« 5:03 CST: Obama Is 12 Delegates Away | hrebendorf's Blog | ABC Calls It For Obama »

If Obama Picks Hillary


I know many of Barack Obama's supporters are adamant that he not choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate.  Some of them have good reasons for being against it.  Others are still just woozy from the venom and adrenaline of a rancorous fight.  But here's something to consider: you support Obama because you believe he has the judgment and the wisdom to lead this nation.  You're putting your faith in this man to run our country for the next eight years.  So now he's got the task of choosing a running mate, and in many ways, it's his first presidential decision.  If you don't trust Barack Obama to choose the best possible running mate, I'd say you've probably been backing the wrong candidate all along.

Hillary isn't my choice.  Not by a long shot.  But if Obama chooses her, it will be the right choice, and I will support it 100%.  Barack Obama is already my president.

124 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

So - how likely do you think it is that Barack will actually pick her?

user-pic

Not at all likely. I think he's got better choices, and I don't think she could pass the vetting process. The Clintons have too much baggage. I also don't think she has the right set of qualifications. He needs someone with military or diplomatic experience, and he needs someone who can help him take one of the big swing states.

I don't think he'll pick Hillary, but if he does, I'll trust that it was the best possible choice. In every single instance, when I've second-guessed his judgment during this campaign, he's been right and I've been wrong.

And you?

100% with you on both paragraphs here. Sure, I think he has smarter choices. But if he picks Hillary I'm ready to lead the cheering squad.

My personal hope for a VP pick is the same as Chris Kelly's.

Preferably someone female, but also southern, Hispanic, older, and with credentials as a hawk.

There's only one person who fits all those criteria:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-kelly/barack-obamas-vice-presid_b_104332.html


Too funny. Took me a minute. Moving slow this morning.

user-pic

I try not to second guess people :)

Totally agree that he's not very likely to pick Hillary. Sure she has big positives, but she also has huge negatives.

I suspect that Obama already has a pretty good idea who he wants as his VP, but he's keeping it to himself.

BTW I'm sure you have noticed how remarkably leak-proof Obama's campaign has been. Their message discipline has been amazing. Were the situation reversed, we'd already have dozens of leaks about who Hillary's VP would be.

You got it. This is the most disciplined campaign I have ever seen.

he's got better choices

This is where I chime in to mention Gov Brad Henry (D-OK)

The catch is that there wouldn't be any way, from the outside, to know whether he picked her because he believed she was the best choice, or because she somehow coerced the decision by twisting a lot of superdelegate arms in spite of Obama actually thinking she wasn't a good choice.

But Obama hasn't been a wimp. I think if his arm were being twisted to do something he didn't think was a good idea, he'd twist it right back.

So if Obama does end up with Hillary as a running mate, I'll assume it was his belief that this was a good choice, and as long as she doesn't undermine him I'll support the ticket enthusiastically.

I don't think anyone's going to coerce Obama into anything he doesn't want to do.

awhhh, so cute, think a little harder and maybe it will become true!


"Hillary isn't my choice. Not by a long shot. But if Obama chooses her, it will be the right choice, and I will support it 100%. Barack Obama is already my president."

I've never been one for this blind loyalty and I'm sure you're not either. As of what I've seen so far, Obama has been amazing. But, that doesn't mean I'm going to give him a free ride on choices from here on out. I'm sure that's not what you want either, but what you're suggesting is flirting with it.

That being said, I'm torn with that whole Lincoln cabinet thing that's been flying around. However, I am one of those people disaffected by Clinton based on how she ran her campaign and exploited divisions for her own gain at the expense of Obama's chances.

She: projected herself as a crusader for voting rights in MI and FL, fueled charges of sexism, claimed if we had the REPUBLICAN inferior way of doing things she'd already be the nominee, suggested he couldn't get the white vote like she could, has led people to believe the popular vote could actually be counted and that she has it, and doesn't want to put her lot in with economists.

And that's just what I rattled off the top of my head. She would be trash for Obama's campaign. If he picked her I would still vote for him. But we shouldn't hop on board and say "well I love what I've seen so far and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt". I'm sure you've learned enough from the Bush administration to know how that can go.


I agree with the post. Obama will pick the candidate who best balances two considerations: which running mate will optimize his chance of getting elected, and which person would best serve him as Vice President. He and his inner circle are not going to base their decision on a grudge about how Hillary ran the campaign.

Whether Hillary is the right person seems like a complicated and tough question. It may in fact be a difficult decision for Obama.

Here's a link that pretty definitively nixes the Dream Ticket:

http://ruralvotes.com/thefield/?p=1248

I don't understand why people are even still talking about it, to be honest. Al Giordano says that he has multiple sources saying she asked, and he said no. What part of that story are people doubting?

One reason it must be talked about is that it looks like Hillary is going to demand to be on the ticket, at least near term. Senator Feingold unfortunately today made a strong statement that Hillary should be VP. Presumably Hillary is lobbying other supers to make the same statement. Ugh...

user-pic

Clinton has probably done herself in on that one by implying that she was the more legitimate nominee last night. I don't see how he can have someone on the ticket who thinks that the wrong person eads it.

The part that says "..and having been told no, she gave up asking."

user-pic

One of Obama's many qualities is his ethics and honesty. He has pushed for ethics and honest government all the way back to his early days in the Illinois senate. I think people are refreshed by this man, especially after the horrid Bush years.

Therefore he cannot have Hillary on the ticket. Besides all the 90's crap the republicans will use, just think about all of the things since...shady advocating for foreign countries (Dubai, Columbia, Canada) not to mention the shady fundraisers. She has already proven herself an outrageous liar.

Obama's greatest strength could be entirely wiped out by choosing her as a running mate. I pray he does not give into pressure to do so. It would be disastrous.

user-pic

But what if he did pick her? Hypothetically speaking, and knowing that it's probably a long-shot, what if he did? What if the decision was made that choosing Hillary was the only way to unify the party? Would you be able to support it? Would you be able to set aside the ugliness of the last 15 months (as Obama would also have to do) and get behind his decision? It presents an interesting dilemma.

user-pic

I'd first listen to his explanation why he did it. Maybe it would all make perfect sense.

Not that I think it's gonna happen...

Was it Princess Bride? "Get ready for disappointment".

sorry ding-dong... don't need your vote.

go vote for McCain and lose twice in one election cycle.

Sorry, can't go with that. She is not the best choice, and I would be very disappointed if she was his choice. She is too divisive--she will bring the Republicans out in droves to vote against Obama. The hard reality is, he does not need her. That's the painful truth, and who needs the drama and Bill and his Hollywood posse creating scandals in the background?

Tom Brokaw on MSNBC just reported on the Obama camp's response to a Hillary VP slot:

- release the Clinton Library donors list
- Bill would have to give up his speaking fees for the next four years
- (missed it)

...then we'll talk.

Ouch. That's a pretty pointed reply. Let me translate that out of PR-ese.

Let's see, I think in English that would be, "Hell no, Tom I'm not going to consider that @$%&# for VP. Want to know why? I'd be happy to tell you a few of the good reasons why I won't . . ."

I'm actually kind of surprised they let loose with something that pointed today. I guess they want to nip the Dream Ticket talk in the bud.

So dear rabbitcat, while I appreciate the sentiment, I think you can relax about the counterfactual hypotheses. And dear hat-wearing dog, please don't lose any sleep.

The signals are not ambiguous.

It's. Not. Gonna. Happen.
The Dream Ticket is Dead.
It's an ex-Ticket.
You could use it as furniture.
It's pushin up the daisies.
It's not just pining for the fjords.

From your lips to the Norse gods who rule the fjords.

They forgot to mention the Paul trial, where she's supposed to testify in November. Nice, eh? I don't think so!

Wow, classy. If that is actually true, I might not vote for Obama.

good... don't need your sorry ass whiner vote anyway.

bye-bye loser.

Umm, OK, see ya later! Loser! LOL! OMFG!

user-pic

You don't sound like you're old enough to vote anyway.

Those sound like fair demands, and demands the Clintons aren't likely to concede, which might just solve the problem.

However, in response to Bunnicat's initial question--I'll support Obama even with Clinton as his running mate. If that's the worst blunder he makes as president (since ALL presidents make blunders), I'll be happy.

user-pic
- release the Clinton Library donors list - Bill would have to give up his speaking fees for the next four years

Yeah, like I said, I doubt they could get past the vetting process. Clinton's supporters like to think she's already been tested, but nothing could be further from the truth. The thing Obama would need to weigh is not the Hillary Clinton he's been running against, but the Hillary Clinton the Republicans would run against.

user-pic

PLEASE change your handle to Bunnicat!

user-pic

You know how I came up with hrebendorf? I just typed out any bullshit that my fingers happened to hit. Because I figured it wouldn't matter. When I signed up, I thought I'd probably post here once or twice at the most. Ha. Joke's on me. Now I'm stuck with a handle that doesn't even make sense to me.

I'm surprised he publicized his response. That seems very un-Obamalike to me. I would have expected him to say it to theclintons or the Feinstein brigade, but not *out loud*. I wonder if he hasn't had just about as much of her as he can stand at this point.

Sorry, but if he picked her, I would suffer a heart attack. He wouldn't just be picking Hillary, he'd be picking the Clinton cabal. No, I don't know what I'd do. I would simply wish for death to come and claim me quickly — no later than Nov. 3.

There's always hemlock. I think Kevorkian is out of business.

user-pic

I'm hoping he'll pick Obama Girl.

Obama/Obama Girl 2008!

Seriously, though, I don't object to Hillary as Veep on her merits, but I do fear her associations with all the previous Clinton baggage. I saw Obama (or Edwards) as a way of getting away from that, but making her veep would bring it all into play again.

Tbe reality is that Hillary is not conceding yet. The reality is that already the voices that would like to 'force' her onto the ticket are speaking. So, I am going to continue to voice my objections until this is over. He is not in this alone and if I felt he was simply going to have all of the time and leverage to choose freely, I would agree with you and wait to see who he felt was the best person or the job.
But because of all of the possiblities that are still hanging in the air, including Hillary fighting to the convention based on her 'claim' that she has won the popular vote, I will keep on making my views heard and I will keep doing my best to debunk false claims.

The "voices that would like to force her onto the ticket" have been heard and overruled.

Your point is well taken that we need to learn to trust his judgment, which has been close to flawless. Although few hours ago I was all capping F*** NO!!! to Hillary as VP. But after a time-out, I feel calmer and will attempt to let go of my own control issues....while I continue to cross my fingers that he picks someone, almost anyone else.
It's a very wise group of people here at TPM, all told. Punctuated by some really entertaining loons. Now I must go chill the glasses for heart-felt toasts. To all of you, and to the amazing man we will soon call Mr. President. Cheers.

user-pic

I suspect her speech tonight took her a long way toward NOT being offered the VP slot.

user-pic

Last night. I just looked out the window. The sun is up.

Wow...what a post.

You've basically said that Obama has excellent judgment. I beg to differ, and the stories of the past 3 months do as well. I can't wait for the general to really kick into gear: it's about time the Republicans take off the gloves with this guy, since evidentally no one else will.

-a Dem

Wow. Since you're "a dem," I guess I'll have to take those vague complaints really seriously.

Nope dumb-dumb, don't need your sorry-assed whiner vote either.

seeya' loser ; )

Obama '08 (without the help of whiney babies and victims of Freight trains of Winning Candidates running over sorry-assed candidates and their assplug supporters)

Um, I kind of doubt that writer was actually a Clinton supporter.

The good news is that the Clintons cannot be vetted. They will never release the Clinton Library donor list, and the two open lawsuits against Hillary in California are very problematic, not to mention the zipper problem of Bill.

Imagine how a Clinton on the ticket would also energize the republican base.

There are so many reasons why this is wrong, and the only reason to choose her is because SHE WANTS IT AND WHAT HILLARY WANTS, WE ALL HAVE TO GIVE HER.

I'm done with that. She has embarrassed us women enough. She needs to shut up and go home and lock Bill in a closet.

She is the right choice for VP. First, it would pretty much bring all those constituencies with her if he did. Second, it would show him as a 'Uniter', as he's claimed, of his OWN party, even before doing it for the US. Third, then together, with both barrels blazing, they could go after McCain and the failure that is the GOP non-stop until Election Day. And, there are other reasons, but these are good ones to start with. The times are too serious to keep the divisions going. It's not about them, it's about taking this country back and restoring the Constitution and our reputation, at home, and around the world. Obama and Clinton on the same ticket would be a powerful message for change. And that would be: change we can all believe in. I do, and I will.

I disagree.

We don't need her sorry blackmailing ass on the ticket.

Obama won't bow down to shit like this, he'll do it HIS way without her. GUARANTEED.

Thanks anyways

She is the right choice for VP. First, it would pretty much bring all those constituencies with her if he did.
Nonsense! It wouldn't bring any of her racist buddies from WV; and most of her votes came from low-information casual observers who will forget her entirely by next week.
Second, it would show him as a 'Uniter', as he's claimed, of his OWN party
That might have been true before her non-concession Bunker Address, but now that she's put a thinly-veiled blackmail threat on the table, a VP offer would make him look like a total wimp.

She's either stupid/delusional or doing her best to put McSame in the whitehouse -- with hopes of holding 2012 open.

...how 'bout McBush/Shrillary '08?

LK

the previous was written with a streak of intense idealism for this country and what it will take to bring it back from the depths that Bush and the GOP have taken it. I still reserve the right to think about her past and Bill's and the way her campaign was waged and go against her as a VP choice. but if it does seem that she is best choice to help Obama defeat the GOP and retake the reins of the US, then i'm for it. it's all for good of this country. simple as that.

If Obama Picks Hillary...

...he'll be doing a smart thing to pick up the half of the voters he lost during the primaries.

How did he 'lose' them?

Didn't you hear? He has a hard time keeping track of things. He may have misplaced them.

Fry! Long time no see.

Indie assumes that anyone who preferred Hillary over Obama will prefer McCain over Obama. No doubt this is true of indiex himself. It will be true of some Democrats who are looking for a neo-con/Lieberman style hawk, but Obama's not going to pick up that demographic no matter what he does (and McCain is welcome to them, and Lieberman, and Hillary, IMO). But it's not true in general, and this is what confuses indeex.


Nope IndieX,

Don't need her, don't need you or any other sorry whiners.

NOBODY blackmails their way onto an Obama ticket.

One thing you Hillary pols don't understand is character, if you did you would have supported him. He won't kiss Hillary's ass and he doesn't need to.

Take it to Denver if you want. Lose on the big screen--TWICE!

no thanks! no free rides!

Let me guess - feeling bitter?

Nope!

Feeling just fine!


I think it's definitely something he needs to consider. I would have no problem with it and after considering her positives and negatives, they think it would be a good idea, I say why not?

I voted for Hillary and I'll live with Obama as the nominee. I'll be very happy if he wins and I am optimistic about his chances and his potential as President. Although I voted for her, I don't think she's the right choice for VP for a number of reasons I won't get into here. But what I will say is that your post is astonishing. After vilifying Hillary Clinton for the past several months -- she's a liar, she's divisive, a race-baiter, willing to say or do anything, only in the position she's in because of her husband, incompetent, etc. -- you are willing to accept, even welcome her, as VP because you have faith in Obama's judgment. Of course, if you actually believed all things you said about Clinton, she would be a disastrous choice, one that would undermine everything Obama purportedly stands for. That is worse than faith, worse than blind faith. It's willfully blind faith.

user-pic

AG, I understand your feelings a bit. But the bunnycat is OK.

(Just a moment, my cats are rolling around in hysterics)

MmmmKay....

just don't lash out at folks making an honest attempt to er, get back to normal. It's been a tough race. Tempers flare. We're all progressives here. (Except for the division trolls. )

Those should be called out, for sure, but there's no good reason for misplaced anger.

Save it for the incompetent boobs (AKA the GOP)

Love,

Yer socialist pal,

Workerbee

Yeah, you're right. I just looked up the rabbit, whom I've seen around quite a bit, and realized this doesn't really apply. I take it back. Sorry. I wasn't really angry anyway, it just sounds that way on the screen.

user-pic

No need to take anything back. I think we all know what we're doing here. Discussing. :)

user-pic

Wow, so you really like her, but you hate it that I'd be willing to accept her. That is truly, truly twisted.

I'll admit that hypothetically it's a strong electoral move. For the larger interests of the party, I can see how it makes sense. Except that it makes him look weak and it's just not a wise move for him even if they were to win. Can you imagine the possible problems he would have governing with Hillary and Bill in the white house?

Not to mention, it completely undermines his theme of change and the republicans will not hesitate to point that out frequently and in excruciatingly painful detail with regard to every piece of baggage the Clintons bring to the table. Just because Obama had too much class to do so does NOT mean the republicans will be so nice. The gloves will come off and we'll be right back to the definition of 'is', what Monica said to whom when (the stained dress...), the chorus line of Bill's alleged infidelities, whitewater, foster, the clinton library, marc rich, the PR terrorists, white house china, and a whole bunch of others i'm too tired to remember. Does he really want to go there? Does the democratic party really want to go back there?

In an election year where everything is in the democratic party's favor, why would it unnecessarily handicap itself like that and give such a crutch to the flagging republican hopes? Did anyone watch McCain's speech tonight? The most impressive part had nothing to do with McCain at all and was when Jindal (most likely his VP pick) introduced him. Can you imagine the energy and strength it would give to his campaign if he can open up the floodgates of attacks on the Clinton white house years?

Thankfully,

This.will.not.happen.

You are nuts. Only one person can lead at one time and Hillary would place banana peelings and oil slicks in Barack's path every step of the way. Advice to Obama, pick a VP that you can trust. Yesterday, I thought maybe, but after hearing Hillary's speech tonite, the answer should be hell no!

Her speech, most ungracious. Sealed the "no deal" on the VP thing.

user-pic

I'm not saying that I think she's a likely choice (in fact, I'd be surprised if he picked her). But like I said, I'm supporting him because I respect his judgment. So if he picks her, I've got to respect his judgment.

I'm sure there will be plenty of times where I'll disagree with him when he's president. I'll certainly let him know when I do. But I have no access to his internal polling data, and I won't be privy to any private conversations between the two of them. If he picks her (and I doubt he will) I'll assume she was the best possible choice. One thing I'm not worried about is that he may pick her for the wrong reasons. If she's the choice, it will be because she was the best choice for the country--not for his campaign.

hrebendorf - I agree. Thank you for putting it into words.

This afternoon, after I heard the "I'm open to it" I thought I would burst a blood vessel. I was so damn angry that 1) she's rain on his parade when surely he's earned 10 or 20 minutes just to savor the achievement and 2) that she would sand-box him into a corner and try some blackmail. But then watching him speak, I reached your level of comfort. You choose to trust in his judgment; I trust to judge in his strength. If he *has* to accept her as VP, then I'll go along - as will you - because it's that important to have him as president and because I trust his strength to somehow contain her .... and Bill! And surely there aren't many people who I would believe can "control" the Clintons. But I think that, if necessary, he could.

Oh, but I should add -- I PRAY he doesn't make the offer!!

user-pic

I'd say the possibility is pretty slim. She's had weeks to prepare for last night. She didn't need more time to make a decision. It was his night, and she grabbed the spotlight. I'm guessing it didn't improve her chances much.

I don't think that will have much to do with it. They're politicians after all, leverage is what you fight for and he must understand this. Give it a month or so and see where Clinton is and what the polls are saying and then we can really start considering this.

The Republicans would run against Hillary & Bill, the VP candidate & former President, rather than the Presidential candidate - and likely win.

We think Rev. Wright was a drag on the line? Imagine Hillary and Bill!

MSNBC analysts, supposedly well-sourced, said Obama's folks let it be known that there would need to be a full vetting of all Clinton income, not just library and foundation donors, but Bill's speaking fees, his "investments" w/ questionable people that have yielded millions, etc.

No telling how much digging they'd have to do beyond the Vanity Fair article to make sure there weren't any Bill affairs that would come to light during the campaign.

Obama and crew have better things to do with their time.

user-pic

Which is why I don't think Hillary will be the choice. I think she'd initially provide a boost, but I doubt it would last more than a day or two. Then she'd be a drag on the ticket. I haven't changed my opinion of her or of her own prospects to become president. If she had become the nominee I'm convinced the Republicans would have made short work of her. But this nominating process has given me enormous respect for Senator Obama's judgment and his skills as a strategist. If he picks her, I'm there.

No Hillary.


1.) The Republicans are foaming at the mouth for the possibility of Clinton on the ticket to salvage their original attack plan when they thought she would be the candidate to unite Republicans and hand them a sure win.

2.) She represents everything that Barack Obama represents and has campaigned against.

3.) Megalomaniacs Bill and Hillary would hijack his administration.

4.) That RFK assassination comment.

5.) That twisted "Shame on you Barack Obama" attack.

6.) Her vile injection of racism into the campaign.

7.) Michelle hates her, and a happy Michelle means a happy President Obama.

8.) Al Gore and what her 2000 ambitions did to give us 8 years of Bush. (He can't stand her either).

9.) She's a neo-liberal hawk like Joe Lieberman.

10.) Her vote for Iraq puts her more in line with McCain.


11.) Tonight's Non-concession speech.

( I know that's eleven, and I'll bet you have more. I'll be writing my Reps and Senators (hopeless since one is Feinstein to let them know: No Hillary. I'll follow Hillary's advice too and write into her campaign since she wants to know how I feel.)

I'm sure you have more to add to the list.

user-pic

I wrote to her. I let her know that I thought her speech wasn't helpful. I asked her to please accept her defeat more gracefully. At the very least, she should pretend to be gracious. For the sake of the party.

I can think of lots of reasons to not have Hillary on the ticket like "McCain's passed the commander-in-cheif test", "and we all know Bobby Kennedy was assasinated in June", The Bill sideshow, old vs new, etc. I can only think of one reason to have her on, 18 million votes. He got a similar amount. That's 36 million votes in a primary. Pretty damn compelling reason.

I know the thought of strong arming herself in is distasteful and nerves are raw. But if Obama and his advisors determine that it's the strongest ticket out there then so be it. If I take the anger at her out of the picture she doesn't look so bad.

On the flipside if her behavior tonight gives any indication of what kind of VP she would be I can see her trying to upstage him and struggle for power.

user-pic

Yup. It was a sobering and somewhat depressing reminder of who she is.

hrebendorf, Thank you for that. I for one needed that reminder. You are right - we should trust his judgement...that is why I voted for him in the first place!

The best reason to put her on the ticket is that she comes with 18 million voters.

Bad math. Most of the 18 million will vote for the Dem candidate, and many of the rest wouldn't vote for a black man, if Jesus Hussein Christ was his running mate.

There are lots of good Dem prospects that would make a stronger ticket -- without dragging in the Clinton negatives and galvanizing the Repug base.

"I think Democrats concentrate too much on how to win and have forgotten to tell people why we ought to win."
- Barack Obama

...there's your answer, Hillary,

LK

If you're right, this must be considered. But time will tell how far the resentment goes and whether those 18 million will accept a ticket without Clinton on it. I'm sure quite a bit will, but how many will hold out is a big question. (I don't like it, but facts are facts and it has to be looked at) This is why I thought it was a mistake to stop fighting for votes toward the end and truly put her out of the race. It's difficult to convince her supporters she has truly lost fair and square. It'll be a few interesting months, though:)

Go blow your gasket.

We won't need your vote, thanks!


user-pic

The best reason to put her on the ticket is that she comes with 18 million voters.

I seriously doubt that. Take a look at this:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/06/no_menageatrois_for_obama.html

user-pic

Recommend

VP Senator Clinton would be too dangerous. Do you not think there would be ample deranged people who would view her as "one heartbeat away" from the presidency, particularly after her RFK debacle?

Based on some of the vehemency I have witnessed in life and read on-line, I would have to say that President Obama would be at least some degree safer in body with Senator Clinton as far down on the ascendancy list as possible.

This is a very good point. Even if the circumstances are as sinister as llOOll implies -- for example, if Obama falls ill during his term -- you have to ask yourself:

Does Hillary Pass the Commander-in-Chief test in order to run the country?

After this Primary campaign, I no longer think she does...

maybe you haven't reviewed the Clinton body count websites. It's eerie how many people associated with them have mysteriously died. I wouldn't want the only thing standing between Hillary and the Oval Office to be my beating heart.

Oh, that's bullshit.

No it's not bs. Go the website and read.

She never has convincingly explained why she's not Badge Man.

user-pic

I just want to make one point here about why I posted this. One of my best friends (a fierce Hillary supporter) is fond of telling me, "Be careful what you wish for. He may become president, and if he does, I think you're gonna be disappointed." Maybe so. But if he turns out to be a disappointment it won't be because I disagreed with his policy decisions. I supported Bill Clinton during the whole Monica Lewinski thing, even when I disagreed with his choices. The day he lost me was the day he perjured himself. That's the day I stopped trusting him. For me, trust is everything. As Obama is fond of pointing out, he's not perfect and I'm not always going to agree with his decisions. But I must have faith in his character and in his motives in order to support him. And as of today, I do. So I leave his choice for vice president in his hands. And I trust that when he makes his decision, he will come to it honestly and soberly. I can't ask for much more than that. He's not running for God--he's running for president.

When George W. Bush took us to war against Iraq, we both knew that he was lying. If he had told the American people the truth, this war would never have happened. Truth is all.

I'll see your realism and raise you one. We *are* going to be disappointed. Best remedy for that is to embrace it right now.

Mistakes will be made. Problems will be swept under the bed; uncomfortable facts will be spun. That's all okay. Politics is the art of the possible.

The standard to hold Barack to is simply this: Does he leave America, and American politics, somewhat better than he found it? It's a nation of some 300 million people, with the average human levels of shortsightedness and selfishness. Making it a better place, even in small ways, is an immensely difficult task.

But I think we have a better shot now than we've had, honestly, since the New Deal. Barack is much better than the average leader -- he's smart, he's more than usually ethical, and he's got the charisma to make it all work. Also, the country is ready for real change. We've got a good shot this time.

user-pic

Amen to that. I'm actually hoping Obama has enough time to leave the country a little bit better than where we were before Bush became America's first court-appointed POTUS. I realize that's a massively tall order, but I think he's up to the task. He'll just need a lot of help from us. It doesn't hurt that he knows the Constitution as well as anyone who has sat in the Oval Office. Job One as far as I'm concerned: restore the Constitution.

I agree. Those are reasonable goals. Making it better than 2007 will be too easy. Making it better than the 90s is what we should shoot for.

user-pic

I agree wholeheartedly.

Obama isn't perfect, and I'm never going to agree one hundred percent with everything he does. But I trust that he will always go in the right direction. He may not take precisely the path I would choose or go quite as far as I want, but I trust that we are heading toward the same goals of a just and robust democracy.

I will not be a happy camper if Clinton is on the ticket, but I'll accept it if that's his decision. Given how carefully he's planned his campaign to this point and how he's never gone off in wild directions, I trust that he will make any such decision with his eyes wide open regarding the positives and negatives.

Hillary reminds me of a communist leader after last night's gala wherein there were no tvs or cell phones allowed for those there to get any true media information — sort of like China or some other communistic country with a blackout on communication.

And, Hillary wants the VP Spot! If she can’t be President, she will be VP and WAIT for something to HAPPEN, so then she can take over the Reins. It is that simple, and that machavallian!

If you don't trust Barack Obama to choose the best possible running mate, I'd say you've probably been backing the wrong candidate all along.

I agree with this. I do trust Obama to choose a solid, electable, and progressive running mate. But if I turn out to be misguided in my trust -- that is, if he chooses Sen. Clinton -- then I have been backing the wrong candidate.

user-pic

That's one way to look at it. I don't think he'll disappoint, but if he does, then what do you do?

As I implied, if he does name her as the person who is so perilously close to being the Keeper of the Football, I would have to consider whether or not to vote for a person with such questionable judgement.

If Barack Obama were to willingly invite Hillary Clinton onto his ticket, I would see it as a fatal error in judgement which would be a show-stopper for me. For all of the reasons posted above and for the very same reason that bunnycat posted this blog (the importance of trust), I can't get behind Hillary Clinton. "Keep your enemies close" is sage advice for mafia chiefs, but it's too Machiavellian for the president of the U.S. If Obama is that style of leader, then he doesn't need my vote. Maybe I'm too idealistic, but that's what attracted me to Obama in the first place -- ideals and principles, not shrewdness and ruthlessness.

Clinton is radioactive. Kick her silly ass to the curb.

It would be tragic because I feel a person should be held to account for their actions. Most of us agree that she ran a horrible campaign and chose to alienate and use the republican playbook. So if you feel that way (only for those that feel that way, if you have a different opinion thats fine) but if you feel that way, it just doesn't make sense that you reward that behavior by offering her a position as VP and saying she earned it. Just my thoughts. There are other positions but this entitlement thing is out of hand. Have always said that if Obama chose her, it should be his choice. Even if they force him to do it, I will bitch about it because she knows perfectly well she is undermining him and its pathetic, but will look forward and do my best not to harp on it. I still think it's so disrespectful for her to demand respect and not show any for this man. It doesn't sit well.

However I understand and it reminds me of that song.......'YOU CANT ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU WANT'

At the end of the day, he/we did it. I hold on to that and let the chips fall where they may.

user-pic

A lot of good points against Hillary as veep here, but i think the strongest is her hogging of the spotlight. The way she's been acting, it will have the suggestion of a co-presidency. Her speech last night was all about her.

In press conferences, could you trust her to look on approvingly as Pres. Obama speaks? Will she front his message? Can she play second banana with conviction?

user-pic

I was so angry at her last night. I couldn't believe she was being so ungracious. After seeing her speech before AIPAC this morning, I'm just feeling sorry for her. There's a very awkward, self-doubting person behind all that swaggering bluster. That's why she's such a chameleon--she desperately doesn't want to be who she is. She wants to be HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. That ain't gonna happen, and I think it's starting to sink in. I feel for her.

user-pic

hrenbendorf--

I was angry, too, and I think you make a good point about the uderlying insecurity here. Can you imagine Obama--or any other candidate, actually--refusing to concede when the writing's been on the wall this long? And the only response so far is to send surrogates to flog her for VP.

Josh Marshall wrote that she'd be crazy to take veep when her position as senator offers so much more clout, but since this is all about pride, insecurity, and emotion, it's hard to see what she wants or how she's going to support the nominee.

The most important support she could give is to gracefully concede, and the party is trying to lead her by the hand . . .

I don't think she wants to be VP. But she doesn't want to appear as if she refused the VP slot either. If she comes out and says that she would not be the VP, she'll be seen as scuttling the unity ticket.

All she wants now is to not be blamed when Obama loses in the fall. She doesn't want to be VP; an offer of a cabinet position is worth absolutely nothing because she knows he can't win.

My last take. Redstateleroy, I think this argument is phony that she doesnt want to be blamed. Its mixing the games she played and the fallout from that with how and if she repairs that. People can spin nuance and thats why we never get anywhere. She knows there consequences for things that rightly or wrongly pissed people off. Fact is, she chose those roads and she has to live with them. Not being sure if Obama is a muslim, and he only brings a speech, South Carolina and other things, there will be fall out from that. Whats not helping is she is not moving in the direction of unity. She can't say that she has all these followers and then turn around and not be able to motivate them to do whats right if they dont already know. She cant have it both ways. She also shouldnt insult people's intelligence if she decides to half as campaign for him going forward and then say she doesnt want to be blammed for it if he lost. She divided the party, and now its up to her and Obama, but here most importantly to get them in the right direction! A true leader just does it, no excuses!

Up to her most importantly

Both sides ran negative campaigns and did dirty things. Obama supporters are mad about what they see as unfair things Clinton's campaign did or said that hurt their candidate. Clinton supporters are mad about what they see as unfair things Obama's campaign did or said that hurt their candidate.

Her presidential aspirations are over. She may have some remote inkling of making one last gasp attempt in 2016 against whoever McCain's VP is.

But realistically, she's done in national politics. She'll go back to New York and work at the one thing that's been the most important to her for 30 years, universal health care coverage. With McCain as president, it'll never happen. So even if she knows he can't win, which he can't, she'll work to help him win.

All the insiders know that if we lose this one, we're toast for 8 years. Whoever wins will seem like Einstein compared to Bush and the country couldn't possibly be in worse shape in 2012 than it is now.

So, she and everyone else in Democratic heirarchy will do everything they can to win the presidential and Congressional elections--except for one thing. We now know they'll do everything except nominating the best candidate.

And no matter what she does you Kool Aid drunks blame her when we lose in the fall.

If you still cant see that she ran as a republican then I cant help you. I didnt mean to start and argument with you, twas not my intent. Arguing with someone over the samantics of what I saw with my own eyes, what polls and pundits and any real objective person saw in how the two candidates ran is not something Im willing to do.

Tired of saying the same things over and over, if you feel I drink koolaid, well, I dont know what to say about that.
Before I go, I pointed out things that came out of her mouth, things she did or didn't do like use her loyal supporters to bring the party together. At the very least show respect that a winner deserves. A true objective person will be able to see in the next few months if she puts her heart into it, or if she does it half ass! So far she still hasn't said who lost, so I guess we will see. Jumping the shark on that argument will not let her off the hook no matter your name calling! We will see her effort going forward.

What attack ads could the GOP put together against Hillary that would star Obama attacking her?

I'd be watching my back if I were him.

Food taster.

Correcting myself...

Time to move on.

I reserve the right to disagree with Obama's judgment. I am 100% against Hillary as VP, or any other consolation prize she feels she is entitled to on account of being Hillary Clinton. I would be very disappointed, and shocked, if Obama picked her, and although I have great respect for Obama's judgment, I'd know it was a big mistake.

There is no way to put a positive spin on the nightmare ticket, it would be a disaster for the Party and his presidency, if he could even get that far lugging the electoral Typhoid Mary along with him.

user-pic

Obama is and has been my first choice as president, by far, but that doesn't mean I have to agree and rubber stamp every and any decision he makes.

This isn't about blind faith. It is about paying attention and using one's common sense and learning and participating and making this country better for everyone.

We've had enough "leadership" that is about -- "I'm the decider!" mentality. We need change in this arena, too!

Therefore, I reserve my right to vocally disagree with any decision he makes, including if he were to make the awful decision to have Clinton as a running mate.

Obviously, with McZombie as the only other major choice, I'd still vote for Obama.

But him choosing HRC -- something that will not happen -- would make it obvious that the guts and strength required to reverse the Blackwatering, Reaganizing, Clintonizing of our country just wouldn't be there.

IF Senator Obama were to make this horrific mistake, then I think we'd be looking at Jimmy Carter, Part 2. (Meaning, someone who could have changed the heart and soul of the country but didn't have the cojones to do it.)

But he'll never take HRC, so I think we'll all be just fine.

user-pic

If Obama chooses Clinton, it will be because he was, effectively, blackmailed into it. It's a step down for her in prestige and power, the only conceivable reason for her to do so at this point is to show the world that she could make Obama do it. I don't know if anyone in the party has the clout the Narcissistically Entitled Ones to make them announce she has no interest in the Vice Presidency and that they will both do everything they can to elect President Obama, but it would be nice to see some actual leadership on this from our party's alleged leaders.

user-pic

Look, it is a case of my own inner judgment that I have supported Obama for this whole primary, even during those months when it looked like Hillary was inevitable.
It would create a real dissonance within me if Obama put Hillary on the ticket, because my judgment says she has more than proven to be unacceptable.
As a self-sufficient adult, I would never automatically allow someone else's judgment to drown out my own sense of what's what, even if that other was someone I greatly admire as I do Barack Obama.
Barack won my support because of his good judgment in the first place. He can lose my support if he uses judgment with which I cannot, in good faith with myself, agree to, though, should such happen, I would listen carefully to his reasoning. That is my answer, bunnycat.

user-pic

Look, it is a case of my own inner judgment that I have supported Obama for this whole primary, even during those months when it looked like Hillary was inevitable.
It would create a real dissonance within me if Obama put Hillary on the ticket, because my judgment says she has more than proven to be unacceptable.
As a self-sufficient adult, I would never automatically allow someone else's judgment to drown out my own sense of what's what, even if that other was someone I greatly admire as I do Barack Obama.
Barack won my support because of his good judgment in the first place. He can lose my support if he uses judgment with which I cannot, in good faith with myself, agree to, though, should such happen, I would listen carefully to his reasoning. That is my answer, bunnycat.

Leave a comment

hrebendorf

user-pic

Following: 32
Followers: 45

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Politics What. Ever.

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs TPM, Huffpost, Angry Chicken, Not Even Wrong, anArchitecture, BLDGBLOG, orriettacat (JamFancy), GHDB, Schneier On Security, masondixonknitting.com, jwz.org, Super Colossal, doxpara, supereggplant.com (I share Mariko's pen obsession)
  • Favorite Books Lyrics by Oscar Hammerstein II, The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham, Lord Krishna's Cuisine by Yamuna Devi, Japanese Cooking: A Simple Art by Shizuo Tsuji, Strunk and White, Kernighan and Richie
  • Favorite Quotes "Complaining is silly. Either act or forget." - Stefan Sagmeister

Bio

I've spent the last thirty years of my life hitchhiking, hopping freights and driving, driving, driving across America. Currently stuck in Minneapolis, but it's a temporary ailment. Next stop? Gay Paree.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address