Michael Moore Endorses Obama
Monday, April 21st, 2008
My Vote's for Obama (if I could vote) ...by Michael MooreFriends,
I don't get to vote for President this primary season. I live in Michigan. The party leaders (both here and in D.C.) couldn't get their act together, and thus our votes will not be counted.
So, if you live in Pennsylvania, can you do me a favor? Will you please cast my vote -- and yours -- on Tuesday for Senator Barack Obama?
I haven't spoken publicly 'til now as to who I would vote for, primarily for two reasons: 1) Who cares?; and 2) I (and most people I know) don't give a rat's ass whose name is on the ballot in November, as long as there's a picture of JFK and FDR riding a donkey at the top of the ballot, and the word "Democratic" next to the candidate's name.
Seriously, I know so many people who don't care if the name under the Big "D" is Dancer, Prancer, Clinton or Blitzen. It can be Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Barry Obama or the Dalai Lama.
Well, that sounded good last year, but over the past two months, the actions and words of Hillary Clinton have gone from being merely disappointing to downright disgusting. I guess the debate last week was the final straw. I've watched Senator Clinton and her husband play this game of appealing to the worst side of white people, but last Wednesday, when she hurled the name "Farrakhan" out of nowhere, well that's when the silly season came to an early end for me. She said the "F" word to scare white people, pure and simple. Of course, Obama has no connection to Farrakhan. But, according to Senator Clinton, Obama's pastor does -- AND the "church bulletin" once included a Los Angeles Times op-ed from some guy with Hamas! No, not the church bulletin!
This sleazy attempt to smear Obama was brilliantly explained the following night by Stephen Colbert. He pointed out that if Obama is supported by Ted Kennedy, who is Catholic, and the Catholic Church is led by a Pope who was in the Hitler Youth, that can mean only one thing: OBAMA LOVES HITLER!
Yes, Senator Clinton, that's how you sounded. Like you were nuts. Like you were a bigot stoking the fires of stupidity. How sad that I would ever have to write those words about you. You have devoted your life to good causes and good deeds. And now to throw it all away for an office you can't win unless you smear the black man so much that the superdelegates cry "Uncle (Tom)" and give it all to you.
But that can't happen. You cast your die when you voted to start this bloody war. When you did that you were like Moses who lost it for a moment and, because of that, was prohibited from entering the Promised Land.
How sad for a country that wanted to see the first woman elected to the White House. That day will come -- but it won't be you. We'll have to wait for the current Democratic governor of Kansas to run in 2016 (you read it here first!).
There are those who say Obama isn't ready, or he's voted wrong on this or that. But that's looking at the trees and not the forest. What we are witnessing is not just a candidate but a profound, massive public movement for change. My endorsement is more for Obama The Movement than it is for Obama the candidate.
That is not to take anything away from this exceptional man. But what's going on is bigger than him at this point, and that's a good thing for the country. Because, when he wins in November, that Obama Movement is going to have to stay alert and active. Corporate America is not going to give up their hold on our government just because we say so. President Obama is going to need a nation of millions to stand behind him.
I know some of you will say, 'Mike, what have the Democrats done to deserve our vote?' That's a damn good question. In November of '06, the country loudly sent a message that we wanted the war to end. Yet the Democrats have done nothing. So why should we be so eager to line up happily behind them?
I'll tell you why. Because I can't stand one more friggin' minute of this administration and the permanent, irreversible damage it has done to our people and to this world. I'm almost at the point where I don't care if the Democrats don't have a backbone or a kneebone or a thought in their dizzy little heads. Just as long as their name ain't "Bush" and the word "Republican" is not beside theirs on the ballot, then that's good enough for me.
I, like the majority of Americans, have been pummeled senseless for 8 long years. That's why I will join millions of citizens and stagger into the voting booth come November, like a boxer in the 12th round, all bloodied and bruised with one eye swollen shut, looking for the only thing that matters -- that big "D" on the ballot.
Don't get me wrong. I lost my rose-colored glasses a long time ago.
It's foolish to see the Democrats as anything but a nicer version of a party that exists to do the bidding of the corporate elite in this country. Any endorsement of a Democrat must be done with this acknowledgement and a hope that one day we will have a party that'll represent the people first, and laws that allow that party an equal voice.
Finally, I want to say a word about the basic decency I have seen in Mr. Obama. Mrs. Clinton continues to throw the Rev. Wright up in his face as part of her mission to keep stoking the fears of White America. Every time she does this I shout at the TV, "Say it, Obama! Say that when she and her husband were having marital difficulties regarding Monica Lewinsky, who did she and Bill bring to the White House for 'spiritual counseling?' THE REVEREND JEREMIAH WRIGHT!"
But no, Obama won't throw that at her. It wouldn't be right. It wouldn't be decent. She's been through enough hurt. And so he remains silent and takes the mud she throws in his face.
That's why the crowds who come to see him are so large. That's why he'll take us down a more decent path. That's why I would vote for him if Michigan were allowed to have an election.
But the question I keep hearing is... 'can he win? Can he win in November?' In the distance we hear the siren of the death train called the Straight Talk Express. We know it's possible to hear the words "President McCain" on January 20th. We know there are still many Americans who will never vote for a black man. Hillary knows it, too. She's counting on it.
Pennsylvania, the state that gave birth to this great country, has a chance to set things right. It has not had a moment to shine like this since 1787 when our Constitution was written there. In that Constitution, they wrote that a black man or woman was only "three fifths" human. On Tuesday, the good people of Pennsylvania have a chance for redemption.
Yours,
Michael Moore
MichaelMoore.com
MMFlint@aol.com
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=225





A brilliantly written and argued endorsement.
Thanks, Mike!!
April 21, 2008 7:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I strongly support Barak Obama, but I remember the lies that Moore and Nader told in 2000 and frankly Michael Moore can go perform on himself an act that anatomically speaking is quite difficult.
April 21, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Outstanding, Mike.
April 21, 2008 8:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
The same genius who endorsed Nader in 2000.
April 21, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, he reconsidered in 2004, when he supported Kerry and actually argued against voting for Ralph Nader. In fact, I was at one of his rallies and heard him say quite a lot about this, quite convincingly from a pragmatic point of view.
April 21, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, the Michael Moore kiss of death! I'd be surprised if Hillary doesn't make this endorsement into a negative ad to run tonight.
Cue idiotic:
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR HILLARY!!!
April 21, 2008 8:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
This would not be an appropriate place for Idiotic’s comment because this actually is excelent news for Hillary.
April 21, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Idiotic has hit the big time:
http://excellentnewsforhillary.blogspot.com/
April 21, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
A well-written endorsement, but does it help Obama?
April 21, 2008 8:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Help? I think Obama's already got the Michael Moore vote (=anti-war), this can only hinder. The endorsements of MoveOn and Michael Moore really could come back to haunt Obama in the general.
April 21, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
WTF? An endorsement where he didn't even pretend to discuss any policy or idea or thought that separated the two candidates. Only how the campaign has progressed and how poor Barack has been treated? I don't think that this can be taken seriously. At least say something about the differences in health plans or war plans or even economic plans since he has made movies about all 3! Jesus Mikey, that didn't help anything. Sorry assed effort.
April 21, 2008 9:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's not voting on policy. He doesn't see a significant policy difference between them, at least not relative to the Republicans.
He's voting on decency.
April 21, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
He's never forgiven Hillary for making a crack about his expertise on the subject healthcare.
April 21, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of decency, you seem like quite an upstanding fellow. I doff my hat to your avatar, your screen name, and your insightful and balanced analysis.
April 21, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fair and balanced, no less.
April 21, 2008 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think his avatar needs a different angle. Check out Crooks and Liars
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/04/20/msnbcs-contessa-brewer-helps-spread-false-rumor-that-obama-gave-the-finger/
April 21, 2008 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sarcasm, mageduley. Sometimes it's subtle.....
;-p
April 21, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I got it Lor, :) I just always feel the need to inject the other angle when I see his avatar.
April 21, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
wow its like you enjoy being blind to reality.
April 21, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone who is voting for either of these candidates based on policy differences is deluding themselves. Their policy differences are insignificant. We are left to make our choice based on ability, caracter, and style. That is where Sen Obama beats Sen Clinton like a drum. He will have at least some chance of geting the platform they share enacted because he has not pissed off everyon in DC whos co-operation is needed to get it through.
April 21, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, he clearly thinks both Clinton and Obama are corporate tools, but that Obama is a more decent person.
April 21, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Michael Moore did discuss a policy, you dink. Michael Moore is supporting Barack Obama because Barack Obama is creating a movement towards returning the keys to the government back to the citizens. That is a policy, and it is also a referendum.
April 21, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Quite the policy there. Just a question. Just when will we know that he gave us the keys back? Anything that as soon as it happens I can point my finger at it and say "yeah, thats it. My keys!"
April 21, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think deposing the establishment candidate and becoming the first Presidential candidate funded primarily by small donors like myself is a signal that the keys are back. Dink.
April 21, 2008 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, didn't factor in that the bar for you would be really low. My bad.
April 21, 2008 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Her war vote is enough for him...and for me. The sleaze just sealed the deal.
April 21, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
This should take the wind out of the Hillary Mandate supporters, when even Michael does not think it is worth electing her for that reason alone.
April 21, 2008 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Considering her recently publicized comments on activists and MoveOn, wouldn't Moore already have been expected (by her) to support Obama?
I suppose the only reason why not would be Moore's Sicko movie and its convergence with health-care—Hillary's number one issue.
April 21, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
He did pocket quite a bit of coin from that movie and hence Mrs. Clinton.
April 21, 2008 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Even though he slammed her in the movie for being in the pocket of insurance and phamaceutical lobby.
April 21, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suppose if I'd actually watched the movie, I'd know that. :)
I liked Roger & Me, but each of his movies has been slightly worse than its predecessor in my opinion. I think someone said that Sicko breaks this trend, but I'm not sure if I'm ready to be disappointed.
April 21, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michael has been burned too many times by people dissecting his "facts" in his movies.
So in Sicko, he made painstaking efforts to make sure the facts he stated were factual and beyond reproach.
You really should watch it. No one has yet sued him for defamation because the facts he presented are true!
April 21, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michael Moore AND Bruce Springsteen? These are two people who have heroically stood up for working class people for decades.
And they both say vote Obama for President.
PA, vote Obama!
April 21, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly when have either stood up for the working man except to make money off the workingman's back. I've never seen either give 1.Copious amounts of money or resources to help the workingman or 2. Time and energy to help the working man. To date, all either has done is make a record and make a movie to line their own pockets off of the Working Man.
April 21, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
policy matters when Louisville's favored candidate's character is called into question ... character matters when Louisville's favored candidate's policy choices are called into question.
April 21, 2008 9:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
!!!
That is too funny, thanks, I needed some troll relief heading into Tuesday.
And yet he keeps on typing as if his comments, or dittohead talking points, should be taken seriously.
April 21, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad to see this, even though I suspect it will move few, if any, from their positions. Those who would not vote for Sen. Obama before will not be swayed, and those who will are already there.
The reason I am glad to see this despite the relatively slim chances of changing anyone's mind is that Moore calls out the Clinton campaign for what it is - a racist, fear-mongering, willful act of destruction. Have they themselves not noticed how her negatives have risen as she's conducted her (smear) campaign these last few months? Is she genuinely that disconnected from the outside world? And if so, is that a quality we need in a Commander-in-Chief?
I see in her now nothing so much as the small spoiled child throwing a tantrum and kicking over everyone else's playthings when she's told to quiet down. And I suspect that much of America sees that as well, thence the rising of the negatives.
What we see in that is developing proof that should she somehow get the nomination, she will make us look back fondly on George McGovern's 49-state electoral loss as "the good old days". Should she get the nomination, she could become the first candidate to lose all 50.
April 21, 2008 9:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I find it sad that Hillary has had to whittle her support structure down to the elderly and the blue-collar Reagan Dems. This is sad because those two demographics usually vote overwhelmingly for the GOP. Instead of broadening her support, she is narrowing in order to eke out key victories. Once she is done, the scorched earth will leave her with a group that will vote for McCain instead of her.
April 21, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
It won't help Obama much as sadly, the people that Moore tried most to fight for since Roger & Me are the sort of people who detest him...and will not vote for Obama. It's a good read, nonetheless, and Moore is one of the most decent comedic documentor around...not the most professional though!
April 21, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
If he wanted to support Obama he would have kept his views to himself.
April 21, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is a Vast Chasm Between Hillary's proposed policies and Senator Obama's.
Their proposals are very similar, but Hillary is lying her arse of like she usually does, and she will ditch all policy promises that are opposed by her Fat Cat Cabal.
There is a reason why 60% of the American voters find her to be untruthful and untrustworthy. She achieved it the old fashion way by habitually lying her arse off.
How many of you are foolish enough to fall for her promises now. Are you among that 40% of the voters who are easily fooled all the time!
April 21, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Color me not impressed.
And WTF is this about:
"Don't get me wrong. I lost my rose-colored glasses a long time ago.
It's foolish to see the Democrats as anything but a nicer version of a party that exists to do the bidding of the corporate elite in this country. Any endorsement of a Democrat must be done with this acknowledgement and a hope that one day we will have a party that'll represent the people first, and laws that allow that party an equal voice. "
This is the shit that always pisses me off about Moore. He likes to discredit his own cause, because he thinks it makes him "honest."
Is anyone convinced by his arguments?
People who support Hillary will still support her, and now have the extra ammunition that loser Moore endorses McCain.
People who support Obama will continue to, and will quickly point out that Obama did not seek or request this "endorsement."
Kiss of Death indeed. I'd rather he keep his big mouth shut.
(I'm not a fan of Moore, in case you couldn't guess. His "documentaries" put him above his subject, so what once was a powerful subject just becomes another feather in his cap. I cringe whenever he makes a movie, because I know the subject will then be reduced to party line attacks.)
April 21, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
major typo:
"People who support Hillary will still support her, and now have the extra ammunition that loser Moore endorses Obama."
Subconciously, I was hoping Moore would endorse McCain...
April 21, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nope and in fact this is the same Nadir-esque crap that gave us 8 years of Bush to begin with.
Moore's getting down on his knees with Bill Maher and begging Nadir not to run in '04 was cute, but doesn't atone IMHO.
Just as I don't forgive Hillary for her Iraq vote -I don't forgive Moore for his Nadir crap.
April 21, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
It supprises me how many Democrats have been cowed into repeating the GOP's "michael Moore sucks" mentality. The guy started off as an angry citizen with a video camera who set out on his own to document the corruption of corporate America in "Roger and Me".
Who else was doing this at that time? Moore represents the "one citizen, one voice" ideal that I thought all Democrats embraced. No, he's not a slick Hollywood producer/director. No, he's not an Ivy League political science major. He's the common man, and he has spent the last decade shining a spotlight on corruption in our corporations, government and health care industry.
He has served as a model and inspiration for a whole generation of documentary film-makers. I can see the typical hate-filled spew of a rant against Moore from our GOP trolls here, but from fellow Democrats? Really? Has the GOP convinced you to vote and think against your own interests, too?
Regardless, this comment from Moore about Hillary is spot-on:
"You cast your die when you voted to start this bloody war. When you did that you were like Moses who lost it for a moment and, because of that, was prohibited from entering the Promised Land."
God bless our independent documentary film-makers! I may not agree with everything Moore says, but I'll fight every day for his right to express those opinions, and to shine a light on corruption in all of its many forms.
The rest of you can go back to watching the Pentagon channel now.
April 21, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mikey Moore is all about mikey moore. If its not about Mikey Moore then he doesn't want anything to do with it. Self proclaimed adovocate of the "little guy". What has he done for the little guy? Nothing. Has ever tried to help out in his home town of Flint MI? Tried to help reopen old companies that were shuttered? Tried an outreach program to bring people from Flint into his businesses?
Naw, what I see outta Michael Moore is pretty typical of what is "Hollywood". Millions pandering to the masses and talking about "helping" the masses and not a crumb from their table. Put your money where your mouth is Mikey. Or just shutup.
April 21, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh you mean like Hillary and Bill helping Katrina victims?
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/clinton-accepts-aid-from-a-div.php
April 21, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said. I was about to type a similar comment, though less coherent comment.
April 22, 2008 2:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Given Obama's already liberal image, I'd be dreading this endorsement if I were on the Obama campaign team.
April 21, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
You say "liberal" likes it's a bad word.
April 21, 2008 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not in the primary. But in a general, you can count on Obama (like most candidates for either party) swinging toward the center. However, I don't think it'll be too easy for Obama to do.
April 21, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good Job Mr Moore. I'm shocked at all the Dems who like he said, can't see the forest for the Trees in regards to his post. Their policy stances are so close, self admitted by both of them! Any logical person would use something else to make a decision. Just because it happens to be character and that doesnt bold well for HRC, everyone is in uproar.
P.S. Michael has a right to have an opinion about the Dem party. Those who claim they have the right to say they love America, but may criticize it at the same time, need to take a look at their party and apply that same standard. Their are too many Hillaries and not enough kuciniches! Deal with it and fix it, you are the people and its your party!
April 21, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry the Forrest for tree's
April 21, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damb...I need coffee....and a spelling coach...Forest....sorry!
April 21, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like Mike. He makes people say WTF! to the movie screen in the theater, which is rare. It's the second movie I've seen that had any obvious impact on the audience at all. The first was Fahrenheit 911.
April 21, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I actually don't mind his movies either. But his stanc is similar to Lou Dobbs..."they are all crazy and worthless" without ever offering any type of alternatives. Maybe, I am too harsh and expect too much from him. But he has such a voice to not use it is sad.
April 21, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
More whining even after Obama goes negative to prove his whole message is a lie.
Go figure.
April 21, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
ABC/Wash Post Poll:
60% of voters find Hillary Clinton untrustworthy and view her in a very negative manner.
The are not going to vote for her against John McCain.
If you give the nomination to Hillary, John McCain will win in a landslide, and take back both houses of congress.
Do you want to do that Super Delegates.
John McCain dares you to nominate Hillary, and make his Election day. After that we will change your name to
Stupor Delegates!
April 21, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even supposing this isn't a "kiss of death" (as someone said above), how could this _possibly_ be helpful in _any_ way for Obama?
What an ego trip.
April 21, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is helpful to show that her mandates are nothing more but guaranteed profits for the healtcare industry.
See the clip from Sicko where Moore points out her hypocrisy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6J1I_EJrCHU
April 21, 2008 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Oranckay,
In 2003 the run up to the war, allot of my non-political friends called me unpatriotic when I oppossed this war. They came back to me and apologized and felt shameful after they watched Farenheiht/911. My point is, he is responsible for allot of people waking up to what was going on. So when you say this is not helpful, not everyone has a Bad idea of what Michael stands for......And for at least that and his putting another spelled out documentary on Health Care, he should not be thrown under a bus. Some will tell you that they dont agree with every thing he says. There is a difference between that, and stating he is not valuable. Everyone isnt a political junkie!
April 21, 2008 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly.
Name another documentary filmmaker who has covered the health care issue, corporate corruption, governmental cover-ups surrounding 9-11, etc.....Recommend some DVD titles for me?
April 21, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr. Moore - slaves were not considered 3/5ths human in 1787, but a slave owner was allowed to claim 3/5ths of his slaves (despite the fact that they couldn't vote) as people in his household. That gave slave owners more legislators in the House, and so on, and inflated slave-owners' power in DC. In effect, the 3/5th rule kept slaves in chains longer ; they would have been freed sooner, possibly without war, if NONE of the slaves were counted as population in 1787. But THEN you would complain that slaves weren't considered human in 1787!
April 21, 2008 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Think again. There would have been no union without the 3/5ths rule since population centers were in the North. The 3/5ths rule evened the playing field for southerners until the massive influx of slaves tilted the scales in favor of the south and ushered in southern political dominance.
Also think twice about slaves being freed sooner. The reason slavery persisted was due to money, not votes. Many northern abolitionists invested in or outright owned slave plantations in the South. America was built on cotton money and the blood, sweat and tears of Africans. They would not freely give up their source of wealth. Even after the Civil War white landowners and politicians conspired to keep freed Africans prisoners in the share crop system.
Bottom line is, this nation was started by racist terrorists who didn't give a damn about anyone but themselves. You are right though that his 3/5th remarks are inaccurate. It wasn't that Africans and Women weren't human- they just were not in the equation.
April 22, 2008 6:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
This has got to be one of the most bizarre and moronic comments I have ever read. You bring up slavery and the distribution of representation in 1787, and then you hold Michale Moore responsible for the continued enslavement of human beings in and post 1787?!!!! 1787???
If you have to work that hard to make up sh*t to blame Michael Moore for something, it's not worth it. Just blame him for supporting Nader2000, it's easier, cleaner, and you saves you from looking like a complete idiotic wacko.
April 22, 2008 3:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
They always like to change the subject!
April 22, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink