« Political mischief-making on Gmail? | akbarjenkins's Blog | BREAKING: Obama can't win the Election of 1828! »

A look at the historical roots of racism in WV, from a depressed mountaineer


The last of my four home states votes today.  (Hey, if Hillary Clinton gets to be "from" Illinois, Arkansas, New York and Pennsylvania, then I should get to have some too.)  West Virginia, the much-maligned and often-mocked place of my birth, is almost certain to deliver a 20 or 30 point knockout for Clinton.  It is among the whitest and poorest states in the nation.  It ranks either last or near-last in the following categories:

1. the percentage of foreign-born residents
2. the percentage of non-English speakers
3. median income
4. economic growth

About 96% of the population is white and about 3.5% black, with Native Americans outnumbering Asian Americans.   Once a reliably Democratic state, the home of labor radicalism, it fell into the Republican column in 2000 because everyone was sure Al Gore wanted to take their guns away.  There is a certain freethinking streak of heterodoxy that still runs through my family, but WV seems to have gotten more and more religious over recent years (hence the love of Dubya).  

There has been much debate in the media about whether Barack Obama's total inability to win over voters in Kentucky and West Virginia means that these folks are racist.  I don't know what to say.  No one in my West Virginian family was willing to come to our wedding because they were afraid of consorting with Muslims, i.e. potential terrorists.  They've hated and feared the government all their lives, and now they listen to Bush tell them to hate and fear other people.  It is unbelievably depressing.   
 
To reach deeper into history, though, there are real roots to the particular racism of this region.  The poor white settlers who colonized Virginia and North Carolina were pushed long ago by wealthier slaveholders out of the fertile lands near the coast, which became dominated by plantations growing cash crops with slave labor.  Many of these pioneers moved into the mountains and the foothills; places like Gastonia weren't as conducive to large scale agriculture, and thus eventually became the sites of textile development starting in the 1880s.  But the mountains were never good for any agriculture, period, and not for much industry either, except for mining.  Remote, isolated and homogeneous, these communities resented the wealth and lopsided political power of the planters in the east, and they abhorred the slave as both the tool of the planters and their potential competitor in poverty.  They basically wanted nothing to do with slaves or slaveholders.  It is no wonder that, when some of these settlers moved on westward, they set up laws in states like Illinois to forbid both slavery and settlement by African Americans.  West Virginia broke off from Virginia when the Civil War came, because they had no interest in fighting to defend the South's "peculiar institution."  Unionist strongholds could similarly be found in western NC and eastern TN.

Flashforward to today... I don't know how much this election can be connected to the Civil War, but there may be historical echoes of these nineteenth century attitudes and conflicts today.  Outside of the arty college towns of Asheville and Boone, Obama got stomped in NC's mountain counties.  West Virginia is pretty much this area writ slightly large.  With the withering of industry and unions in WV, there is not as much of an organizational infrastructure for progressives in the state anymore.  I've seen several old union halls, abandoned, with broken windows.  It's sad.  All I can say is that Obama's vaunted "50 state strategy," designed to reach out to Americans of all stripes in even the most conservative communities, runs aground on West Virginia.  He can't win it now or in the Fall, and I seriously doubt that the baby-killing, gun-hating pantsuit-wearing She-Beast of conservative myth would have been able to win it either.

I've always been proud of West Virginia's motto, "Montani semper liberi" -- Mountaineers are always free! -- and I wish it were true.  I'll stick with the credo of my adopted home state, NC: To be, rather than to seem.

150 Comments

| Leave a comment

Thank you Akbar, this is excellent historical analysis. I liked this part:

I've always been proud of West Virginia's motto, "Montani semper liberi" -- Mountaineers are always free! -- and I wish it were true.

Nicely put, given that what you're implying in your post is that while the whites in that area do say and act in racist ways, it's not quite fair to say they ARE racists. They've basically been pushed into a situation and setting that teaches them to be racist.

I think of racial identities as learned forms of training. White people learn to perform their whiteness. So if they act racist, we should do less blaming of them as individuals and more blaming and analysis of what forces led them to be racist.

thanks again,

macon d

Stuff White People Do

Hey Macon,

Thanks for understanding that I didn't mean to condemn all mountaineers as horrible people... right after I posted the story I reread it and worried that it basically conveyed the meaning that, yes, everyone in WV is racist just because they won't vote for this one particular candidate, as if that could be a litmus test for anyone's moral character. I wanted to put certain prejudices in a context where, as you say, racism is "learned."

There is an interesting, if controversial, book by David Roediger called "The Wages of Whiteness" that you might find interesting, if you haven't already looked at it. It examines the origins of interracial hostility within the working class throughout American history:

http://www.amazon.com/Wages-Whiteness-American-Expanded-Haymarket/dp/1844671453/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210689816&sr=8-1

Anyway, thanks for the positive feedback! Let's hope Morganton and Charleston can keep the margin of defeat to something less than expected.

Esse quam videri!

I hate to shatter you crap theory with this post.

‘Applachia Virginia had no problem voting for African American Douglas Wilder in ‘89. Buchanan County, for example borders both West Virginia and Kentucky, is 97% white, and voted 90 percent to 9 percent for Clinton over Obama on February 12, but in 1989, it voted 59 percent to 41 percent for Wilder.
So, the notion that people are monolithically racist in Applachia and will not vote for Obama because of some sort of knee-jerk reaction to Obama’s ethnicity is largely false.’

user-pic

Typical of Obama supporters. Facing a blow-out defeat in WV, they blame racism. You do realize that Clinton can put WV in play in the general, right?? But no, you're too busy generalizing and stereotyping your neighbors. "If you don't support Obama, you are racist." Bulls*it!

Don't you see you are throwing away our chance for a new tomorrow??

Clinton '08
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/bizarro-day-at-tpmcafe.php

She can't put it into play in the general ... she was unable to win the nomination, so she won't be in the general.

Great post Akbar! I used to live down the street from WV and have family there. I think that the regional racial issues are there (and in Western PA as well). In the same way that Simone de Beauvoir said that "One is not born a woman, but becomes one", the region perpetuates a lot of generational fear of "otherness" for many of the historical reasons that you present, and those patterns perpetuate racial fear and antipathy.

Of course, de Beauvoir also said, "Change your life today. Don't gamble on the future, act now, without delay." There are always currents of change and opportunities to discard those old models of thought.

Indeed. Hillary Clinton is the only Democrat who could put West Virginia in play in the general election. John Edwards might have done it, but, then again, he couldn't sway his own state one inch in 2004. Clinton stands a much better chance of winning this state (which arguably tipped the 2000 election) than Obama does in so many of the red states he has won (e.g. Idaho). We can't afford to write off states like West Virginia just because we think we're "better" than all the people of modest means who are just struggling to get by.

"Typical of Obama supporters. Facing a blow-out defeat in WV, they blame racism. You do realize that Clinton can put WV in play in the general, right??"

The problem there is the shit-loads of anecdotal evidence pointing to overt racism in WV - no matter how much you resort to playing the "You are playing the race card" prevent defense, that fucking dog just won't hunt.

user-pic

SO NOW YOU ARE TRYING TO DISENFRANCHISE RACISTS??!! SO MUCH FOR YOUR SO-CALLED COMMITMENT TO DEMOCRACY! YOU THINK YOUR VOTE SHOULD COUNT MORE THAN A RACIST'S??? YOU ARE ELITIST!!

AND DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT RESPONDING UNTIL YOU READ THIS:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/bizarro-day-at-tpmcafe.php

I *heart* you, Bizzaro Allsburg (wink)

So, have you been to the party at Hillaryis44, yet? It's a hoot!

LOL, thank you, I thought you had lost your mind! Much love, with cookies - don't Hillary's girls bake? Someone told me they baked... I thought I smelled baking...

"Disenfranchise racists." And you even screamed it in capital letters.

What a hoot.

"SO NOW YOU ARE TRYING TO DISENFRANCHISE RACISTS??!! SO MUCH FOR YOUR SO-CALLED COMMITMENT TO DEMOCRACY!"

Its no so much disenfranchising racists, but putting Clinton's WV victory in the proper perspective. Thank go the country doesn't follow West Virginia's lead.

Present -
In case you missed it, nowhere does it say that any group is monolithic.

Secondly, where did you get those numbers for Buchanan County? Could you direct me to a reliable source? As I understand it, the exit polls for that race were notoriously unreliable.

No one who lovingly defends their home state by putting attitudes in a more complete historical context is racist.

Does blaming history and teaching instead of individuals then absolve those individuals from change? Does it mean making decisions as a Democratic party based on those individuals inability to change? Maybe it does mean that... Maybe we should make sure we have a democrat that is white, because it's better at least than a republican that is white. I'm not saying he ONLY lost because he is black but he certainly lost to such a great degree because of these historical racial issues in WV.

You're missing something here, at least in my words. There's no question that Obama was always going to lose in this state because he is black.

The discussion moved to how we interact with history and experience, different folks describing the dualities they experienced in these areas and how that jibed with what they've studied later on.

Many of the posters were looking at the culture of the area in a manner beyond racism, while still explaining it in an historical perspective.


I understand what the discussion is about. My last comment probably ended up in the wrong spot and was more focused on my own reaction than the discussion going on around me. Today is the first day I realized I know absolutely nothing about WV and this post has been my first WV history lesson (thank you!!!). Given this history, it sickens me to listen to the MSM and Hillary talking about how Obama has failed to reach these voters. What chance does he have? Maybe, considering the historical racial tension, fear of the unfamiliar, deficiencies in education (all over the country), I should be less surprised at today's events and instead happily suprised at how well Obama has managed to do in spite of it all.

Yes, yes, the really remarkable thing is not how poorly he has done in one or two states but how very well he has done everywhere else! I've supported Obama from the very start, but I never thought he really had a realistic chance of winning the nomination or the presidency. What has happened in the last six months is amazing!

Gotta thank Akbar as all of us should for the wonderfully conceived and written post. Best post I've seen here.

And if we had no electoral college, and elected the president by simply counting the votes, treating each vote the same, and giving the White House to he or she with the most votes, we wouldn't have to worry about WV or the racist vote. All of the fear being spread about how a Dem can't win without WV (even though Al Gore did it), and how Obama can't win WV, ergo Obama can't win, would be moot without the EC. Obama's extra votes (i.e. the ones you don't get credit for in the electoral college because the minute you get that one vote that puts you over the top, you receive all of the electors and the extra votes you get, as well as ALL of the votes your opponent got, are basically thrown away) in California and NY would cancel out the racism of PA, WV, OH, and NC. Imagine that, the candidate with the most votes would simply win, and we would no longer be held hostage as a nation by four fucking states (MI, OH, PA, and FL).

Best thing about WV:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=DC8nDdPM_Qk

Seriously though: I grew up outside Pittsburgh, about 20 minutes from the WV border. It's a beautiful state, but it seems it's kind of gotten left behind. Not quite the South, not quite the North. I believe have the lowest education rates in the nation, as well as one of the lowest median incomes.

There's certain areas in that area (where I grew up), through Western PA, and WV, where coal and steel were king at one point. With those industries diminishing, certain areas have either had to really focus on revitalizing and bringing in new industries, or they start to drift into that ghost town feel. I don't know if you're familiar with Johnstown, PA, but it was a lively steel mill town back in the day. After the last flood, and the abandonment of the steel mill industry, it's just basically a dead town now. There's towns like that scattered all through Appalachia.

And then it becomes a self-perpetuating circle. The schools aren't great because the economy is not great, and because there's not a reliable pool of educated workers, new businesses don't choose that as their location, which keeps the local economy down, and so on and so forth.

The last flood? Do you mean 77?

Yep. You familiar with Johnstown?

I am. Born and raised in a small town outside of Johnstown (and if you're from the area, I'll tell you where, but otherwise, no one's ever heard of it). My mother was born in Conemaugh. Lots of the family worked in the mills. And I remember the last flood like it was yesterday.

No way! Yeah, what town? My parents were both born and raised there. Pretty much my entire family back to when they immigrated lived in Jtown or at least in Cambria Co.

My parents moved to Pittsburgh the year after the flood so I never lived there, but I was always fascinated by the town. My dad grew up in Moxham and my mom lived in Moxham and then on a farm in Davidsville.

You ever go back?

Excellent description of the region and my perception of it, as well. I don't think that the answer is how to strategically avoid inherent racism in areas like this when it's time to run a political race. I think the answer is how to revitalize these areas economically. They relied on old steel or coal industries, typically, and once those were gone, nothing took their place.

Great post. Having been caught in anti- time in Elkins, I vowed never to bring my wife into the state so that she wouldn't experienced the Mississippi-style racism.

The only "industry" left in Elkins is government supported health care. The home care "professionals" include former convicts who steal from the dying.

Did I mention that a college education in Elkins doesn't mean the the holder of the degree won't openly bring up the "Jewish question."


But the country is some of the most beautiful I've seen. The better natured folks, descended from old Anglo-Celtic stock, and singing variants of songs that reach back some four centuries (though they don't know it) --can offer blessings, till
the Jewish thing comes up.

Obama could come to West Virginia with Christ and only get a bump of two points in today's election.

I think you're dead on... if it weren't for Senator Byrd's bottomless barrel of pork, and government services in general, I don't know how WV would survive economically. If Obama campaigned with Jesus, a lot of people there would still think he is the Antichrist.

And, boy oh boy, the anti-Semitism is a whole other mess up in those mountains.

They do make some beautiful music, though.

down in that hollar, where i did dwell....

And the political machine, as you point out, makes Chicago seem tame.

It's easy for JFK's father to spread some dough and put the squeeze on it to swing that election. There is a particular family big in that realm. Even I wouldn't mention their names at this point, having a relative in Elkins.

I know, right! I have heard some hair-raising stories about political corruption in WV...

Very scary shit, my man. You don't ever want to get into a situation with the state cops if you're dealing with someone connected to that family. Even a health care worker abusing a relative. I'm going too far here.

Can't tell you how much it reminds of Mississippi. I think it's worse because there is no black population.

Again, great post. Thanks.


Great post. It is a very interesting history that you point out and that I have come across; specifically the animosity from wealthy slave and land owner versus individuals who were "forced" west. Do you know much or can you say anything about a population of people called Melungeons?


Wow... I was totally ignorant of these people. There is a somewhat similar story around Robeson County in eastern NC, where the Lumbee people are thought by some to be the descendants of Native Americans who mixed with the "Lost Colony" of European settlers. Over time there was some mixing with African Americans as well. I am told that there were once FOUR separate school systems in Lumberton: one white, one black, one Native American and one mixed-race. It just goes to show the preposterous extremes to which racism will go.

Related to the WV topic... Steve Hahn's "The Roots of Southern Populism" is a great study of poor white people in the hill country of Georgia and how they developed a political consciousness in the nineteenth century... well worth a look

http://books.google.com/books?id=_LyGBzIYbgoC&dq=hahn+roots+of+southern+populism&pg=PP1&ots=gmGSYvzqv7&sig=L9EWcKbyHTCBRZgXVicsXhcE8O8&hl=en&prev=http://www.google.com/search%3Fq%3Dhahn%2Broots%2Bof%2Bsouthern%2Bpopulism%26ie%3Dutf-8%26oe%3Dutf-8%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26client%3Dfirefox-a&sa=X&oi=print&ct=title&cad=one-book-with-thumbnail

I really only know this group of people because of my research in Virginia and North Carolina. There is a body of research by Paul Heinegg, called free African Americans of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Delaware and Maryland which traces the ancestry of individual families who who have (but aren't necessarily) surnames found among Melungeons. I believe surnames like Gibson and Collins extend all the way back to colonial America.

Some of the free people of color listed have pension files from the American Revolutionary War.

Fantastic link. Great project.

The forward written by historian Ira Berlin describes the nebulous history of colonial America with all it's permeations in legal, extra legal and social terms. Mr. Heinegg's impressive text is a narrative about the lesser known America. It is a vast collection of records left in the State Archives, County Courthouses and Historical Societies which report a different and complex colonial America. These records tell a much more accurate picture of our nation and country.

Can you mention even more specifically the scope of your research?

The names alone are useful in so many areas --some of those free blacks before the war came west. Were they free? Did they run from slavery? So many unknown stories. Thanks for link. It's quite useful for me at present.

First, thanks for the inquiry.

Can you mention even more specifically the scope of your research? I started out with the normal avenues of discovery when it comes to genealogy; census schedules, marriage records, death records and deeds.

A sundry of records led me to the 1850 Ohio Census where I found the family. I also found an 1886 obituary for my great great grandfather's father; later on, I found the obituary for his wife and an 1836 marriage record in Ohio. Most of the records pointed to Virginia's Albemarle County. I read many accounts of my surname possibly having connections with and to Melungeons. I tried to read every book I could get my hands on about Melungeons, people of color and colonial Virgina because of that obituary. I think it made me a better student of American history.

I started trying to look at the convoluted social history. One of the books(among others)I read was Notorious in the Neighborhood. It is amazing that narratives like Joshua D. Rothman is widely unknown. I had to find stories like Notorious in the Neighborhood to give me a glimpse of Virginia before 1800.

Records at the Albemarle County Historical Society and Charlottesville's courthouse say that my great great grandfather was there. These records include a census taken by the commissioner of said county in compliance with a Virginia state law to count all "free people of color." The sole purpose of this census was to provide the government of Virginia with a record and list of "free and colored people. With this census, these individuals were scheduled to be deported to Liberia. This was done under the auspices of the American Colonization Society.

The names alone are useful in so many areas --some of those free blacks before the war came west. Were they free?

My family were "free people of color." My family had a choice. Go to Liberia, go into slavery farther south or move to free soil like the Old Northwest Territory. My family showed up in Ohio.


Did they run from slavery? So many unknown stories. Thanks for link. It's quite useful for me
at present.

It think Virginia was about to outlaw slavery. There were economic reasons like the exhaustion of soil--tobacco is soil intensive-- which expedited the movement of people. I don't know under what specific circumstances my family left Virginia.

A have a picture of the brother of the person for whom I am named.

I knew nothing about this. So, if I read you correctly your folks were in Ohio by 1830. I'm looking for some possible theories for a freed man reaching the northwest just at that time. This could be one.

What kind of family material do you have besides the picture?

One of the great problems of tracing non-whites in this time are a absence of cemeteries where they would have been buried. At least the records. In the case of Native Americans, they just disappear.

Another problem I've found is the anonymous status assigned to blacks and Native Americans. One can find many marriage records in the northwest from, say 1850---something like John Odell married Mary (no last name) on ...... These "Marys" would have been Native American women.

I'm sure that the issue is even more clouded with any "mixed race" issues.

Quite intriguing.

I just ordered the Rothman book. Others that you think crucial?

I tried imagining this era with reading this list (not necessarily in order):

1)The Wolf By the Ears John Chester Miller
2)Foul Means Anthony S. Parent
3)Bound Away David Hackett Fischer and James C. Kelly
4)Slaves without Masters Ira Berlin
5)Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings
Annette Gordon-Reed
6)People's History of the United States
7)Albemarle, Jefferson's County, 1727-1976
John Hammond Moore
8)Afro-Virginian History and Culture
edited by John Saillant
9)One Drop of Blood, The American Misadventure of Race Scott L. Malcomson
10)Nat Turner, Slave Rebellion In History and Memory Kenneth S. Greenberg

I have Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia but haven't read it yet.

Thanks. Have read one and perused another but the others look really good.

I knew nothing about this. So, if I read you correctly your folks were in Ohio by 1830. I'm looking for some possible theories for a freed man reaching the northwest just at that time. This could be one.

The first record I have of them in Ohio is 1836. Within the past few months (I had been searching for a few years) I found them in 1840 Ohio Census. The obituary lead me to records in Virginia prior to 1833. I have one record where my ancestor appeared before a justice of the peace to swear he was he said he was. He appeared with men who I strongly believe are his uncle/cousins/brothers.

When I thought about how my ancestors made it to Ohio, I went looking for the activity of the Quakers (the Society of Friends) in the area. The Underground Railroad was very active in that part of Ohio. I don't know for sure if they were passengers on the Underground Railroad but the landed in the area. One thing for sure, the Society of Friends kept extensive marriage records.

What kind of family material do you have besides the picture?

After doing an exhaustive search on the Internet, I did some quick thinking and figured that a few of the males in my family were old enough to fight in the Civil War. I searched and searched and I finally hit pay dirt. Two. One lived and one died in Tennessee. After requesting and receiving the 96 page pension, of the one who lived, I went to Washington to visit the Memorial/Museum for African Americans in the Civil War. It was amazing to see his name among the Civil War Veterans. I am still working on the individual who fought in the American Revolutionary War. I found a relative of his who told me to join the Sons of American Revolution. She successfully joined the Daughters of American Revolution.

One of the great problems of tracing non-whites in this time are a absence of cemeteries where they would have been buried. At least the records. In the case of Native Americans, they just disappear.

This is very true. Fortunately I found the obituary of the Civil War Veteran which lead me to his grave. The headstone is plain and still barely standing. It is weather worn and engraved with military markings. I took a picture to treasure for the rest of my life.


Another problem I've found is the anonymous status assigned to blacks and Native Americans. One can find many marriage records in the northwest from, say 1850---something like John Odell married Mary (no last name) on ...... These "Marys" would have been Native American women.

The problem I had was is similar. I went to Salt Lake City to the great library of genealogy and found just that one record. It is just line 86. So-and-so married on this date in May 1836. I went to the county in which they lived and found it again. The 1836 document is/was rather plain. Some states kept better records than other states; for example the State Library of Virginia in Richmond has some incredible archives. I was able to view their rare collections and read descriptions of the people who shared my surname. Some were "negro" and some were "Indian." Sometimes the record described the persons color. My jaw dropped to see "negro" father and "Indian" child. As far as the marriage records, there is no way of knowing the parents of the bride; there is usually no maiden name unless it was written in someones bible or the state keep records like Virginia.

One of the other records for people of color were surety bonds. They had to swear to be the person standing before the law and that they would stay within a certain jurisdiction. Sometimes these records have more information than someone might think.

I'm sure that the issue is even more clouded with any "mixed race" issues.

Sometimes I think they really didn't know someone's "race." Each person had their own metric for measuring someone's "race." The census records sometimes depended on who they spoke with during the census interview. Maybe the neighbor didn't know the "race" of the person?

Quite intriguing.

I have more questions than I have answers even though I have eight years worth of records.

At the top of this, before the post head out:
(1) remember that you can access this string (not sure how long) through your profile so we can keep the conversation going -should you be interested.
(2) you cal ALWAYS contact me by e-mail at tcarpman@gmail.com,
not my real name, but the real me.
(3) Your research is especially interesting to me. Often when working on any project that delves into myriad aspects of culture, it is impossible to read fully in ancillary but important aspects of the subject.
(4) A may be able to help you put some of your information into some wider historical framework as this is one of things I do professionally.
(5) Any contributions to my project would be duly noted in print.

The Negro/Indian records make sense, as does your thoughts about how people identified the classification. Depending upon the region, these were identifications tried to forget and hide in many cases, ironically now, such peeling back of history seems essential to understanding lineage personally and in the greater realm of history, though I would suggest most emphatically that an individual sense of self relies profoundly on the greater historical and cultural context.

We can't know many of the details. In my case, my mother's people are easily traced to well known names as far back as the early 1600's, and additionally through Scottish names which now that side of the family explores in Scotland. My father's people left Russian during the pogroms at the outset of the 20th century. Jewish records were most often destroyed and it becomes impossible to find the certain village. This has been a real problem for memoirs and family histories for Jews after the holocaust. In this respect I highly recommend the work of Helen Epstein, an author who welcomes inquiries at her site. But read one of her books first.

If you are planning to write something on your quest (it would make a fine book, and perhaps you are, please let me know that also. I would encourage you and help you in any way that I can.

When placing personal history into a cultural context when a lot of that history has vanished, one turns to informed assumptions.

You have plenty. You are tracking down every lead. Impressive and fascinating. A deep thanks to you for taking the time to answer my inquiries.

On race identification, as you point out, the variety is all over the place though one can follow some of it directly within very recent memory.

In certain place in the South, certain Mestizos would be classified as whites due to straight hair, a characteristic of Native Indian Blood. The wide range of racial "categories" among Hispanics is impossible to decode.

I think of one issue in which a Jewish Argentine whose lineage was European claimed to be a "person of color" because he/she spoke
Spanish.

This kind of thing is political correctness gone a bit mad in my opinion. I asked a very political person about the nature of the classifications. I inquired about Jews. And I asked if I counted as
a person of color. The answer was pure Stalinist. "That depends upon what political beliefs you hold." A professor of ethnic studies said that. What a jerk.

I'm classified as white which seems about right to me. I can remember being told that I was from another "race" in the 60's.

This all points to the confusion and instability about the perception of race. It can't be solved by political rhetoric. No chance. It can be enlightened by historians and by examples of its inaccuracies --Tiger Woods and Barack Obama, are two.

Race classification in Hawaii is fascinating. Not enough is written on it. There's a movement before the UN by the descendants of orginal inhabitants to recover independence stolen very clearly in an illegal overthrow of a legal country more than a century ago.

Relating any specific study or quest --such as yours -- is enlightened deeply through comparisons throughout culture and history.

Finally, if you are writing a book, please forgive any indication that I might be talking down to you in any way as a scholar or writer since you seem plenty good at it, and in the writing area quite accomplished compared with the lowly Blue Guy.

When I found the obituary which said my great great grandfather's father was from Albemarle County, I immediately planned at trip to Charlottesville. I was mostly intrigued because I knew this to be the home of Thomas Jefferson. Even though Monticello isn't directly in Charlottesville, I made a visit to Jefferson's house on the hill. I made the trip and it was so exciting to be in Thomas Jefferson's home. What a view of the University of Virginia.

Still the main reason I was in Charlottesville was to use the Albemarle Historical Soceity's library. I also made a trip to the University of Virginia's library. When I went in and told the librarian at the historical society my surname she knew it. She went directly to the vertical file and pulled out articles on the people who share my last name. Some of information of the people in the file were caucasians which didn't upset me. She also pulled out an amazing article about a historic foundation in Charlottesville trying to save a house built by an African American circa 1840. The shocking part of this tidbit was that he and I share first and surnames. I almost fell out of my seat. I most certainly made a copy of the article.

Without missing a beat, the librarian introduced me to The Magazine of Albemarle County History. She opened the well bound magazine to page 114. The name of the article: A Just and True Account: Two 1833 Parish Censuses of Albemarle County Free Blacks by Ervin L. Jordan, Jr. The article written in 1995 explores the names of families caught up in the attempt to record their names for deportation to Liberia. Mr. Jordan says, "these censuses are in several more detailed than the federal census of 1830." I believe some of the format from that census of people of color is the bases for all the censuses that followed. It really shows up in the 1850 Federal Census.

Mr. Jordan takes on several angles of life for the people enumerated. He talks about the men who served in the American Revolutionary War. Men, black men, men of color, who served in the Navy and Infantry respectfully. Mr. Jordon describes the kind of jobs African Americans had in Albemarle; for example some were employed in coopering, shoemaking, weaving, farmer, blacksmith or seamstress just to name a few. The census also includes how much land they owned, the number of people in their house hold, and their age. As I remember the 1830 and 1840 Federal Census, most of this information doesn't exist in those documents.

RememberNotorious in the Neighborhood by Joshua Rothman. In the review the reviewer mentions David Issacs and Nancy West. I believe David Issacs is Jewish? Nancy his wife is a person of color. They live in separate houses in Charlottesville due to the laws of marriage(it is not so bizarre that Loving case was in Virginia). Nancy West shows up in the 1833 census examined by Mr. Jordan and he writes about her and her husband. Notorious in the Neighborhoodis a more detailed account of their marriage. This story is worth the read alone.

Well Mr. Jordan's is well worth reading as well because the people listed are somehow related to me. I just haven't figured the familial connection just yet (it is slow process). When I was tirelessly going through this magnificent article and document there was a family that stood out. Sally Hemings and her children were listed among the people enumerated in this special census. I closely noted the age of Madison Hemings because he is same age as my great great great grandfather. I am far from saying I am related to Sally Hemings but I thought it was nonetheless interesting.

What is also interesting is the sheer number of family members in this document and article who share my surname. Mr. Jordan's body of work includes the person who served in the American Revolutionary War. I made contact with his descendant and again she told me to make an application for the Sons of the American Revolution.

Right now I am working between discovering records in Virginia and Ohio. So many records and so little time. I hope make another trip to Richmond and Charlottesville.

What I tried to do after learning about my family in Albemale County was to read books like Negro President by Gary Wills, Thomas Jefferson by Christopher Hitchens, Founding Brothers by Joseph Ellis and Ron Chernow's Alexander Hamilton . I thought reading these political books would shed light on some aspect of the social life during colonial America. Sometimes it is very revealing. For example, I am re-reading Gary Wills' Negro President and last night, I came across the details of the three-fifths clause in the Constitution. Though this clause does not specifically deal with "free people of color" it says something about the "racial" attitudes of the time. Furthermore, the absence of mention of "free people of color" is more interesting because it makes it seem like they don't exist.

I find Jefferson's attitude toward Haiti very intriguing. After reading Hitchens and Wills, it seems like Jefferson or the people he represented--Southern plantation owners--couldn't fathom a free and sovereign black nation state so close to the shores of the United States. It upset the social order in the their minds and possibly could lead to disorder on their plantations. When I read books like these I wonder about our current relationship with Haiti.

THANK YOU! Amazing information. Melungeon. It reminds me of Turducken. I realize one is way more serious than the other, but if food is combined, but compartmentalized, you can imagine how it would extent to people. Turducken - a chicken, indside a duck, unside a turkey, all boned and sliced like a roast. I wonder about the language origins, or colloquial references for the word, Melungeon.

They had the same thing in Hancock County Tennessee. Now that the genealogy stuff is on the web 70% of white southerners claim some mixed race descent.

I've been to West Virginia number of times, about 80 miles away as the crow flies, and Eastern Kentucky a lot more. You Obamabots are just dead wrong about the racism there. Blacks and whites freely congregate and socialize in ways that you would never see in many Northern cities. Nobody thinks anything about interracial couples.

And I've been to places urbanites would never go. My brother and I (both of us are in interracial marriages) went to the Opry House (off 64 between Huntington and Morgantown) with our wives and no one said a thing or gave us a strange look.

When I was PhD student another student (white northerner) and I drove through Southern Georgia to attend an academic conference in Savannah. We saw a barbeque joint, a real one with a pit blowing grey smoke in the yard, and I did a quick 360 and pulled into the parking lot.

I swear to God. The guy was scared to get out of the car. Eventually, I coaxed him in and we ate some great smoked pork with incident. Afterwards, my buddy said, "Thanks, that was great. I never in a million years would go in a place like that if you weren't with me."

Can you believe that? A 6' 200+ pound guy afraid to eat in a barbeque restaurant because of those scary small town southerners.

A lot of the Obamabots on this site remind me of him. Stop insulting WV and Kentucky because they don't vote for your candidate.

You've been there so you know more than the people who were born and raised there. Right.

The better natured folks, descended from old Anglo-Celtic stock, and singing variants of songs that reach back some four centuries (though they don't know it) ...

Condescend much?

Sorry. I didn't mean that as a criticism.

If you read about the passing of folks songs through generations in any country or culture, it's always the case that the singers don't know the history of the songs beyond their family traditions.

When they become aware, as in the case of the famous singer Jean Ritchie, they change, influenced by scholars or record producers,

This is the delineation for scholars for identifying what is real folk material. But the last several decades has destroyed most of that tradition through media. The new generations everywhere watch Real World and listen to Hip-Hop.

A great purity in the human fabric has been lost.

Having said that, if I ran into some KKK woodsmen with a gun looking to hurt me or mine, I'd put a fucking bullet in his head.

Additionally, folk music was a form of education back in the day. West Virginia is ranked in the top 5 of states in which students know various folk songs. Unfortunately, it's become "hillbilly music" and as such gets degraded in popular culture. From an anthropological standpoint, culture has forced a negative view of West Virginia. Hillbilly. Redneck. Evokes images of toothless people living in trailer parks. Or worse, scenes from Deliverance. As a result, I think it's created kind of an insider-outsider mentality in those areas.

The area I grew up in is much like that. A rural turned suburbia area, now most of the people from my hometown commute to Pittsburgh, since it managed to make the transition from being an all-steel down, but it used to be a rural mining area. I used to think my elementary school was being held together by rulers. Really, it was just measuring the rate of mine subsidence. But anyway, although the economy of my hometown is now a lot different, culturally, it's much like West Virginia. Identity is forged through faith, and self-reliance, and strong familial ties. And extremely strong ties and pride in the place in which you live. The mountains, the rivers. Ties to nature and all that. We hunt, fish, hike, camp. We think the mountains are the most beautiful area in the nation. So there's all that pride in the land from which you are born, but the rest of the country looks down on you. Call you a redneck. Says you're married to your sister. Thinks you have no "culture".

It ends up breeding distrust. Distrust of outsiders, of government. And most people that perpetuate those stereotypes have likely never set foot in West Virginia. They get forged through a series of cult films and the like. And I think it's that distrust that's at the root of a lot of the prejudice that exists. Fear and distrust of the outsider.

I didn’t know that about the top states where students know folk songs. Speaks to the to deep river of the oral tradition, especially the Celtic for me in which so many branches are rich with songs, tales and poets. All part of the same thing anyway. Most ballads are stories, often variants of world mythic themes. A great wonder when carried back through time to find ancestors melodically, structurally or, dealing with the story/myth itself, its local nuances of the mega-story, the deep structure as a structural anthropologist would state.

Can you point me to the other states?

The insider/outsider mentality is perfect. There have been some attempts to show something more nuanced, the movie “Song Catchers” for one, though that might have placed in Kentucky. A mostly laborious piece of cinema, it does capture some of the insider/outsider confrontation at many levels.

Mining all through the areas you mention was the battleground for some of the greatest strikes in American history, the strikers adapting the old tunes to union songs, or in some spontaneous utterance of convergence, we heard some new songs come from singers of that tradition—most famously “Which Side Are You On.”

These songs went south with SNCC and CORE into the battles of the 60’s.

As you start to discuss, the deep understanding of a culture begins by not judging it, whether it be the mountain folk in West Virginia or the Ainu folk in Japan.

And, as you point out, explaining the difference between the two uses of "culture" is difficult. I’d like to have a say on your lower post in about an hour.

Five states you say? Kentucky, surely. Hispanic songs near Mexico?

Just learned it myself. Stumbled across while doing some research for a paper on Western PA.

It's a dissertation on teaching folk music - I haven't read all of it but it's pretty interesting, and includes a lot of interesting background on the subject. The tables that show the rankings are towards the end, near pg. 136 (it's a PDF, by the way.) It ranks children's songs, folk songs, and patriotic songs. Kentucky does very poorly on folk songs. Ironically, the so-called "cultural meccas" of NY and California don't do so great either.

But WV is top 5 for all three categories.
http://www.neflin.org/marilyn/Marilyn%20Ward%20Dissertation.pdf

I'm in and out today, but your comments about the strikes got me thinking about something else. I'll post it later once my thoughts congeal...

Correction: Native Americans do not outnumber Asian Americans in WV. I misread the statistic. They're both slightly more than half of one percent, though.

A bigger number of Native Americans found in Mississippi. You may have looked, but if you examine a map that shows reservations in the states, you get the picture.

As sad aside on that, but related to your topic. When three civil rights workers were killed in Mississippi in 1964, their car was found on a reservation.

That would be Neshoba county. They were killed by KKK and cops from Philadelphia Miss. When that the "great communicator" Ronald Reagan announced his presidential run from that very town, a mall town, it was a purposeful announcement about race and politics as was noticed by some at the time.

The problem with history today (as something understood by most of the public) is that few know it other beyond test questions --sort of spread-sheet approach to the human condition.

A nice thing about the Obama campaign is that young people feel they are part of history. And in that participation, some may read history again beyond some easy test question like "How Did MLK's Speech ..... blah, blah...

sorry, I wrote "mall town" instead of "small town." There probably is a mall there today.

Bizarrely, as least in my stepsister's school, they're not using this election as a time to teach. They're not even talking about. Talk about a missed opportunity.

But about history - I think the biggest problem with history education, and the reason why so many are lacking in historical knowledge, is that it's taught in the worst possible way.

I speak from experience here. After I graduated college, with a liberal arts degree, I had taken exactly one history class, which was something about the civil war. Don't remember exactly, b/c I took it freshman year which was mostly spent outside of class and in parties.

I probably would have failed a 5th grade history test, my historical knowledge was so lousy. Why? Because everything I had learned had been taught and reinforced without any attempt at creating understanding. Literally, my tests all throughout elementary and secondary school were questions like, "What was the date of the Battle of Gettysburg?"

Dates. Places. Names. No understanding. No discussion. So it stayed in my head long enough for me to fill in the little bubble on the Scantron and then, poof! Gone. It wasn't till after I graduated college that I got interested in it on my own. Being able to choose my own books, resources, and methods let me actually learn something. There's a shift away from the dates-only style of teaching, but in social studies and history, it's lagging the most. Methods for teaching history are the least focused on now, and it's an awful development.

The issues you present about learning and teaching history, whatever the area--art or music, American or European, by example -- is that they are intertwined. But as presented in the academic sphere, especially in text books, the mode and material is
“discipline-specific.” Culture is not a construct of different disciplines. While snapshots of its dynamic nature can be brilliant, and there are some disciplines that are more open-ended than others in scope and methodology, the slices are too thin.

Take music history. Forty years back, an author of a standard text that covered Classical Music had to deal with music from about 1600-1950. But history keeps piling up, and every twenty five years, a music historian has to add new material, and even a new era.

At the same time, historians and musicians are now working in the period 1200-1600.
For a comprehensive text, history is getting longer at both ends, so to speak.

Add to this the emergence of ethnomusicology –technically in the anthro area in the 80’s, and jazz, folk and rock history.

A text can only sustain so many topics. Especially when its mode is basically an accumulation of facts, picked from a greater reality that the writer knows (or should) but not presented in the text. Put another way, the author knows how the facts are connected (sometimes) but doesn’t tell the reader how.

More history to teach. More facts. More pages. A kind of interaction that hit self-destruction long ago. The only to get through it was to start leaving more context and discussions out. Only the facts remain on a skeleton, and this is the offereing. Of course in terms of the reader, some are fat and need not eat. Some are hungry and the cracking bones seem mighty

Attempts to create more dynamic structures in the 80’s were widely praised but did not succeed in the market place. Well, not entirely, but mostly.

Take our present topic, West Virginia, local culture and folk songs. What’s important? Should we take a mountain song and trace if back to the Renaissance?
Should we follow its journey elsewhere? Wouldn’t the song’s movement between folk and aristocratic styles in 1600 be of special interest to us today, as we gently prod the nature of class and what is “cultivated. ” And we can play the song for students in its historical history. We can play the Anglo-Celtic song and follow with its West Virginia version.

And what of that song’s more recent journeys? One way went to Allison Krauss. Another way went to Hee Haw. And another way went south, crossing from poor whites to blacks in the civil rights movement (with altered lyrics). Wouldn’t that be interesting today?

Indeed, it’s the slicing up of culture into constructs that no longer can us anything really important of what matters to us that is counterproductive to a richer understanding of history. Following a song along some purposeful path of history brings me to one a understanding of what happens today. Both factually and poetically.

OMG is crap-speak on the net. PHD can be crap-speak for history, in the spectacles of academic myopia.

not read for typos, sorry

Some quick corrections in a few place. Sorry. Not going to correct everything. SHould have give it a read.


"The issues you present about learning and teaching history, whatever the area--art or music, American or European, by example -- are intertwined."


"Some are hungry and the cracking bones seem mighty barren of meat."


user-pic

I have been reading your thread about music and culture with Hilarym99, and I must say I am getting some good stuff out of it via your dialog.

Glad to know that it's not a side show. Chime in anytime.

it's OK, we know you head thinks faster than your fingers...

OMG.

Just kidding. You're absolutely right. Curriculum that is subject-specific is failing us.

However, don't despair. We don't have to resign ourselves to the skeleton. Teachers programs now are really pushing towards integrated curriculums, integrated teaching styles. Teaching that brings in all the realms of learning. At this point, the biggest focus is on linking literacy to the other subjects, but it's starting to move towards a teaching method that incorporates all the subjects into one, because they are so intertwined. (I'm in grad school now for teaching - I can't speak for every teachers school, but that's what we're doing.)

Additionally, schools are going to need to start giving students more say in their education. That way, the teachers won't have to decide which direction learning will go. Rather than teaching from top down, it's more like pushing them towards learning from the bottom up. So if we were doing folk music, the teacher wouldn't have to pick which of the directions you mentioned above we would go. The students would do so individually. And then we'd all get back together for a discussion, and they can learn from each other.

Now, the problem is that the system is behind. Curriculums are improving but the problem is that they are still improving within the old frame of doing things. What we really need to do is something closer to starting from scratch and rebuilding our educational model.

The other thing is, with history, is that in the past at least, it was never taught in a way that created connections with the students. I know I was bored by it back then. What actually got me interested in history was when I got interested in genealogy. Once I figured out who I was related to that fought in the Civil War, the Revolutionary War, I wanted to learn more about what life was like in those times. Teachers need to focus on creating motivation for learning. A connection to it. Not just something that needs to be done to pass the test. But a reason they want to know. Keep the curiosity alive, rather than beating it to death through endless quizzes and tests.

If you want to get the most out of history, write a book. You can write. You can think with nuance. Best way to figure the real stuff out.

I've spent a minimum of 15 hours a week this year tutoring my son through AP US History. They speed through it so fast, that he was absorbing exactly ZERO, based on what he was getting in class. I had to step in to slow it down for him, organize the information, and help him actually draw some meaning out of it.

This push to get kids into accelerated coursework is doing nothing to help them to actually learn.

Yeah. It's a shame. We'd do the kids better if we moved slower, even if it risked not making to it 1878 or whatever arbitrary year you're supposed to get to by the end of the school year. And if we had integrated curriculums, he could learn history through other ways too, like literature of the era, music and art of the era. Give them lots of different avenues to learning the material.

Checked out the study on folk songs. I may have missed some of it, but I think the chart indicates the number of folk songs taught in schools today rather than the number of folk songs students know when arriving at school. Still of interest though. I'm sure readers would welcome any expansion of your research if you have the notion to share it. I would.

Lovely post, Akbar. I have a fondness for this State, as well. Spent my freshman year of college at WVU - well, spent most of it hiking around, caving, partying in the woods...and then went home to actually attend college. But, I loved this State - it's natural beauty left an indelible impression on me.

It is strikingly beautiful. One of the most in the nation, in my opinion.

Best part of partying at WVU: 1 AM renditions of John Denver's Country Roads. :)

Ah yes, best part of partying at WVU...there are so many, and they were coming back to me quite a bit yesterday.

One of my faves was skinny dipping in the Cheat River on Saturday afternoons!

Some of us old coots left that country to head west. We'd killed off enough Indians, won that fight, and still wanted more.

We were the first trappers into the Northwest. In the early days we made friends with the Indians, often marrying into a tribe. Then we lead wagon trains to the west, and fought in wars to obliterate Native American people and their cultures. We did that pretty damn well.

Robert Redford got to play me before he realized that scalping
Indians wasn't going to help him at Sundance.

But some us were interesting people --killers, but interesting.

It's refreshing to see so little prejudice on this thread. Let's see: WV people bad, but not their fault. Obama black young upper middle class good guy. Hillary not always PC so bad girl.

Of course if Barak wins big in NC there's no need to mention his skin color. If Hillary wins WV it's because of bigotry.

What world it is on TPM.

And let's not forget the obligatory appearnce of a Hillary supporter to indulge in grotestque reductionism that somehow ends up leading ineluctably to the conclusion that Hillary is a victim.

I really did not wish to demonize my fellow West Virginians in this post, but I can understand how it would come across that way. Not everyone in WV is a racist by any means, and there are many people who will choose Clinton over Obama on the basis of the issues. However, I do think that there is more than just a correlation between this being one of the whitest states in the Union and there being such a huge gap between Clinton and Obama in the polls. Do you not think that racism or xenophobia might be a factor here?

I know there are differing views on this, but I consider it very doubtful that Clinton would win the state in the general, no matter how big her margin is today. To the many West Virginians who have drifted into the Republican fold over the years, she is still the face of gun control, gay rights and feminism.

Well, for the record, I didn't take it that way at all. As I said above, I'm from south of Pittsburgh, just over the border from WV. Classic rust belt/appalachia area. That part of southwestern PA has much more in common economically and culturally with WV than it does with the eastern part of PA.

I think we all recognize that generalizations are a dangerous thing and that this post wasn't meant to generalize all West Virginians as racists. But racial relations differ in various parts of the country, and I don't think talking about them here is a bad thing, in any way.

I wasn't directing my comment at anyone in particular. I feel that prejudice is an animal response to the unfamiliar. It has been incredibly destructive in human history and at the same time it is unlikely that we would be here to click away at our keyboards if it didn't exist.

To pretend that we as individuals are without prejudice is unrealistic. Naturally we all have different prejudices because we are all have a different set of perceptions and experiences. To behave in an unprejudiced way in our world is difficult and admirable and it needs to be taught.

On TPM and in the media in general, racial, ethnic, religious, cultural, age, class prejudice is bandied about as though it is in others and that our intellects have somehow freed us from it. We all see it most clearly in people that we disagree with. That's why I see this thread (not Akbars's analysis) as what others would call hypocritical. I just see it as people revealing their prejudices in public.

user-pic
"I wasn't directing my comment at anyone in particular. I feel that prejudice is an animal response to the unfamiliar."

WHich is basically what this post and much of the commentary are discussing. How the history and the outsider/insider aspects of human nature, particularly in more isolated settings over time manifest and amplify those traits, which are in turn reflected in political attitudes and voting patterns.

Obviously people can only understand things from the perspective they have gained through experience, education and information saturation. But, is it not possible to have enough other positions on TMP to open a few minds to a perception they have not previously experienced? If it had no value, why would you be here? Or, is this your attempt to widen someone else's framing of perception?

So what exactly is your criticism? You say that it's unrealistic to say that individuals aren't prejudiced, but then it's hypocrisy to reveal these prejudices? And what of your own?

Who is outside, who is inside?

Yep. That's about the size of it. As I'm sure you know, Akbar, East Kentucky (where my roots are) is barely distinguishable from West Virginia except that the unmined parts of West Virginia are a bit prettier. The cultural and economic dynamic that caused mountaineers to hate both slaveowners and slaves alike is alive and well in the mountains of Kentucky, West Virginia, North Carolina and Tennessee and we're seeing it play out in this election.

Akbar didn't mention to y'all that there's a real taboo about talking about our problems, or in any way running down our culture, in front of "outsiders" so I know it was a little hard for him to write this. And I dare say that if somebody who wasn't from there said this about us, we'd both have our backs up abuout it. Few things piss off a mountaineer worse than being studied by sociologists from the lowlands.

But, hey, while we're airing the laundry, let's not forget the horrendous schools caused by the equally horrendous tax bases, and the virulent anti-intellectualism that seems to be such a uniquely American attitude among the poor, both rural and urban.

The hard fact is that Appalachia is the whitest region left in a rapidly browning country, is rapidly aging and is becoming progressively less educated as people like Akbar and trickle away to places like North Carolina. Been going on for decades but the process has been accelerating like glacial melting as environmental standards shut down the high-sulfer coal mines and the continuous miner and mountain top removal wiped out jobs in the low-sulfter coal mines. The end result is a UMWA that's a shadow of its former self, lot of unemployment.

The idea that this makes them some sort of bellweather for the nation would be horrifying if it wasn't so facially ridiculous.

Oh my goodness, you are right and right. I've spent my life rebutting slanderous attacks on West Virginia, while secretly lamenting the parts of what people said that were true. I did feel a bit guilty for downing the Mountain State in public here, but certain things need to be said to be understood.

The other really, really salient thing you've touched on is the idea of a "bellwether." WV is the farthest thing from any leading indicator of what's going on in America; the same can be said for western PA, despite so much blather about hardy, white working-class folks constituting the "real" America. I think part of the anxiety does have to do with the feeling of being a potential minority in a brown America. Hell, Pat Buchanan sends out e-mails through Human Events that trumpet the dangers of a shrinking white population. Incidentally, Buchanan is very popular in my extended family, and my aunt and uncle in southern Indiana gave immigration as their #1 reason not to vote for Obama. Does this also mean they won't vote for McCain because of his stance on the issue? I hope so!

I once asked my mom why so many West Virginians had moved to NC. (We had followed the lead of my other aunt and uncle, who left Charleston for Gastonia in the mid-80s.) She said, "It's about as far as you can get from Charleston on a tank of gas."

Knew a gay fellow who tried to open a bed-and-breakfast in WV. Got death threats. Vowed to stay. I'm going to track that fellow down. See if he made it.

Friend of mine's brother does radio in Kentucky. A liberal. His house has been burned down twice. He stays.

Can you give a bit more on the story?

"The hard fact is that Appalachia is the whitest region left in a rapidly browning country, is rapidly aging and is becoming progressively less educated as people like Akbar and trickle away to places like North Carolina"

Kind of sums it up, doesn't it.

Meant to say "Akbar and I" of course.

Tough to think of the UMWA in the present day as you suggest, considering the momentous role it played in American history. Too sad, even for the blue guy.

Hillary will win WV big tonight. And like every other state that Hillary wins, she'll designate it as THE state you have to win to get to the White House.

Her campaign and the media exaggerate things so much, it's hard to recognize the truth.

Is it a fact that "white hard working Americans" won't vote for Obama even if he's the nominee?

No.

But since Hillary has already pledged to campaign her heart out for Obama should he win the primary, I look forward to seeing her go right back to WV and prove it.

user-pic

Akbar,

Added thanks from an adopted daughter of Kentucky for a gentle and lucid explanation of what's happening in the hills.

From years of slowly making friends in the eastern part of the state, I'd add that I think there's a systematic wariness of strangers.

A justified wariness, given the way folks from other places have been known to cheat and exploit both the people and the land.

And a wariness that lasts longer because of the educational barriers and, until recently, the substantial difficulties of communication and travel.

And a wariness that may be getting more concentrated as the folks with options and confidence move away to escape the economic depression that gets deeper year by year, and the local community becomes more and more those who could not find a a way to leave.

The wariness is, I think, not mainly about race.

It's about anyone from elsewhere, and about whether one count on respect from strangers who seem to have had some type of social advantage. An Anglo-Saxon with Obama's resume and rhetoric would also have a problem--not as big a problem, but a serious one all the same.

Building trust takes more work than in other places, because people have been burned so often. Sadly, Obama does not have that time this month.

More happily, he's going to have eight years to work on it from the Oval Office.


Absolutely. I think that's one of the reasons Clinton is doing so well in this area. She's a known quantity. For the most part, what you see is what you get. They trust her because they know her, and know Bill, and have for a long time. While there may be things you don't like, or don't agree with, she's not an unknown by any stretch of the imagination.

Hey Sporcupine... thank you for this warm response. I hesitated to weigh in on matters of education or attitudes, such as the suspicion of outsiders, because those factors are somewhat harder to nail down, but I think you're spot-on with these observations. The outside world has screwed WV so many times that you can't blame people for being cautious. It's the idea we've heard so many times recently, about people in the hard-hit heartland balking at the slogan of "change" because change has been nothing but trouble for them. And, like you said, the state has been bleeding population for years, as the poor and working-class go out in search of any kind of employment and the more privileged escape to brighter prospects elsewhere. The West Virginia of old was more populous, more prosperous, more unionized than the West Virginia that is voting today.

I think you're right that any plucky young leader would face resistance compared to the proven leadership of the Clintons, though Obama brings with him the huge disadvantages of blackness and foreignness.

I've seen several old union halls, abandoned, with broken windows. It's sad.

A great, poetic diary. This passage reminds me so much of the end of Season 2 of The Wire. Different state - same result.

The supreme irony is the unwavering support for the same corporate Republicans who have methodically and cold-bloodedly broken the back of West Virginia.

Beautifully written. Very powerful. But very Obama-centric in attitude. You seem to say that prejudice is the answer. Your argument leaves no room for other answers. You don't leave room for any positive reason for the people of W. Virginia to support Hillary. And you don't leave room for any culpability on Obama's part.

Had Obama not found his black identity under the sponsorship of Jeremiah Wright and black liberation theology - had Michelle not made her "proud" comment - had he not accused Hillary of belittling MLK - had he not defended himself by pointing out his grandmother's racism - had he not called her a typical white person - had Wright not prayed with Obama immediately before Obama announced his candidacy - had Wright not been a member of the Obama campaign's religious advisory council until the video clips hit the airwaves - had Obama not insisted that it was impossible for him to disavow Wright - had Obama not reversed himself under political pressure - had his supporters and surrogates never cried "racism" - had he not made the "cling to faith and guns out of bitterness" remarks about small-town Americans - had he never appeared judgmental and condescending - had he never appeared elitist - had he not looked so out of place in that bowling alley - had he not left an almost uneaten waffle on his plate - had he not appeared to live in a very different world from those people in W. Virginia - you seem to be saying that it would have made no difference because they would only see the color of his skin and vote against him anyway. That's where you are wrong.

Thanks for taking the post seriously and offering a needed counterpoint. No doubt, gaffes like "bitter" and Michelle's "really proud" remark have worsened his chances in WV, and the Jeremiah Wright thing has to have finished off any consideration many white West Virginians were giving to him. Obama's race, his "foreign" name, his radical friends -- all of it adds up, for sure.

But I think your comment also points to the central issue here, which is whether certain voters could see past his race at all. I know there are people in WV who made up their minds about him before they knew any of the good or bad things, such as the problems you listed. When my grandparents' pastor demanded to know who I was voting for, and I told him, he assured me that, "Barack Obama is straight from the pits of hell!" Everyone around us nodded in agreement. He would tell you it's based on Bible prophecy, but I think we can make a safe guess as to what this perception was really based on.

In other words, can we agree that racism is a factor, if not, as I might have implied, the only factor? And what do you think the result of this contest could have been if Obama had not made any of the mistakes you have listed? Do you really think he would have had a shot at winning WV, or just would have lost by significantly less than 20-30 percent?

It's been said before, but it bears repeating: just because people sometimes cry "Racism!" when it is neither accurate nor appropriate does not mean that racism should be ruled out as a factor in other cases.

By the way, I just wanted to add that I'm glad folks like you who are not Obamamaniacs have stuck around this site. I know many have left and probably won't come back. It's good that there are still some, though, who can offer an alternative viewpoint, because we do need someone to call us on our bullshit now and then.

Also: if Obama manages to lose by less than expected tonight, I'm going to feel pretty dumb for making all these generalizations.

"I keep telling people, no Democrat has won the White House since 1916 without winning West Virginia."

user-pic

Though we have lost numerous times with it.

So you're resigned to losing this time, with, or without West Virginia.

user-pic

http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/clinton_wins_wv.php

"What's even more interesting is that no Democrat has won the White House without carrying Minnesota since 1912 ... so given that Obama won Minnesota and Clinton won West Virginia, McCain is guaranteed to win the general election unless the eventual nominee can somehow completely replicate the social and political conditions prevailing in pre-WWI America. The outlook, in short, is very grim."

Bahahaha ...

user-pic

No. I am saying we can win without WV, though we should try in all 59 states.

No Democrat has won the White House without winning Washington, D.C."

Rec'd, both the post and the discussion. Thank you for opening up and spending the time and the effort typing to make aliens like myself understand your fascinating world.

What a learning experience has this extended primary season become. As an foreigner who has lived in big multicultural states, the tour of the forgotten parts of the US has been fascinating.

AMEN... I think Kos said something to this effect on his site, about how he has learned so much about counties, towns, cities, voting districts, demographics and so on through this amazing democratic process. It has been unbelievably frustrating at times, but I agree that there has been a lot gained in terms of knowledge.

I just visited Canada for the first time this weekend, and I spoke with several Canadians and Europeans who expressed astonishment that Americans choose their leader through this labyrinthine, two-year process; in contrast, a British election lasts about five weeks from start to finish.

Wow! As a WV native (Fairmont), I am so glad to stumble upon a thoughtful discussion of WV, considering all of the crapping on the state I have encountered in various blog postings and comments lately. Thank you Akbar, Cypher, et al.

I too now live in NC - came here in my mid-20s with my soon-to-be wife, looking for work.

Maybe because of all the time I spent wandering in the hills and beside the streams, first in magic childhood, later with occasional psychedelic inspiration - no place I have ever been has shown me the kind of mystical beauty I found and felt in WV.

I certainly relate to what you said re: WV and NC state mottos. I have said for many years that the unofficial WV motto is "Leave me the fuck alone!" Unfortunately, if you keep repeating it, eventually there's no one left but you. I have faith that mountaineers are realizing that, in their own good time.

You are in tune with what Hillary has written about above. Within the arms of its rich tradition you could experience such joy. What is so difficult about the human condition is that wouldn't have applied to me.

When these complicated issues are reduced to the banalities of power politics, the differences sharpen to cut. Too bad.

Man, the fishing up those streams is great.

That reminds me of a fishing trip with my former uncle, hiking and camping on a creek flowing into the South Branch*. "Light My Fire" was the big hit on the radio, but when we parked the car on a dirt road and hoofed it across that railroad bridge into the wilderness, the sounds were nothing but primeval.

*FYI for the WV-naive: That's the South Branch of the Potomac River, way up in the hills, far from DC.

I'm not sure on the map, but driving from Elkins to Washington D.C. took me up into some of the most beautiful mountainous areas I'd ever seen, just as you say, a primeval sense. I'm hard pressed to think of another area in the east to match it. Perhaps part of the magic is they aren't big mountains by comparison to the west, which somehow makes the valleys so lovely and enclosed.

Bush carried WV by pretty decent margins. This state may have been part of Roosevelt's coalition when unions were strong, but they aren't any more. The Clinton's did little to help unions when they were in power. It has only gotten worse with Bush. Before we can bring WV and the rest of Appalachia back into the Democratic fold, we need to reinvigorate the labor laws and let people organize. WV will vote for McCain no matter whom we nominate.

I agree wholeheartedly. I think the biggest thing that has been overlooked in the media discussion of WV is how the decimation of industry and unions has crippled the progressive movement there. Reagan/Bush's war on labor really started to pay political dividends in the 2000 election...

user-pic

We have some lovely memories of camping and driving in WV. Wow, what winding roads! People were kind. But then we were campers, so I suppose we didn't stick out as effete snobs. (which we aren't)

Thanks for your great post! Very educational.

user-pic

Akbar, thank you. Your analysis and the responses it elicited helped me understand to some degree where West Virginian's are coming from with this overwhelming support for Hillary Clinton and why it will produce the most skewed results, to date, in her favor. Not a pretty picture.

Hi Ceci... thank you for understanding that I didn't mean to belittle or condemn my fellow West Virginians. Since I've been in grad school, I've learned so much about why my grandparents and their relations look at the world in the way that they do, and where their own unique sort of radicalism comes from. My grandpa once punched his boss in the face on a picket line in Florida, and he is antiwar and anticorporate and everything else... but he is still racially prejudiced. (The word "racist" is just too awful for me to use for someone I love a whole lot, though it probably fits...) There are a lot of good books that reveal something about where this working-class tradition of resistance and racism comes from. David Roediger's "The Wages of Whiteness," Richard Hofstadter's "Age of Reform," C. Vann Woodward's "Origins of the New South," and many others.

You're right, though, as we're learning just now... WV is not a pretty picture for Mr. Obama. The good news is that this picture is not the picture of America today. It might be a picture of what once was, a snapshot frozen in time, or it might be a picture of something that never was until now -- an economically devastated state, less diverse, less prosperous than the rest of the nation, draining population and kept ticking only by environmental destruction, pork-barrel spending, and white-water rafting. That does not exactly represent the United States, wouldn't you say?

Interesting perspective:

So if OBAMA becomes president would states like WV and KT secede from the UNION because of this historical reality.

What direction would HRC going, after this, if she stays in the race.
This is just WIERD.


au contraire

So you're resigned to losing this time, with, or without West Virginia.

Humph. What are the folks in WV and other states who voted for Obama under your thesis--Mark Penn micro-groups that don't matter? I doubt if one could realistically call these WVa Obama voters actual racists. I'm also sure there are those voting for Hillary who are not racists.

Now you've presented a bit of anecdotal evidence backed by "being born" there. Big hoop-de-doo. I was born there.

My family went into them thar hills in the 1600s. And let's not take 21st century ideas and impose them backward in time. Around the Civil War, even Lincoln wanted to resettle the slaves into Liberia. American society was not without prejudice.

To understand West Virginia, rent Matewan from Netflix; read about the lumber barons and the coal barons to understand suspicions about the rich folk; and study up on who Bobby Byrd lent his knowledge to in this campaign (bet it wasn't Obama). And please do take account of the number of folks who think that Bill will just help Hillary out since he's the hubby.

Let's not be too ignorant with this anecdotal nonsense. Apparently a lot of us were born and raised in West Virginia and didn't come out of it drooling idiots. Jeesh. This really isn't that difficult.

Matewan is one my favorite movies. I wondered historically how accurate the film portrayed the various groups of minors, especially the presence of an important black figure.

user-pic

Google "Affrilachia," and you'll tap into a discussion of being African-American in the highlands.

thanks

Don't know about "minors" but there is some accurate information about "miners". :) And, yes, my dad worked in the coal mines--and, yes, AA miners worked in the mines as well.

I think people who are reading this thread as a sweeping generalization of West Virginians are missing the point here. Nor do I think anyone is painting them as "drooling idiots."

And I also don't think that sharing stories of places you were born and raised is "anecdotal nonsense." We're not writing a thesis here, we're just having a discussion. Trying to talk about what is wrong with viewing West Virginians through the ill-conceived stereotypical lens that exists. Or any of Appalachia. Call me crazy, but I think having roots and living in a place creates a deeper understanding of it than having driven through it once.

How sweet. Did you miss the part where I was born and raised and stayed in West Virginia--until my early 30's? And I missed the part where the racism of those voting for Obama was left out of the discussion--or the thesis that the Hillary supporters were, gasp, racist.

It's a colorful historical analysis being presented--and doesn't even take into account the timber barons who cut all of the first-growth trees out so the beauty of West Virginia now is only from second growth forests; or the coal barons who didn't just rape the land but the miners until the damned state became unionized--and that was certainly not a bloodless fight--and on to today when mountaintop clearing for coal illustrates just how powerless this region of our country is.

The unions that are powerful in this region backed Edwards and didn't make an endorsement after Edwards dropped out. And I did ask seriously about who Byrd endorsed--and I suspect it was Hillary.

And the song folks need to trace the folk songs of this region to the Scottish influence--serious folk think the bagpipes are repeated in bluegrass banjos and mandolins.

I'm glad you have such a great memory of the 1600s, Mr. Cube! Congratulations -- you're more West Virginian than me!

And how do you think the timber barons impacted the state? What about the unions? You're trying to present an historic picture so present one that is more cohesive than reaching back in the fog of time to the 1600s and 1700s with your pushed out by the slave plantations. The Western Virginia terrain would never have supported the plantation economy. Explain the racism in New York back in the day using "pushed out by the plantation owners".

You're having a bit of fun with where you were born and the folks who live there. It isn't accurate and you need to say you're being a comedian.

"Union men, my ass!"

You just reminded me that I've been meaning to go to Amazon.com and and see if I can find that movie on DVD.

user-pic

I just went to a closing event for my husband's academic year. In years past, there's often been a student performance, either classical or barbershop. This year, for the very first time, there were fiddles. Strong ones and a strong voices that led off with "Blue Moon of Kentucky."

I don't think anyone saw me wipe my eyes, but I surely did.

Eventually, when people and place become part of you, they stay part of you even when you disagree. That's what home means, and it's something that doesn't need explaining to most folks here in the Bluegrass state.

I won't say my Kentucky neighbors are right, but I will say they're mine.

You know Akbar, without thoughtful posts like this, I think most people reflect on WV somewhere inbetween "The Walton's" and "Deliverance". At best it is a hard dichotomy to resolve. You do your homeland proud in your understanding.

You do your username proud. Thanks for the props! WV needs to be understood, and not simply exploited as a prop for some last-ditch demagoguery or cast aside a retrograde runt of the Union.

user-pic

Thank you Akbar, this is excellent historical analysis. I liked this part:

I've always been proud of West Virginia's motto, "Montani semper liberi" -- Mountaineers are always free! -- and I wish it were true.

Nicely put, given that what you're implying in your post is that while the whites in that area do say and act in racist ways, it's not quite fair to say they ARE racists. They've basically been pushed into a situation and setting that teaches them to be racist.

I think of racial identities as learned forms of training. White people learn to perform their whiteness. So if they act racist, we should do less blaming of them as individuals and more blaming and analysis of what forces led them to be racist.

thanks again,

macon d

Give a listen to, or a read of, the lyrics to Bob Dylan's "Only a Pawn in Their Game".

It's a bit more "eastern" than the above, but it gives another relevant facet to the picture.

Akbar and others: what a good little discussion here. You all have been articulating what I've not been able to articulate since Obama lost so big to Hillary in my native county of Virginia.

I became an Obama supporter because I saw how much his candidacy meant to people in my new home for the last seven years, South Carolina. Never had I seen people be so excited for a candidate -- people waving, holding signs at major intersections throughout the state. A solitary black man stood holding a large Obama sign on the corner of the State House grounds in Columbia, right under the statue of Tillman: "Change You Can Believe In."

I really think the issue in Appalachia with Obama is about Hope, really. My grandfather told me to "never be beholden to anyone." That's about independence and self-reliance, sure. But it's also a rejection of help and grace, and ultimately, hope. It's a fear of outsiders -- especially from coal companies from Pittsburgh -- historically, legitimately felt. But it's a crazy way to live. It bothers me.

Now is that why Clinton beat Obama so badly in Appalachia? Don't know.

Thanks for the kind words... I think you hit on the essential Achilles Heel of Obama in certain primaries, in certain regions... some people are immune to "Hope" with a capital-H, when they've seen their communities dwindle in size, their jobs disappear, and, in the case of WV, the rest of the country make fun of them in their misfortune. "Change" has done nothing but harm to them, and "hope" seems like an example of the emptiest kind of puffery. Is it any wonder that Obama couldn't get any traction in that kind of setting?

Yes, you say it better than I do... hope as "the emptiest kind of puffery." Now see this is where I think the isolation (geographical and empathetic) of Appalachia takes its toll. Obama's experience as an organizer in the Southside of Chicago perhaps seems like puffery, too -- but I believe Obama would hold that it was tough too. And yet there's reason to hope.

You gotta give Sen. Clinton credit -- she knows how to hit the register of a union organizer when she gave her speech tonight.

Gotta love me some Pitchfork Ben Tillman, by the way! It's such a great image to picture the Obama supporter waving a sign under the monument to the one-eyed old lizard.

This has been a beautiful thread. My father's family was in Western Pennsylvania from before the Revolution, my mother's was there from a couple of generations back, I was born there, and those hills are home to me still like nowhere else on Earth. Can't say that we had any of the mountain music. Had a fierce dedication to education, though. That was partly from the Scots in us, but it was certainly because an education was the only way not to have to go down in the mines. My children all have that fierceness for learning even to this day, though come to think of it they know nothing of their great-great uncle disabled by pneumoconiosis. Remarkable how these traits can persist. So thanks, Akbar, and thanks to everyone who has posted. I learned a lot and am glad of it.

In deciding your vote for president today, was the race of the candidate:
Clinton Obama
The single most important factor 85 10
One of several important factors 79 14
Not an important factor 59 34

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226014

And your vast knowledge of Appalachia comes from having lived there for how long, exactly?

A guy comes (several of us actually) and tells the harsh truth about the place where they were born and raised and explains the sociology and the demographics of the region but you know better because you are in possession of, indeed, one might even say possessed by, the received wisdom spewed by Hillary's spin machine.

Sorry guys. I know its embarassing to you to only be winning in the places where the demographics are disproportionately white, old and uneducated. I know you want to believe your Dear Leader when she tells you that West Virginia is a microcosm of America and that this great victory has nothing to do with Appalachia being the last bastion of unabashed, unashamed racism in America. I get that. Just like you want to believe that she still has a path to the nomination that doesn't end in abject defeat in November, that Gerry Ferraro was totally misconstrued and martyred, that Obama is the one who "played the race card" and Bill and Hill are being smeared by those who say they did it, that none of the opposition to Obama is based on racism but all of the opposition to Hillary is based on sexism, and that Obama's entire success is based entirely upon the support of starry-eyed political virgins who just don't understand the real world like you guys do.

But, see, here's the thing. One major party that thinks its entitled to its own facts is one too many. Two parties that think they're entitled to their own facts would pretty much be the end of our ability to govern ourselves in this country for good. So, please, either accept the embarassing and unpleasant facts with the good ones or go join the Republicans with Lieberman.

This was supposed to be a reply to "Present" up top of the thread.

Great.

Leave a comment

akbarjenkins

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 3

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address