Prophet sharing.
(Cross-posted here.)
She introduces us to Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, a theologian and civic leader whose record of civil rights activism was something I'd never learned about. From marching with Dr. King from Selma to Montgomery (above) to speaking out against the Vietnam conflict, Rabbi Heschel drew great inspiration from the writings of biblical prophets in forming his own ideas about justice.
What does that have to do with Barack Obama?
Those following the campaign have undoubtedly seen Obama deified in various ways - even likened to the Messiah. Some have taken such comparisons to ridiculous extremes.
In a lot of ways, it's Obama's own fault. He arrived in the American consciousness at a time in which this country was already searching for a savior, someone to guide America out of the morass of George W. Bush's myriad sins back into the light. The nation met him in 2004, then just a state senator recently elected to the U.S. Senate. Inconveniently timed, perhaps, to save us, but thank God he was here!
Deep down, we knew John Kerry wouldn't save us from Bush. Even if Kerry had been elected, many believed (as did I) that he'd be tarred with the Republican mistakes of the previous years, chief among them the war in Iraq. But wait...look over there at the freshman senator from Illinois! Was he hinting at a presidential run? Could it actually be possible that a man who'd just been planted in Washington could grow roots at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.? A Black man...in the White House?
But how would he get there? He'd have to speak truth to power, no doubt. That brings me back to the late Rabbi Heschel. The prophets that shaped his outlook on human justice weren't polite. Their words were meant to agitate the complacent out of their haze. (Think Jesus Christ made change by coddling folks?) In his work "The Prophets", Rabbi Heschel wrote:
"Above all, the prophets remind us of the moral state of a people. Few are guilty, but all are responsible."In a way, that second sentence could be considered a part of Democratic Party dogma. Despite its many faults, no party has been as clear about Americans' communal responsibilties as the Democrats. Senator Obama and his groundbreaking campaign have embraced the collective in ways never before seen or imagined in American presidential politics, and as such, a hallmark of his stump speeches (particularly concerning education) have emphasized the responsibilities of the many to care for the few, for communities to take charge of making change for themselves. And as evidenced by his nomination, many of us have been captured by his message and incorporated more than can be reasonable into how we see him. Add in amazing gifts for writing and oratory, plus a hint of a preacher's cadence...and you end up with this.
The question is simple: is Barack Obama a prophet? The answer: not so simple.
Rabbi Heschel defined "the main task of prophetic thinking" as "bring[ing] the world into divine focus." Couple that with the political evils that are often deemed necessary, and I'm not sure any politician can clear that bar. Senator Obama nears it in his own way, but to give him the charge of imparting the divine in any fashion seems outside the job description - even for a President of the United States.
That said, his courage in speaking truth to power - and to us - has been remarkable. This is a man who marched into Detroit and proclaimed that the automotive industry needed to change its ways to help save the planet. A man who tells Cuban-Americans that he'll talk to Raul Castro. But in doing so, he's not being prophetic, per se. He's being prudent.
As the article details, there can be a danger to using prophetic language too much. Obama knows this too well - our pundits call it "lacking specifics". In fact, Obama truly found his voice in this race when he didn't use it, listening instead to thousands of Americans, meeting them face to face, reassuring them that he had their concerns at heart and real strategies to address them. A prophet in politics takes the risk of making the path harder for him or herself. In demonstrating his ability to, as one professor put it, engage in the back and forth of rational justification, Obama shed any hope of being a prophet - and became something even more useful in the process. He became presidential.
The way that some on the other side of the aisle would have you believe it, you need a direct line to Heaven in order to be an effective head of state. Though his personal faith seems to be strong, Barack Obama isn't running for the job of Chief Prophet. He is applying for a position that requires him share whatever "prophetic spirit" he has with a pragmatic mindset that can address problems Americans are struggling with back here on Earth. While passionate oratory that moves grown men to tears is useful in capturing the hearts of Americans, Barack Obama seems to have discovered that much more is required to capture their heads.
Rabbi Heschel may not, as Jordana wrote, sought to have us depend too much on politics. But I believe he also would have hoped we avoid leaning too much on prophecy, too.
Advertisement





Great post.
This is one of the more irritating memes to come out of the primaries. Like a ton of cynical progressives who have seen every party sell out over the last 40 years would be so naive or so easily fooled.
I love the point that he is so much better than a prophet. We actually don't need a prophet so much as a president to create the environment where a prophet wouldn't get killed for coming down.
We can't let up one bit. Not until November. Glad to see someone is still out there countering the spin!
June 5, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
No cult here.
June 6, 2008 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did you even read the post?
June 6, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I did read the post, Scientific. And it is a well written, moderate-toned essay, I’d say. I still left that snark (but probably should have kept the smiley face) because the question of whether Obama’s core following is being led by the head or heart is an open one, and I don’t think fanatical Obama supporters see any danger in “worshiping” him. It’s qualitatively different from believing in a political activist or being inspired by a good orator or statesman.
I think you try to dispel the deification of Obama with your post, or put it in the more reasonable terms of a politician with a prophetic spirit, but this only emphasizes it to the outsider who sees Obama as just a politician. And I think you downplay Obama’s own hand in perpetuating that view (i.e. Oprah in SC proclaiming, “He is the One.”). I think there is a real problem in seeing our political leaders in religious terms and certainly don’t want a preacher-president.
Cornel West, arguing for a statesman/prophet combination here previously said of Obama’s skipping the MLK memorial, "Martin Luther King Jr.'s deep commitment to unarmed truth and unconditional love can in no way be subject to strategies for access to political power. Hence, I have a very deep disagreement with my dear brother, Barack Obama – in this case, commitment to truth is in tension with the quest for power."
How much of the prophetic spirit when he said, after the acquittal of the policemen who shot Sean Bell fifty times, "The judge has made his ruling, and we're a nation of laws, so we respect the verdict that came down." Compare that to the decidedly unprophetic Hillary Clinton, "This tragedy has deeply saddened New Yorkers - and all Americans. My thoughts are with Nicole and her children and the rest of Sean's family during this difficult time. The court has given its verdict, and now we await the conclusion of a Department of Justice civil rights investigation.” How much of a prophet is he when he compromises with the insurance industry on health care thereby perpetuating the broken system we have? How much truth to power did he speak at the AIPAC convention the other day?
It is blind allegiance and the elevating of leaders beyond what they are that actually thwarts change in the end. A prophet can’t be questioned and can’t be criticized. They can’t easily admit fallibility and change a wrong position. One of the consequences that comes from too much adoration of a politician is the oppression of other voices by the true believers, and I’ve seen a lot of that from the Obama camp.
June 6, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don Key,
If you ever come back to this thread just want you to know I enjoyed your comment a great deal. Especially appreciate you pointing out that Cornel West quote, it's a keeper.
I've been looking, hoping to find somewhere discuss this issue of Obama's preacher campaign with some grown ups of the Cornel west type these last few months, but unfortunately it became ever clearer that one couldn't do that on this site or anywhere else in the blogosphere that I could find.
I actually am agnostic on a lot of these campaign methods, I think of them as necessary politics, only as good or evil as the intent of those using them. Ot's just that I like to be with a group that wants to understand and deconstruct rather than proudly reveling in falling for it all, loving it, exalting in it. (Never been into rooting for a professional sports team of any kind, can you tell? :-))
I find it a pity that a political junkie like Josh Marshall could not manage to make a space for such kind of discussions, instead letting his web space be used for supporter v. supporter advocacy and partisanship. If he can't do that, who can? It's ironic, it got to the point where the blogosphere went so whole hog into a "CNN Crossfire" world of amateur spin v. spin, that TV punditry started to look like the height of respectable politica analysts in comparison.
The Obama idol/preacher campaign phenomenon (and hysteria at times) was and still is something very important to talk about, it has great historic significance and many precursors, but it seems one still can't do that in many places without being labeled an Obama basher.
June 7, 2008 9:24 PM | Reply | Permalink