tom perhaps my initial angst resulted from the fact that hillary clinton, in responding to obama's comments, was simply doing what any sane politician would do when confronted with what, in my ever so humble opinion, was a really tone deaf and dumb thing to say.

hale or hail mary, it makes no difference, its just that why must you rail about hillary, its actually about obama, what he said, it was ill advised at best, and quite arrogant at worst...in a political campaign one side goes after weaknesses in the opponent

what would you have had hillary do? lavish sympathy on obama, drop out of the race in an emotional moment of female skitishness?

please, please, when your candidate fouls up it really does not speak well of your guy if you must immediately attack clinton for doing what any reasonable, sane individual

there might be a vaunted new politics, but it will not survive making egregious errors of the old politics kind

hey, but maybe i am wrong, perhaps getting caught up over how bitter those pennslyvanians are shortly before the penn primary, perhaps that is good strategy

it was/is amusing that some posters initially proclaimed this was all a trap set up by axelrod and how the trap was going to close

how is that coming guys