Am i the only one who thinks that Hillary's new point is ridiculous?  She thikns that she should be the nominee because Obama cannot finish her off...Let me give you a minute to think about that.



Is that not like saying, Ok, i know i'm down by 3 runs with two outs in the 9th inning but the fact that it is only by 3 and not by 7 or 8 clearly means that i'm the better team.  Am i missing something?  She claims that even though Obama is winning the popular vote, number of states, delegates etc... He can't finish her off so she should obviously be the nominee.  Can a Hillary supporter please explain her point for me...seriously, i'm not kidding.  Maybe i'm just not smart enough to understand what she is trying to say.