« Disney Imagineers Called In To Animate McCain | richieville's Blog | Telecom Companies Get Immunity, Congress Gets Free iPhones »
Obama's Boomer Problem - He's Younger Than They Are
Richieville News Service - BERKELEY, CA
The campaign of Senator Barack Obama, having only just secured the Democratic presidential nomination, suffered an unexpected setback today when millions of baby boomers simultaneously came to the same frightening realization – the next president of the United States might be younger than they are. This historic possibility threatens to erode the Democrat's support among a demographic seen as crucial to his victory in November - members of the 60's generation who refuse to come to grips with their age.
The reaction of Bernie Schwartz, U of C Berkeley class of '68, was typical. "I was all for the first woman president, " he said, as he listened to the local NPR station on the radio of his Volvo wagon. "And the first black man? Far out! But younger than me? That's too much change. Are you sure?"
At age 46, Senator Obama is indeed younger than members of the baby boom generation, born in the years following World War II. Having come of age protesting older authority figures, these former flower children now face the terrifying prospect of being older than those in authority.
"I just don't understand it," said Alison Johnston, 56, sobbing quietly into her latte at the Starbuck's across the street from her yoga class. Ms. Johnston was at Woodstock in 1969 when Senator Obama was seven years old. "The president is like, old, right? So if he's old and he's younger than me, that means I must be...," Her voice trailed off, seemingly incapable of finishing the sentence.
Other boomers, like Russell Keller, 59, tried to take a more defiant attitude. "So Obama is 46," he said, while handing the keys to his Prius to his 19-year-old son Free, a freshman at U of C Berkeley. "I'm still as young as I was when I protested Richard Nixon." When told that when he took office in 1969, Richard Nixon was 56 years old, Mr. Keller could only stare off into the middle distance. "I should have voted for Hillary," he remarked bitterly. "At least she's 60."
Strategists for Senator McCain's campaign were quick to seize on Mr. Obama's perceived weakness with ex-hippies and former acid heads. They believe the Republican's age, once seen as a liability, might become a selling point with liberals in mourning for their lost youth.
"We're telling these former summer of love, bra burning, pot smoking long hairs that John McCain represents their last chance to feel like angry teenagers," said senior McCain advisor Charlie Black. "Electing McCain guarantees them at least four more years before they have to face their own mortality. Let's see Obama top that!"
For its part, the Obama campaign was not taking this new development lightly. "All you old folks are voting for McCain," said David Axelrod, the 53-year-old Obama advisor. "All us cool young people are voting for Barack Obama. If you want to be a cool young person, and I mean, really, really, really young, then vote for Barack Obama!"
Advertisement





The article raises an interesting question. I wonder if there is any evidence that people resent voting for someone younger than they are. I could see such a conflict in someone's personal or work life, but the presidency? I'll have to ask my dad about it. Anyway, very funny.
June 17, 2008 9:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Beside this being an obvious snark.
As a boomer I am more than happy to vote for somebody younger and smarter than me for a change.
June 17, 2008 9:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's not McCain's advanced age that concerns me, it's that his ideas are old.
June 17, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Like Obama I'm Gen-X, so I don't really have much insight into this, but I wonder if any Boomers are bummed at the prospect that their generation's sole contributions to the presidency will have been Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
OTOH, McCain (b. 1936) can hardly be considered a boomer either; he's a Depression Baby.
June 17, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Obama was born in 1961. Like me (born 1959), he is a baby boomer. The baby boomer generation goes through 1964. So if he wins, even under your snarky and meaningless standard, Obama's election will be mean that yet another baby boomer was elected.
June 17, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me, but baby boomers and their parents have left quite a mess. Take your choice of how the vast majority failed to safeguard and protect, much less improve (to identify only a few) - our environment, energy issues, healthcare, economy, veteran's care and protecting the sanctity of the electoral processes.......
We have proven by electing and re-electing those who have continuously abused and denigrated our constitution, their constituencies and country - instead engaged in catering to special interests and personal agendas (mired in 'politics as usual'), that we cannot be trusted to make the best, even good enough, choices.
Ah, and let's not ignore (nor forget) the reality that for decades precious few have even attempted to become informed about our government's actions, much less engaged in our own inherited rights to stand up and speak out - to take positive action to 'right the wrongs'.
So perhaps the question should be not if a candidate in his 70's should or can be elected to serve as POTUS, but if anyone over 60 should even be allowed to vote.
June 17, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Generational battles. Ho hum. The game any moron can play. How cerebral.
June 17, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, Bslev is right
Generation X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Generation X is a term used to describe generations in many countries around the world born from 1965 to around 1982.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X
Baby boomer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Baby boomer is a term used to describe a person who was born during the Post-World War II baby boom between 1946 and the early 1960s. ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomer
So he's an on-the-young-side young boomer. So what was the point? Let's see, he was 8 when Woodstock was going on. If he was living in the U.S. instead of Indonesia, he would have heard all about it on TV, for several days. Instead, he was off living the real counterculture with Mom. I we called in King Soloman on this one, maybe he'd give 90% of him to the boomers and 10% to GenX, but more likely he'd say, hey, this kid's childhood and adolescence were really unusual for an American, he doesn't fit into the standard categories.
June 18, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama's National Security Working group: haven't checked all the birthdays to be absolutely sure, but it looks like a dozen boomers and greatest generation, with only a single token for the GenX'ers, born in 1964, as the 13th. The list certainly screams "I'm just like Bill Clinton."
June 18, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink