« Pennsylvania Demographics: Older, More Women, Fewer Blacks, Fewer Latinos, Lower Income | lifelongdem's Blog | Responding to the Republican Attack Machine »
A New Democratic Southern Strategy?
If we grant that Penn, Carville, Ickes, and the Clintons themselves are
political geniuses, it follows that there must be some intelligent
strategy behind their divisive actions. There has to be a bit more than
destroying all the other candidates and rallying everybody under the
"Vote Hillary - you have no alternative!" banner. Yeah, I know, there's"Vote Hillary, or you're against women's rights, you rat," but that's not
enough to put Hillary over the top.
Puny-minded folks like me don't see how the Democratic candidate can win without blacks in Hillary's case and without women in Obama's case. So I've assumed the Clinton strategists think blacks will come crawling back to vote for Hillary because - ta da! - they will have no alternative. Only it's asking a lot for black folks and lots of others to forget having such a great alternative right before our eyes for so long.
I think it's so clear the geniuses are wrong about hanging onto the black vote that I'm beginning to wonder if they're not making a mistake, they're just a couple of steps ahead of everybody else.
What if Clinton strategists have decided it's time for the Democratic Party to ignore the black minority in political calculations? Not to expel blacks, of course, or to say blacks are unwelcome, just to make campaign decisions without regard to black opinion. Not to send Hillary to Philadelphia, Mississippi to extol states rights. Nothing that crass. Just going with the numbers.
After all, blacks are a shrinking percentage of the population - a mere 12.8%. Supporting pro-black positions is a handicap for the party -- too many unpopular positions like affirmative action and busing repel more than 12.8% of the population. We'll remain committed to equal rights, of course, but be quietly effective instead of so all-fired loud and moralistic about it all. Besides, if you don't win, you can't do a thing about equality, can you?
If it's not a new Southern + rural Midwest + iron belt + middle PA strategy, I'd be grateful to anyone who reveals the gem of rationality behind the apparent train wreck that is the Clinton campaign.
Puny-minded folks like me don't see how the Democratic candidate can win without blacks in Hillary's case and without women in Obama's case. So I've assumed the Clinton strategists think blacks will come crawling back to vote for Hillary because - ta da! - they will have no alternative. Only it's asking a lot for black folks and lots of others to forget having such a great alternative right before our eyes for so long.
I think it's so clear the geniuses are wrong about hanging onto the black vote that I'm beginning to wonder if they're not making a mistake, they're just a couple of steps ahead of everybody else.
What if Clinton strategists have decided it's time for the Democratic Party to ignore the black minority in political calculations? Not to expel blacks, of course, or to say blacks are unwelcome, just to make campaign decisions without regard to black opinion. Not to send Hillary to Philadelphia, Mississippi to extol states rights. Nothing that crass. Just going with the numbers.
After all, blacks are a shrinking percentage of the population - a mere 12.8%. Supporting pro-black positions is a handicap for the party -- too many unpopular positions like affirmative action and busing repel more than 12.8% of the population. We'll remain committed to equal rights, of course, but be quietly effective instead of so all-fired loud and moralistic about it all. Besides, if you don't win, you can't do a thing about equality, can you?
If it's not a new Southern + rural Midwest + iron belt + middle PA strategy, I'd be grateful to anyone who reveals the gem of rationality behind the apparent train wreck that is the Clinton campaign.
Advertisement
Leave a comment