We cannot have a ticket with two long winded guys.
DOA
Bold, softly.
brilliant, but not wise.
To me it makes sense.
My preference order of remaining candidates:
obama
paul
generic green
generic reform
generic libertarian
clinton
mccain
other generic 3rd party
I don't know much about Paul, but I get the idea that he has a reputation as an honest, principled politician.
He likes Obama's foreign policy better than McCain's or Hillary's...
-"Don't you want a Republican elected?"
-"Well, that's secondary to wanting the Constitution defended and wanting the country go in the right direction, bringing peace around the world(...) That's more important that just having a Republican..."
His endorsement (once he quits the race) couldn't hurt Obama.
mr. Paul is for a flat income tax of 0% for everyone and a national sales tax. That means a rich person can save and never spend 99% of the money they make and thereby never get taxed for it and people that have no money could end up paying taxes on about it all when they never would have had to before.
I can't support that tax idea.
I still think that Paul endorsing Obama would make many Republicans look Obama's way and consider.
Favorite Books Enders Game
Imagica
Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy Trilogy (Plus)
It
Bio
I started out with a desire to be an architect fueled by the Briggs Meyer results of a test I was told I was too young for. INTP - The Architect. That drove me quite far even after I decided that the act of architecture creation was too simple or rather limited in the number of reasonable permutations which is further limited by economic power.
What came next was this innate desire to build systems of people. Now here I am, building away.
Are there new rules here?
Is the system working that fast?
May 4, 2008 2:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mmmm! Kool-aid! (Refreshing!)
May 4, 2008 8:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Insane, firmly.
May 4, 2008 3:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was going to go with Disturbing
We cannot have a ticket with two long winded guys.
DOA
May 5, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bold, softly.
May 4, 2008 3:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
brilliant, but not wise.
May 4, 2008 8:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
To me it makes sense.
My preference order of remaining candidates:
obama
paul
generic green
generic reform
generic libertarian
clinton
mccain
other generic 3rd party
May 4, 2008 8:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know much about Paul, but I get the idea that he has a reputation as an honest, principled politician.
He likes Obama's foreign policy better than McCain's or Hillary's...
-"Don't you want a Republican elected?"
-"Well, that's secondary to wanting the Constitution defended and wanting the country go in the right direction, bringing peace around the world(...) That's more important that just having a Republican..."
His endorsement (once he quits the race) couldn't hurt Obama.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/02/paul-not-ready-to-endorse-mccain-likes-obamas-foreign-policy/
May 4, 2008 8:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
mr. Paul is for a flat income tax of 0% for everyone and a national sales tax. That means a rich person can save and never spend 99% of the money they make and thereby never get taxed for it and people that have no money could end up paying taxes on about it all when they never would have had to before.
May 4, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can't support that tax idea.
I still think that Paul endorsing Obama would make many Republicans look Obama's way and consider.
May 4, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink