« from a south carolinian to rep clyburn: chill! | blackflag's Blog | leave it to Bill Kristol in New York Tmes- a challenge to TPM »
Obama on Fox News...why?
he was going to take them on, but apparently played the continued prevent defense, do not say anything to tip the boat...having said enough to cause sizeable listing.
he apparently wants to distance himself from some of his, uh, well, more unsteady supporters ready to brand the clintons and the second coming of nathan bedford forrest and scarlett o'hara...which group includes wide swaths of the liberal blogashere, including this one.
if obama is willing to foreswear these vile insuations about racism and trying to destroy obama so he cannot win, then i suggest his more ludicrous followers try to head his call, because the arrogance is not working, the do the math, no chance, give up hillary arrogance, along with the trashing of the clintons, quite unfairly history will show, this attitude that settled about the obama supporters and campaign is quite a toxic brew, the american people do not like cocky, know it all smart kids, they appreciate confidence and smarts, but do not appreciate having their own deficiencies rubbed in their noses by those who would deign to tell someone when to quit, accuse of heinous offenses and generally act like a group of spoiled children
get over it, we need obama to show some heart, some fire for what he wants, and we get, well, not hot water and steam but a tepid spray.
i am 60 i have seen more than one golden boy who was going to change politics....they aint changed yet
he apparently wants to distance himself from some of his, uh, well, more unsteady supporters ready to brand the clintons and the second coming of nathan bedford forrest and scarlett o'hara...which group includes wide swaths of the liberal blogashere, including this one.
if obama is willing to foreswear these vile insuations about racism and trying to destroy obama so he cannot win, then i suggest his more ludicrous followers try to head his call, because the arrogance is not working, the do the math, no chance, give up hillary arrogance, along with the trashing of the clintons, quite unfairly history will show, this attitude that settled about the obama supporters and campaign is quite a toxic brew, the american people do not like cocky, know it all smart kids, they appreciate confidence and smarts, but do not appreciate having their own deficiencies rubbed in their noses by those who would deign to tell someone when to quit, accuse of heinous offenses and generally act like a group of spoiled children
get over it, we need obama to show some heart, some fire for what he wants, and we get, well, not hot water and steam but a tepid spray.
i am 60 i have seen more than one golden boy who was going to change politics....they aint changed yet
Advertisement





Agree. The only reason to go on FOX was to pitch to the NASCAR fans and lower income voters in Indiana where he has to win. He blew it badly. Let them hang Dukakis and Stevenson on him. Seemed boring and just not with it. Either he has internal polls telling him he's going to win Indiana or someone has convinced him he can limp into the convention and still win. But neither of those possibilities explains why he would go on FOX.
They treat him with disdain. I keep thinking of the moment at the beginning of the last debate when he called Gibson "sir." It can't be good for him to let newscasters seem to dominate him.
April 27, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why? Because he didn't look so good on ABC, and needed to take someone on. However, he didn't take Fox on either.
April 27, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
"i am 60 i have seen more than one golden boy who was going to change politics....they aint changed yet"
I know exactly what you are talking about. To change politics one has first to get elected. And to get elected, one has to deal with politics as it is. And if elected, one still has to deal with that inconvenient little thing called human nature.
This whole "new kind of politics" is just a mirage. It is intended to cover Obama's weaknesses.
April 27, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink