I was just watching Larry King Live, where yet again all of Hillary's supporters were accusing Obama of blocking the re-vote in Florida.  I know Obama raised questions about the legality of the mail in re-vote.  However, I also read in a post today that Hillary's National Campaign Co-Chair blocked the Florida revote.  Curious about that, I looked into it.

Per Hillary's site, Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wassermann Schultz is Hillary's National Campaign Co-chair.

Per an article on CNN.com on March 18th:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- After weeks of negotiations, the Florida Democratic Party said Monday it will not hold a second primary in the state.

"We researched every potential alternative process -- from caucuses to county conventions to mail-in elections -- but no plan could come anywhere close to being viable in Florida," said state party chairwoman Karen Thurman in an e-mail sent to Florida Democrats late Monday afternoon.

"I'm glad that the party has reached the same conclusion that was reached by the congressional delegation a week ago," said U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Florida.

A supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton, Wasserman Schultz had staunchly opposed a re-vote.

She said she would consider a proposal that would allow the full delegation to weigh in at the convention, but she wants each delegate to have only half a vote.

Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, a supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, said Obama would like to see Florida's delegates counted in a way that would not alter the overall outcome heading into the party's convention

But, he said, Obama wants to "give Florida the opportunity to vote."

I found a lot of articles saying that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was blocking the re-votes,  including one from Governor Rendell's favorite "balanced" network:

Now I recognize you can read from these articles that Debbie Wassermann Schultz was against the mail in revote.  But how about the idea of a primary revote?

Per an AP story in the San Francisco Examiner:

Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida, has called for a new Florida primary, although he thinks the national party should pay for it. But Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz says another election would be too expensive.

And from another AP story:

"The potential of a do-over is slim to none," said Wasserman Schultz, a national co-chair of Clinton's campaign. "The cost of a do-over is beyond reach. A do-over would be unfair. We still have nerves that are very raw from the 2000 recount in Florida."

So now I am confused.  Hillary's National Campaign Co-Chair was instrumental in blocking the Florida re-vote, and we know Hillary refused a caucus in Florida, but Obama is being accused of stopping the re-vote in Florida.  I know Wolfson accused Obama of blocking the re-vote, but was that just to deflect the the criticism that is was really Hillary's campaign co-chair that blocked it?  Am I missing something here?