« What I Learned on My Summer Suspension | MassDem's Blog | Quick - How do you tell when a pundit is shilling for McCain? »

Don't Get Fooled Again


Some time ago, there was a reader post on TPM that listed phrases from this campaign cycle we never wanted to hear again.  I don’t know if it made the list, but for me, the one that rises above (sinks below?) all others is Karl Rove Tactics.  Aside from reminding me of the repugnant man himself, the tactics that bear his name represent the worst that America has to offer.  The fact that they still work in spite of the fact that we are aware that they are being used is just sad.  The old adage is fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.  What does it say about the electorate that we can be fooled over and over again by this clown and his minions?

I bet some of you are reading this thinking yeah, but he’s not gonna get us this time.  We are fighting the smears, we’re not letting them get away with it like they did with John Kerry in 2004 or to John McCain in South Carolina in 2000.  We called them out on the whisper campaigns, we called them out by name, and we have a candidate who can express himself simply and forcefully who can fight back himself. 

To our peril, we forget about the other key aspect of Karl Rove tactics.  Sure, he is the master of the covert:  damaging whisper campaigns, race baiting, direct mail, push polls, and Barack has fought back against those, but what about the more overt tactic of turning your strength into a weakness?  They’re trying this as we speak:  They are trying to paint Barack as the typical vacillating politician, thus taking away his “outsider” advantage.  There is limited success here and I think defenses are up.  They are trying to brand Barack as an elite, thus taking away any advantage he might have from his meager upbringing.  This has had some success, but again, the defenses are up.  Barack is able to eloquently and forcefully put down these attempts in a speech, or a turn of phrase - This is going to be the problem. 

When the word got out that the acceptance speech would take place at Invesco Field, the conversation turned to what a moment it would be.  To see 70,000 people cheering while Barack brought the house down with an amazing address.  McCain can’t possibly match this spectacle, as evidenced by his “green screen” debacle the night the nomination was clinched.  The only option left is to minimize it.  Not to set the expectations so high that they can’t be met, but to actually turn this amazing positive into a negative.  This started yesterday with the comment out of camp McCain that “even NSYNC was able to sell out Invesco - twice.” 

We need to see what they’re trying to do here:  They are looking to turn one of Barack’s greatest strengths, mastery of the oratory and ability to draw large crowds, into a negative.  They are trying to create an environment where each time he gives a brilliant speech, people roll their eyes and say “there he goes again.”  And worst of all, the very target of this attack will make it difficult to defend, since any direct defense from Barack could be met with “see? there he goes again.”  I know it would be ridiculous for McCain to attack Barack on the topic of speechgiving, but that’s what defines this particular “Karl Rove Tactic.”  Attack an unimpeachable strength that your opponent is completely unprepared to defend, with bonus points if it’s also a weakness for you.  It was ridiculous for Bush to attack Kerry for military service, but he did, and it worked.  Defenses need to be up on this one.  The attack has started subtly, with eye rolls on Fox News when they talk about the latest speech, but it will turn more overt.  If we take the attitude that it’s so ridiculous that it couldn’t work, and we don’t dignify it with a response, it will work.

Don’t get fooled again.

 


16 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Framing and message control are skills the Republicans have traditionally excelled at and the Democrats have never seemed to learn. Until this year, that is. I'd say we're ahead on framing and struggling a bit with message control. But so is the McCain campaign. And Obama runs a far tighter ship than McCain ever will. So maybe we've got the bastards beat this time. The indicators all seem to point that way. The flap over Obama's decision not to accept public financing is fading in the rearview mirror. I haven't heard Reverend Wright mentioned for a long, long time. There will be a week of hell to pay over FISA, and then that will pass as well, I suspect. I think we're in pretty good shape. And I really don't think the Republicans are going to get any traction out of the Invesco Field issue. They'll just end up sounding like jealous whiners. And Obama's foreign trip is going to destroy them. All those photos with all those world leaders. The Republicans are going to be playing defense right up to election day.

I love and agree with that outlook, but we need to keep out guard up as well.

That's why we are here.

Forget the world leaders, I'll bet a fair amount of folks will turn out at airport, etc. It will be unreal, especially in France!

I think Hillary tried to fault him with the speeches in the primary, and it seemed ineffective. I really don't see that particular theme taking hold, although I hadn't heard the NSYNC concert. Which is hilarious, because maybe McCain doesn't know that they were huge before they were a joke.

On the lighter side, I simply cannot hear the "fool me once" phrase without thinking of G.W.

I can't hear the "fool in me" without thinking of myself during this time.

In some ways we all have been caught up in something we thought we understood, but looking back, it seems very chaotic in its constant turns, its fights that still rumble here with anger.

I thought I knew what was happening. Maybe I knew half of it. Obama's run was based on knowing and feeling secure in that knowing. The fool in me feels a bit duped, by my own brain, and I think now that there's plenty I've missed. In the dark now on many things,

Good message, MassDem. Good to remember. One thing about this tactic you mention that's interesting is that, demean his speeches as they will, it doesn't change the fact that his speeches are powerful and inspiring. They can try to belittle that, but it goes in the face of the facts - that they do move people. Moreover, if we want to push back, we can simply say, "Jealous? Too bad you don't have anyone inspiring on your side."

user-pic

I agree, simply because I've never seen another candidate galvanize people like Obama does.

The Repugs have nothing positive to run on, so of course they're going to run on tearing Obama down.

The beauty of this candidate is that he isn't going to "belong" to any one constituency or group - he's told us that over and over and right from the beginning. I guess some weren't listening - he knows the president is the president of everyone, not just progressive Democrats.

If he doesn't seem to be listening to progressives on some issue, perhaps that is because we are outnumbered by the other voices he hears from voters on those issues. D'uh?

And why this has evolved into the fucking crime of the century is a mystery that once solved may stop the goddamn insanity in the Democratic Party that causes us to disembowel every one of our candidates the minute we get him nominated.

Have you seen McCain's new ad -
“Beautiful words cannot make our lives better. But a man who has always put his country and her people before self, before politics … can.”

It's on The Page

It's funny, but sometimes beautiful words do make a country better. FDR did it during WWII and so did Churchill. So did JFK. People who inspire others actually do make their world better because those who are inspired will take action. That's why they often say that the pen is mightier than the sword. Because words have power. I guess the Repubs have no good words only swords.

The GOP has Reagan to point to, who did quite well.

There is this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjWDrTXMgF8

and this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEjXjfxoNXM

He wasn't called the Great Communicator for nothing. Pure theater? Sure. Just like we've seen from the Dems (remember Bill Clinton looking empathetic and biting his lower lip?)

And if you want a montage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpOgYbr234Q

This is the reason that Reagan was popular in the country. Like his policies or not, he comes across far easier than any candidate we've seen in a long time.

Happily, the Dems have Obama this year -- the first orator we've seen from that side of the aisle in 45 years.

My prediction for coverage of the Denver speech: we'll hear a lot of Fox News and talk radio types go on and on about whether or not such theatrics and showmanship are appropriate in politics, and at least one of them will compare Obama's speech with one of Hitler's (as Tom Sullivan did in February[1]). And the backlash, I think, will definitely help Obama.


[1] http://mediamatters.org/items/200802130016

I was over at FDL and emptywheel all day following FISA debate, so I am just catching up to great posts over here at TPM. MassDem, that was a great post. Cogent warning. Similar to NCSteve warning/begging us not to throw chum in the water for the stooopid MSM to commence more shark attacks. I'm too late to respond to any of your commenters; please post more of these!

After what Hillary tried, Obama is ready for any smear tactics the Republicans attempt.

I urge all to read Raider99 posts about MSM. This is the best way to unite and do something productive to stop the smears and disreporting (real word? if not, it's still appropo).

MassDem way to go and please don't stop!

Leave a comment

MassDem

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address