Larry Johnson is loony.

Down-rated trash.

"Y...A...W...N"

I smell desperation. Poor Clinton, such a victim. She can't be a fighter and a victim at the same time. seriously

scumlord has also managed to somehow disable his "reply" button, and then wonders why no one replies to his comments. Ha!

Do you agree with Wilson's argument?

I read the Wilson piece. It mainly is self-defense since he was enthusiastic about his part in the first war. He can't do more than say Obama was not very involved in his first couple of years in the Senate. And there is a paradox in retroactively justifying the troop buildup as essential to the readmission of inspectors, without admitting the hugely unlikely event of an entire army just going home afterward. THat was never going to happen.

On top of which Wilson sounds like he is justifying the actual invasion. This can't be accepted. Sorry, your heroes are bending over backward to defend Hillary's AUMF vote. They offer no proof of her superior judgement, only assert Obama's is not proven. That's not an argument, only a hope.

But whatever your preference for Democratic candidate, do not trash the loyal opposition within your party. I don't care how many Obama supporters say bad things about Clinton, I don't, and you only aid the GOP by doing so to Obama.

Excellent post.

Hello? Yes, me, hello! I caucused in Texas on primary night, and was chosen as a delegate to caucus again at the Senatorial District Conventions. While Texas is a big state, I've got to say that Mrs. A's story smells. As she's "one of our precinct captains," I assume you're talking about the Conventions.

El Paso was strongly Hispanic and thus strongly Clinton. How in the world would that kind of force have allowed the sort of shenanigans being reported?

In fact, the idea that any one supporter or precinct could have been -personally- targeted that Saturday is laughable. Across the state, caucuses had 10 TIMES the normal turnout, and all of them had to struggle just to get everyone seated and start the meeting (most were called to order between 4 and 6 hours late). In my Tarrant County convention, another reason for the late start (other than the chaos) was that Clinton supporters had challenged 87 precincts out of the less than 200 precincts represented. That's how challenges are made, you see. It was moved (by a Clinton supporter) that we save time by splitting the difference--giving half of all challenged precinct delegates to Clinton, and half to Obama, instead of taking four hours with the credentials committee going over every. single. challenge. But that motion was voted down, largely because it turned out most of the precincts that had been challenged were Obama-heavy. So we took the four hours of meeting with the credentials committee one. precinct. at. a. time. Everything was legally doublechecked. And then we moved on.

Again, that doesn't mean they all went that "smoothly" (if you can call the chaos of 3000 people, 80% of them newbies, "smooth"). But an organized targeting after the deadline to challenge? Not likely.

Also? All the delegates who went to training from the Obama camp were warned ("and this is from the big guy") from the very start: Obama wants to win this thing the RIGHT way.

I wonder if Clinton's supporters were given that same instruction?