A Veep for Barack Obama
We made it. A 15% win in N.C. and a narrow 2% win for Hillary in Indiana. What a great contest!
I've tossed around ideas of folks who would be great VP choices in conversations with other Obama supporters and I've wanted to write about it for several months. But the perpetual closeness of this race has made me uncomfortable with posting these thoughts — superstition. Just take a look at today's Huffington Post home page for the reason why I'm confident about sharing now.
I'm not going to speculate about Hillary's chances of being asked or of taking this job. The MSM has that covered — overcovered, I'm sure. My list will read in the order of my preferences. Here it goes.
1. Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) of Kansas. When I saw her endorsement speech in El Dorado, Obama's Kansas hometown, I was taken aback. I guess it began the night before actually when she delivered the Dem. response to the State of the Union address. Not only was she warm and well spoken, she echoed the themes of change and unity that Obama has made his own. She wasn't yet a public supporter of his, though there were rumors. Back to El Dorado, she gives her endorsement and then switches gears to address the crowd more directly -- looking into their eyes -- to encourage, even admonish, them to show up at their caucuses to caucus for Obama. Her message was simple -- one might say midwestern -- and clear, the crowd responded with enthusiasm. I wouldn't call that pressure, but Gov. Sebelius was cool on the stump at the presidential level. While I think that women who had deeply powerful hopes for the first woman President will support Obama insofar as they are Democrats to begin with, Gov. Sebelius is an outstanding and ethical woman for the job. 2012 just might be her year. One last point: Obama has mentioned that he want a Veep who brings something he doesn't already have to the party. Sebelius is a popular 2 time governor of a red state, whose lineage goes back to Ohio in politics. She is solidly midwestern, in a non-Chicago way, and she stands up with great intelligence and strength for policies she believes in. Take this story about new coal plants in Kansas and her opposition.
2. Sen. Jim Webb (D) of Virginia. Not that I was thinking about VPs yet in early 2007, but when Sen. Webb gave the Dem. response to the State of the Union address I knew there was something special. As a DC area resident, I had watched the Senate race in Virginia between George Allen and Jim Webb. It was tense and action packed. There were distractions galore, but in the end a Dem. was elected to what had been considered a solidly Republican seat. Especially since the Presidential-hopeful George Allen was supposed to be unbeatable. However, Allen was no match for the not-so-new new media that would bring him down. Sen. Webb had issues of his own to address, but his earnestness and eloquence saved the day. Jim Webb's military background, his high post as Secretary of the Navy under no less than Ronald Reagan, his decision to change parties from Repub. to Dem. and his ability to write and speak as compellingly as Obama all add up to a formidable Veep choice. That and Virginia is a key state in November. Finally, Sen. Webb just might help shore up the lunch pail voters as he is naturally conservative, as opposed to suddenly so, and even one of the few concealed weapon licensees on the Hill.
3. Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) of Nebraska. This one just came to my attention about a month ago. I watched an interview with Sen. Hagel with Keith Ulbermann and I was convinced that this was a third way. Chuck Hagel has dissented from the Republican party line on several key fronts. He's an intelligent and experienced firebrand who knows what he believes and sticks to it. I still have more to learn about Sen. Hagel, but I like what I see. I also like the idea of Obama putting his money where his mouth is on the notion of appointing the right people regardless of party for the Veep positions. Also, there's an aspect of this match-up that could be appropriate in light of the primaries — Obama took Nebraska in a blow out like Kansas and Virginia — that's a good start for building support.
4. Is the "Clinton" option without Hillary: Gov. Ted Strickland (D) of Ohio. Having just read his Wikipedia page I know more than I did right before I read it, but he was widely credited with delivering Hillary's Ohio win. If it becomes necessary to ask a Clinton surrogate to join the ticket, he seems like a good choice.
There it is. I know there are many qualified and powerful options for this job. These are some that just resonate with me.
I've tossed around ideas of folks who would be great VP choices in conversations with other Obama supporters and I've wanted to write about it for several months. But the perpetual closeness of this race has made me uncomfortable with posting these thoughts — superstition. Just take a look at today's Huffington Post home page for the reason why I'm confident about sharing now.
I'm not going to speculate about Hillary's chances of being asked or of taking this job. The MSM has that covered — overcovered, I'm sure. My list will read in the order of my preferences. Here it goes.
1. Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) of Kansas. When I saw her endorsement speech in El Dorado, Obama's Kansas hometown, I was taken aback. I guess it began the night before actually when she delivered the Dem. response to the State of the Union address. Not only was she warm and well spoken, she echoed the themes of change and unity that Obama has made his own. She wasn't yet a public supporter of his, though there were rumors. Back to El Dorado, she gives her endorsement and then switches gears to address the crowd more directly -- looking into their eyes -- to encourage, even admonish, them to show up at their caucuses to caucus for Obama. Her message was simple -- one might say midwestern -- and clear, the crowd responded with enthusiasm. I wouldn't call that pressure, but Gov. Sebelius was cool on the stump at the presidential level. While I think that women who had deeply powerful hopes for the first woman President will support Obama insofar as they are Democrats to begin with, Gov. Sebelius is an outstanding and ethical woman for the job. 2012 just might be her year. One last point: Obama has mentioned that he want a Veep who brings something he doesn't already have to the party. Sebelius is a popular 2 time governor of a red state, whose lineage goes back to Ohio in politics. She is solidly midwestern, in a non-Chicago way, and she stands up with great intelligence and strength for policies she believes in. Take this story about new coal plants in Kansas and her opposition.
2. Sen. Jim Webb (D) of Virginia. Not that I was thinking about VPs yet in early 2007, but when Sen. Webb gave the Dem. response to the State of the Union address I knew there was something special. As a DC area resident, I had watched the Senate race in Virginia between George Allen and Jim Webb. It was tense and action packed. There were distractions galore, but in the end a Dem. was elected to what had been considered a solidly Republican seat. Especially since the Presidential-hopeful George Allen was supposed to be unbeatable. However, Allen was no match for the not-so-new new media that would bring him down. Sen. Webb had issues of his own to address, but his earnestness and eloquence saved the day. Jim Webb's military background, his high post as Secretary of the Navy under no less than Ronald Reagan, his decision to change parties from Repub. to Dem. and his ability to write and speak as compellingly as Obama all add up to a formidable Veep choice. That and Virginia is a key state in November. Finally, Sen. Webb just might help shore up the lunch pail voters as he is naturally conservative, as opposed to suddenly so, and even one of the few concealed weapon licensees on the Hill.
3. Sen. Chuck Hagel (R) of Nebraska. This one just came to my attention about a month ago. I watched an interview with Sen. Hagel with Keith Ulbermann and I was convinced that this was a third way. Chuck Hagel has dissented from the Republican party line on several key fronts. He's an intelligent and experienced firebrand who knows what he believes and sticks to it. I still have more to learn about Sen. Hagel, but I like what I see. I also like the idea of Obama putting his money where his mouth is on the notion of appointing the right people regardless of party for the Veep positions. Also, there's an aspect of this match-up that could be appropriate in light of the primaries — Obama took Nebraska in a blow out like Kansas and Virginia — that's a good start for building support.
4. Is the "Clinton" option without Hillary: Gov. Ted Strickland (D) of Ohio. Having just read his Wikipedia page I know more than I did right before I read it, but he was widely credited with delivering Hillary's Ohio win. If it becomes necessary to ask a Clinton surrogate to join the ticket, he seems like a good choice.
There it is. I know there are many qualified and powerful options for this job. These are some that just resonate with me.
Advertisement





This is poorly cross-posted from my blog: http://nazardesignblog.blogspot.com/. The idea is still there even if the formatting isn't. Sorry it's so funky looking.
May 7, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wes Clark jumped off the Clinton wagon today to perhaps get his name added to Obama's short list.
May 7, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
No kidding? I'll have to look for that. You don't have a link do you? Thanks for sharing.
May 7, 2008 11:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have been reading interviews with Chuck Hagel for a while, I think the most recent was about a month or so ago on News Week.
To me, he leaps off the pages about being VP for Obama or at least in his Cabinet some place. Very intelligent, straight forward, and I couldnt find a b.s. line in any of his interviews.
May 7, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
that's much the impression I got from the one interview I saw. Good to know there is more to back it up.
May 7, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I met him a week ago and told him I was hoping to see him in an Obama cabinet soon.
In his public comments before I met him, he sounded like he would not be endorsing McCain and said he would have to seriously consider "any" offer to serve that was offered him. Seemed like a very veiled reference to Obama to me, but then, its what I was wanting to hear too.
He would be a perfect Sec. of Defense. One of his heroes in Eisenhower who warned against the industrial military complex.
I like Webb for VP, or Wesley, but mostly Webb, who will, I think, manhandle the Republicans which is what we need. Don't see the benefit of picking someone from Kansas, as Obama can lay decent claim to the Kansas vote as it is.
May 7, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jim Webb is my choice
May 7, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've always been for Jim Webb. He has a bit of a female problem though, I think (Some boorish comments somewhere along the line that could be misconstrued...). This concerns me after the alienated HRC older women supporters that we need back into the Obama fold. But other than that, he's tough as nails. Barack needs a VP that has Top Rated moral authority and is tough as hell to bash Fox and the fake conservative drumbeat everyday.
Chuck Hagel is v-e-r-y intriquing. Would have to learn more about him. If he's tough as nails and can beat the hell out of FauxNews, then I'm game.
This is a good quote found on the youtube link re: Hagel:
May 7, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
i think some people won't like 2 senators on the ticket.
May 7, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
My #1 is Gov. Sebelius. I think she is very capable, has red state appeal (her Lt. Gov is the former Kansas GOP Party Chair), and would go a long way to mending fences with baby booming feminists that feel Hillary has been victimized.
Last night, I heard Chris Matthews say he might need to pick one of her supporters like Gov. Vilsack, or Gov. Rendell. I think he just has Rendell on his brain because he's from Philly and apparently is planning to run for Sen. Spector's seat in 2010. Rendell is a horrible surrogate and a worse VP pick. He has serious diarrhea of the gaffe.
May 7, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
"diarrhea of the gaffe" - You ain't kidding. I hated and hate hearing his voice.
May 7, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey make sure Chris asks Rendell what he thinks of Farrakhan. We all know how important that is....(sigh)
May 7, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was underwhelmed by Gov Sebelius in her SOTU response speech. (yawn) And I wonder if it's too much to have a woman and an AA on one ticket? I'm thinking of some of those older, more conservative undecideds.
Forget Rendell, beyond the gaffe problem he reeks of back room politics and "the machine."
Vilsack just isn't very exciting. What would he contribute?
For VP, we have to consider the "one heartbeat away" factor, because that's how undecideds will look at the ticket as a whole.
Likewise, what will the VP candidate add to the ticket?
Then there's the campaigning. We'll need someone with character, energy and decent debate skills.
And I think it's true that having double senators isn't so great.
Who does that leave?
Richardson? Great foreign policy cred, also a strong governor and helps with the western states and hispanics. Also, a very authentic guy who would have good regular, working class appeal.(My conservative 69 yr old uncle from Ohio likes an Obama/Richardson pairing.) But his debate performances left a lot to be desired....
Wes Clark? Again, good for foreign policy, military, and against the war. Also a prominent Clinton backer, so would help bridge the party divide. Well spoken. But is he perceived as too elite? He didn't run the greatest presidential campaign, but maybe he's improved. Why didn't people go for him for pres, anyway?
Some have suggested Schwietzer (sp?), who I think would play well in the west, but how would he go down in the urban northeast? Also, not sure he could be thought of as presidential.
In conclusion, that's a huge point: can the VP candidate be seen as presidential by most Americans? After all: one heartbeat away....
I'm looking forward to an Obama victory on May 20th here in Oregon and hoping we'll be celebrating even more with an important delegate milestone there.
May 7, 2008 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like Richardson for Sec. of State. Serious negotiation skills.
May 7, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink