionID=27

40 Philly districts left, to be specific.

obama people stop crying like babies...

But according to the AP she's at 9.4% and not they have 99% of Philly precincts in.

I've been looking at the Commonwealth of PA site, and they haven't updated a few of the remaining districts yet, such as Adams County and Pittsburgh, which are 100% in now. The AP must be going straight to the county websites. Philadelphia County is password protected, so I can't see wht's up with the last 40 districts that haven't been updated.

I ran into that password problem too.... I bet someone here has connections. Anyone know how to get these results?

Anyway, the AP numbers are updating very slowly, but they seem to be ahead of the PA site only because they have a bit more votes tallied. For example, in Philly PA has ~429.5K, and the AP has ~431.5K. I was banking on the Philly precincts having more voters, but who knows.


With all the voter fraud in Phili:
http://www.avencia.com/electionincidents/
who knows what the true numbers are.

fraud is when florida votes do not count!(2000)

"fraud" in a legal sense means concealment of a material fact. It is a fact they turned away registered democrats saying their name was not on the list (when in many circumstances it was).

In addition, many polling places were changed, and no new address made known. Many polling machines broken, and judge denied request to keep the polls open for an extra 2 hours. All this in a high black vote area.

Oh yeah, and check this out:

http://www.runhardmedia.com/hrc.jpg

Hmmm.... is something missing?

user-pic

That's one of those "sample" ballots that they hand out at every election I've ever been to that had more than one candidate. It only has the names of the people they want you to vote for.

user-pic

If Obama 'won' Florida then they both split Missouri.

why is obama getting more than 90% of the black vote...

B/c black people have great taste in presidents...

why?

b/c they were born that way...

user-pic

Gee, maybe they are non-bitter elitist who don't cling to guns and religion... I'm starting to wonder if they drive Priuses, wear Birkenstocks and only drink lattes and Kool-aid.

Yeah! I think is that!

Reuters news isn't saying 10%. They're correctly stating, "With more than 99 percent of the vote counted, Clinton led Obama in Pennsylvania 54.6 percent to 45.4 percent, the state's elections division said."

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1931827220080423

I guess that's why I enjoy Reuters... For the most part.

...they are racist!

54 rounds up to 100, 45 rounds down to 0.

Hillary got 100% of the vote!!!

user-pic

PA SoS latest update

9,219 out of 9,264 Districts (99.51%) Reporting Statewide

Clinton: 1,238,232 - 54.6%
Obama: 1,030,703 - 45.4%

That is a margin of 9.146537914% (i.e. 9.15%) which rounds to 9%

I have a feeling this thread may even calculate the last digit of pi. Reminds me of the time I wrote an Excel macro to find all of the prime numbers between 1 and 1,000,000. Who knew that 4,999 and 49,999 would both be prime?

Nice work w

He lost, dear. He lost after spending a fortune. Don't be overly concerned about how they calculated his loss.

user-pic

This post reflects in living color the current and perhaps short-term problems of the Obama campaign. The poster deserves no criticism; even Josh Marshall, while pretending that this is really a silly issue, makes sure to prominently display that, yes as a matter of math, 9.2 percent is not 10 percent.

Of course, the fact is while some folks write posts about the injustice of comparing 9 to 10, most people who are able to step back a step or two understand that Obama took a good ole' fashioned beating on Tuesday in Pennsylvania, and he spent record amounts of money and three times more than Hillary for the simple privilege of receiving that good ole' fashion beating.

I was never good at math, but I will posit that the key to the White House in November is not to rest on laurels shaped like mathematical equations. IMO the key to the White House for Obama is to keep winning so that America sees that he can take a punch, get off the mat and fight back.

My brothers and sisters on the Obama side, I promise I'm with you if he is the nominee; it is my solemn oath that I will work for him with vigor even if I still don't like him.

But right now, as we sit here today, the key is not the math; the real key to success is far more simple, and that is to win in the State of Indiana. Senator Obama does that and Hillary is toast. Now that's as simple as one plus one, and please feel free to remind this Hillary supporter that I wrote on April 24, 2008 that if Obama wins in Indiana he should be our nominee.

Is it counterintuitive to laugh at numbers-based arguments about whether this race is over? Perhaps, but welcome to politics--deal with it, move on and get in the game.

The "Obama needs to win X" or "Obama needs to show he has a knock-out punch" arguments are really strawmen.

In reality, Obama doesn't need to win anymore states to become the nominee. He could lose the rest of the contests with the same gap he lost PA and still lead in pledged delegates. Sure this would make it mighty difficult to convince superdelegates to come to his cause, but no more difficult than HRC's task is currently. The truly amazing thing, is how intelligent people buy -- and even spout -- the HRC talking points. He needs a knock-out punch. He should have won with the money advantage.

Well here's a question: Why did HRC let him spend so much more than her? Why couldn't she raise more money from the people?

Here are some facts regarding PA. The Gov gauranteed HRC would win by 10. HRC was polling between 20-30% up on Obama during Wright. Double Digits were the standard going in, not JM's 8 point threshhold. Obama had to deal with Wright, the "Bitter" issue, a Debate where he took it from all sides, Bill Ayres, etc... and he lost by what is now a little more than 9 points with 40 precints in Philly still not reporting.

And the fact that 40 precincts have not reported in Philly still hasn't become an issue... the MSM reported it as a 10 point victory and everyone, thus far, has eaten it up.

I think intelligent people are able to take a step back and see this for what it was: Obama probably lost by 8-9 points, but everyone will believe its 10 because this race must go on.

Leave a comment

tpmgary

user-pic

Following: 0
Followers: 6

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location ny
  • Party independent democrat
  • Politics progressive

Favorites

Bio

yes

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address