« VOTE HERE: Hillary Concession Date Pool | Stuart Vyse's Blog | Bill Kristol's Admonishes Obama on (Military) Service? »
Hillary's Gaffes: Could it be Groupthink?
Hillary has made a number of unfortunate statements lately, the recent one about RFK being the most egregious. Sometimes this kind of thing is the result of groupthink. When a group of people attempt to make a decision or choose a plan of action, loyalty to the group may trump concern for a good outcome. Individual members who might have dissenting views tend to bite their tongues. In other cases, the members of the group are chosen on the basis of their loyalty, and diverse opinions are unlikely to surface. Groupthink has been blamed for the Bay of Pigs Invasion fiasco and other bad governmental decisions.
Now that Hillary is facing such adversity, the circumstances seem ripe for groupthink. To keep going and remain optimistic, it would be natural to surround yourself with loyal, like-minded people. Listening to devil's advocates would be more difficult. The problem, of course, is that loyalists will not tell you that a phrase like "hard-working white people" is a bad idea or that the mention of presidential assassination could be offensive.
Ironically, President Bill Clinton sought out the Republican David Gergen as an advisor, a move that increased the likelihood of diverse viewpoints. This must be a difficult time within the Clinton campaign, but if Hillary wants to avoid tarnishing her image any further, it will be important to listen to diverse viewpoints. If she hasn't already, Hillary should find herself a Gergen.
Now that Hillary is facing such adversity, the circumstances seem ripe for groupthink. To keep going and remain optimistic, it would be natural to surround yourself with loyal, like-minded people. Listening to devil's advocates would be more difficult. The problem, of course, is that loyalists will not tell you that a phrase like "hard-working white people" is a bad idea or that the mention of presidential assassination could be offensive.
Ironically, President Bill Clinton sought out the Republican David Gergen as an advisor, a move that increased the likelihood of diverse viewpoints. This must be a difficult time within the Clinton campaign, but if Hillary wants to avoid tarnishing her image any further, it will be important to listen to diverse viewpoints. If she hasn't already, Hillary should find herself a Gergen.
Advertisement





See the story in the May 19 issue of Time magazine detailing Hillary's top 5 mistakes. Loyalty over know-how is number two on the list, after misjudging the mood. Good reading.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1738331,00.html
May 24, 2008 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
You could well be right, but various print articles (including the NYT), quoting Clinton campaign insiders, suggest that there are many within the campaign who are well aware of how desperate this candidate is sounding, how desperate she has become, and how hopeless her chances are. Keep in mind that these people will soon be out of a job, and whatever emotional loyalty they may have to Clinton, they also have families, financial responsibilities, and ambition: many are actively planning their next step.
What it sounds like may be happening is that the candidate herself will not listen to, or tolerate, any discussion of closing down the campaign. To me this is a more frightening prospect - the candidate herself is delusional, and those around her are unwilling to confront her, while they secretly plan for their own futures. There may be a few other delusional individuals - Terry McAuliffe sure sounds sincere in arguing her case, for example.
In any case, those campaign meetings must be bizarre, like, did anyone bring the Kool Aid?
May 24, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink