« Getting Whitey: Michelle Obama's Secret Negro Agenda | Leonce Gaiter's Blog | David Broder's Twisted 4th of July »
The African American Patriotism Quandary
On the topic of patriotism, Barack Obama wrote the following for Time magazine:
"When I was a child, I lived overseas for a time with my mother. And one of my earliest memories is of her reading to me the first lines of the Declaration of Independence, explaining how its ideas applied to every American, black and white and brown alike. She taught me that those words, and the words of the United States Constitution, protected us from the brutal injustices we witnessed other people suffer during those years abroad."
I can't imagine what it's like to be physically identifiable as black, and have a white parent--particularly a mother; both of mine were black. I was old enough to watch the height of the civil rights movement and my ambitious, striving parents were furious enough to ensure that the eyes through which I saw it were filled not with today's nostalgic pride at America's eventual move forward, but with the Movement's rage that we had to suffer death, beatings, jets from water hoses and white men and women's spittle to gain our rights as human beings.
Like Obama's mother, they could have read the Declaration of Independence to me. But it would have been with a rage and sadness that the ideas, in application, did not apply equally to those like us.
Michelle Obama is attacked for saying she was proud of her country for the first time in her adult life. Some white conservatives expressed outrage that anyone could harbor such a sentiment. Some such critics are probably ignorant of history. Some desperately seek to "disinvent" a history that is counter to their preferred American narrative. All of them, in the immortal words of Jack Nicholson, "can't handle the truth." They can't handle the truth of America's past. They can't handle the truth of that past's continued existence in the African-American present.
My father was a career Army officer. In the 50s, black officers battled suspicions of communist sympathies. It was quite a dance: Whites treated them as second-class, and then dared them to seek an alternate path so that they could attack them for not loving the country that treated them with contempt.
There's an updated dance for black politicians. They have to go the extra mile to prove that they "love" America. Conservative Republicanism is the surest route. If you tolerate a party that owes its modern political good fortune to racial fear and hatred, then you must love America. If you're willing to eat that much shit, you're one of the "safe" ones, one of the "good" ones.
Since I'm not a politician, I don't have to pretend. I am not one of the "good" ones. I cannot say that I "love" America. I do not know what that means. Raised as I was, when I was, and by the parents I inherited, America has always been an abstraction to me. It certainly was not the "land of the free." It was not the cradle of freedom and liberty. It claimed to cherish those ideals, but it denied them to me. America has always been where I live. It is what I know. I admire a great deal about it. As my home, I would defend it.
But I don't consider America's grandest actions to have been taken on my behalf, in my generational stead, or in my name. And so I do not take personal pride in them. Love? I love those things that I trust well. I love those things that I know in my heart love me in return, and that I know in my heart would never knowingly harm me. I can attest to none of that about America.
As black, the bulk of America's history is, to be blunt, a hundreds-year insult to me. While black Americans have successfully battered our way into America's mainstream, I principally credit black Americans with that accomplishment, not "America." If America wants thanks for "allowing" us our rights, look elsewhere. Only the personality disordered narcissist insists on congratulations for not doing evil.
Imagine you were born where you and your parents did not have the rights of most, in which you witnessed the majority laugh at coon-faced parodies of people like you, in which your young self knew that the majority of your countrymen did not consider you quite as human as they were, and felt justified in treating you accordingly. It leaves a scar. It's a scar many Americans don't want to see, so they attack those like Michelle Obama who draw attention to it. They call it "grievance." In fact, it's just history--yours and mine. There are other scars in America's history, but few that are treated with such revulsion.
Time magazine asked MIT neurobiology professor Matt Wilson, "Why do we remember unpleasant events better than ordinary ones?"
He replied, "We think of memory as a record of our experience. But the idea is not just to store information; it's to store relevant information. [The idea is] to use our experience to guide future behavior."
And there's the rub. America is asking black politicians to prove that they will not use African-America's brutal and humiliating historical experience to guide their behavior.
I guess they just want to make sure that black politicians don't treat America the way America treated blacks. Ironic, isn't it? So many Americans insist that blacks forget our history in America, but it obviously remains at the top of their minds.
"When I was a child, I lived overseas for a time with my mother. And one of my earliest memories is of her reading to me the first lines of the Declaration of Independence, explaining how its ideas applied to every American, black and white and brown alike. She taught me that those words, and the words of the United States Constitution, protected us from the brutal injustices we witnessed other people suffer during those years abroad."
I can't imagine what it's like to be physically identifiable as black, and have a white parent--particularly a mother; both of mine were black. I was old enough to watch the height of the civil rights movement and my ambitious, striving parents were furious enough to ensure that the eyes through which I saw it were filled not with today's nostalgic pride at America's eventual move forward, but with the Movement's rage that we had to suffer death, beatings, jets from water hoses and white men and women's spittle to gain our rights as human beings.
Like Obama's mother, they could have read the Declaration of Independence to me. But it would have been with a rage and sadness that the ideas, in application, did not apply equally to those like us.
Michelle Obama is attacked for saying she was proud of her country for the first time in her adult life. Some white conservatives expressed outrage that anyone could harbor such a sentiment. Some such critics are probably ignorant of history. Some desperately seek to "disinvent" a history that is counter to their preferred American narrative. All of them, in the immortal words of Jack Nicholson, "can't handle the truth." They can't handle the truth of America's past. They can't handle the truth of that past's continued existence in the African-American present.
My father was a career Army officer. In the 50s, black officers battled suspicions of communist sympathies. It was quite a dance: Whites treated them as second-class, and then dared them to seek an alternate path so that they could attack them for not loving the country that treated them with contempt.
There's an updated dance for black politicians. They have to go the extra mile to prove that they "love" America. Conservative Republicanism is the surest route. If you tolerate a party that owes its modern political good fortune to racial fear and hatred, then you must love America. If you're willing to eat that much shit, you're one of the "safe" ones, one of the "good" ones.
Since I'm not a politician, I don't have to pretend. I am not one of the "good" ones. I cannot say that I "love" America. I do not know what that means. Raised as I was, when I was, and by the parents I inherited, America has always been an abstraction to me. It certainly was not the "land of the free." It was not the cradle of freedom and liberty. It claimed to cherish those ideals, but it denied them to me. America has always been where I live. It is what I know. I admire a great deal about it. As my home, I would defend it.
But I don't consider America's grandest actions to have been taken on my behalf, in my generational stead, or in my name. And so I do not take personal pride in them. Love? I love those things that I trust well. I love those things that I know in my heart love me in return, and that I know in my heart would never knowingly harm me. I can attest to none of that about America.
As black, the bulk of America's history is, to be blunt, a hundreds-year insult to me. While black Americans have successfully battered our way into America's mainstream, I principally credit black Americans with that accomplishment, not "America." If America wants thanks for "allowing" us our rights, look elsewhere. Only the personality disordered narcissist insists on congratulations for not doing evil.
Imagine you were born where you and your parents did not have the rights of most, in which you witnessed the majority laugh at coon-faced parodies of people like you, in which your young self knew that the majority of your countrymen did not consider you quite as human as they were, and felt justified in treating you accordingly. It leaves a scar. It's a scar many Americans don't want to see, so they attack those like Michelle Obama who draw attention to it. They call it "grievance." In fact, it's just history--yours and mine. There are other scars in America's history, but few that are treated with such revulsion.
Time magazine asked MIT neurobiology professor Matt Wilson, "Why do we remember unpleasant events better than ordinary ones?"
He replied, "We think of memory as a record of our experience. But the idea is not just to store information; it's to store relevant information. [The idea is] to use our experience to guide future behavior."
And there's the rub. America is asking black politicians to prove that they will not use African-America's brutal and humiliating historical experience to guide their behavior.
I guess they just want to make sure that black politicians don't treat America the way America treated blacks. Ironic, isn't it? So many Americans insist that blacks forget our history in America, but it obviously remains at the top of their minds.
Advertisement





Beautifully written, Saharag, and deeply moving. I hope that we'll see more of your contributions here. Thanks.
June 28, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great post. When MSNBC's Chris Mathews had hs multi-day tribute to Tim Russert, we got to see Mathews along with Pat Buchanan and Mike Barnacle praising the benefits of an Irish Catholic upbringing. There is no way an NBC or MSNBC African-American reporter could point out American history regarding Blacks and keep his/her job.
When Obama gave his speech on race, MSM cynically talked about opening an honest discussion about race. We all knew that this was a lie. The Whitebread MSM news anchors on broadcast and cable have lives too isolated to lead a true discussion on race.
What we can expect from mainstream media is to hide behind Obama's statement about a colorblind society. Look for MSM to follow the GOP meme on colorblindness if Obama wins.
The GOP will say that the country has now transcended race and that race no longer needs to be considered in applying programs. The problem, of course is that we have not transcended race.
African-Americans continue to receive less than state of the art care for a variety of illnesses including cancer and heart attacks. When Whites hear this fact, they almost all reflexively fall back on the meme that this disparity is due to economic factors. The truth is that the disparity in care remains even with upper income and highly insured Blacks.
If we consider poverty programs, there are more poor whites than poor Blacks in the country. Colorblind poverty programs could actually be detrimental to those impoverished Blacks with fewer programs directed their way.
There is limited access to have a true discussion on race in MSM. There are NO African-American news anchors on prime time or morning shows on broadcast or cable shows. Pat Buchanan can be a constant presence on MSNBC, but let Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson show up and watch the White audience faces redden from outrage that Jackson and Sharpton are allowed on air at all.
Chris Mathews can openly state that he understands the woman who asked about the flag lapel pin. Mathews continues to focus on the "bitter" comment Obama made in San Francisco. We will not see an African-American voice on our screens on a daily basis providing a slightly different perspective.
June 28, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
You made some good points.
You reminded me of some things I hate about MSNBC and its there morning show Morning Joe. I feel that this show is utter abomination and I wish that the PC police within the powers that be in NBC didn't fired Don Imus and canned his program Imus in the Morning. Joe, Mika, and Willie are a bunch of fakes, far worse than I think I ever seen and I use to watch Fox & Friends years ago. Joe Scarborough is a very spoiled prissy man who likes to start a like of (excuse my language) shit. I use to feel sorry for Mika when he would pick on her but I've notice that this pattern of abuse is part of the entire shows act, which I think is disgusting.
I use to put a lot of blame on Hillary for sparking a division in the Democrat party but a lot of that is shared by the media. The other day I was watching Hardball and they were talking about how Bill Clinton was upset at Obama for calling him a racist. Then I had to think for moment recounting all the headlines of the past 6 months of this campaign race and I don't ever remember those words being uttered by Obama campaign. I do a google search and find a blog site talking about the same subject "Obama calls Bill Clinton racist" they had a video linked to it. here it is and I am infuriated by this because I saw no one utter the words racist, but yet here Joe, Mike and Willy going nuts over nothing and watch them slander an African-American political worker who shared her feelings with CNN.
June 28, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Black history may be constantly on your mind, but the question is -- who does that help? If we're never going to get past the evils of the past, the scars will never heal.
Vicious atrocities happened to white people in the civil war and both sides were guilty. The South was left in ruins by the North.
Chinese Americans were treated so horribly there are still remains of underground cities they had to build to protect themselves from whites in Western cities.
Japenese Americans were rounded up in camps in WWII.
Irish and Italians were 2nd-class citizens in the boroughs of New York.
We can point to any number of bad things that have happened to other races in America, but past grievances against blacks seem to be the only ones we can't get past.
One can understand your decision to maintain a hostile posture, but I would advise to at least try and let go and liberate yourself from those negative thoughts. They don't change the past, and they prevent us from ever changing the future.
June 28, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Hostile postures" aren't about the past, their about the present inequalities.
And how are we supposed to "get over it?" Everytime we have to say, "With liberty and justice for all," know that's a lie? Or sing, "Land of the free. Home of the brave," knowing that's a lie.
And why should we forget? No one asks the Jews to forget the first Passover. I don't recall anyone asking Italians and Irish to "get over it."
And, we all know why. It's because Jews, Italians, and the Irish have successfully assimilated into American whiteness. Cause, they can like anglo and for the most part, their color of the skin isn't a disadvantage for them in America's social market.
But, brown skin is something that can't be assimilated. And it hard to get over those things that haven't changed. It's not black history that's on our collective minds, it's black present.
June 28, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why is it, do you suppose, that past grievances against blacks seem to be the only ones we can't get past? Could the eagerness of (apparently) the majority of white Americans to trivialize, rationalize, minimize and just plain pulverize that past have anything to do with it? That blind faith that unvaniquished ignorance bequeaths a perfect innocence?
June 28, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
To BrookD:
We "can't get past" them because a large part of white America would prefer to pretend they never happened, or were not as bad as reported, or were isolated sins committed by a handful of people with no one watching or cheering them on, or doing anything to stop it.
We have to remember because you don't want to.
I don't think Saharag is assuming a "hostile" posture. Just reporting a personal experience.
Let's put it this way: We keep hearing you say we need to have this "national discussion of race" so we can "get over" our grievances. But when we talk about it... not in an accusatory fashion, but from personal experience, you say, "stop talking about it so we can get to the future." But how does one get to the future, without reconciling one's past and present?
How do you grow the skillset to recognize racism, and racist behavior, if your means of education is based on ingorance (that is "ignoring" fact or circumstance)?
Why is the burden of race relations in this country always the problem of the minority to solve and never the majority? When will you instigate the great national discussion -- and talk about something other than "reverse" discrimination, "reverse" racism and white resentment?
To Saharag, a damn fine post!
June 28, 2008 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jade, I remember the issues, just like all the others I mentioned. You can toss in the Trail of Tears for good measure. People have been treated horribly in this country in the past, and black Americans are not the only race that have suffered. I fail to see how a "dialogue on race" will change the past, but if you listen to talk radio like Tavist Smiley, BET, NPR and a numerous other outlets, you will hear a deafening roar of discussion about race. We are talking about it every day. Are you listening?
June 29, 2008 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
You may be focused on history. My post was about disparities that are present today.
June 28, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
This was in response to BrookD
June 28, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, agreed. The history provides the context. The issue is about the disparities that continue today. In fact, the artful narrative that now exists around how we talk (or don't talk) about race, succeeds in burying the issues. Allows us all to work together and play nice without feeling uncomfortable. I think we need to be a little less comfortable - because that comfort comes at the price of allowing inequity to continue unchallenged.
June 28, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Al Sharpton is on Fox News and every other channel all the time. What are you talking about? Most people don't consider news anchor race to be a social disparity.
Besides, anybody can come down here and be a rich white boy from Greenwich. That's no challenge. You should consider your position a challenge for a more mature spirit that could handle it.
June 28, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The anchors pick the guests, the questions to be raised, and direct the discussion. Certain points of view will not be presented.
.......Besides, anybody can come down here and be a rich white boy from Greenwich. That's no challenge. You should consider your position a challenge for a more mature spirit that could handle it.
That explains how a language and thought challenged C student like GW Bush got elected, White Affirmative Action. So Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice should be proud to serve an intellectual inferior?
June 28, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
no, what i meant was Bush is an infantile spirit that couldn't handle the tougher challenge of being Hispanic or Mexican. As the saying goes, God doesn't give you more than you can handle. So, you've got a tougher mission to accomplish, but you will reap a greater reward in the end. Bush is way behind you, but instead of focusing on the injustice of his position, stop wasting time and get on with your own mission. You're missing the opportunity.
June 28, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your posts are ridiculous.I focus on what affects my life. If I ignore the simple fact that African-Americans receive inferior medical care. i put my own life at risk by being unaware. If I don't make attempts to make the disparity common knowledge, I leave a job undone and up to another generation.
Similarly, being aware of disparities in loans, housing, etc also makes me able to be in a better financial position when dealing with my personal economics. Focusing on race, keeps me healthy, wealthy and wise, thank you very much.
June 28, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
"So, you've got a tougher mission to accomplish, but you will reap a greater reward in the end."
Yeah, that tune is all played out. The reward of a better life in heaven (through Christianity)was also forced onto African slaves by their slavemasters to pacify them and make them accept their horrible status in America.
I'm sure lots of folks of all races would be happy to bear the burden of white privilege like Paris Hilton's.
June 28, 2008 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think BrookD is either just intentionally posting nonsense, or just ruly ignorant.
I appreciated your comments as well as those of Jade7243 above.
June 28, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
it's only nonsense if you believe this is your one shot at being human, and then it's over. If you consider an eternal existence, this life is a mere blip, but you're here for a purpose, and it's best to get to it.
June 29, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Black history may be constantly on your mind, but the question is -- who does that help?
I would submit that we don't a have full perspective of our history in the United States; for example, most of us celebrate the fourth of July without a second thought that black men--some held in bondage and all with little or no rights--fought to make this country free. We shower praises on the men who fought at Concord, Yorktown and Valley Forge (among others) but do we know that black men were among those Patriots? We honor the men who fought in the Civil War again without second thought that black men--some held in bondage and all with little if any rights--fought to set themselves free and help preserve the Union. Those two feats in and of themselves are remarkable considering our history.
To illustrate how little we know about our past, the Daughters of the American Revolution finally this past May acknowledged the contributions of African and Native Americans during the Revolutionary War. In fact, the DAR is looking for additional Black Members. There were approximately 5000 Blacks who fought in the Revolution and only about 60 Blacks-- nation wide-- who have connected to them as DAR members.
June 28, 2008 1:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
We must remember and acknowledge this part of our history if we are to arm ourselves with the tools needed to recognize the ongoing perpetuation of bigotry. We need to do this in order to ensure we never again allow the processes and methologies that were responsible for enabling those who participated in bigoted acts, either by word or deed.
I understand there is nothing we can do to eradicate the past, but one way we can pay homage to those who were the victims of the bigotry and ignorance by pledging that everytime we witness these actions, we must Stand Up and Speak Out!
Note: After viewing 'Long Walk Home' I was in theater rest room, washing my hands next to a young black woman who I had seen sitting in the theater too. As we looked at each other in the mirror, I suddenly began crying and turned to her and said, "I am so sorry."
Without waiting for her reply I quickly exited. A few minutes later as my husband and I were leaving the building, I felt a hand gently touch my shoulder. As I turned, there she was with a sad smile and tear stained cheeks much like my own. She simply and graciously said, "Thank you" before she rejoined her friends.
This wasn't the first time I was overcome with emotions attributed to anger, sorrow and shame (for members of my race who participated) when confronted with reminders of how it was and in many ways, still is among us. And it definitely wasn't the last.
I always remember this young woman every time I confront a bigoted ignoramus or otherwise protest actions of bigotry. I can't change the past (before I was old enough to take action) but I acknowledge it and accept the responsibility of both my actions or lack thereof for today and tomorrow.
June 28, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm a white guy, getting older, kinda boring, and yet I have an opinion on this: This is your home as much as it is mine. (And I'm glad of that.)
Your ancestors were treated far worse than were mine, of that there's no doubt.
Still, we're both here today. Let's, for the moment, each do what we can to make it the best home for us and those of us we hold close. Different areas will require different types and levels of attention, to be sure. Let's both (and anyone else out there reading this!) pitch in and make things better every day.
Why do I bring this up? None of us can change the past, while all of us can improve the future - if we want. Our different histories don't alter that one bit.
In my life, I've seen the US change from a place where a black man was taking his life in his hands for trying to vote in some areas to a place where a black man has a better than even chance of being the next President. Will that "make everything better"? Of course not. Is it demonstrable evidence of things having come some distance to the good? No doubt. Let's keep making it better as we can.
That's it...
June 28, 2008 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Marvellous post. Simply stunning. Thank you.
"Only the personality disordered narcissist insists on congratulations for not doing evil."
This sentence simply leapt out at me - so powerful.
Do you write for a living? I hope so.
June 28, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree it is hard to love America as it is or as it has been, particularly hard for black Americans. Hard also for poor Americans, Asian-Americans, Latino Americans, but particularly hard for Native Americans and blacks.
However, it is easy to love America's potential and promise. To love what she aspires to be. When I feel that cloud of anger I do try to focus on her aspirations, her promise.
June 28, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
sarahg,
Congrats on a fabulously written post that evinced both your emotional hurt and your intellectual competence.
But, when I finished reading and re-reading your article I was left with this question: What is the point you are trying to make?
This sentence caught my eye: "America is asking black politicians to prove that they will not use African-America's brutal and humiliating historical experience to guide their behavior."
What does that mean?
Are you suggesting that black politicians should run on platforms that state they will brutalize non-blacks as blacks have been brutalized throughout US history? That a couple of hundred years of de jure slavery should be imposed on whites for the misdeeds of the US past? What are you saying?
All but the most vile and ignorant among us no longer contest the fact that the black experience in the US has no equivalent in any of the other ethnic groups and various minorities who inhabit the country.
But the country is on the verge of electing a black president, before it elects a female president, a Jewish president, an Asian president, a Hispanic president. The Big O may not be your ideal choice for this role, but nevertheless, it will be a monumental achievement for all blacks.
It will mean that every little white boy and white girl in grade school will see a black man leading their country; it will mean that every little black/brown/Hispanic/Asian/Jewish(?) boy and girl will grow up knowing for certain that a black man can be the President of the United States, and perhaps they can too.
Will that erase slavery? Will that erase the raping of female slaves by white masters? Will it erase the lynchings and beatings? The hundreds of years of large and small personal humiliations suffered by black people? No, it will not.
But one thing it will do: When someone around the world sees the Leader of the United States, he or she will be gazing at the visage of a black man, and no one will ever be able to take that fact away from the black community in the future.
Again, great post.
FB
June 28, 2008 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I must admit I was cryptic at the end there. The point I was trying to make is that in Obama's case (who is about as "over it" as any identifiably black man could possibly be), it seems that it is some whites who are obsessed with the ugliness of black America's past. It is they who insist that his words on patriotism cannot be the truth. Why? Because he's black, and the logical conclusion is that there is something in his (and his wife's blackness) that precluded patriotism as they believe it should be practiced.
While white conservatives consistently tell African Americans that we should forget our own past, they seem quite obsessed with it.
June 30, 2008 10:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
"What does that mean?"
"Are you suggesting that black politicians should run on platforms that state they will brutalize non-blacks as blacks have been brutalized throughout US history? That a couple of hundred years of de jure slavery should be imposed on whites for the misdeeds of the US past? What are you saying?"
You know full well that's not what he meant. What he meant was what he said. He has a hard time feeling patriotic toward America for all the reasons he detailed above.
It leaves a scar. It's a scar many Americans don't want to see, so they attack those like Michelle Obama who draw attention to it. They call it "grievance." In fact, it's just history--yours and mine. There are other scars in America's history, but few that are treated with such revulsion."
Well, maybe I as a black person have a scar, too. More and more, whatever I do have is beginning to manifest itself as indifference toward America. All I want is access and fair treatment under ENFORCED civil rights laws.
June 28, 2008 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chris Mathews explains away a White Pennsylvania woman asking about a flag pin lapel by saying is that patriotism is all that people like her have.
Mathews has done this repeatedly. He tells a tale he was told about why a White person who is struggling loves the flag. The answer is that that's "all they've got". He cannot understand how African-Americans might have a slightly different feeling. Cindy McCain, the multi-millionaire, has always been proud of her country. Duh!
Michelle Obama is trashed because we refuse to fully discuss race. Pat Buchanan wrote a column asking for a Thank You to Whites from African-Americans for all that has been done for them. Buchanan is a go to guy for political analysis on MSNBC.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200803220001
They throw the bias in our faces.
June 29, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can see a connection here also to Wright's God Damn America statement. There's a tone deafness along racial lines to the issues that underlie the "patriotic" veneer. Wave the flag, put the pin on your lapel, and say thank you very much for all that your country has given you. And that will make you a good American. But, bring attention to the fact that, hey, this country has a history of social, political and economic injustice towards non-Whites and it continues today and we need to recognize and deal with that - and some will consider you un-American, unpatriotic, a traitor to your country. Can I love my country and still call attention to its flaws and insist on change where change is needed? I'd say if you truly love your country, you ought to have the honesty and determination to do so.
June 29, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Being an African-American, I am always amused by Republicans and this idea of patriotism. Back people do not see patriotism the same way people of European blood do. Why should we? Why should we love a country dearly that brought our ancestors over against their will, made them property, stripped them of all human and humane rights, sold father, mother, and children, and said they were not entirely human? Why should we exhibit the same patriotism whites do on Independence Day? That is not when we received our Independence. It's when YOU received yours.
Why should we be as proud of a country in which women were rapped, the men lynched and mutilated, homes burned down, were not citizens, were denied freedom, the right to own property (hell we WERE the property!), could not vote, receive an education, and were forced into segragated worlds?
Have the GOP lost their minds? Why should we cry when we see Old Glory? Why have OG waving in our yards? Why shoud we love a country that said "you are different, therefore you are not worthy?
Why should we love a country as much as European-Americans that said you are not beautiful, you are not worthy of love, you are not worthy, period
Why should we love a country as dearly as those GOP's that said we had to fight tooth and nails for every thing that whites received automatically. Our sons, husbands have given their lives in every war our country has ever been in, and still not respected. In the Civil War, and the 2 World Wars, Korean, and Vietnam, and still not valued.
Why should we love a country as much as whites when our government sits back and does nothin while we are treated as nothing? And you expect us to be as patriotic? have you lost your MINES?!!!
Get your head out of the sand. This denial has to go into cessasation! I know Michelle misspoke, but to a lot of African-Americans, her words rang true.
June 29, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for a great post, Saharag. (For those of us interested in reading more of his writings, here is his website: http://leoncegaiter.com.)
The idea that we "should put the past behind us" and "come together as a country" is a way to continue the myriad forms of racism in this country and the world, from the superficial but hurtful to the pernicious and structural. I also think we should try to put the past behind us, but by rooting out racism in all its forms today, not by pretending racism no longer exists today, or that it is not a serious problem. Forgetting this country's racist past is a way of preserving its racist present for the future.
June 29, 2008 2:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know, I fully understand and empathize with those who are black not loving Old Glory or the other trappings of Americana that are symbols of oppression and of a genocidal history. But, I have noticed that some people seem to think they are speaking for all blacks and that's simply untrue. I know black people who are perfectly aware of the injustice of the past, who have worked in the civil rights movement who are flag-wavers and can't wait to get decked out in red white and blue for the 4th of July. Two of them, in fact, get quite gaudily red, white and blue for the 4th. Black patriotism has been a long part of our history - from Crispus Attucks to Barack Obama. That some blacks are troubled by the symbols of patriotism, that they are frustrated with our unfinished work toward equality for all, that they are impatient with how we dawdle along with excuse after excuse on the road to full equality for all, that's understandable. But that's not unpatriotic.
Generally speaking, I don't question people's patriotism and love of country just because they express it differently than I do. There's only one group of people who I would say are "bad for America" or unpatriotic and those are the ones who are satisfied with America as she is now. The "love it or leave it" types who think America doesn't deserve to do and be better than it is. That think a second class, ,second-rate education system, that third rate health care and bargain basement election systems is the best America deserves. Those people, they are unpatriotic. Anyone who thinks America is just fine the way she is right now doesn't really give a damn about this country.
June 29, 2008 5:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Black history should be on all of our minds because the history of all Americans should be known and understood. Why? Because it informs our present condition. Like Bob Marley sang: "Know your history, Know your Destiny. For in the abundance of water the fool is thirsty."
I taught African American History and Women in US History to seniors at an elite private school in Manhattan. They were outraged that their parents were spending close to 30K a year for a college prep education yet, so much of American history had been omitted from their traditional American history classes.
By the time they finished my courses, they had a much greater understanding of America with all its successes and failures. Since I taught from the perspective of history being a dynamic relationship between groups and events, they felt more ownership of their American identities and their roles in forging a future America and as such it also informed their sense of citizenship.
For most of the white students and male students, learning the history of other groups (I tried to integrate the experiences of Native Americans, Chinese Americans, Mexican Americans, etc.) encouraged a respect for these groups they simply did not have before. For students of color and female students, it encouraged a sense of pride in the accomplishments of ancestors that they didn't know they could have.
In the end, my sense is that it made them all better Americans and excited in them a desire to make America better. And this happened because they learned the truth not because the ugly was hidden.
June 29, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Damn it! Only Marley's quote should be italicized.
June 29, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
How the truth shines through. I especially agree with the "you can't handle the truth" aspect of your piece. (I think otherwise known as the even more inexcusable re-victimizing of the victim by those unwilling to take a hard look at themselves).
I feel the truth of everything you say until I hit last two paragraphs.
"And there's the rub. America is asking black politicians to prove that they will not use African-America's brutal and humiliating historical experience to guide their behavior."
I take issue with this. Who is America? I know I hope Obama will use all his experiences to guide his behavior and guide this country to a better place. And a black politician who can put that experience to use is probably essential for us to overcome the residual effects of that history. The fact that we have never had a black president with that key in his hand could well be reason that although we outlawed slavery and passed the Civil Rights Act, we still have many inequities and hostilities. I think the majority of Americans would want him to use that experience to help us become a more strong, just and united society.
"I guess they just want to make sure that black politicians don't treat America the way America treated blacks."
Again, who are they and who is America? I don't know what they think, but I want to ensure no politician, whatever the color, is destructive in any way to anyone. How does your notion of they here square with the fact that many of all colors in America have worked tirelessly to put Obama in the most powerful office in our country, before they have one iota of proof about what he will do with that power? If "they" were really worried about this, do you really think Obama would have had the support necessary to win the nomination? Obama may be the most intelligent and gifted politician I've ever seen, but votes are necessary for legitimate success in the US political arena.
Bear with my white perspective:
People of all colors share in the nightmare of slavery and racism as we do in the existence of any evil. Hearing about slavery as a child was a terrifying assault on my spirit that I still remember. There is no way for me to know what the black experience was or is, but I do know that when people demonstrate the capacity to be so despicably insane they also victimize those who are not the direct target.
When I made this discover, the fact that I was white was no comfort. The fact that evil existed at all had just happened to me, and the fact that someone else had the power to force their evil into the space of others was devastating. Perhaps the pain of this assault instructed me that although evil changes form, it does not really discriminate; most people suffer because of it. That is not a claim that I have suffered as any black person has, but I do believe suffering is often shared. And if at least some of the white abolitionists did not feel deep pain and revulsion about evil in their midst, they would not have been driven to risk their own lives to abolish slavery.
So for the record, this white American says Obama's success is not only as it should be and well-deserved, it feels like a healing, not any sort of threat. I guess that is partly because instead of feeling disillusioned about the problem of the evil called racism, I feel hopeful and proud of Obama and all his supporters. It inspires me to think that healing might be occurring in the black community as the world embraces this leader of their community who seems destined for the sort of greatness we read about only in history books. And I love the the sense i have that the multi-colored support for Obama has caused much of the distrust or discomfort between whites, blacks and others to dissipate. I also think Obama is positioned to put most American presidents to shame, and I have to say, the rebel in me sees some real poetic justice in that playing out to the best end.
That said, there are disparities today that linger and we're all responsible in some way. I think many Americans do not really understand this due to lack of exposure and the media. There's plenty of proof that most Americans can't even recognize what is in their own interest or help themselves, so the right leadership and guidance are essential to overcome this.
So we disagree about who "they" is. And I think it is really important to acknowledge that although legalized slavery in this country ended for many reasons, it did not end because there was an overwhelming revolt by slaves. Part of the reason it ended was because so many whites found it intolerable and unjust enough that they were willing to risk their own lives. That further supports what I already know, which is that everyone who is not black does not deserve to be labeled a "they."
June 29, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink