« The 95% white party and the decline of the once powerful GOP | Yoda Urbinato's Blog | Why polls in May (even by Survey USA) can't be trusted »
Hillary's concession speech planned...early draft leaked
Not really. But when it is leaked, it's going to read something like this (except longer):
But here's what I really wanted to say now that I've got your attention: (I'm sorry I've misled you but it's for your own good.) Please stop the Hillary hate. I was pretty dismayed to hear that folks at the Obama-Edwards event yesterday started booing at the mention of Hillary. The same attitude continues on many TPM blogs and comments.
It's ok because the race is over. Let it go. It is not cool to boo or taunt a team that is about to lose the game, especially when the game is an intrasquad scrimmage.
Stop directing ugly comments towards the Clintons. It's pointless. Hillary is letting up on the Obama attacks and has essentially called a ceasefire. It's time we all reciprocated.
It's time to start the healing process. So, here's your three step process for kicking your bad hating habits:
The next time you read a comment from a Hillary die-hard and you want to respond by writing that Clinton is never getting your vote because she is "insert hateful language here", I want you to do the following:
1. Take a deep breath
2. Say to yourself "Obama is the nominee, Obama is the nominee, Obama is the nominee"
3. Exhale.
Repeat as necessary and feel free to picture yourself playing a game of hoops or drinking a PBR with the Democratic presumptive nominee as you discuss his possible VP pick.
To Hillary supporters: I'm sorry. It's sucks that your candidate lost and you fought valiantly for her. I salute you. I know you're going to need some time to get over this and I'll give you space as best I can. (I may take a jab at Terry McAuliffe or Harold Ickes or Mark Penn from time to time).
I hope you'll give Obama a chance. I wasn't sold on Obama the first time I heard him. I too didn't really understand all the fuss about him and worried that he sounded too much like someone who wouldn't fight for progressive values. But get to know him a little better. He's on our side. He's worth fighting for. But more importantly, the progressive values that we all share (with him) are worth fighting for.
Democrats are poised to control Congress and the White House and there's a whole lot of good that can be done in that scenario. We'll need all the help we can get to make it happen and I hope you're there with us through November and beyond.
"I concede. I'm proud of you and I'm proud of me. I like Obama, I really do. Obama's a good candidate. Vote for Obama."Obama people - listen up!
But here's what I really wanted to say now that I've got your attention: (I'm sorry I've misled you but it's for your own good.) Please stop the Hillary hate. I was pretty dismayed to hear that folks at the Obama-Edwards event yesterday started booing at the mention of Hillary. The same attitude continues on many TPM blogs and comments.
It's ok because the race is over. Let it go. It is not cool to boo or taunt a team that is about to lose the game, especially when the game is an intrasquad scrimmage.
Stop directing ugly comments towards the Clintons. It's pointless. Hillary is letting up on the Obama attacks and has essentially called a ceasefire. It's time we all reciprocated.
It's time to start the healing process. So, here's your three step process for kicking your bad hating habits:
The next time you read a comment from a Hillary die-hard and you want to respond by writing that Clinton is never getting your vote because she is "insert hateful language here", I want you to do the following:
1. Take a deep breath
2. Say to yourself "Obama is the nominee, Obama is the nominee, Obama is the nominee"
3. Exhale.
Repeat as necessary and feel free to picture yourself playing a game of hoops or drinking a PBR with the Democratic presumptive nominee as you discuss his possible VP pick.
To Hillary supporters: I'm sorry. It's sucks that your candidate lost and you fought valiantly for her. I salute you. I know you're going to need some time to get over this and I'll give you space as best I can. (I may take a jab at Terry McAuliffe or Harold Ickes or Mark Penn from time to time).
I hope you'll give Obama a chance. I wasn't sold on Obama the first time I heard him. I too didn't really understand all the fuss about him and worried that he sounded too much like someone who wouldn't fight for progressive values. But get to know him a little better. He's on our side. He's worth fighting for. But more importantly, the progressive values that we all share (with him) are worth fighting for.
Democrats are poised to control Congress and the White House and there's a whole lot of good that can be done in that scenario. We'll need all the help we can get to make it happen and I hope you're there with us through November and beyond.
Advertisement





I vote Obama.
I like Hillary.
I take Penn's lunch money.
I haz good day.
--BizarroMooseHB (Moose No Body)
(Can't get the bizarro out of this keyboard.)
May 15, 2008 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Obama wins and Clinton concedes, I will support Obama ONLY if I see a change in the way Obama's supporters treat Clinton supporters. I have only marginal preference of Obama over McCain, and being "part of the team" is the only reason I would swing my support to Obama.
But to feel like "part of the team" I need to see the sexism, accusations of racism, etc. from Obama supporters on this site apologized for in a litany of gracious posts.
May 15, 2008 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sincere question for you: what issues are important to you and where do you stand on them that you only see marginal differences between Obama and McCain?
May 15, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The #1 issue for me, and it has always been that way, is the President of the United States has to have wisdom, and for me, that comes primarily from experience, trial, and
To all the Obama supporter assholes who were taunting me and saying that I am stupid because I don't see the obvious differences between Obama and McCain--READ CAREFULLY. I said I had a marginal preference.
While I prefer Obama's positions on most issues, I do NOT trust his inexperience, nor do I prefer his style of leadership. I also feel like McCain is far FAR more likely to work bipartisan solutions and bring Change to Washington.
Obama is just claiming he will change it, and has not done much to make me believe he means what he says, let alone that he has the ability to effect change.
So there's where I am.
Some of you Obama supporters have to stop thinking that we are all Democrats. I am not a registered Democrat. I am a registered Independent. The Democrat does not get my vote automatically.
May 16, 2008 5:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
BTW... My mother, a middle-aged Massachusetts woman who loves Hillary, is in an even worse boat. She actually IS leaning toward McCain. Nothing particularly bad about Obama, and she thinks McCain would extend stupid Bush policies, but overall, she prefers McCain.
May 16, 2008 5:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure what you want left. But calling people names is kinda childish.
Nobody here is gonna grovel. If you haven't made up your mind then good luck with your decision.
May 16, 2008 8:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
left is simply saying, "Stop piling on."
May 16, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think my post says clearly don't pile on. Left is calling people a-holes.
This is the internet and people have different motives for what they write. I'm sort of suspicious when people start name calling through anonymous blog posts. It's sad and either the person has an agenda or they really need some time away from the keyboard.
May 16, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
You also say clearly to Clinton supporters:
And then you don't give the space? I guess your generosity is wearing down today? Or you didn't mean it in the first place?
I'll vouch for left. You know me, right?
There are many sad things in the world. This is not one of them.
Everyone needs time away from the keyboard. Look at NCSteve below, for crap's sake! What a freakin' windbag!
In any case, you need to remember that you wrote this post. You opened up the forum. I appreciate the sentiment of unity you express in the OP, but the reality of achieving it takes work. It's a daily challenge.
So follow your own advice, starting with Step 1.
May 16, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess I'm just having a hard time with giving someone their space when they're calling everyone a-holes on a post I wrote that's about reconciliation.
The same goes for Obama supporters. Name calling makes you look childish and trollish. If there were a time-out room on TPM I'd put you there.
It's time to shake hands and move forward.
Everyone needs to chill - and if you can't do that then go volunteer for habitat for humanity and go bang a few nails to get those raw emotions out of your system.
May 16, 2008 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
lol! You are very wise, Yoda. I agree with you about the name-calling. It upsets me too, and it will take time to exhaust itself.
Btw, I would notify Josh there's a troll in this thread. Same one that keeps getting in to all the threads lately. It references primates and feminists.
May 16, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
lol! You are very wise, Yoda. I agree with you about the name-calling. It upsets me too, and it will take time to exhaust itself.
Btw, I would notify Josh there's a troll in this thread. Same one that keeps getting in to all the threads lately. It references primates and feminists.
May 16, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The danger of Mc Cain from an Iranian perspective: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuVYlGZmtYg
May 16, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Apologies for the double post. "Internal server error." TPM must be disinfecting for trolls.
May 16, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would argue that the inexperience argument against Obama is a red herring. Go and check up his legislative record in Illinois. Go and check it up in the US Senate. Consider how effectively he organized the business of running a campaign. Look at the anti-nuclear-proliferation legislation he has authored with Senator Lugar, while the Bushies did nothing to stop loose nukes in Russia. Think about his remarkable feat of getting every single REPUBLICAN as well as every single Democrat in the Illinois legislature to vote, over the opposition of the governor, for his legislation that effectively enhanced defendants rights (the requirement that police interrogation in murder cases be videotaped, in order to prevent a repeat of the incidents in which Chicago area police were torturing innocents into confessions).
And think about the "experience" that McCain offers. Temper tantrums all over Washington. The Keating Five. Endorsing Bush on everything this year. Endorsing the Iraq War. As everyone on the internets from Obama partisan Kos to Hillary partisan Taylor Marsh has pointed out, this country cannot survive four years of this kind of "experience."
May 16, 2008 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, we won't kiss your ass. Go vote for McCain. I dare you.
May 15, 2008 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the mature response!
May 16, 2008 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, no, thank you for continuing to pelt the candidate of your party with discredited accusations.
This year, we call it "swiftboating." In 2012, we'll call it "rezkoing."
May 16, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Name one "discredited accusation" that I have pelted Obama with, moron.
Name one. Just one.
Go ahead. We'll wait.
May 16, 2008 10:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Surely even a completely-hypnotized person could not deny that Hillary's supporters are still trying to summon the Ghost Rezko's Father. I'll post links if you insist.
See, you didn't have to wait all that long, did you? Happy to help out.
May 16, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
See? You couldn't come up with a single example. That's because there aren't any. Yet you accused me directly.
I am only responsible for myself, not all of humanity. So go jump in a lake.
May 16, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another shock. Distortion and denial from a Clinton supporter. Imagine!
May 16, 2008 1:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, not distortion, just typing too quickly when I said it the first time:
See, you didn't come up with any such quotes from me personally. That's because you can't come up with any. I couldn't care less about Tony Rezko.
The Republicans care, however. I would shift my focus on them, if I were you.
May 16, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Kool-Aid drinker, heal thyself.
May 16, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Kool-Aid drinker, heal thyself.
May 16, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lefty - I think you'll find Obama and the vast majority of his supporters to be extremely civil and sensitive. Here's how I think the problem has arisen.
1) HRC and supporters consistently say that Obama is not tough enough, mean enough, resilient enough and enough of a fighter and Hillary is - hence she must be chosen.
2) HRC and supporters then proceed to lambaste Obama with a vast arsenal of below-the-belt ugly, divisive attacks - Wright/Rezco/Ayers/being black/nonsense about being Muslim etc.
3) Neither Obama nor the great majority of supporters goes anywhere near the many vulnerabilities of the Clintons in terms of scandal, etc., but not returning in kind isn't enough. But getting angry at being attacked with these premeditated attacks is then viewed as divisive, aggressive, vile behavior on the part of Obama supporters towards HRC supporters. For example, if Clinton flat out lies in ads smearing Obama on the second amendment, that's fine, but if Obama makes light of it with an Annie Oakley joke, then it's Obama who's the horrible sexist responsible for the whole disagreement.
Remember Lefty - if you really are a lefty and not a rabble rousing Republican troll - then you need Obama as much as he needs you. Ultimately beating McCain is infinitely more important than which of the two similar candidates defeats him. If McCain wins, everything that Hillary's supporters support her for will go down the toilet.
May 15, 2008 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about Hillary supporters agree to support Obama if she drops out of the race and endorses him? Would that have an impact for HRC people out there?
As I said down the thread, people should vote for whoever they want - that's democracy.
Truthfully, I'm not really feeling a strong urge to try to convince anyone on TPM to vote for Obama over McCain. I'm more reaching out to folks who know they've voting for the Democratic nominee.
May 15, 2008 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm interested in having people at least know what they're voting for. I want them to decide which issues are important and learn where the candidates stand on them, rather than make their decisions based on whether they'd like to have a beer with the candidate or, even worse, what the candidate's supporters are like on-line.
May 15, 2008 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I commend you for that - and I think you are right to begin to talk about the issues that people care about.
I'm going to be more patient at the moment and am waiting for the wounds of the primary to heal.
May 15, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am deeply sorry that your case of selective perception causes you to only perceive statements or actions that reinforce your own sense of grievance while blinding you to acts by persons on your own side that are as bad, or worse, than those for which you demand an apology from us.
I am profoundly sorry that you are so utterly afflicted by the Hillary supporter groupthink that you cannot perceive any difference between Obama and McCain when, in fact, the difference between the two nominees is more profound than it has been at any time in this country since 1972.
I sincerely apologize if I have in any way failed to abide by a standard of conduct that the supporters of your candidate insist on applying to my side, but not to thier own.
I could go on, or I could just cut it short and ask you to snap out of it and grow the hell p.
The very fate of the Republic is at stake in this election.
Our Democracy is in the balance. Democracy in this country, or any country, is not sustainable in the face of the massive transfer of wealth from the bottom 50% to top 1% that the has occurred over last sixteen (yes, sixteen) years. The malevolent combination of reducing the top income tax brackets, dropping the capital gain rate lower than that imposed on the bottom ten percent, gutting the estate tax, outsourcing labor, and runaway deficit spending has created the greatest disparity in wealth in history. No rrepublic in history has survived that kind of disparity.
Lives are in the balance. McCain today basically promised to keep this war going, and even to intensify it, through 2012. Our reputation is in the balance if we don't stop living down to the world's worst fears about us and start living up to their, and our own, dreams of what we stand for.
Indeed, the whole fucking planet is in the balance if we don't get a handle on our CO2 emissions over the next eight years. Do you think McCain and the Republicans are going to really do that?
And yeah, with all of that at stake, I ought to be big enough to swollow my pride and assuage the hurt feelings of you, and all the other aggrieved Hillary supporters, with an apology that I feel you manifestly do not deserve. But, instead, just this once I thought I might ask whether, in light of the stakes in this election in November, you might consider acting like a goddamned grown-up and doing the right thing rather than acting like a thirteen year old who got snubbed by the popular crowd at school.
And my sincere apologies to PJ. It was atrociously rude of me to do the exact opposite of what you're quite rightly asking for on your own blog, but, frankly I've had it with the childish grievance mongering of the last two or three days. My bad for reading comments at Hillaryis44.org earlier today. Although I know it is almost always best, and most expedient, for the victors to be magnanimous, breathing the irrationality and the outright hate that's still boiling away there kind of spoiled my capacity for generous gestures for the day.
May 15, 2008 9:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
What? It's not left's fault that you read upsetting trash, NCSteve, it's your own damn fault. Yet you unloaded an out-of-proportion pile of crap? You're a prince!
I don't even read that site. I've never even been curious about it. Never. Why the hell are you reading it? You don't even like Hillary.
Sigh. I think you might try following your own advice and "snap out of it and grow up."
As you yourself say:
Sorry, but you win today's Ironic Comment Award.
May 16, 2008 2:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I read it because I am, in fact, greatly concerned about the way many of Hillary's supporters are becoming more and more intransigent the worse her chances get and I want to keep an eye on where their heads are as we close in in the nomination.
I also confess to a certain horrified, yet clinical, fascination with the evolving group dynamic. Its like reading papers on cognitive dissonance and groupthink, which, btw, people like yourself are invaluable in preventing here and for which I thank you.
But irony notwithstanding, I stand by my pique. I am sick unto death with the notions that a) Hillary supporters are owed an apology by Obama or his supporters about the way they've been treated--the abuse has flowed both ways and has been equal and b) the way supporters act on the Internet have a damn thing to do with whether one should support the candidate.
If anyone wants to talk about real reconcilation beginning with an acknowledgement that the acrimony was mutual but the stakes going forward are high, I'm all for it. But, Lefty here is instead insisting that we must line up and kiss his/her ass as the price of his/her support in this crucial election. Personally, I decline to get into that line.
May 16, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've said it elsewhere but I'll say it again NC Steve: I'm not asking Obama people to apologize for anything. Perhaps we all just have to let go of some comments posted here for a while - give HRC supporters time to be angry and move on.
The important point is that we should stop fighting Hillary and stop piling on - it's unnecessary and counterproductive at this point. The primary is over.
May 16, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
I could be wrong, but I'm guessing left misspoke, NCSteve. Like Obama did with "sweetie." ;-)
Anyway, about groupthink: It's one thing to be fascinated with cults and cliques and groupthink, but not when you have such a personal stake in the study! Wouldn't it be better to study some groupthink you are not personally so invested in?
Consider this: Who knows who is screwing around in the Hillaryis44.org comment threads, manipulating the groupthink? I've seen really good trolls work the Reader Posts and threads at TPM, much to my flabbergasted amazement. Obama supporters are as vulnerable to troll infestation as the Hillaryis44 group is. The most memorable concern troll I've seen was one named Ellen/rallyround. I suspect there's another concern troll or two who post here who have sucked me in more than once. I'm not immune by any means.
I'm not worried about Hillary's true supporters, however. As one myself, I trust Hillary to convince her supporters to vote Dem in Nov. In the meantime, I think there's a lot of passionate display throughout the party on both sides, as there should be. But because it's passion (read: emotional), it doesn't always get expressed in a mature or articulate way. (Don't worry, I'm not exempting myself from this observation!)
I am nervous about two things.
1) If the party does something stupid (which is quite possible) to humiliate Hillary, I would head for the nearest bunker, if I were you. I may join you there myself.
2) If the media doesn't shift its tone toward Hillary at some point, it's going to be hard for her most fervent supporters to contain themselves. Example: If Hillary concedes and the press then publicly hangs her burnt effigy from the rafters like a Blackwater contractor in Fallujah, again, I would head for the nearest bunker.
My concerns, as you can tell, place a lot of responsibility on the party to do the smart thing. Given the past actions of that particular brain trust, I am nervous. Some days more than others. Therefore, I won't go near Hillaryis44.org. I occasionally skim No Quarter for news, but I stop myself when I detect that the bitter meter needle starts to twitch.
I really like your writing, NCSteve. I mean it. I even like when you get all worked up (well, some times more than other times). Thanks for the acknowledgment in your own comment.
When all else fails to cheer me up, I put on some Oscar Peterson. Works every time.
cheers,
rtbag
May 16, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the summer of 1999, I rode the train from Toronto to Montreal seated next to an elderly black gentleman. We got to chatting and he regaled me with a few hours of amusing stories of his travels as a pianist. I asked him why he was going to Montreal and he said it was to visit family. At that point in my life, I was a fan of Oscar Peterson, but had only seen pictures of him from his youth. That same year, however, I received Oscar Peterson's christmas album as a gift, and I will be damned if the picture of the older Oscar Peterson on the label did not look a lot like the man next to whom I had sat on the train.
I can never prove that I sat next to Oscar Peterson. He never mentioned his name and I never asked. Still and all, Peterson did grow up in Montreal and he did live in Toronto in his declining years. As such, I like to think that I got to meet the master. If not, however, I console myself with the knowledge that I really did (for certain) sit and chat with Dave Brubeck over coffee and muffins for half an hour in the fall of 1995.
No particular significance to this story, save that I like to tell it whenever I encounter someone who enjoys Oscar Peterson's piano as much as I do. :-)
May 16, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
omg! You gave me goosebumps! Thanks for the great story, Missouri voter. :-)
May 16, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Left:
As with BevD and Otto F, you are now forbidden from voting for Obama. We will not permit it. You are free to vote for McCain, write in Hillary's name, sit out the election, whatever you wish -- but do not let us catch you voting for Obama.
Thanks! And this should take care of any angst you have. You are welcome.
May 15, 2008 9:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks! And when people ask me why I abstained instead of voting for Obama, I'll tell them "This self-righteous asshole on TPM showed me exactly what it means to be an Obama supporter, and I don't want America heading that direction. We're already TOO self-righteous as it is."
So nice work!
May 16, 2008 5:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
left, I know it's hard, but just ignore this pompous baiting from clearthinker. As you know, Senator Obama welcomes Independents.
I genuinely admire your ability to lean toward Obama despite all the hard feelings. I also admire your steadfast defense of Senator Clinton in a stubbornly hostile environment like TPM. I have personally appreciated your comments as a much-needed voice to break through the echo here.
But who cares what I think? I support Hillary. ;-)
May 16, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
So, because you don't like some of Obama's SUPPORTERS, you're going to vote for McSame? Grow up. Get a brain, or rent one. If an Obama supporter said the same thing you did, I'd tell him the same thing, too.
May 16, 2008 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why would you let anything that someone ELSE says or does affect your vote? I really think that is a waste of anyone's vote. Decide for yourself based on the issues that matter to you and who you think will deliver them.
If you honestly think that McCain is older and wiser (even though he wants to do things you disagree with) why would you want to support him? I would rather have someone who I wasn't certain of, but who agreed with my values than someone I thought was highly competent going after goals that are repugnant to me. By the way, I don't think McCain is competent at all; but you said his years of experience mattered to you the most.
Dick Cheney and George Bush have been extremely competent is dismantling our Constitution and reputation. Maybe someone with less experience in ruining everything they touch would have been a better bet.
Really, though; all of that is beside the point. What really is the most amazing and self-destructive is saying that because you don't like the behavior of what -- 20 Obama supporters here at TPM -- you will vote for someone else? That'll teach us a lesson! That really is the way adolescents think.
Try this on for size:
May 16, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is much like arguing with Christians about loaves and fishes, Jan. I hope you're doing it because it's fun and not in hopes of converting them to Shinto.
May 16, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been an Obama fan since the begining, but I always disliked the so called Obamabots, just like any kind of trolls. Although oftentimes I felt Hillary or someone was being unfair and wanted to act just like them, but I resisted, because I knew that spewing bile on people who think differently, instead of explaining politely, would only make them less likely to accept my views. That's what every fan should have in mind when attempting to "spread their religion among heretics". Unfortunately many people don't and they just troll and spew bile.
However, we should also keep in mind that having obnoxious die-hard fans does not mean there's something wrong with the candidate. In fact, it's usually the best football teams that have the most passionate fans and also the most hooligans among them. They just get people more fired up. (Try to imagine someone like GWB make people fired up and having die-hard fans...) Also, a lot of Obama's supporters, especially those on the Internet, are young, for the first time feeling fired up for a politician, which also explains some of their irrationality - just like when you're in love for the first time you may do stupid things.
The point is, we can all understand each other and we should do that more often. And Hillary and Barack are both great candidates, sharing most of the same views (it's not like they're polar opposites), so a lot of the bile is really unnecessary. And PLEASE don't use guilt-by-association (as in "I won't support Obama because some of his fans on the Net post before they think." etc.)
May 15, 2008 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with you although the more time one spends on websites like this, the more difficult it becomes to separate the candidate from his more vociferous supporters. No sooner had Yoda delivered his plea for peace, the thread seems to have been overwhelmed by commenters from the winning side accusing the other side of all sorts of vile, dirty tricks. When one gets off the board and listens to the candidates themselves, the rancor subsides. I have said this before, but it bears repeating. If Obama ever had the misfortune to read some of the divisive attacks being propagated in his name, he would most likely be disgusted. He will need all the support he can get in the general and insulting the nearly 50% of voters who chose HRC is not the way to get it.
May 15, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
AMEN! Not only that...rant coming...
It's virtually all virtual, it's all in blog unreality land. Long labored posts about the horrible rifts in the Democratic party and how we must worry about them! Hours spent on the imaginary! All imagined from intense immmersement in blog kung fu keyboard gaming tradition!
Used to be one could blame "the MSM" for this, but not any more, nosiree, it's blogs that are the center of the political war gaming now. Blogs like ones that proudly proclaim they love the horserace game and that's mainly what they're going to cover to the exclusion of what's going on in the world and invite all to participate in the game. That's where the TV producers and writers go now to get inspiration, to write Keith Olberman and Bill O'Reilly's nightly rants, not the other way around.
Bet it would be quite difficult to find someone who never looks at blogs who thinks there is a big rift in the Democratic party right now. It's all in your head, blog people, it's a game you're playing. Josh Marshall, in that link above, presumed people would become informed before playing the game, not that they would think this game is the most important information. (It's gotten to the point where my gut says "the horror, the horror" thinking of the future when I see yet another blog commenter proudly brag that they no longer read newspapers but get "informed" now by blogs alone.)
I've posted this quote before, but I think it goes over the heads of those that most need to understand it. Clue: onne should not be thinking "oh that's like Bush and the neo-cons fearmongering." Wrong answer. One should be thinking, "oh, that's the Democratic primary as envisioned by the blogosphere."
May 16, 2008 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. Or, here's something that hasn't changed after months of hububbery:
1) I can't afford to go to the hospital, and neither can you.
That's what this is about.
May 16, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's getting to the point of "I can't afford to go to the grocery store, and neither can you."
At the DMV today, the silent radio was advertising food stamps. It was letting folks know they could qualify even if they owned a car or a house.
Just didn't sit well. Neither do the breadlines or the soup kitchens closing up shop because there are too many customers and not enough donations.
May 16, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
ditto
May 16, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Which raises an entirely new set of concerns as to the efficacy of this new medium, doesn't it? One that it is too late to weigh in now, but worthy of discussion. While many here (rightly) extol the virtues of the blogosphere and the unique effect on this election season, there is a downside as well that is rarely mentioned.
May 16, 2008 1:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
The danger of Mc Cain from an Iranian perspective: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuVYlGZmtYg
May 16, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The danger of Mc Cain from an Iranian perspective: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuVYlGZmtYg
May 16, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
The danger of Mc Cain from an Iranian perspective: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuVYlGZmtYg
May 16, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Master Yoda:
Surely your keen perceptiveness would recognize that in a room full of Obama supporters - who took off from normal activities to be in a cramped room, would display emotion, would they not? Do they represent the typical Obama supporter? Doubtful. In fact, they are whipped up into a frenzy like any studio audience for the theatrics they provide!
And why do you perpetuate the belief that those people who oppose Hillary hate her?
This is sort of the odd received wisdom that gets whipped up on boards here.
I didn't want to see the Clintons anywhere near the White House. I can make all kinds of remarks concerning their inappropriate behavior, their pandering, their disingenuous platform, and a host of other issues that are reality based.
Does that mean I hate them?
No.
May 15, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think "Hillary hate" is just a catchy term - but I think it characterizes the vitriolic comments and actions by some folks (not everyone obviously). But certainly, most folks here probably don't hate Clinton but are just having a hard time letting go of the primary battle. It ain't healthy.
I think emotion at a rally is one thing, but booing a fellow Democrat is another. Clinton has lost and it's just bad form to pile on. We need to heal the party fractures and move forward.
But I also hear you that hate is a strong word and that's something that should be reserved for things like "I hate formulaic movies, I hate racism, I hate pickles, etc"
May 15, 2008 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Personally I don't see how you can "hate" a person you don't know.
As far as:
Well, I'm thinking about blogging something here that for sure will be unpopular:
How can you demonize or boo the other party. Aren't they also Americans?
The fact is that it is the "little people" who do most of the booing -- the people who vote emotions and viscerally. The truly shrewd recognize all the validity of the statement that we are all Americans.
Why do you think the sophisticated donate money to both sides of the campaigns? Or that Tip ONeil and Ronald Reagan were able to work effectively together?
While personal animosity does exist in the halls of Congress, the fact is that for the most part, little demonization by dint of party affiliation goes on. And especially not in the Senate.
Something to think about the next time someone here cracks all kinds of jokes or non-issues associated with McCain's age, etc. No one gets their hides tanned for it because presumably no one here (except Billy Glad) will be voting for McCain -- but it's just as childish. The tyranny here got so bad that people went off if someone use the word "shrill" in a Hillary post. But we can talk about doddering McCain? And for those who think it is okay, be prepared to defend Obama's 57 State comment:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/05/barack-obama-wa.html
In fact, those are exactly the types of arguments used to sway the ignorant who are unable to get their heads wrapped around the real issues. (See also: "vast right wing conspiracy", "corporate shilling", ".... is just EVIL", etc.)
Thanks for providing a forum to start bringing up a wider set of issues!
May 15, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
The are Americans. But they are Americans that are openly contemptuous of other Americans. They use fear, jealously, hatred and innuendo to divide us, to set us off against each other, or keep us jaded and thinking that we can't make a difference. They appeal to our worst instincts to keep us at each other's throats while they loot our treasury and kill innocents abroad.
They are worthy of being hated. Both the prosecutors of this filth and their enablers.
Hillary has employed these same tactics (albeit in a very modest way) during this campaign, so she deserver, not hate exactly, but shame. I don't think anyone here started with hatred in their heart for Hillary, but she let us down... even those of us that would have supported her had she won.
It will fade in time, but , like her vote to allow President Bush to do violence on a mass scale in Iraq, some of us may never forgive her for it.
May 15, 2008 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
In my line of work I have met many firefighters.
I have seen them go into very dangerous situations, and more often than not the biggest danger is other people. Firefighters are always unarmed -- and yet there were times we had to wait for a police escort.
Because people shoot at firefighters. And why are the firefighters in these very dangerous neighborhoods? To help people in a more direct way than most people on this board.
And a significant number of them vote GOP.
So now what? Do you have a pat answer now? Are these firefighters "enablers"? Are they "openly contemptuous of other Americans"?
I make the bold statement:
If you want to make a better America than mindless demonizing and vilification is just as stupid and idiotic on the left as on the right.
And the left is hardly blameless. Just look at some of the vitriol on this board, your post is a perfect example. And frankly, the left, in general, is more arrogant in this regard than the right -- feeling that they have some lock on insight and righteousness.
Extreme dogma is no good for anyone. Regardless of it's place on the political spectrum.
Let's heal America, people.
Isn't that Obama's message, after all?
May 15, 2008 9:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's some pretty remedial logic. You just made a huge non-sequitir because you've observed some vague correlation/intersection between firefighers and Republicans, and you're looking for a pat response? I don't think so. I suspect that you think you see the world in nuanced terms, shades of gray if you will. But I'm not convinced you do. Let me explain:
What I'm saying is politically, such people are the enemy. They embrace values that I despise. I have a good friend, Mike let's call him, we work together, laugh together even have a good time out on occasion. But he is kind of an intolerant asshole who harbors deep down racist, xenophobic and believes that if he doesn't do everything he can to prevent a black man from getting ahead
I like Mike and he has some redeeming qualities. He provides for his family, he doesn't cheat on his wife (that much), but politically, he is my enemy. After countless arguments, I have come to regard him as a lost cause, so I will do everything I can to defeat him (at the ballot box). Maybe not him so much, but the insular, lazy casual loathing that he carries around with him 24/7. I do what I can to convince those people that are on the fence about his ideas, that his ideas are poisonous, they easily lead to things like hatred and violence against strangers, and cause people to lash out at Sikhs, when our towers were attacked by Sunni Muslim extremists on 9/11.
I can hang with Mike, but his views are abhorrent to me. He is not part of the "healing" you are talking about. Neither is Jonah Goldberg, or Ann Coulter, or Michael Savage or Pat Buchanan. We can live in a place where these people are not physically threatened for holding the views they have, but make no mistake. Their views, if allowed to be accepted as mainstream, is what makes fascism possible. The best we can hope for is having enough people around to make his views an aberration, rather than a valid viewpoint. And that's my goal.
And liberal arrogance, if it's borne of actual real life experience, careful observation, and understanding of circumstance and context, and not some shrill overeager college student enforcing the PC code, or self-righteous hippie bullshit, is perfectly fine with me.
May 15, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see. So all racists are in the GOP?
None in the Dem Party?
Thank you for making my point about healing more eloquently than I. I'm sure you haven't missed the irony of these particular posts by you on this thread.
May 15, 2008 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain used a picture of him from like 20 years ago in an ad. His age is an add-on issue but probably a little fair game. doing calls for Obama several old folks told me that mccain was too old, and the people I called were as old as him or older.
May 15, 2008 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Age is certainly an issue.
Because I want a strong, vital, and alert person in charge. And people age differently and some 50 year olds are less alert than some 70 year olds that I know.
But that is different than going around calling the candidate "doddering" or "grandpa".
And that's my point: it's possible to talk issues cleanly without the appeal to base emotions. Without vilification. Without demonization.
May 15, 2008 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Name calling is stupid, immature and pointless, I agree 100%. But pretending that all views are equally valid (when some are clearly motivated by injustice, hatred and fear) so that we can get on with the healing, clearly misses an important step. Sometimes you need to set things right, using plain language, and demand atonement before you can bring everyone back into the fold.
May 15, 2008 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clearthinker: You are making some very good points. My impression of you has been of a partisan, rather than a peacemaker, but perhaps I was wrong. If this thread is any indication, you are practicing what your candidate preaches.
May 15, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hate her and oppose her. It came with all the tactics she has displayed since the "kitchen sink." Call it Dem on Dem crime.
May 15, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
She is starting the healing y'all:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Clinton_defends_Obama_from_Bush.html
Don't give into the hate. Hate leads to the dark side.
May 15, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well I hope so Yoda. But, and I quote "An Ohio-based group of Democratic Hillary Clinton supporters say they’ll work actively against Sen. Barack Obama if he becomes the nominee, arguing that Clinton has been the subject of “intense sexism” by party leaders and the media."
From http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Clinton_backer_backlash.html
They will be on O'Reilly tonight. She needs to shut those people down like Obama shut down Media Matters when it started fundraising for anti-McCain ads. If not then she will just be looking the other way while her little "527ish" group goes out and campaigns to withold the vote from Obama. She should be able to do that. If she can't then she is weak.
May 15, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, I saw that and it is disappointing. But I think you will see a lot of attitudes change once HRC concedes and endorses Obama.
May 15, 2008 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hilarious maneuver! Yeah, I think we need to just bite our tongues from time to time when we encounter frustrated Hillary supporters. It's so hard sometimes, but if we're going to be real supporters of Obama we should follow his lead in our own behavior toward fellow democrats/progressives.
May 15, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
In my experience it's more fellow dems than progressives. in pro-hillary facebook groups I was constantly having to deal with DLC-types ("moderates" but they usually don't actually know what the DLC is up to) and whenever I threw out the word progressive I usually got no response, suggesting to me that "progressive" is an unfamiliar word to some democrats.
Funny, because progressives in my US history class were writing books like "the Jungle", fighting for women's suffrage, women's rights, minimum wage, against the gold standard, etc etc.
The moderates? being stubborn until the last minute and then giving in to history.
May 15, 2008 9:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not hate. It's tough love, it's silly season, and we are having our fun. Good old American political humor fun, Ă la Mark Twain.
May 15, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will always love the Clintons.
May 15, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
There you go! That's the attitude. I can feel the love already.
Every time someone shows Hillary and her supporters some love, an angel gets their wings!
May 15, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just watch your long fingers. I've seen a few olive-branch-extending hands being snapped at.
May 15, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well aren't you just a sweetie
May 15, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I still like them, although I don't respect them as much as I used to.
I still thank them both for convincing America that the Democratic Party was worth their votes, especially after over a decade of destructive GOP dominance.
May 15, 2008 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The race isn't over yet. I don't hate Obama. I think -- if he decided to -- he could finish his term in the senate with some innovative legislative proposals. And I will most certainly consider voting for him in a future election.
May 15, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I hope that you'll commit to voting for the Democratic nominee in this year's future election.
May 15, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I differentiate between the clintons and the voters. Up with voters! Unity for voters. Help for voters! Healing for voters!
These voters are in the middle of a grief reaction. It takes time to grieve. Time to let go. And sometimes grieving involves anger. We need to be patient with that.
But as for the clintons themselves, they have some serious fence mending to do. Bridges to rebuild. We simply don't know what hillary will do, once she takes stock of things. How does she want to spend her life? What really matters to her? To them? We'll ahve to wait and see.
May 15, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Certainly, for the party to heal and move forward we need Hillary Clinton to bring the party together with her actions and words after she concedes. I think she's starting to do that.
But let's model good behavior for her. Imagine the her reaction when she hears that she's being booed at an Obama rally? It's just going to make her more determined to fight to the end. (it's the same reason that we don't want Obama or his surrogates demanding that Hillary drop out).
May 15, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do not advocate booing. And I totally agree that we are now seeing a chastened hillary. I personally think she sees the handwriting on the wall. That even party elders are now expecting her to change her tune. And she's doing that. In fact she seems to be lying low. Which is probably a good thing for a time.
I'm sensing a change here at tpm. Quieter. More reflective. It's a relief!
I have no quarrel with your efforts here. Bravo!
May 15, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Although the mention of Hillary was booed at first at the EdBama rally yesterday, by the end of his effusive praise of her, Edwards had the crowd cheering for her. I think it was a good example of a microcosm of what's to come. It won't happen immediately, but, as they say: "Primaries are a time to fall in love, Generals are a time to fall in line."
May 15, 2008 5:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's a reason I don't like the Clintons, I have no respect for them, I'm living the Bush elections over again by talking to her supporters and ending up utterly disgusted by the lack of rationality and decency.
May 15, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
See my above 3 step program - guaranteed results!
May 15, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your program will work. For anyone willing to try it.
May 15, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, here's an alternate 3-step program:
May 15, 2008 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Strong are you with the force Master Hocking.
May 15, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem with yours is it focuses the mind on the negative not the positive like the other one does. Far less effective in changing behavior.
Oh, when you take the deep breath - inhale through the nose. Inhaling through the mouth triggers the stress response receptors in the lungs and increases your stress hormones.
Thanks Yoda. Totally on point.
May 15, 2008 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, it's not mine. That was Yoda's. (His description, that is. I don't believe he was advocating it, mind you.) I just want people to know what their options are.
May 15, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's still worthwhile pointing out that:
There isn't a pile up on Hillary because she has yet to concede the Primary.
This is a critical point.
If you don't believe me, go back to 2000 -- when Bush acted as if he were the President. That went a long way to convincing people he was.
At this point in time there are only two ways to end the Dem Primary season:
a) Obama gets to the magic 2025 (and then we will hear about why not MI and FL...)
b) Hillary throws in the towel.
So the healing really won't occur until everyone agrees on the reality of the situation. For most of us, we agree: Obama won, Hillary lost.
Most of us. Not all. Sigh.
May 15, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good advice which I will do my best to follow.
So I now make the following pledge:
I will not say anything bad about Hillary anymore so long as she refrains from saying anything bad about Obama or anything stupid about "hard-working white voters."
I will not say anything bad about the 99 percent of Hillary supporters who backed her because they honestly believed she was the best candidate. I will do my best to recognize they are not happy now, give them time to grieve and be as nice to them as I can. (As trite as this sounds, some of them are even my friends.)
I will make no such pledge when it comes to the likes of Mark Penn, Lanny Davis, Terry McAuliffe and Howard Wolfson who made a lot of money spreading cynical lies and Orwellian double-talk. They neither reflect nor represent Clinton's volunteers and supporters, the Obama campaign does not need them to win in November, and their absence from the electoral scene would only improve our democracy.
Glad I got that off my chest. Now, time to be a grown up and be nice.
May 15, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent work - and don't you feel better?
May 15, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ommmmmmmmm....
May 15, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
♪ ♪ ♪
May 15, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't buy this forgive forget crap, especially when it comes to the internet community. I'm convinced that at least half the loudmouths out there shilling for Hillary on the tubes aren't even democrats.
After all the drama, after that infuriatingly hypocritical spat over MI and FL, after the racist dog-whistling, the right wing smears, the smug gloating after OH, PA, the constant REZKO and WRIGHT references, smugly calling us obamabots and cultists, the kool-aide/latte line, howling MISOGYNY at every turn, etc, etc.
These aren't progressives, they are loudmouthed soccer Moms who probably voted for Bush, and who have VASTLY inflated senses of self-importance and entitlement. You all know the type.
I for one reserve the right to point laugh and gloat 'till my heart's content. A few sourpuss Hillaristas cannot stop the movement. So when the time comes and Hillary finally has no way to continue, I plan on kicking back, popping some corn, and watching with glee as the Hill-o-Sphere collectively cries and cuts itself.
May 15, 2008 4:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Try my 3 step program today!
It has a retail value of $19.95 but today's internet offer is $0.00! Yes, it's FREE for the next 24 hours.
Don't miss out on this amazing deal.
May 15, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes I feel the love! ♪♪♪
May 15, 2008 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
How dare you call yourself a guerilla!
Your small-mindedness will never allow you to build a movement. Such talk relegates you to the dustbin of history.
May 15, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
At least I know how to spell guerrilla!
And despite your smug assumptions, you don't know anything about me, much less the size of my mindedness. My fault here is not small-mindedness, it's immaturity and spitefulness, plain and simple. So if you are going to anoint yourself expert on me, at least get the facts straight.
What can I say, life is short, and one of the simple pleasures I enjoy most are seeing blowhards get their comeuppance. Most of those asshats over at Hillaryis44.org and noquarter weren't going to vote for Obama anyway no matter what I say, so this kumbayah bullshit and "democrats unite in kissing Hillary's ass" hogwash are really very silly, and I'm not having any of it.
May 16, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
A serious post by the little green puppet? Another bizarro day at TPM...
May 15, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. I could understand it yesterday. Hillary's newfound tact and grace had not yet made the rounds for everyone to see. I have a hard time faulting them if they felt Hillary was still on the mission to destroy Obama for the general in pursuit of a SuperNomination.
But now that she seems to have altered her approach (assuming it isn't just another rope-a-dope like the Texas Debate) I agree that it is time to forgive and forget, and move on to battling the fascists and gangsters who are in the processes of "Busting Out" America.
May 15, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The first step is admitting you hate Hillary.
May 15, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
personally i think the average OBAMA person on this site is extremely insulting. i also think many of us could care less about how, because you think you need us, you want to make nice and sing kum by ya. there will be enough of us out here who are moderates and deeply resentlful who are so not interested in your new found kiss and make up tactics. you will figure that out soon enough.
the democratic party has pissed off many women, even african american women, not just feminists... for a truly long time. you will not get my money nor vote for a very, very long time.
May 15, 2008 5:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
See how it works? Olive branch extended - fingers bitten off.
May 15, 2008 5:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Be strong young jedi. No one said this would be easy.
May 15, 2008 8:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, "many women, even african american women, not just feminists" will be a lot better off once McCain is President. That'll show that sexist Democratic Party.
Cut nose, spite face.
May 15, 2008 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
because your arrogant pompous olive branch is out of necessity not sincerity
May 15, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, Michelle. Ask anyone here. I get carried away with the humor.
I mean the apology, sincerely, not for political reasons, but because I truly understand what all this means to you.
May 15, 2008 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Then the question becomes, are you so pissed off that you are willing to endure another four to eight years of Bush's policies under McCain by not supporting the alternative Obama presents?
May 15, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
More voters disagree with your opinion on who is a better alternative to McCain. If the roles were reversed, and Obama had n path to the nomination without destroying the party, I would gladly suck it up and support Clinton.
The reverse however is the reality. So the question is, and will continue to be, do you give a shit about the policies and issues that Clinton advocates (most of which Obama and most other Democrats advocate as well) or not?
If you care about what Clinton advocates for you will not just vote for Obama but you will bust your ass off to make sure McCain is defeated in November like the rest of us who give a damn about women's rights, ending the war, addressing global climate change, crafting a viable reform to get us on the path to UHC, etc.
So is it about Clinton the person, or is it about everything Clinton claims to be fighting for that matters to you?
May 16, 2008 5:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm perfectly happy to see Hillary finish out the race. The only thing that really bothers me about her right now is that she keeps pumping her supporters for more cash donations, based on some rather magical ideas about winning the nomination.
May 15, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Clinton campaign is changing their attitude and they are going to end with class:
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/05/15/1027329.aspx
As far as asking her supporters for money even while she won't be the nominee, this is SOP for politics and her supporters are well aware of the situation.
May 15, 2008 8:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Take a look at the candidates' schedules on the sidebar of EC. Hillary has one event today and none tomorrow. Bill has 6 events... all (tiny?) places in Kentucky. Seems like a fade to me.
May 15, 2008 11:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
bush's policy's are not hurting me. i was a conservative dem who as an african american felt she would never vote republican. i can deal with mccain for 4 to 8 years economically.
as far as roe V wade i heard a funny poster who said something that had a tinge of truth. poor people bitter whites typically have their kids it's the elites who are more concerned with the abortion option.
i strongly believe in divided government and have NO interest in the liberal/progressive side of the house making policy for this nation. i prefer the middle ground. as it appears the dems will take the house and senate in a landslide. john mccain will not be able to do much so i am comfortable with my answer. i am as concerned with OBAMA's foreign policy's lack of experience as mccain's over zelousness. as i said MIDDLE GROUND is best for the counrty and the world.
May 15, 2008 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wasn't even thinking specifically of the abortion issue. Aside from anything else, thinking about the massive numbers of dead and maimed American soldiers (not to mention Iraqis) and their traumatized families, as well as the American treasure flushed down the toilet that could have been dedicated to other purposes, and the loss of esteem for our nation in the world -- we each have been severely abused by the Bush administration. McCain's commitment to continue in that conflict until we have "victory" "in 2013" is enough reason for me to flee from him like I would from a mad dog.
May 15, 2008 6:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michelle,
It is Obama's foreign policy which I trust more than any other aspect of his platform. With McCain, we will spend trillions, lose more young lives, and neglect to control Al Qaeda and our real enemies, all for the war profiteering that's now occuring. Remember Eisenhower's warning. As awful as Bush was, McCain will be much, much worse.
I trust as the real campaign progresses, and people understand more of Obama's foreign policy platform, even a skeptic (which is a good thing) like you may be convinced.
May 15, 2008 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, Michelle, it occurs to me that your "strong belief" in divided government and your commitment to "MIDDLE GROUND" did not prevent you from supporting Hillary. So why is it suddenly a insurmountable issue to supporting Obama?
May 15, 2008 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
michelle,
You have to decide how you vote in November. This post isn't about groveling for Clinton supporters votes. It's about putting what differences we had in the primary behind us. I would hope that would mean that Democrats unite behind the nominee, but you have every right to vote another way. That's what democracy is all about.
Good luck, Yoda
May 15, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
You obviously haven't been paying attention to what a president, even with an opposed congress, can do. Smarten up.
May 16, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
In terms of policy, what is the middle ground? Choose any policy to elaborate.
I ask this because it seems a lot of people seem to think there is a middle ground between liberal and conservative policies that is sustainable; and I think this is the case. I tend to support more moderate liberal/libertarian/pragmatic policies and McCain is far from those policy prescriptions I espouse. Most people would see that as the "middle ground", but really my policy preferences have more to do with what works to move the economy and nation along for the greatest amount of people while considering the costs and benefits of each. It has little to do with ideology, it just so happens that many policies I support end up being supported by Democratic officials.
However, you seem to be saying the "middle ground" of ideology is what you strive for. In the end, ideology is not a very good way to approach policy IMO. Only because the ideological tenants of both parties conflict with other tenants of the same party. If your opinion sways with ideology, how could you possibly not set yourself up for conflict among competing policies and candidates?
May 16, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has it occurred to anyone that there may be a reason Obama supporters are angry and frustrated? Could it be that we strongly support our candidate too, and the vicious attacks against Obama, his wife, and his supporters are hurtful? Could it be that Obama supporters don't understand, and are frustrated when Hillary supporters can't seem to accept that we strongly believe that the game was played fair and square by Obama - but that Hillary seems to want to change the rules practically every day? I hear a whole lot about how awful Obama supporters are - but I have seen some of the most heartbreaking, shocking, terrible statements out of Hillary supporters; statements that I can hardly believe would come out the mouths of Democrats. Hillary supporters are not innocent. They have played an equal role in the hard feelings. AdAbsurdum is exactly right - there have been times that Obama supporters have tried to extend a hand in peace and reconciliation - only to have that hand slapped away. Michelle Bociurkiw's comment:
"because your arrogant pompous olive branch is out of necessity not sincerity"
illustrates my point exactly. Michelle - how can you expect anyone to feel sincere about extending an olive branch when this is the response?
I'm not saying that Obama supporters are innocent either - they aren't. In order for reconciliation to take place, I think that BOTH sides need to recognize their own responsibility for the divisions and resentments. As Hillary herself said: it would be an unbelievable tragedy for all Americans if the anger and resentment was held so strongly that Democrats would actually vote for McCain as revenge for their candidate losing the nomination in a contest that was waged fair and square and by the rules that all parties agreed to in the beginning. We truly are at a pivotal moment in history. I think many of us will agree that in order to overcome the challenges we face: restoring our civil liberties, stopping torture and spying, preventing our country from going bankrupt, preventing extreme right-wing supreme court judges being appointed and overturning Roe v. Wade, bringing a halt to the shameful tragedy of Iraq, addressing climate change, and rebuilding the middle-class in this country......to do these things we MUST have a Democrat sworn in as President in January 2009. I wish to urge Hillary supporters to please think of these very important issues before casting a revenge vote that could potentially give the presidency to McCain.
I'm willing to forgive and forget. In the interests of this country, in the interests of the world, and in the interests of future generations. Can you forgive and forget? Will you?
May 15, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bravo.
May 15, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen. This contest is about the future of America, not two personalities.
May 15, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
i don't think her continued candidacy is magical. if things go right as we continue there will be some realities hitting the ground that if she doesn't win the primary she will still be in a very strong political position. i look at it this way she has 4 options
1. she becomes VP and influences the policy for 8 years as well as have a better chance to become president after the country learns she is a damn good politician. you then have 16 years of clinton influence.
2. she becomes VP candidate and OBAMA loses. she is now much stronger and OBAMA will go back to illinois. she can then run against mccain in 4 years.
3. she wins on a pending legal fight...texas hispanics are filing a lawsuit against their state delegates that could significantly change the delegate math in texas. it may or may not have an impact who knows...add florida and michigan’s changes and there is a slim chance she is all that much closer. add kentucky's 4.8 million potential voting population (let's say they have 30% turnout and she gets 60%. her popular vote count gets much higher. now if they improve her chances in oregon she may bring it all that much closer.
with mccain and the GOP coming out hard against OBAMA i think you all will start to see just how vulnerable your candidate really is. you will also see how desperately he will need hilliary's supporters. enough of us will not budge for him because many of us are moderates and can accept mccain as an option knowing the democratic landslide will keep mc amnesty's hands tied. there are also those who will never forgive the OBAMACANS vitriol and vote for him. you also have those who will not vote for an african american no matter what went down.
May 15, 2008 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
because hilliary is much more moderate than OBAMA. period dot
May 15, 2008 6:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"period dot"? Most analysts actually see her health plan as more aggressive than Obama's. And other than that, it is difficult to find much breathing room between them on policy matters.
May 15, 2008 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, Obama's foreign policy posture is not nearly as warlike as Clinton. Which is a good thing for everyone outside of far-right chickenhawk whack-jobs and neocons.
May 16, 2008 5:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
PJ...you're a lot smarter than the rest of the herd you run with.
May 15, 2008 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
err...uuummmm.....thank you? (sorry herd)
May 15, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like you could tell.
May 16, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
This said by someone who's proud of their missing teeth.
May 16, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Name one one place I have expressed pride in the missing tooth, moron.
Name one. Just one.
Go ahead. We'll wait.
Come to think of it, no we won't. It's not even fun insulting a mouth-breather such as you. A battle of wits with an unarmed adversary. Enjoy your President McCain.
May 16, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
You took a picture of it.
May 16, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
sorry but with dems in power he does not have the power to do any of those things you listed. a democratic landslide in the senate and congress will give you the protection you need. to go from one extreme of bush to another extreme of obama is not what we need either. we need moderate ground. that was hilliary for me. all now that will happen is we will stop mccain for four years and then try another shot at another dem candidate. hopefully it is hilliary...if not someone else.
May 15, 2008 6:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
period dot lol
it means the end of my point. end of story... lol
May 15, 2008 6:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know what "period dot" means. My point was that the finality you were expressing with that phrase does not accord with how close Hillary and Obama are in terms of policy. It is very difficult for me to see Obama as more extreme than Hillary, for the reasons I noted above.
May 15, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why bother even engaging her? She's made up her mind, and all she wants to do is argue with you at this point.
There are so many millions more Hillary Clinton supporters who are open to hearing your story about Barack Obama. Find them, spend your time talking with them.
The hundred or so Clinton supporters on this site, even if all of them decide that McCain is worthy of their vote, won't make a lick of difference in November. Those who won't accept a personal plea for reconciliation and solidarity probably aren't going to be swayed to vote for Obama (at least not yet).
May 15, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I did it simply to see where it would lead, hopeful that we could have a reasonable discussion. I have had a conversation with another Hillary supporter who is similarly committed to her candidate and lacks the ability to dialog in any meaningful way (conceding some points but contesting others). I'm frankly dumbfounded by this phenomenon.
If Hillary had won, I would have been convinced to vote to her because the other option is just so unthinkable. I don't understand what drives people to refuse to engage in meaningful dialog. I study the phenomenon of religion as an academic profession, and thus I know all about tenacity of belief in that context, but I have difficulty comprehending that in the political sphere, even though I know it exists.
May 15, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good on you for trying. Hopefully in a few weeks it will be easier to find more Hillary supporters here who are open to discussion.
HRC folks here at TPM are tame compared to some other sites. And everyone knows it goes both ways -- the Hillary hate in some places is downright scary.
She would make a great president, but it's not going to happen in '08.
May 15, 2008 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
During the Primaries the rhetoric has gotten heated on both sides. To the Obamaniacs- be gracious. To the Clintonistas - do the right thing. George Bush has been an unqualified disaster for this country. Continuation of his policies vis-a-vis McCain would put us into the dark ages.
Everyone has to decide what is going to be the best for our children. If you make the wrong decision they will want to know why.
May 15, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't hate Hillary. What are you talking about?
May 15, 2008 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
i guess there are more than just a hundred of us females out here who are willing to walk out on the democrats...like i said above no more money, no more volunteering and no more voting for their candidates. women FAR outnumber the african american voting block. period dot! ;-)
Women Threaten Obama Boycott
May 15, 2008 5:04 PM
FROM GUEST-BLOGGER RICK KLEIN, OF ABC'S THE NOTE
I've posted a few times in the last two days about female supporters of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton who are angry -- at the Democratic Party, at the Obama campaign, or at the general situation that sees their candidate facing tough times, in their view, in part because of sexism.
Just talked to a 55-year-old Columbus, Ohio resident named Cynthia Ruccia, a spokesperson and organizer for a group calling itself "Clinton Supporters Count Too." She said the group -- numbering in the hundreds, and organized in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan -- stands ready to boycott the Democratic Party if Clinton doesn't win the nomination, and will work against superdelegates who support Obama over Clinton as a means of registering their displeasure with the party.
"We have a plan to campaign against the Democratic nominee," the group said in a press release Thursday. "We have the (wo)manpower and the money to make our threat real. And there are millions of supporters who will back us up in the swing states. If you don’t listen to our voice now, you will hear from us later."
Ruccia tells ABC News that she believes "millions" of women share her group's views, though they have only begun to make contact with like-minded women. They're disgusted, she said, that Democratic Party leaders haven't more aggressively denounced sexist media comments and coverage in the campaign, and are angry at the drumbeat for Clinton to get out of the race.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/women-threaten.html?cid=114843030
May 15, 2008 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary told her supporters it would be a "profound mistake" for them to vote McCain in the general election. If you believe she is so smart, why not heed her pragmatic advice?
May 15, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Heed which pragmatic Hillary advice? That McCain would be a better commander-in-chief than Barack, or that it would be a mistake to vote for McCain?
May 16, 2008 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
hmmm
May 15, 2008 11:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Memo to the Democratic leadership elite: Consider yourselves on notice. Hell hath no fury. Believe it.
May 15, 2008 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn Right! Hell hath no furry like my scorn for not nominating our beloved candidate who is fully entitled to this. I'm proud to vote against my former party, to encourage the overturn of Roe vs Wade, to ignore the mothers and fathers of soldiers dying in Iraq, to promote the current economic and foreign policy that has brought us so far so fast.
F*ck em. My personal outrage is more important.
May 15, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
i make my own decisions. this is more than about hilliary clinton. this is about women who have worked tirelessly for this party for years. WE ARE THE MAJORITY OF THE PARTY. this campaign disrespected me as a woman. that is enough for me to let them know we will not stand for this level of disrepect. all i have is my voice and i will not give it to a group with so little respect for women.
May 15, 2008 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Michelle,
I'm not sure I'm buying it - whenever people say things that don't quite add up I'm a little suspicious on these here internets. But if you're for real, then go ahead a sit this one out if you think Obama is so bad.
Obviously, if you want to talk about political parties that don't respect women I think you can start with the GOP.
I jsut think it's interesting when there's a post like this that tries to simmer down tensions and there's one or two people who are clearly trying hard to rile everyone up. So I'm a bit suspicious of your motives...or what your point is exactly.
May 16, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yoda,
I've had it out with her before. Maybe a month or two ago...she was supporting McCain then as well. She made up her mind a long time ago.
May 16, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
So far I haven't heard any concrete point on how Obama's campaign has been sexist. Not one.
I know that members of the media, like Chris Matthews have made some ill-advised statements and Keith Olberman doesn't like Hillary but those are not related to the campaign. People on the Obama side also feel they have been wronged by the abc debate and extremely excessive coverage of Rev. Wright. But again that's the media and neither campaign control that. Ratings control that, it's the holy grail for them. They piss off people on all sides.
May 15, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yoda -- very nice! Fellow Obama peeps -- just think of it chosing to do what's best for our guy, rather deciding to say something just because we can. There's no use in hurling epithets.
May 15, 2008 11:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
If only the Obama fanboys had known that early on, it probably would have made a big difference.
May 16, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Chinese have many ancient proverbs dealing with just about every human contingency imaginable. My favorite one (in the present context of Senator You-Know-Her and her refusal to recognize reality) says: "The centipede is dead but not stiff."
Therefore, when and if political rigor mortis sets in and the Democratic Party C.S.I. team processes the Clinton campaign's corpse to formally pronounce its time and cause of death, then and only then will I speak less ill of the damaging departed than I did while they unfortunately lived. Some souls more generous than me may yet have cause to claim of Senator You-Know-Her that "Nothing in her short political life became her as the leaving of it." As long as she leaves, I'll hold my peace during the eulogy.
May 16, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Over three years ago now, I wrote a poem in honor of my hero, Cindy Sheehan: an admirable American woman of impressive personal courage, who reminded me so much of Shakespeare's Isabella (in "Measure for Measure") and J. R. R. Tolkien's unassuming Hobbits caught up in vast wars over glittering rings of power.
But your poem didn't cover what happens when you discover that Barry has funded those vast wars over glittering rings of power?
Who cares whether you hold your peace? You're not going to fool anybody anyway so just be yourself. Get out there and alienate as many potential Barry voters as you can.
May 16, 2008 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
His name is Barack, not Barry. You want respect, earn a little by showing a little, and we will do likewise and you can do so with little painless gesture by using his given and preferred name.
May 16, 2008 5:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's right, Indiex. Just ignore the "Senator You-Know-Her" part that prompted you to say "Barry." You're supposed to be the magnanimous one first, after all. Get with the Do-As-I-Say program already! ;-)
May 16, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
How big of you.... now that you realize you need us.
May 16, 2008 1:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
We need each other.
What exactly are your politics, Otto?
I ask because I want to clarify exactly what you mean by "us." If by us you mean Hillary partisans, then yes, every vote and voice of support helps the United States reassert itself as a nation of temperance and sanity.
However, if by "us," you mean contrarian psychic vampires, then no group needs their presence because the pathological need for attention and importance undermines social progress.
Do you want a country that can move past Bush and begin to undo the damage inflicted by neoconservatism? Do you simply want to be right? Or are you addicted to the tingle in your solar plexus that comes with picking fights?
May 16, 2008 5:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
From Politico:
Clinton backer backlash
My colleague Beth Frerking reports on something we're likely to hear a lot more about in coming days: Grumblings from the almost-half of the party, disproportionately women, whose candidate is losing.
An Ohio-based group of Democratic Hillary Clinton supporters say they’ll work actively against Sen. Barack Obama if he becomes the nominee, arguing that Clinton has been the subject of “intense sexism” by party leaders and the media.
Led by Boomer-aged women, the group, Clinton Supporters Count Too, is holding a press conference in Columbus at noon to release this statement.
Organizers Cynthia Ruccia, 55, and Jamie Dixey, 57, both from the Columbus area, say they’re coordinating women, men, minorities, union members and others in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and Michigan – all important swing states next November – to impress upon Democratic party leaders what they think has been outright discrimination – and not of the racial kind.
“We have been vigilant against expressions of racism, and we are thrilled that the society has advanced that way” in accepting Obama as a serious candidate,” Ruccia said. “But it’s been open season on women, and we feel we need to stand up and make a statement about that, because it’s wrong.”
With growing calls for Clinton to leave the race, she said, women feel like “we’re being told to sit down, shut up, and get with the program.”
Hard to know what to make of any given group, but the sentiment is clearly out there, and putting the party back together will be Obama's, and Clinton's, challenge.
Oh, and they're doing O'Reilly tonight, of course.
May 16, 2008 1:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I will be voting in November. I'll be writing in Hillary Clinton. I hope many follow suit. I would never vote for a joke like Obama. He is deeply offensive on a moral level: he and Clinton are both politicians and corrupt, but he's gotten away with bold-faced lies, telling voters that he's here to change the way politics works. I despise this man. His supporters are, generally, proud and hateful. I hope he loses. I look forward to four years of McCain as opposed to you people getting your way and leading the country in an even worse direction.
Hillary 2012
May 16, 2008 1:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
"I will be voting in November. ......[Obama]is deeply offensive on a moral level: he and Clinton are both politicians and corrupt"
With a view like that and complete acceptance of it you lower the standards of what we can and should demand from our government. We must demand more. To do that we need to have our voices heard and have our message be clear. Obama's plan to allow less influence from well monied lobbyists and to allow us to view the money flow with such groups will give us a greater voice.
May 16, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have a better idea for you:
Instead of writing in Clinton, you can just take your ballot and flush it down the nearest toilet. Same impact. Same result.
May 16, 2008 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Also from Politico:
Misogyny I Won't Miss
By Marie Cocco
Thursday, May 15, 2008; Page A15
As the Democratic nomination contest slouches toward a close, it's time to take stock of what I will not miss.
I will not miss seeing advertisements for T-shirts that bear the slogan "Bros before Hos." The shirts depict Barack Obama (the Bro) and Hillary Clinton (the Ho) and are widely sold on the Internet.
I will not miss walking past airport concessions selling the Hillary Nutcracker, a device in which a pantsuit-clad Clinton doll opens her legs to reveal stainless-steel thighs that, well, bust nuts. I won't miss television and newspaper stories that make light of the novelty item.
I won't miss episodes like the one in which liberal radio personality Randi Rhodes called Clinton a "big [expletive] whore" and said the same about former vice presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro. Rhodes was appearing at an event sponsored by a San Francisco radio station, before an audience of appreciative Obama supporters -- one of whom had promoted the evening on the presumptive Democratic nominee's official campaign Web site.
I won't miss Citizens United Not Timid (no acronym, please), an anti-Clinton group founded by Republican guru Roger Stone.
Political discourse will at last be free of jokes like this one, told last week by magician Penn Jillette on MSNBC: "Obama did great in February, and that's because that was Black History Month. And now Hillary's doing much better 'cause it's White Bitch Month, right?" Co-hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski rebuked Jillette.
I won't miss political commentators (including National Public Radio political editor Ken Rudin and Andrew Sullivan, the columnist and blogger) who compare Clinton to the Glenn Close character in the movie "Fatal Attraction." In the iconic 1987 film, Close played an independent New York woman who has an affair with a married man played by Michael Douglas. When the liaison ends, the jilted woman becomes a deranged, knife-wielding stalker who terrorizes the man's blissful suburban family. Message: Psychopathic home-wrecker, begone.
The airwaves will at last be free of comments that liken Clinton to a "she-devil" (Chris Matthews on MSNBC, who helpfully supplied an on-screen mock-up of Clinton sprouting horns). Or those who offer that she's "looking like everyone's first wife standing outside a probate court" (Mike Barnicle, also on MSNBC).
But perhaps it is not wives who are so very problematic. Maybe it's mothers. Because, after all, Clinton is more like "a scolding mother, talking down to a child" (Jack Cafferty on CNN).
When all other images fail, there is one other I will not miss. That is, the down-to-the-basics, simplest one: "White women are a problem, that's -- you know, we all live with that" (William Kristol of Fox News).
I won't miss reading another treatise by a man or woman, of the left or right, who says that sexism has had not even a teeny-weeny bit of influence on the course of the Democratic campaign. To hint that sexism might possibly have had a minimal role is to play that risible "gender card."
Most of all, I will not miss the silence.
I will not miss the deafening, depressing silence of Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean or other leading Democrats, who to my knowledge (with the exception of Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland) haven't publicly uttered a word of outrage at the unrelenting, sex-based hate that has been hurled at a former first lady and two-term senator from New York. Among those holding their tongues are hundreds of Democrats for whom Clinton has campaigned and raised millions of dollars. Don Imus endured more public ire from the political class when he insulted the Rutgers University women's basketball team.
Would the silence prevail if Obama's likeness were put on a tap-dancing doll that was sold at airports? Would the media figures who dole out precious face time to these politicians be such pals if they'd compared Obama with a character in a blaxploitation film? And how would crude references to Obama's sex organs play?
There are many reasons Clinton is losing the nomination contest, some having to do with her strategic mistakes, others with the groundswell for "change." But for all Clinton's political blemishes, the darker stain that has been exposed is the hatred of women that is accepted as a part of our culture.
Marie Cocco is syndicated by the Washington Post Writers Group.
May 16, 2008 1:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Otto F. I hadn't had a chance to read this article yet, so I appreciate your posting it—in this thread especially. Smart man. :-)
May 16, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mmmm... Otto shows how this is a difficult process. He's not going to stop the drumbeat of accusing Obama supporters of misogyny, etc. Sure, some show some signs of ugliness. So do some Clinton supporters.
But I'll let it go -- I was happy to see Clinton strongly defend Obama from Thursday's round of bullshit from the Republicans. It just highlighted that we're all on the same side.
But it's just hard for some to deal. If an Obama supporter is wearing a "Bros Before Hos" shirt, indeed they should be smacked upside the head. But I had no idea such shirts were out there until Otto posted about them in his massive cut-n-paste from Politico.
It's hard for some to deal. I went to the local Dem HQ to get an Obama bumper sticker and to sign up for the cause. At the same time a middle aged woman came in. She asked for bumper sticker. The guy asked if she wanted an Obama. She said very firmly, "Oh, no."
She sounded like she really didn't want such a thing sullying up her car. She did take a general pro-Dem sticker. But I kind of wanted to tell her that it's time to deal. Maybe she heard me enthusiastically ask for an Obama sticker, thought about giving me a piece of her mind.
Take a deep breath. Time to deal.
May 16, 2008 2:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
It just highlighted that we're all on the same side.
You wish. Sow. Reap. It's a lesson in growing up. Deal with it.
May 16, 2008 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
So you admit you give less than a shit about any of the things Clinton stands for.
Thanks for clearing that up for us.
May 16, 2008 5:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Learned it from Barry supporters back when Clinton was 'inevitable'. You shouldn't have burned the bridges. Live and learn...
May 16, 2008 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
What bridges were burned? When?
Are you still on the side of the Democratic party?
Clarify.
May 16, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought I was on the Democratic Party side but I kept hearing from Barry's Boyz that I was ...the old politics...he's changing all that...new generation taking over...my vote not needed because Barry's bringing so many new voters to the party...etc.
I'll definitely be supporting and voting for the downticket dems as always. But I've seen nothing from the Obama campaign that merits my vote. In fact, after he went race pimp in the lead up to SC, I wasn't sure he'd ever be able to get a vote from me. Add to that his punkster posse posting recycled pubbie smears and balancing out their Barry-Luv with Clinton-hate, it's not a group I want to be associated with.
Hope that helps.
May 16, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
So how's Indiex working to heal the party?
May 16, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nope. Not a chance.
And before I begin, I just want to say how much I hate people throwing out 'misogyny' whenever Hillary is criticized. People dislike her not because she's a woman, but because she is such a duplicitous, untrustworthy human being, gender irrespective.
That being said, she--AND BILL, for that matter--have earned the animus and disdain of Obama supporters, such as myself. Playing the race card--SC, 'hard working, white Americans'--is despicable, the kind of bald-faced lying represented by her deliberate manufacturing of the Bosnia story, her Republicanesque tactics of trying to disenfranchise NV voters and discredit the TX results, the list goes on and on. She has mercilessly, cold-bloodedly attacked Barack, TRYING to make him unelectable, because she can't stand that her own dream is going down the gutter, and she cannot accept defeat.
She does not deserve our forgiveness. She deserves to lose and to get kicked out of the Senate in 2012.
Fuck her. And fuck Bill. Chelsea's the only decent person in that family.
Obama '08.
Obama '12.
May 16, 2008 3:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Playing the race card--
Fuck you, groupie-boy. Obama's a race pimp.
I could tell from your post that you enjoy a frank exchange of opinions.
May 17, 2008 1:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good post, Yoda Urbinato. And I think your comments throughout are even better than the post.
To bolster your public-service efforts, I think this digby post is worth reading. digby correctly identifies the press's contribution to the current level of rancor among the rank and file Dems.
No matter if you prefer Hillary or Barack, I think we can all agree that the media treatment of the 2008 primary season has been abysmal. We rarely come away from any of the coverage with any information we actually needed.
I'll also go out on a limb to say that TPM has been guilty of reporting "sheer trivia and misdirection" as well. No one has to agree with this opinion, but ask yourselves if you've learned anything important about your preferred candidate (here at TPM) since January.
May 16, 2008 4:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have to admit the biggest grievance I bear for Hillary Clinton is how she courted and won the approval of Richard Melon Scaife, the architect of the Arkansas Project. Shortly after this episode, the Jeremiah Wright scandal broke, and the mainstream media put on its outrage mask and engaged in color aroused politics 24/7 for an entire month.
The Scaife-funded Arkansas Project helped start and fan the flames of Whitewater, Troopergate, Filegate, the Vince Foster murder allegation, rumors of Clinton drug smuggling, and a host of smears that resounded on all levels of public discourse.
So, the fact is that Hillary Clinton made bedfellows with the people that she tells us plebes she is going to "fight." That, combined with her dangerous foreign policy, soured me to her candidacy.
Will bygones be bygones? Of course. Am I a mysoginst because I have specific valid reasons for opposing her candidacy> Of course not. Am I an Obamabot? Definitely not.
What chaps my ass about this whole Democratic Primary is that both sides have gone out of their way to criticise candidates because of their supporters... neglecting the fact that by and large all of these supporters belong to the same party! I have always limited my arguments to the individual I am talking to, or criticisng the candidates themselves. I refuse to wallow in ad hominem prejudice because it gets my outrage flowing.
I don't like to see Obamabot, Obamaton, or Kool Aid used in relation to Obama supporters. We are real people with deep thoughts and volitional consciousness. There is no reason to so deeply dehumanize people by calling them cultists or cogs in a well-oiled propoganda machine. I find these insults reprehensible above all else because it smacks of the darkest places of human nature. When you render someone or a group as less than human, inferior and animal, you open the door for inquisitional practice.
Those insults are not cute or clever. They betray a monstrous intent. Treat Obama supporters as human beings. I will do my part by continiung to engage anyone, even trolls, as people. This is the golden rule; the law of reciprocity.
Physician, heal thyself.
May 16, 2008 5:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well said.
May 16, 2008 5:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
And how will Obama deal with the Great White Wing Conspiracy? All I hear are vague platitudes and have seen nothing that shows any particular talent in that direction.
May 16, 2008 8:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I presume you mean the "white Appalachian working class" problem.
They can hop on board or not. That voting bloc has proven historically fickle.
I am much more in tune with the voter outreach and mass registration underway. That will more than offset the "target demographic pander" approach that has marred political discourse since George Wallace.
May 16, 2008 8:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nope, that's not what Desidero meant. You completely misread, so never mind.
May 16, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
How about you explain on behalf of Desidero...
Clariaty of prose is important. I can not answer a point if it is written in troll jargon.
May 16, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Translation:
You mentioned your beef about Hillary meeting with Scaife. Desidero wants to know how Obama is going to handle the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy press (which, for Obama, will transform itself into the Vast White Wing Conspiracy press). Hillary takes them on directly, for which she has always been criticized. Obama supporters give "vague platitudes" instead of plans about how Obama will deal with the Republican slime machine. So far, Desidero doesn't see any evidence that Obama can vanquish the great blob of slime thundering rapidly toward him (I took a little poetic license here, obviously).
Does that help? Desidero wasn't talking about voters by mentioning "White."
May 16, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the great ball of slime is overrated.
I just don't see the threat from 527s and red meat wedge issue politics playing with the same level of authority that they had 4 and 8 years ago.
Face it: Kerry was a weak candidate and folded under pressure. His campaign had poor funds and had to withdraw from campaigning during crucial 17 days that the Swift Boat Ads aired and gained national traction.
I daresay that lessons have been learned from all sides, and that the Obama campaign has so far shown an ability to beat the slime machine.
The only consequence is that he lost the Appalachian white vote... my Louisville friend still believes that Hillary is going to win: mark my words, he says. Well, I'm marking them.
I just don't see the same threat that everyone else is seeing. I daresay that this time around I am confident. I was not confindent in Kerry... the 2000 election broke my heart... but that is a story for another day.
May 16, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
As the Buddha said over 2,500 years ago: "You can't give offense to anyone unwilling to take it." (note the active nature of the transitive verb "to take.") No one can give me any offense because I won't let them. And I expect the same refusal to take self-interested umbrage from others.
Senator You-Know-Her has made quite a point of publicly impugning Senator Obama's "toughness." Fair enough. Yet now that he has proven tough enough to beat her and her three testicles (as her attack dog James Carville says) with only one of his own, it seems less than tough of her and her supporters to start suing for sympathy while simultaneously hurling the "mysogyny" epithet at the ostensibly "weak" Senator Obama and his supporters.
Again, though, when and if You-Know-Her publicly acknowledges her defeat at the hands of "a better man," then I'll start calling her by her given and paternal/married names, because soon enough now the phrase "you know her" will only elicit puzzled looks and the rejoinder "no, I don't." Not for nothing do I call amnesiac America "The Land that Forgot Time." So, Senator You-Know-Her had better enjoy her last few fleeting moments strutting and fretting upon the stage, because oblivion awaits poor players whose one-act political life closes on opening night.
May 16, 2008 7:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
UNITE THE PARTY. i do not care who gets the nomination, as long as
1. they are progressive (which both candidates who ran are)
2. its done before 1st week of June so we can prepare for 100 years war McCain
and I do think people need to stop attacking each other and start attacking McCain who will be another bush term.
UNITE !!!
May 16, 2008 7:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is customary for the losing coach in a lopsided game to sue for mercy by sending a concession signal to the other team -- such as substituting for his starting players. If instead the defeated coach sends out his goons to slash at the wrists or kneecaps of the stars on the winning team, it is the obligation of the winning coach to discourage his opponents. After all, he needs his best players healthy for the finals.
May 16, 2008 7:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
If it were lopsided it might make it easier. I think that's why Edwards came crawling to Obama.
May 16, 2008 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can we say nonsequitur, boys and girls?
It's over. Your candidate's attempts to aid the election of the folks more in tune with her political philosophy are having their desired effect in uniting her friends and dividing her party. Her party is lashing back. Gasp!
May 16, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're a little slow, Tank Ard. That blow to the head that knocked out your tooth may have done more damage than you realize.
May 16, 2008 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, your Mom hates being told "No!" and she packs quite a punch.
May 16, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
She told me she socked a guy in a bar once. Never thought I'd meet him on a political website.
May 16, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
That couldn't have been me. I lost that tooth in a brothel.
May 16, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
That couldn't have been me. I lost that tooth in a brothel.
May 16, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
lol! You're full of shit. No wonder someone punched you.
May 16, 2008 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Please stop the Hillary hate... It's ok because the race is over."
I have no reason to stop hating Hillary. But I'll stop talking about it when she and her sleaze-team stop spewing BS.
May 16, 2008 8:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
They have. HRC is not not attacking Obama anymore and all her ads running in Oregon and KY are about her, not Obama. That's a big change.
May 16, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
lefty, i am a little confused as to why you feel obama supporters must kiss your hiney in order for you cast that vote for obama. hrc supporters are equally mean if not more vile in my eyes. to add insult to injury i find hrc as vile as her supporters, but no way in hell would i cast that vote for mccain over hrc simply b/c her stance on the issues are more aligned with my views.
as far as whether or not either candidate will follow through? well, we take that chance every time we vote in a new candidate. i am willing to give obama that chance, you are not. like hrc, your stance is "my way or the highway".
lets make a truce, i would graciously accept your vote for obama if you simultaneously apologize for all nasty hrc supporters and your candidate's ungracious attitude while i do my best to do the same. until then, please do not play with anyone's intelligence by pretending you ever had any intention of casting that vote for obama.
it is a democracy and you are free to vote for mccain or write in hrc. that kind of wishy washy support obama can do without b/c when the republicans unite full force behind them, we do not want further erosion within our ranks from the likes of you defecting to the other side. that is what hurt hrc the most. her base is not solidly behind her. when she is in trouble, they run to obama like bees to honey. so far, obama has had no such erosion. those of us who made a conscience decision to stand by him did so conviction and proper thought.
again, no umbrage intended towards hrc supporter's but the education level and the age spread of obama's supporters is a great benefit and will aid in our success in november. being able to understand that mccain is the other side and no matter what obama or hrc will be better than more of bush's policies is fundamental to success.
when the going gets tough and the republicans start to swiftboat hrc, i wager you would drop hrc like a hot potato and race to mccain's side. she and obama share almost the same exact stance on the policies. if that can't sway you, then neither hrc nor obama need your shaky support.
gracious thank you...
May 16, 2008 8:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just ignore that part. It was a moment of weakness. We all have them, as you demonstrate with your own pugnacious response. See? See how human you are? Same is true of left.
May 16, 2008 9:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yoda, you have initiated a good discussion with this post.
My two cents: the supporters of both Dem camps are still sporting bruises and the bruised areas are still tender and aching. When those bruises eventually fade is the time when minds can move on to think about reconciliation with whomever was considered to be the 'bruiser'. It would behoove both sides to take this time while the bruises are healing to affirmatively choose to not throw any more punches.
May 16, 2008 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whenever I hear people bitching about the supporters as opposed to the candidate, I think people need to start using their heads. The guy who wrote that all the Obama supporters need to come up with effusive apologies? He's not paying sufficient attention to what actually makes differences in the world.
May 16, 2008 10:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
At least I know how to spell guerrilla!
And despite your smug assumptions, you don't know anything about me, much less the size of my mindedness. My fault here is not small-mindedness, it's immaturity and spitefulness, plain and simple. So if you are going to anoint yourself expert on me, at least get the facts straight.
What can I say, life is short, and one of the simple pleasures I enjoy most are seeing blowhards get their comeuppance. Most of those asshats over at Hillaryis44.org and noquarter weren't going to vote for Obama anyway no matter what I say, so this kumbayah bullshit and "democrats unite in kissing Hillary's ass" hogwash are really very silly, and I'm not having any of it.
May 16, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Left, Don't let the crazies get to you. Lots of us who support Obama simply want Clinton's supporters to think about the issues and then vote for the DEMOCRAT because that's where we are in this country. It's about the war, the economy, choice, the future of the Supreme Court (!) and our international reputation (among other things). This nation has been trashed for 7 years and we need to get back on track. McCain is just too much of the same.
May 16, 2008 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
The mood and perspective of an organization trickles down from the top. I see much divisiveness in these Clinton supporters who intend to not vote or support McCain with the hopes of subverting our Democratic candidate. It has flowed down and permeated their political views.
BTW if Hillary and her supporters allow the Repubs to win out of spitefullness she will take a huge hit politically and not have a chance in future elections of the Democratic party.
May 16, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
The mood and perspective of an organization trickles down from the top. I see much divisiveness in these Clinton supporters who intend to not vote or support McCain with the hopes of subverting our Democratic candidate. It has flowed down and permeated their political views.
BTW if Hillary and her supporters allow the Repubs to win out of spitefullness she will take a huge hit politically and not have a chance in future elections of the Democratic party.
May 16, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's sort of troubling that people cannot see the difference between John McCain and Barack Obama. McCain believes in things like Blackwater, the mercenary force currently occupying large parts of Iraq (and, unfortunately, participating in sexual assaults against our troops, without any recourse for the victims). McCain wants Iraq to continue at least until 2013. That would be ten years in Iraq, over a trillion dollars of U.S. treasure sent to that country (while ours continues to underfund schools, roads, etc.). McCain (and Hillary) want to repeal part of the gas tax, asserting that this would bring "relief." Nothing could be further from the truth. I mean, I could go on and on.
It's unfortunate that you cannot distinguish between McCain and Obama. If you're willing to vote for a candidate solely because their supporters don't offend your candidate's supporters, we're going to continue sending troops to Iraq, we're going to ignore health care, we're going to underfund schools, etc., etc., etc.
I would rather vote for a candidate who is right on the issues and is light on experience than vote for a candidate who is wrong on the issues.
May 16, 2008 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
What the heck, I am happy to make nice with Clinton supporters (at least most of them) and if I have said anything to offend them I apologize. Unreservedly, at that. I have been regularly appalled at the fratricidal lunacy on the blogs and if I have contributed to it I really am sorry for it.
On a brief note of substantive rebuttal to a common argument made on this thread, however, I am totally lost as to how Clinton is the "moderate" in this race and Obama is the "lefty" or "radical" or "extremist." There is not a hair's bredth of difference between them on the issues. The one point of substantive difference between them - mandate or no mandate in the health care plans - puts Clinton to Obama's left (albeit only by millimeters). There simply is no cogent argument by which Clinton can be styled more "moderate" than Obama.
May 16, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not, mind you, that I think that this is even a point worthy arguing. There is no virtue in being the "moderate" in this particular race. We should be proud to claim our status as the "left" end of this years political battle. The left (at least this year) stands for all that is best in the American tradition and the right stands for most of what is least appealing. We should be proud to fly our leftist colors without trying to disguise them. If we do wish to disguise them, however, it is not clear to me that Clinton is any less obviously a leftist than Obama - at least such is not evident in her policy positions.
May 16, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
The danger of Mc Cain from an Iranian perspective: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuVYlGZmtYg
May 16, 2008 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I Agree. I saw a lot of calls after NC/IN by Obama supporters to switch into party unity mode, and it seems like that has been largely ignored. Cut the negativity out. All of Sen. Clinton's TV ads are apparently positive and make no mention of Obama. The gloves are on. The party must be united. Act accordingly.
May 16, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I saw a lot of calls after NC/IN by Obama supporters to switch into party unity mode, and it seems like that has been largely ignored
I saw it ignored back in Jan/Feb when Barry wasn't leading. What goes around, comes around. Sow. Reap.
May 17, 2008 2:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dear Hillary Supporters,
Please be aware that there are many, many GOP brownshirts out there online trying to ratf**k the democratic primary by posing as misogynist Obama supporters. They want you to feel disillusioned about the democratic party. They want you to feel bitter. They want you to blame Obama and his supporters.
Don't give them the satisfaction.
May 16, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
for anyoen who want to know where the term ratf**k comes from, read "All the President's Men."
One of my favorite books!
May 16, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
let's be clear...the majority are not trouble makers but clear obama folks and his surrogates. Also, many of those republicans you speak of are you OBAMA republicans who are supporting your candidate and in fact were previous hilliary haters. OBAMA has bought new folks to the party and those new people have changed the tone of our party in such a way it is no longer the party we thought it was. you folks really should have thought about all this long before now. the media chose OBAMA and they did everything they could to discredit, defame, marginalize, racially exaggerate hilliary and bills positions constantly. the biggest culprits were chris matthews, tim russert, keith olberman, huffington's post, david shuster, and cafferty. their strategy was to destroy hilliary early on and swift. they never expected her to fight this hard and this long nor her supporters to care so deeply about her candidacy. they helped obama's camp become shrill, vicious, hateful, ungrateful and downright disgusting. since hilliary has stayed in and fought everyone is now afraid of how deep the divide is. well the media and you folks helped turn this election into a massacre. now deal with the aftermath.
my credo is never do or say anything you are unwilling to deal with the consequences of. as i said before this has been a deeply offensive campaign to women and if women in OBAMA"S camp don't see how you have also been marginalized in the eyes of the world too bad. women have always worked for this country lifting it up and carrying more than their share of the load. for this campaign to treat hilliary (and in my heart all women) in this manner goes far beyond the supreme court justices and roe V wade...to say you want rights for women and then stand by and let this country destroy the symbol of a woman so viciously is pathetic at best. you may not think that is what you have done but you have in the eyes of the world. OBAMA does not deserve my vote. and young women will realize how far they put themselves back by not realizing how important it was to stand by a competent, intelligent and strong women even if you had issues with her. i have issues with them both and would have supported OBAMA in 8 years wholeheartedly.
in my opinion there were enough issues with his lack of experience to begin with. if he wins then he will do so without my help and i believe many, many others. if women matter so little to democrats then do it without many of our daily support and monies.
May 16, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Yoda"... Look down at some of the obnoxious responses given to me. I have every right to call these rude people assholes.
I didn't use that term to refer to YOU (or Ben or others who can show a shred of decency).
I laid my motivation out as plainly as I could. There's nothing more to read into it. Okay?
May 16, 2008 10:58 PM | Reply | Permalink