« "Baby mama". | Scientific's Blog | Darfur's tears. »

Michelle's moment.


I've said before that I never cease to be amazed at how frightened America can be of an angry Black man. That statement, as it turns out, was incomplete.

Despite her husband's insistence that spouses should not be fair game, Michelle Obama has become a principal target of the Right. Condi, she ain't - and boy, does that get under their skin. I don't have to link to their sexist and racist garbage here to remind all of you of the ridiculousness that has circulated about her: that she carries an abnormal level of resentment for a Black person (which is to say, any at all) despite her high level of achievement. The Right seems to think that every educated and financially successful Black American (and/or woman, for that matter) should simply walk around thanking White folks, and saying "What, me worry?"

This is the perception in which Michelle Obama has been living for the greater part of her life, ever since the mother of a Princeton freshman threatened to withdraw her daughter from the university if Michelle LaVaughn Robinson remained her roommate. But even in that last sentence, I fall victim to what the MSM at large has been indulging in like so many turkeys at Thanksgiving - a desire to feed us lazy accounts of Internet rumors (without debunking the obviously false), scant actual reporting and the repetitive pundit commentary that has been the tryptophan of this election season.

I don't know Michelle Obama. And likely, neither do you.

The Obamas are doing their best to change that perception, and help America get to know the "real Michelle". (You know, the one that actually seems to exist, not the Fox News "baby mama".) Today, Michelle was a guest-host on ABC's The View. (Some poor souls actually live-blogged her performance here and here.) She got the front-page treatment from the New York Times. Mrs. Obama will begin using a stump speech that will emphasize her roots on the South Side with a hardworking, MS-afflicted father. She'll be the subject of a cover story in the celebrity mag Us. Michelle Obama seems to be in the throes of a full image makeover.

The question is, why?

We live in a society in which people can't stand to be made uncomfortable. This applies to all of us, but sadly, the majority of our social conventions, at least, are geared towards comforting people with a Eurocentric perspective on American life. (Or "All-American" - pick your favorite code word.  And these people I refer to are not all White.) This is not necessarily intentional - many folks don't even know that they're asking people of a different culture to capitulate to their norms. But here's the thing - Michelle Obama has done everything possible to adhere to those norms, exceeding within their boundaries and yet, remaining a strong individual, wife, mother and professional that seems satisfied with her own self-image and readily identifies with her African-American culture.

So really, this is all to make certain White people feel comfortable with putting a Black woman in the White House. (Imagine if she were actually running for the job in question.) When America saw hints of a woman not completely mollified by her lofty education and elevated station in life, folks couldn't deal. A woman whose femininity America can't handle and whose honesty they refuse to recognize is worrisome to a lot of people. I mean, "does she love her country"?

Could she be blamed, despite her Ivy League education, for not being completely in love with a country that within her lifetime, treated Blacks as second-class citizens under the law? Could she be blamed, as the only descendant of African slaves in her marriage, for carrying that cultural burden as she seeks a higher plane of life? Because you're American, because your successful, because you're happy on many levels - that doesn't mean you can't carry the scars of your ancestors. I do, and I know many brothers and sisters that do. Some let it hold us back, some don't. Some are victims, some are not.

I think it's safe to say that Michelle Obama and her husband are not victims, nor do they play the role. But again, we don't know her. While this revision of her public identity may or may not serve the campaign's political purposes, let's take the opportunity to get familiar with Michelle Obama. Let's use that knowledge, and wipe clean the stink of racism and sexism that the Right seeks to spread through our culture solely in the service of Republican victory.

Any impact on America be damned.


232 Comments

| Leave a comment

It seems that black folks can't be angry at the predjudices that have and still do occur unless they are comedians or preachers. And preachers can't be angry either if they minister to politicians.

user-pic

And another thing - I witnessed some talk-show host from the Right on Dan Abrams' program tonight getting eviscerated by other guests because he let his real feelings slip out: that this country "gave" Michelle Obama her education and her "do-nothing" job, as the guy called it. One of the other guests was quick to correct him - she EARNED it. I'm an Ivy League grad myself, and I certainly can attest from my experiences and those of other African-American students that someone is always trying to assert that things were "handed" to us. As if we were some intellectual hoodlum, holding a sign that said "Will Study, Write Theses, Take Exams and Get Good Grades for Food". Please.

I've had up to here with folks that want to brand me as one of America's charity cases, and I certainly don't want to see them do it to Michelle Obama on a national scale. But it's happening.

someone is always trying to assert that things were "handed" to us

Ahh, you can't blame 'em, for many it's impossible to conceive of someone getting into a reputable college on anything other than a fat check and a phone call from pops to the dean.

Turns out that the affirmative action candidate in this election is none other than Mr. McCain who never would have gotten in to the Naval Academy had his grandfather and father not been high ranking naval officers. He surely did not earn it himself--and he pretty much proved that he deserved to be there less than 893 of his 899classmates.

I saw that guy -- Lars Larson -- on Dan Abrams' show tonight. He and other right-wing talkers are trying to characterize Michelle Obama the way the most hateful bigots in our society view successful, outspoken African Americans: as an ungrateful, lazy, angry, affirmative action n----r. Very, very ugly. It made my blood boil.

As more of the public get to see and hear Michelle Obama, they will see how horribly ugly and wrong that characterization of her is.

And the hideousness of this bigotry that drives right-wing talk will be exposed and displayed like never before.

I hear you! I was so mad I was screaming on the phone to a friend for a full hour after that.

Who was that asshat?

The other thing I have been thinking about is these people do not see Michelle as a woman. It feels like that to me. As if her race erases her gender. Cindy McCain as a white woman is a woman. Michelle Obama as a black woman is not a woman. That's what I'm hearing through all the noise.

Hmmm, I'm not sure I agree with that Cricket.

I think they indeed see her as a woman but as a black woman she occupies a uniquely despised place in the race-sex hierarchy. As a black womanshe can be ascribed all of the worst stereotypes of black people and women. As a black woman, she can be degraded as both and that lowly status has been historically promoted and acceptable.

As a black woman she can be ascribed all of the worst stereotypes of black people and women.

Bingo, visions.

That display on Dan Abrams was loathsome. The horror of Lars Larson (and people like him) in their bigotry will come into sharp, horrible focus during this campaign.

I hope these racist attitudes, all too often tolerated or even embraced by the Republican Party, will be revealed in full light for all decent Americans to see.

Interesting. Thanks for being provoking. I like that.

Perhaps the problem is in our mutual understanding of "woman" as a signifier. I'll have to think some more on this. Sorry, cannot get back again today. Massive projects, all due on Monday and all biting at my ankles. I've spent too much time at TPM this week. I'll catch up to you later though.

that was for Visions_in_Blue.

user-pic

My word. I simply cannot believe that MSNBC is sexist. Where did we hear that before? Oh yes, from dead-enders supporting the other person who shall remain nameless lest the TPM thought-control herders begin another riot and start stoning Sargent again for mentioning that name.

I simply cannot believe that MSNBC is sexist.

Lars Larson = MSNBC?

user-pic

That's the way it works. Let's see if he's invited back.

On Dan Abrams' show? You bet he will. Abrams loves this kind of cheap crap.

I'm surprised he hasn't had Coulter on more often.

Hey, Bruce. He's baaaaaaack. Lars Larson is on Dan Abrams' sorry little show again.

I knew Abrams would have that asshole on his show again.

The cheapness. Dan LOVES him the cheapness.

He's a conservative shock jock Portland, Oregon.

user-pic

Snicker...

Yes, no matter what the topic is, or when it is, in the end its always all about Hillary all the time.

And right. MSNBC as a whole is sexist because they had some right wing asshat spewing racist filth on a show as a guest.

user-pic

I just want to thank you for writing this. I think (hope?) that willfully ignorant "liberals" who always had an explanation for why I was treated like I was, are finally going to see outright what I was on about. I even hope that they realize that they do it too, on a more subtle level. This is the main reason I quit working on YearlyKos. I figured, I wouldn't deal with that crap at a job that paid me, so why should I when was volunteering my time and money (yes, they own me $$$)?

As usual, great post, Scientific. I am also an Ivy League grad (Harvard college and law school) and continue to live with the burden of having to prove myself. I am tired of having to reassure some white people that I know what I am talking about and that I am not an angry, militant black woman. At work they've finally gotten comfortable with my braids. Lord help me if I decide to lock my hair. I am hopeful that more of the people who harbor suspicions about Michelle will find a way to see beyond their prejudices. I've found that getting my skeptical friends to focus on her story makes a difference -- especially, when I tell them that it is similar to my own.

But, it's a trap. There are people who are going to negatively judge Michelle no matter what she does or says. She faces a hard road and I'm sure she knows it. But, I'm betting that she has more than a little character and toughness and will withstand it. I hope she stays true to herself and just gives America the opportunity to come to know her, understand her, and those who are willing, will develop and appreciation for her.

Hey, Nicky, I think you just broke the Guinness record for most use of the word "I" in a single paragraph.

Now try for the "me" record!

user-pic

Grow up.

user-pic

Here's hope that you lock that hair eventually...thanks for the kind words.

user-pic

I prefer the Michelle Obama who leans into the microphone implores us to be not afraid to the restrained and dolled up Michele Obama who must defend the fist jab or whatnot.
I always feel a little sad seeing spouses tone down their voice for the sake of the office.

Not to worry. We haven't seen the last of the bold Michelle Obama.

I love her.

Yeah, like watching Laura Bush transform herself into an empty-headed idiot so as not to outshine her boneheaded husband.

Michelle Obama is gracious, intelligent, assertive and sassy. I think she's an OUTSTANDING role model for little girls and young women especially because she speaks her mind and is usually right. She holds on to and openly discusses her principles.

I was in high school while Clinton was in office, and most of the young women at my school respected Hillary because she proved you could be First Hostess without being a "cookie-baker." She seemed to view her role as an opportunity to do good things within her area of expertise (legal and policy work). Where she lost many of us was in supporting her misogynist husband and subverting her own opinions for those of her husband and the administration. She emerged from those years as a triangulator, putting aside her own opinions to get elected. (And I'm not saying this to bash her campaign now, I'm saying it as a retrospective on her days as First Lady and I'm saying it from my then-18-year-old perspective.)

My hope for Michelle Obama is that she doesn't let her new staff "transform" her too much - I like what she seems to stand for, and I LOVE that she speaks her mind. The right-wingnuts will just have to get used to a strong woman telling them the truth from time to time.

I caught Dan Abrams tonight as well and almost lost my mind after those comments by that horror of a man, radio host, Lars Larson. Here's a link to the exhange.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/25253180#25253180

Good for Tanya Ackers pushing back at his statement that Michelle was "given a do-nothing job" by proclaiming clearly that Michelle had "earned it." Of course, Larson dismissed Michelle's work..."outreach and diversity, that's a B.S. job. You know it's a baloney job. It's a do-nothing job."

So not only is Michelle an angry black woman, a terrorist, a bitter, unpatriotic hater, but like her husband, she is lucky to be black.

As a black woman, she was "given" an Ivy League education and "given" a do nothing job dealing with do-nothing issues like outreach and diversity.

You know, I am so enraged by this shit that I can barely type....As a black woman whose work has been outreach and diversity, who graduated from an Ivy League college and is the same age as the Obamas, these attacks against her feel so personal to me.

My road was HARD and the work I did on behalf of others, mostly children and young people was so fucking hard to do in a society that at times is so cruel and inhumane. And fucking assholes like this --a radio talk show host can sit in all his privilege and dismiss this woman's life!!!

Sorry, I should know better then to watch Dan Abrams.

As if being an asshole radio host was a "do something" job. He should wash dishes for a living. Now that's doing something.

As if we were some intellectual hoodlum, holding a sign that said "Will Study, Write Theses, Take Exams and Get Good Grades for Food". Please.

Hear, hear. I'm an Ivy League grad too. I'm so fucking tired of that.

user-pic

Rec'd.

The only problem I'm having with Michelle Obama is that, having heard her speak, it's led to an inability to suppress all sorts of uncharitable, unfavorable comparisons in my mind whenever I tune into the important messages that the current occupants of the White House are trying to get out.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1319126,00.html

BOULTON (to MRS. BUSH): Did you think it was an unfortunate statement when he used the Wild West language?

THE PRESIDENT: Tell the truth. (Laughter.)

MRS BUSH: Sort of. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: Let me just say, when I got home she made a few comments.

BOULTON (to MRS. BUSH): Why, because it was just inappropriate?

MRS. BUSH: Well, I don't know why exactly. Just didn't sound serious, really, I think.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, because it makes it look like I like war, and I don't. And that's why. I mean, it's --

BOULTON: And it was the wrong message.

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Look, it was unscripted, I spoke my mind, and it just sent the wrong signal. I didn't realize it at the time, obviously; otherwise I wouldn't have said it.

He's gonna try harder to sound more serious, OK? In the meantime, if Michelle can help out by sounding less serious, I think that'd be a nice gesture to the First Couple and all profoundly silly people everywhere.

Squeamish lot, aren't we?

If I'm scouting a new CEO for a Silicon Valley company, and the candidate's spouse says, "I don't really like California, I really much prefer New England falls", warning bells go off. If it's interviewing for Microsoft and the spouse says, "but Microsoft is so corporate and greedy, I think the open source movement put them in their place", I would similarly wonder whether the candidate shares his/her spouse's views, and whether that's the appropriate person for this important, high-profile position (and whether the spouse will provide some huge embarrassment for the company further down the road).

I'm amazed when you say Michelle comes from a "different culture". Funny, blacks at 4th of July picnics seem to be doing about the same thing as whites, blacks post-9/11 seemed to react the same way as whites, from my generation we were all watching Partridge Family and Room 222 and seeing white and black bodies coming home from Vietnam on TV. In my 6 months living with a black family in a lower middle class black neighborhood with a parade of musicians coming through daily we ate the same kinds of cereal and hamburgers, drank the same kind of beer, watched the same kinds of movies, had the same kinds of mobile phones, told the same kinds of jokes, etc., etc., etc. We have the same conceptions of free speech, the same conceptions of property and MYOB, and a relatively similar world view. I've lived around the world where it took me a year to even get my bearings on a place, much less feel comfortable, but in that half year I don't ever recall feeling like I was in a different culture other than knowing that a clique of black musicians will be a bit different than a group of jocks or white engineers or whatever. I'm sure the reverse situation would be more difficult because of more racial intolerance the other direction, but that doesn't mean a different culture.

You may think this is a question of semantics, but America is a brand and a culture. If you don't support the two, you may be still accepted but you're not going to run it. We may have a lot of improving to do, but we have no ambition to be Japan, Germany or Kenya. We're America, it's the Presidential election, it's big stakes - get used to it. I don't hand the keys to the Porsche to a guy coming in off the street holding a beer and cursing society either. It's basic common sense and self-preservation.

Sorry to be dense, Desi--but what the hell are you talking about? I'm trying to make out what your point is, but I'm not getting it.

Help me out?

Project manager business blather.

No shit? It's interesting, but I just can't figure out what his point is. Something about Michelle Obama and the American 'brand.'

Vvvvfffffftt! Right over my head.

Come on, Laura, don't play with me. Obama is the candidate of hope and change. His wife wears the Jackie O tops and signifies the black successful-but-still-down-to-earth everywife. It is a brand, it is an image, it is a message. It is packaging. This is how marketing works, and Axelrod has done a great job at bring all the micromarketing niches together, as Penn noted, building a winning coalition out of blacks, youth vote (that they got to the polls) and in-roads into other sectors. So don't blow the marketing, don't screw the image.

I don't mean to play with you, but you took a very long and rambling way to making a silly statement that looks to me like you're just gulping up and swallowing Republican spin like it's the gospel truth. I didn't see the point of all the rambling (even though it was entertaining to read).

Look, the right wing wants to portray Michelle Obama as a sour, negative figure who is down on America. The extreme right wingers will paint this picture with sharper, uglier, racial tones--Michelle is a radical, liberal, angry Black woman who has the temerity to be ungrateful to our great country and all the opportunities it has offered her.

Pooh. I've heard Michelle speak. Yeah, she talks about what's wrong in this country. But she never fails to point out that her story would never be possible were it not for the opportunities that were available to her in our country.

For anybody with an open mind (not going into it with an anti-Obama bias such as yours) who hears what Michelle says, the right-wing portrait of her just won't make sense. In addition, I think the racial codes the extreme right-wingers load into the message will look surprisingly transparent and exceptionally ugly to a lot of moderate, low-information voters. This strategy will backfire badly.

Tell me: If my predictions are correct, will you be disappointed? Are you hoping the smear efforts gain traction, since they support your personal opinion of the Obamas?

Her point does not cut through. That's what's wrong with her speeches, that's what's wrong with her marketing.

I watched an hour of her and was disgusted. No good vibes. Nowhere was there, "and then the great things happened..." Grandma got eaten by the wolf, LRRH did too, let's hope the hunter shows up.

She has a great positive story to tell, including service, including hard work, including (moderate) rags-to-riches, including overcoming prejudice. But it needs to be a Cinderella tale - there are no black-or-white Cinderella tales, there are no "Cinderella made it but boy is it tough work being a princess" tales. It's "happily ever after". Look at the Lee Iacocca story (back when it was still evolving, when he was America's hero), look at Ross Perot's story - the have classic lines, classic literature - story setup and introduction, tension, resolution, denouement.

What a load of crap. America is way more than a brand and way more than its culture. Brand identity changes, so does culture. Neither or static or defined by what came before, though sometimes they are. That's the thing with branding - it's only static until it stops working. The evidence would suggest that American brand is in some trouble, which is why we are changing it.

That's why the election is "change" and not "experience" this year.

The idea of the American brand changes with just about each generation that takes power. Some generations throw the whole brand out and start over from scratch. Some generations simply tweak the logo a bit and basically carry on as before. But change in branding and culture over time is as inevitable as it is undeniable. This is true for companies as well as countries.

Unless you deny everything and make mountains out of every Obama molehill, then I suppose this is a perfectly reasonable comment. In the meantime, you should go back to analogy school. This one is pretty thin.

Of course brand and culture evolve, but what is Scientific talking about, woman from a "different culture"?

Don't get me wrong - I blogged before that Obama' team should get Michelle on track, so I'm happy they're doing it. You know, it's pretty basic, you're running for president, don't glower into the camera and smile more. You can criticize but maintain some optimism - Reagan's morning in America and all that. Hillary got shut down in '92 for her cookies comment and had to back into the corner for the duration. I watched Michelle go on for an hour about struggle and suffering, a real downer of a speech mired in victimhood, oh her poor student loans, etc, no mention of the opportunity to go to the best schools, to get the best jobs. I'm happy if the Obama team is remaking that no-win message. But here's Scientific going on as if it's about her "not being completely in love with her country". No, it's about her seeming not in love at all with her country at all - you know they're shooting kids in the classrooms and at the bus stops? Michelle could embody the promise of America, that anyone can make it with hard work, that these social and educational programs that conservatives criticize *DO* work, and so on.

Scientific says, "they're asking people of a different culture to capitulate to their norms". My, who would have thought that running for the highest office in the land you'd have to capitulate to someone else's norms. Why, I think jeans and a t-shirt are just fine, and I enjoy my morning beer, and I don't see why my investments in strip clubs (okay, "Adult Lounges"), should bother anyone, and while I occasionally make animal sacrifices to my pagan deities, it's not like I'm infringing on anyone else's rights, am I? And then the lady who interviewed me for the cosmetics sales position asked me to put out my cigarette - what is this, the United Fascist States of America? So maybe my problem was I aimed too low - that despite my convictions for shoplifting and child abuse I really was Presidential material. I think my culture offers me so much in so many ways, makes me a better person for it, and as soon as my 700 Club show is over I'm going to put the hood and fender back on my truck and go find me a campaign manager. I hear Mark Penn might be available. But I'm not going to take no goddamn lip from no one.

You make excellent points, many of which I agree with.

The problem is that they are lacking in historical context.

However, for the most part I agree Michelle, despite having been ostracized by her white roommate freshman year, should rise above all the hate America's racist society has rained down on her and only address how she has 'overcome' all those obstacles due to the great opportunities this country offers if a black person survives the hate.

You are sooooo right.

Michelle should pattern herself after Laura Bush and keep on steppin...no body wants to know the trouble she has experienced as a black person in America raised on the South side of Chicago who integrated the most prestigious white educational bastions the country has to offer.

Michelle...get thee behind Laura Bush...and make happy.

No, you miss the point. People love stories of struggle that turn out well. There are a million self-help books. It's just that Michelle messes up the "look how far we've come" message. It's not motivational. She embodies the new American dream, everyone's Horatio Alger, if we stop putting all our energy into tax cuts and instead invest it in our people, this is what can happen. It's a great story, she just has to learn to tell it.

Jason, still with that stupid photo, eh?

A CHANGE election. Guess you're too busy posing before the cameras to have noticed, but Uncle O has already:

Stabbed the great Reverend Wright in the back.
Left his church of 20 years.
Went down to FLA spewing shit about Castro and basically sounding like Ronald Reagan.
Backed off on his "negotiate with Iran" position. (As if this country has anything to teach Iran, a country which hasn't attacked or invaded another country since the 16th Century.)
Took it up the bum from AIPAC.
Wagged his stern finger at all those dead-beat darkie dads.
Filled his Foreign Policy "Advising" Team with a bunch of the Undead, the same people who gave us the Iraq Sanctions, the Sudan bombing, the destruction of Yugoslavia, and similar happy events.
Announced that NAFTA is A-OK with him.
And pushed his great wife to convince people that she's basically just another Condi Rice.

And my God, we're only in mid-June!

Maybe he'll be giving his convention speech in Denver wearing white gloves and a big bow-tie.

Time does not heal all wounds. Sometimes, in a life-threatening situation, the doctor opts to speed the healing by inducing a fever.
Before entering the race, the Obamas knew his candidacy would necessarily be a form of shock therapy for the American psyche.
But what else could they do?
You're black, you want to be president? You've got to persuade people to elect a black president.
First lady? Ditto.
The amazing thing to me is that this couple has taken on the herculean task of sweeping aside decades (in fact, centuries) of racial prejudice as an INCIDENTAL aspect of their drive to the White House.
Think about it: That isn't even the core of their message of change.
It's just a salutary side-effect.
What I'm saying, Scientific, is don't feel bad about the crap either of them has had to put up with, or will have to put up with.
They weighed the cost, and decided it was one they were willing to pay.
That alone shows amazing strength and courage.
And voters are beginning to sense that, and respond to that.
The first couple will be just fine, and they will better America in the process.

Love this comment. Very astute observation.

I just joined TPM, I usually just come in to read the posts and articles.
I had to comment because i was flipping through the channels when i caught the exchange. My heart broke because there were 3 males including Dan Abrams [an atty] who could have silent that language right away. I don’t know why I am so emotional but I think its venom and hate. I actually cried. Where is the feminist outrage?

user-pic

Drudge has splashed this link ...

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/06/cindy-mccain-pr.html

... as "Cindy Unleashed"

My guess is that Cindy's Thursday GMA appearance is gettin' set to get panned - big time - for her critical comments on the show re Michelle.

Scientific, I love your posts. I was livid when I watched Abrahms tonight and that odious Lars person started going on about Michelle's "make-work" job. How dare he, and the right-wingers denegrate such an accomplished woman who has earned evry GDthing that she has in her life. How f**king dare they?!!!

The longer I thought about it though, the less pissed I got. I'm a Harvard legacy, I didn't attend because of finances, but I got accepted because a relative was an alumn. Neither of the Obama's had my "in" into that world, they both earned their way. Sure they got scholarships, but they also had to take out massive student loans to pay their own way.

George W Bush was given every chance in this world because he was the son or grandson of powerful people who were also alumns. He never earned his way into anything, except his fight as a spermatozoa breaching an egg. See Andover and Yale.

John McCain went to the best schools. Private HS and then on to Annapolis, one of the most elite schools in the nation. All because his father and grandfather were alumns and Admirals. As he performed at the lowest of his college class, he was still accepted into the most prestigious branch of his service, not because he was worthy, but because his forefathers were worthy.

Cindy's father built a business and became very wealthy and bequeathed to her his empire. I'm not doubting for a second she's very good at her job, because she probably is. But she didn't earn it through her own merits, hard work or innovative ideas. She got where she is because she inherited it.

The undeserved/ minority opportunity equalization charge, the Obama's can fight. Neither of them came from money or name or history to give them a legacy "in" into that world. And they can shatter that particular "crystal ceiling", the one where the wealthy take care of their own. Michelle and Barack both broke that ceiling in very individual ways. (And if they didn't break them, themselves, they sure threaded that needle, especially Barack and the Harvard Law Review.

Anyway, I can see Obama fighting the earned/unearned and given stations in life argument and how that 95% of the population can and will relate. But the "lazy black negress" meme that the Lars "person" was trying to establish last night on Abrahms show is something more pernicious.

The only thing they(Republicans) have that might pull in the votes is affirmative action and reverse racism. And that is all. It's going to get much,much uglier between now and Nov 4.

Anyway, Scientific, please keep up with the provacative posts. I appreciate them.

Dee

user-pic

"[l]et's take the opportunity to get familiar with Michelle Obama".

Let's do. I think folks around here can appreciate Michelle Obama, her accomplishments, where's she has come from, and her potential to be a real role model and partner as first lady. She is undoubtedly one of the most accomplished women ever to be a potential occupant of that position. America should be proud of Michelle Obama, and this crotchety cynic can only hope that his daughters grow up to be like her.

It is so easy to blame the racist across the street. But don't lose sight that outside of the TPM halls of groove, Michelle, principally because of the sexism that is all a figment of the imagination of Hillary Clinton's deadend supporters, is now being made over by blockheads, smart campaign handlers but still blockheads in a long-term cosmic sense, who will strip her of all of the traits that folks like us are proud of, divorce her from her rightful place as an independent and accomplished woman, and she will become the very nice wife of the Democratic nominee, and soon we shall know her cookie recipes (if we don't already know them).

Again, people, meet that new boss. . .no different than that old boss, but through no fault of his own. Change is, more and more, just a word, and again it's nobody's fault. But don't just blame Boobus Americanus and their petty-ass stereotypes, because our candidate and our party are playing right along with the way things are, and our champions right now are doing nothing but helping to perpetuate the stereotypes we've learned to detest.

P.S. Duck! Two women with headscarves are trying to be visible at an Obama campaign rally. Hide them, quick! [cuz the refs are cowering and you won't read about it here, but it fits right into the point I'm making about Michelle--we are sooooo progressive, but we have no problems with the fact that our change candidate is being forced to live with the kinds of decisions that every other candidate has had to live with, even decisions that are blatantly filthy and discriminatory and a bow to hate]

It is going to be a long campaign.