The NARAL Endorsement and an Obama-Clinton Ticket
I have been virulently against an Obama-Clinton ticket for a while now for a few reasons. First and foremost, I think it undercuts his message of change. Adding the wife of a former president (and by default, the former president himself) to Obama's ticket doesn't seem all that revolutionary in terms of revising
Advertisement
How would you like to see McCain for a change?
May 14, 2008 10:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that why you want to see an incompatible VP?
Why do you want the VP's profile to supersede the actual candidate's?
May 14, 2008 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can someone explain why people are making such a big deal of the NARAl endorsement? I know they're a pro-choice group but I'm not sure I understand why some Clinton supporters are upset that they endorsed Obama. (I genuinely want to know because it doesn't seem like such a big deal to me.)
May 14, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
They're a pro-choice group based upon a feminist base, which essentially means that feminists are now telling Clinton to drop out (probably because she makes them look bad).
May 15, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gotcha. Thanks.
May 15, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink