New Huffington Post column about Obama as part of Generation Jones, not of GenX nor Boomers
This matters. Generation Jones was widely reported to be the decisive vote in 2004, letting the GOP keep the White House (The Polling Report, Mason-Dixon Polling, and others pointed to polling data that clearly showed that GenJones was the key to the GOP victory then). Numerous pundits have asserted that whoever is able to capture the GenJones vote in Nov.'08 will win the White House (GenJones is almost a third of the electorate, was 29% of '06 midterms electorate).
Obama, being a Joneser himself, is a wild card here. Especially if he embraces his GenJones identity, he may be able to pull a lot of Jonesers away from the GOP.
Here's yet another article arguing that Obama is a Joneser, this one was published in The Huffington Post yesterday, authored by up-and coming writer Bennet Kelley:
"Obama and Generation Jones: It is Our Time to Lead"
by Bennet Kelley
"Let the word go forth from this time and place ... that the torch has been passed to a new generation." -- John F. Kennedy.
"Each generation of Americans must define what it means to be an American." -- Bill Clinton
Throughout our history we have matched great challenges with great achievements. Whether faced with civil war, the depression or world war, "each and every time, a new generation has risen up and done what's needed to be done. Today we are called once more -- and it is time for our generation to answer that call." --Barack Obama.
These words from John Kennedy's and Bill Clinton's inaugural and Barack Obama's announcement speech, all invoke the same theme of generational change and acknowledgment that it is their time. Kennedy was from the "Greatest Generation" "born in [the last] century, tempered by war [and] disciplined by a hard and bitter peace." Clinton is from the "Baby Boom Generation" "raised in the shadows of unrivaled prosperity" and the Cold War. Obama is from Generation Jones, born in the shadow of fallen heroes, tempered by Watergate and disciplined by economic uncertainty.
Generation Jones? Generation Jones, a term coined by social commentator Jonathan Pontell to convey both their anonymity and unfulfilled expectations, covers those of us who were born between 1954 and 1965. The group is often lumped in with Baby Boomers or Generation X, since statistically the Baby Boom runs through 1964 while the characters in Douglas Copeland's novel Generation X would have been born the year after Senator Obama (although Copeland agrees that Jonesers are distinct from both Boomers and Xers).
Each generation is defined by completely different experiences as reflected in their cultural touchstones. Boomers grew up with Beaver Cleaver, cheered Willie Mays, reveled in Woodstock and voted for Richard Nixon; Jonesers had the Brady Bunch, Muhammad Ali, Live Aid and Ronald Reagan, while Xers had Doogie Howser, Michael Jordan, Lollapalooza and Bill Clinton. Each a distinct era.
Jonesers did not have a Vietnam abroad or anything resembling Selma's Bloody Sunday at home, instead we had Grenada and détente and the bridges we crossed were in high school cafeterias and playgrounds without narration by Walter Cronkite. The war that divided our generation occurred not in the jungles of Vietnam but in our homes as the divorce rate doubled.
Jonesers' formative years instead were defined by watching a nation that stood tall as Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon, stagger through the 1970s amidst Watergate, the fall of Saigon, oil shocks, hyper-inflation, the loss of manufacturing jobs, a dramatic increase in violent crime; and the humiliation of the Iranian hostage crisis which led to the transition from malaise to "Morning in America".
The world greeted Boomers with open arms and they were even Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1965; Jonesers, however, had a different experience. As they worked through high school and college to help pay for soaring tuitions and then struggled to find jobs in an unwelcoming marketplace, Jonesers quickly realized life offered few guarantees and that they had to be adaptable and pragmatic. Instead of "We Shall Overcome," Jonesers sang "I Will Survive".
Jonesers, unlike Xers, embrace the 1960s' idealism and beatified its heroes, while both generations view of government is colored by Watergate and Washington gridlock. As a result, Jonesers adopted a less ideological and more nuanced approach to politics than Boomers and this has made them key swing voters in the last few elections. In general, Jonesers have rewarded candidates exuding confidence and decisiveness but have punished the timid.
Senator Obama is the first Joneser to emerge as a serious candidate at the national level and just as Senator Clinton represents the Baby Boom era and Senator McCain the Ice Age, Obama's campaign embodies the Generation Jones zeitgeist. Obama exudes the same idealism, confidence and decisiveness they admired in Presidents Kennedy and Reagan.
Obama also recognizes that voters do not just want change -- they want a new type of politics (a theme he has emphasized since ABC's tabloid debate). This is why Obama has tried to steer away from the confrontational politics of the Clinton-Bush era, but has not dodged the taboos that the prior generation assiduously avoided from the death penalty to Social Security. Unlike his opponents, Obama understands that the method is part of the message -- change.
Historically, "the torch has passed" to a new generation when an energetic challenger faced a ruling generation that had simply lost its steam (although this spirited campaign has demonstrated Boomers still have plenty of steam) or one whose governing paradigm was repudiated by the voters as with Franklin Roosevelt's 1932 landslide rejecting the disastrous laissez-faire policies of that era.
There are tremors indicating such a shift is occurring today. Polls portray a huge wave of voter discontent with 83 percent of Americans believing the country is on the wrong track, confidence in Congress and the White House dropping 63 and 70 percent respectively since just after 9/11 and voters talking of "Bush-Clinton fatigue" (i.e., "Boomer fatigue"). Obama's success comes from harnessing the power of this extreme voter disaffection which may ultimately enable him to build a new majority coalition, just as Roosevelt built a new majority that held the White House for 24 of the next 32 years.
Boomers are increasingly aware of the advancing Jonesers who have ascended into power in countries such as Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany and Mexico. President Bush has acknowledged that "Generation Jones is undeniably an important group. If we Baby Boomers don't lead, they're right behind us ready to." With Senator Obama, the Jonesers have found the moment and candidate to do just that.





If we don't get The Partridge Family to the White House, we're going to blow up Gilligan's Island. We mean it, we're serious. For all you too uncool to appreciate Room 222, I have 3 words to say to you, Rocky - "Mission Im-possibull".
April 27, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not really sure if I'm a Jones-er or if I'm just Jones-ing. But I'll see your Partridge Family and raise you Lite Brite on a shag rug.
April 28, 2008 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
We were too busy demolishing Bigwheels to get into the artsy stuff. Training for Rollerball and Death Race 2000 after learning how to disable cable filtering.
April 28, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Posters! Hit the recommend button right now.
April 27, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
So if he has a good shot at getting Gen Jones, and he will take a good chunk of Gen X and the vast majority of the Millenials (or are we still calling them Gen Y?), why the hell are we wasting so much time talking about electability? Oh yeah, because the corporatist media are haters, and they know no other way.
April 27, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
The corporate media are filled with us Boomers, that's why.
:-)
April 28, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Count me a Joneser.
I was talking to my father when he suddenly hushed me to hear a voice interrupting the music on the radio. Then he leapt from the couch and yelled up the stairs to my mother. Dr. King had been shot.
I finished my cereal and headed for the door to walk for school, then stopped because my mother, standing by the same radio was in tears. Bobby Kennedy was dead.
I was eight years old then, and I’m forty-eight now.
In the long years in between, I’ve voted for Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry.
I did it proudly, but I did it knowing I was voting for modest proposals, pared-down visions, and versions of “the best we manage for now.” The overall message was that in a divided country facing trying times, these candidates were offering us a restrained, realistic idea of what could practically be done. It was as though we were working through a generation of grief for lost leaders and past campaigns, doing without big dreams because we couldn’t handle any more failure.
Enough of that.
Our beautiful country is fired up and ready to go. Senator Obama is the leading voice, but he can lead because we are, at long and wonderful last, ready to move ahead.
April 27, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
*Sniff* I suddenly feel like I have the jealous little sister I always wanted.
*sob*
;)
April 27, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting. I didn't know us Jonsers had so much clout.
AFT
April 27, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
You have clout with me. I'm married to one of you.
April 27, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll take all the clout I can get.
:D
April 28, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is there some subtle romance going on here at TPM? Is this the reaching across aisles we've heard so much about?
April 28, 2008 1:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
LOL
April 28, 2008 5:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't turn your back on me!
April 28, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is confusing. Born in 58, boomer, I am Wuuuhmaan! Well, anyway, my whole reaction to this article is: "huh?"
April 28, 2008 1:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
1958 makes you a Joneser! You have a whole new identity to get in touch with. Don't fight it. Let the energy flow through you. Your time has arrived. You are the change you have been waiting for. Grab yourself now, before you disappear.
April 28, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I truly dislike being stereotyped under one of these generational aegis, I have nothing in common with what my generation's supposed to like. Incidentally, what do the Republican counterpart of these look like? I don't think they were ever at the disco or in the mosh pit.
April 28, 2008 3:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad that Obama is looking beyond the sniping from Hillary towards November. Hillary supporters are either true Dems and will vote for him when he emerges as the nominee, recognizing that he won fair and square, or they're so crazed and unhinged, they will vote for McCain out of spite. It is good for him to get away from the Madding crowd for now and shift his position towards McCain. If he can win enough moderate conservatives, he's on his way!
There is a Generation RonPaul (I count myself in, since I will cross party line to vote for him over Hillary) of all ages, and they will vote for Obama over McCain. Anti-Bush, anti-war, fiscally conservative, impeccable integrity and ethics. The only downside is his Pro-Life position, but he has stated that he respects the legal status of Roe vs. Wade.
The other group that I hope Obama will try to woo is the Hispanic bloc that can veer towards McCain this November, but isn't shut off from Obama. Along that way, the Catholic vote may make a huge difference in swing states as well. These are conservatives who can be persuaded as they are the most disaffected with George Bush.
He doesn't have to appeal to the left-of-center of his own party any more, they're behind him safely. It's those who hasn't and doesn't plan to vote for him he must go after.
Go Obama, bag 'em!
April 28, 2008 4:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad that Obama is looking beyond the sniping from Hillary towards November. Hillary supporters are either true Dems and will vote for him when he emerges as the nominee, recognizing that he won fair and square, or they're so crazed and unhinged, they will vote for McCain out of spite. It is good for him to get away from the Madding crowd for now and shift his position towards McCain. If he can win enough moderate conservatives, he's on his way!
There is a Generation RonPaul (I count myself in, since I will cross party line to vote for him over Hillary) of all ages, and they will vote for Obama over McCain. Anti-Bush, anti-war, fiscally conservative, impeccable integrity and ethics. The only downside is his Pro-Life position, but he has stated that he respects the legal status of Roe vs. Wade.
The other group that I hope Obama will try to woo is the Hispanic bloc that can veer towards McCain this November, but isn't shut off from Obama. Along that way, the Catholic vote may make a huge difference in swing states as well. These are conservatives who can be persuaded as they are the most disaffected with George Bush.
He doesn't have to appeal to the left-of-center of his own party any more, they're behind him safely. It's those who haven't and don't plan to vote for him that he must go after.
Go Obama, bag 'em!
April 28, 2008 4:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm new here and I just learned that I'm a Jonser and that I matter!!
Who knew!?
April 28, 2008 5:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's funny how often Boomers get bashed for things, but the older boomers aren't the problem
I am part of Generation Jones too and I can see why they split the boomer generation. We didn't face the draft, do the marching (and we were too young for Woodstock). We walked through the doors that boomers and those before them have opened for us...and somewhere along the line we went wrong.
Crazy high tuitions came after us, that wasn't our problem.
In the 5 swing states every other generation including boomers and seniors went for Kerry. We went for bush in high enough numbers that it overrode the votes of the other generations.
In America as a whole the female vote went for Kerry...except for the women of generation Jones.
Yuck! Please let us back in the boomer generation or even generation X, I don't care, I swear I didn't vote bush.
It has been funny when people would say the boomers are done, they wouldn't vote for a boomer. I'd think...that leaves McCain then.
April 28, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said.
April 28, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Walked through the doors that the boomers left? Wha? They're still blocking those doors. They won't LEAVE.
When I left Art School, it took about seven people to do the work I do now with my computer in a quarter of the time. I watched as secretaries picked up once lucrative work for those in my field, and the resultant cut in pay that little experiment produced.
How can you even look at the wage statistics over the last 25 years and think there were any doors into prosperity at all?
Not to mention, all those folks whose jobs I'm doing now? They're asking "do ya want fries with that?" I'm one of the lucky ones.
Maybe you're a privleged banker or something, but let me just say, whatever you're smoking, pass it around.
Thanks.
April 28, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, anyone with a different world view from you workerbee is labeled as the "other side" (bankers typically being associated with the GOP).
The fact is that the computer allowed those who were interested in graphic design (such as yourself) to set up boutique ad agencies and reap huge sums of money for the business explosion that happened during the 90's by design ads and -- ta da! -- websites.
I know several people like this (of the Boomer/Jones/GenX era) -- one of whom paints in watercolors in the evenings still.
So, like so much in life, one's cleverness and flexibility accounts for making the most of unique opportunities in time. For someone who espouses how progressive they are, your posts often talk about well-worn paths, the type that a more conservative person would be familiar with.
Do not always assume someone else's success is ill-gotten -- despite the cat-calls of Marxists and others.
Extreme viewpoints -- be they left or right -- are necessarily wrong since, by definition, all nuance and complexity must be beaten from them to make them extreme, and simplistic.
April 28, 2008 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, ignore the numbers and put me down. Look you addle-pated, condescending shill, I own 2 houses in Connecticut. I was home for my kid everyday after school. I doubt your "friend" was.
So much for success. I think my priorities are just fine.
Are you going to ignore the facts once again? What has happened to salaries in the last 25 years? They're flat. Talk around that.
This is the reality faced by the Jonsers. The boomers had it easy, and I for one, am sick and tired of their self-satisfied sneers about it.
OK fine, you got yours, you took from generations that followed you to get it, and now you're going to catch hell for it.
Quit whinning
April 29, 2008 7:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
See my comment at the end of the thread, I thought I had the little box checked.
As to flat salaries... you are blaming that on boomers? Again, your knee-jerk emotional reaction is misplaced. There is no connection.
You went to art school and got a job as a graphic designer. You live in the advertising age. You should be ecstatic... 100 years ago you would never have been paid for doing artists work -- there was no field for "commercial art".
April 29, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
They're still blocking those doors. They won't LEAVE.
What doors are you talking about? That they should retire? I'm front-edge-of-the-wave boomer (1946) and I'm an early retiree. What are you talking about?
April 28, 2008 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
What would a boomer know about a Jonser.
There's a reason we're considered separate. It wasn't your experience, consider yourself lucky.
The fact is that the boomers are the most spoiled, richest, resource consuming, disaster to happen to this country.
Forgive us if we want nothing to do with you.
Why not go vote yourselves another SS increase?
April 29, 2008 6:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
There were few jobs. I remember that quite well. I got one, but had plenty of friends that couldn't.
And yeah, when I started college, it was reasonable. $2K tuition cost increases per year while I was in college.
That rivals now, even.
If you have figures and facts to disprove the OP, bring 'em.
April 29, 2008 7:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
You are in the Art field.... were your friends also there?
That could explain the job hiring issue. Society doesn't need many of them. Never has, never will.
Talk about a sense of entitlement!
I'm sincerely curious, workerbee. You said you work as a graphic designer. Who typically hired you? Were you in a ad agency? (Pushing products = evil corporatism) Were you working for a corporation?
Obviously, if you own 2 homes, then you did quite well. I'm betting you weren't developing PSA in that case. If you got your money from investing, then you invested in corporations.
Either way, it will be interesting to know how your work benefited society, since you are so quick to cast aspersions on the rest of us. (My work has been involved in getting more bang/buck on energy as well as protecting the environment... and I don't own 2 homes.)
April 29, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mostly in Education and publishing. Not that it's any of your business, but I've helped kids learn.
Now you move the bar again. It isn't enough to be "successful" you have to be morally superior, too?
Good luck with that. I do gratis work for environmental organizations, I guess that will just have to do.
April 29, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, fuck. I was born in 1966, which means I've just missed out on yet another generational tag!
I've never felt like I was either a Boomer or a Gen Xer. The Gen X stereotype always seemed like it applied to the kids who came later. Family dynamics-wise, I always felt more boomerish because all my siblings were Boomers (born in '56, '57 and '59 - yes, I'm an oops baby).
But now, turns out my siblings aren't Boomers, they're Jonesers.
I'm so confused. And so rejected by yet another media-created tag.
April 28, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm thrilled! I've been saying for years that I don't identified with Boomers, even though my birth year, '57, is statistically part of the "boom"--I even blogged about it here a few weeks ago. And I've lamented that nobody's come up with a good generational label for us "after boomers." Now it turns out someone has come up with a label--and it's MY NAME! At last I have an identity: a Jones Jones. And I even have a Joneser candidate of my own to vote for.
April 28, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Generation Jones" would be a good name for you. Especially with your superhero avatar.
April 28, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the efforts of your posting, Jim.
I remember upon reading Jonathan Pontell's analysis , that I had a transformative epiphany. I called someone, who I had been complaining and musing to about this issue for years, and related that though I didn't not have a structual argument for this dismay I felt "This is what I've been trying to communicate and express, this is what this ideology is!" The premise that we were sent out into a clash of ideologies.
It helped me understand that it was a short but defining time in social culture.
April 28, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just caught up with this posting.
I'm tempted to start another blog about how demographic emphasis is another legacy left by the Boomers.
Are the Boomers a single group? Who represents them?
Those more privileged students that protested the Vietnam war and voted for McGovern? Or those more working class that supported it and voted for Reagan?
Similarly, the Jones voted for Bush??? What fraction voted one way or another?
Remember that a 60-40 split is considered a landslide... but that doesn't mean that an overwhelming majority of a "generation" can easily be assigned characteristics.
Besides, the "Joneses" are only a 10 year period!
The generally accepted "treatise" on this topic stars in the 1980s with the publication of GENERATIONS:
http://www.amazon.com/Generations-History-Americas-Future-1584/dp/0688119123
which talks about the cycle-of-4 generations in America and who a dislodging external event every 80 or so years keeps things going.
The Civil War was just such an event.
As was the Depression and WWII.
We are about due... I suspect it will be the crisis brought on by ... yep... energy.
April 28, 2008 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nope. Corporatism, and try looking up the Gilded Age..
This ain't nothing new.
April 29, 2008 7:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
It doesn't sound like you have read the book -- or at least understand it's thesis. Corporatism is not an event.
April 29, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
2 homes? Fine priorities? Then you should be happy and not constantly complaining about what others have -- or why you should be getting a piece of theirs.
By the way, if you are 46, I'm younger than you. So no need to lump me with another one of your "enemies" group (GOP, Boomers... or apparently anyone else who doesn't think like you). For someone who is allegedly so progressive and liberal and celebrates diversity (claimed keystone of the Dems), you are rather rigid and intolerant.
April 29, 2008 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Constantly complaining?"
You are such a putz. You just can't resist the temptation to engage in ad hominem in lieu of argument. That has been the content of your every post on this thread and your every reply to me.
I'm glad I managed to put a nick in your ridiculously inflated sense of yourself. It was about time someone did.
Try not talking down to people as if you're some enlightened being. You ain't. As far as I can tell you're a corporatist with an agenda.
If I can drive holes through your arguments, that's your fault.
Now when you come back with some actual hard fact to refute the above OP, which I happened to agree with, let me know.
Otherwise your 'constant whinning' about me personally is getting a might old. You simply aren't worthy of a response.
April 29, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Glad you feel like you are living a purposeful life. One would assume you would be happier in that case, but your posts do not reflect this (sadly). Your attention to me seems to border on some sort of obsession. And yet, I have never not treated you politely.
Interesting.
I notice that for all your claims on "refuting" my arguments (which seems mostly to try to put me in a box - that would be impossible if you really knew me, call my posts "BS" - your words, and react personally to me in ways that no one else at TPM seems to - love? hate?), you have actually put little actual content on TPM. Mostly angry, bitter diatribes or various one-liners.
Your profile lists no blogs at all.
Again, interesting.
I did note, however, that per my suggestion on the Avatar blog, you changed the coffee cup to a latte cup on your award-winning logo. You're very welcome, workerbee.
April 29, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink