The Wright Stuff
Now that Barack Obama has separated himself from Rev. Wright, an act
that visibly cut Obama to the quick, maybe all — but the far right —
can get back to deciding who's right on the issues. I still have
something on my mind, though. The day before Obama gave his press
conference rejecting Rev. Wright, the same day that Wright gave his own
press conference at the National Press Club, I wrote about how much
this episode in this long race has to do with a cultural
misunderstanding. Then I saved it — rendering it untimely. I think it
still bears examination.
"The most recent attack on the black church, it is our hope that this just might mean that the reality of the African-American church will no longer be invisible."
— Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright, The National Press Club, Washington, D.C.
This quote, though merely a sound bite of words, sums up much of the controversy surrounding the revered Biblical scholar and retired pastor, Rev. Wright. His claim to represent the whole black church in this controversy sounds egotistical, but I feel that there's some merit there. It's clear from folks I've spoken with that Wright's not like most other African American preachers, but much of the strong reaction in the MSM and in the public has as much to do with what he says in his sermons as with how he says it. Nonreligious observers understandably lack insight into the value and complexity of a church community — that not all members agree or march in lock step with each other and their pastor. Religious observers, right and left, are often not familiar with any church tradition outside their own.
While much can be written on this, I just want to highlight two conversations that really opened my eyes to a cultural tradition that I was previously blind to. A culture that was invisible to me. The first conversation was with an African American coworker and the second was with a former student of Rev. Wright's. I learned something about the tradition of the black church — that it is an amalgam of traditions: the African tradition brought here, the African American tradition cultivated here and the Christian tradition shared at a basic level by all Christians (Catholic and Protestant). I learned also that black churches routinely meld the social issues of the African American community with the teachings from the Bible making the pulpit a place where ideas flow both out of and also in to. That it is not uncommon for the energy level to become elevated and for the volume to rise. While I attend a church that is staid and solemn, black churches engage in an exchange of ideas between the pastor and the congregation that can be imagined even in the simple call and response popular in hip hop. Because the issues relevant and vital to the African American community aren't always addressed in the MSM or in many other arenas, they become topics during the church service on Sunday. Far from being divisive to society, these problem sharing opportunities — containing passionate speech — are a catharsis. Just like revivals have been for more than a century.
Maybe this sounds like a high fallutin' look at the black church. That's OK. There is a misunderstanding, even an ignorance, about what goes on behind church doors among all races and creeds. Most folks don't know what it's like to worship in a mosque or synagogue let alone in an Orthodox church, a Catholic church or an Evangelical mega church. Though the latter gets beamed into many households every weekend. We could use a little anthropology on our neighbors faiths, then perhaps we could leave it out of the public forum for good.
"The most recent attack on the black church, it is our hope that this just might mean that the reality of the African-American church will no longer be invisible."
— Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright, The National Press Club, Washington, D.C.
This quote, though merely a sound bite of words, sums up much of the controversy surrounding the revered Biblical scholar and retired pastor, Rev. Wright. His claim to represent the whole black church in this controversy sounds egotistical, but I feel that there's some merit there. It's clear from folks I've spoken with that Wright's not like most other African American preachers, but much of the strong reaction in the MSM and in the public has as much to do with what he says in his sermons as with how he says it. Nonreligious observers understandably lack insight into the value and complexity of a church community — that not all members agree or march in lock step with each other and their pastor. Religious observers, right and left, are often not familiar with any church tradition outside their own.
While much can be written on this, I just want to highlight two conversations that really opened my eyes to a cultural tradition that I was previously blind to. A culture that was invisible to me. The first conversation was with an African American coworker and the second was with a former student of Rev. Wright's. I learned something about the tradition of the black church — that it is an amalgam of traditions: the African tradition brought here, the African American tradition cultivated here and the Christian tradition shared at a basic level by all Christians (Catholic and Protestant). I learned also that black churches routinely meld the social issues of the African American community with the teachings from the Bible making the pulpit a place where ideas flow both out of and also in to. That it is not uncommon for the energy level to become elevated and for the volume to rise. While I attend a church that is staid and solemn, black churches engage in an exchange of ideas between the pastor and the congregation that can be imagined even in the simple call and response popular in hip hop. Because the issues relevant and vital to the African American community aren't always addressed in the MSM or in many other arenas, they become topics during the church service on Sunday. Far from being divisive to society, these problem sharing opportunities — containing passionate speech — are a catharsis. Just like revivals have been for more than a century.
Maybe this sounds like a high fallutin' look at the black church. That's OK. There is a misunderstanding, even an ignorance, about what goes on behind church doors among all races and creeds. Most folks don't know what it's like to worship in a mosque or synagogue let alone in an Orthodox church, a Catholic church or an Evangelical mega church. Though the latter gets beamed into many households every weekend. We could use a little anthropology on our neighbors faiths, then perhaps we could leave it out of the public forum for good.
Advertisement





I suspect that if it turned out that Bill and Hillary Clinton had attended a church where the parishioners worshipped snakes and that snakebites were a sign you were "filled with the devil" and had racist leanings -- a denomination that does exist and is found among rural whites in certain areas, this conversation would be mouch more tolerant of their religious choice. They would not be held to account for the "crazy things" their pastor said as if it came out of his or her mouth.
If we remember one good thing Rev. Wright said, it is "Different is not deficient, just different."
April 30, 2008 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Saturday after the whole Wright thing blew up my rabbi gave a talk drawn from conversations with other Conservative rabbis on the Super Secret Rabbi Mail-list. I was actually playing hooky that day, but she later told me that gist of it was the differences between religious cultures in how they express controversial views.
For Jews, expressing controversies and differences aloud defuses their power and allows for compromise. Your average white Protestant is discomfited by this kind of display as unseemly. Here in Utah, our LDS neighbors also think public dissent is bad manners.
And the Rabbi said that, at least to some degree, Jews share that rhetorical style with blacks. Now, I don't know what she based that on; it may have been as simple as realizing that, taken out of context, the online rabbis realize that although they may not have been as inflammatory as Wright, excerpts of their statements could be seen by outsiders as positively scary.
Anyhow, I wonder if anyone from the black community--or others--has given thought to this.
April 30, 2008 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
"If we remember one good thing Rev. Wright said, it is "Different is not deficient, just different."
Maybe, I'm missing something. Maybe, Wright is correct that African American (pundits, candidate surrogates, and candidates aside) process information differently than European Americans, because outside of his bufoonish delivery and his whack attack argument about AIDs being a government plot, I didn't hear or read one single word from Wright that denigrated white people, individually or as a group.
I keep asking folks to point out the offending comments, free of projection or reinterpretation and I have yet to hear or read anyone who could point out what it was that he said that was "offensive."
Different is not deficient. He stated that 25 times during the NAACP speech. So if you are different and aren't deficient as a result, then what the hell are we all talking about?
April 30, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink