Some women are fixated on her candidacy. She must become president just for pure gender reasons. I know because some such women are in my family.
Also, some poeple keep associating her with the Bill Clinton economic good times of the 90's. I think they actually believe her B.S. about needing a 2nd Clinton presidency to clean up after the 2nd Bush presidency. She never explains what it was about the 1st Clinton pres. which also lead to the 2nd Bush pres.
Where have you been the last 6 weeks?
It was *expected* that she would win it.
The real issue is by how much. Remember, she "won" Texas as well... and Obama scored more delegates.
Old vs. new.
If he beats his personal bet, there will be no problem. He's already the candidate with only a 6 point spread.
And yes, I don't understand the women either and they're my own generation. They seem to value gender over honesty. I don't get it.
Some women are fixated on her candidacy. She must become president just for pure gender reasons. I know because some such women are in my family.
Also, some poeple keep associating her with the Bill Clinton economic good times of the 90's. I think they actually believe her B.S. about needing a 2nd Clinton presidency to clean up after the 2nd Bush presidency. She never explains what it was about the 1st Clinton pres. which also lead to the 2nd Bush pres.
April 22, 2008 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where have you been the last 6 weeks?
It was *expected* that she would win it.
The real issue is by how much. Remember, she "won" Texas as well... and Obama scored more delegates.
April 22, 2008 9:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Old vs. new.
If he beats his personal bet, there will be no problem. He's already the candidate with only a 6 point spread.
And yes, I don't understand the women either and they're my own generation. They seem to value gender over honesty. I don't get it.
April 22, 2008 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink