Or we could actually talk about problems and issues facing this country and figure out who would be the be the best person to lead us through the long and perilous process of finding and implementing the solutions.

If we could do that Barack would still be the clear winner, and I could still stand to look at myself in the mirror in the morning.

>

Obama's been doing that. But the MSM ain't interested. Given that the MSM won't discuss the issues, I'm much rather have them talk about McCain's temperament, which is singularly unsuited to the office of the presidency, than other time wasters like Obama's patriotism.

I normally only read here, don't post. But yesterday finally blew my reserve out of the water.

Did anyone here bother to watch Obama's patriotism speech yesterday?

I can tell you, this expat was so emotional and homesick when he was only halfway through it. I was in floods by the end of it, enough to restock Puget Sound.

And what did Obama get from Democrats here? Trashed for apparently not defending Clark.

What do we know? We know that through the fall the GOP 527s are going to be parrotting the Wright/unpatriotic meme in ads across the country on at least a weekly basis. This speech was a pivotal attempt to help pre-empt them. And what did Obama get for it?
Nothing but the MSM and the blogs arguing about a non-issue.
Obama would have been justified in being furious with Clark for this mammoth distraction. (He probably was.) But instead of allowing that to dominate, he moved today to take the heat off Clark and stressed that his comments about surrogates not criticising McCain's service had been written months before.
This man has a fantastic temperament. (As also
witness how he bit his tongue so many times throughout the primary)
I urge everyone who hasn't got around to watching the entire patriotism speech to go to his website now. And resolve that, loving this country of ous, the only politicians we want to attack from now on are those of the neo-con, tax-cuts for the rich and the devil take the hindmost ilk.

The more McCain crys about his hurt feelings the more he looks like a self-centered fool. Maybe it is time to start making fun of wrong way McCain.

BTW Wrong Way was the name of a pilot that showed up on Gilligans Island, some people have a life and may not know that.

Dr. David Butler is a highly decorated Navy combat veteran and pilot. He has known McCain for more than 60 years. They were at the Naval Academy together. Butler had already been in the POW camp for two and a half years when McCain arrived and was there for another five and a half years until they were released. He has quite a different view than the spin McCain puts on those years and some strong reasons why he feels that it would be dangerous to our National Security if McCain were elected. One reason given is McCain's life long temper which Butler describes as "quick and explosive" and not to be trusted near "the button". (McCain's mother has told the story of his flying into such intense rages as a boy that he would pass out.) Butler is not a political surrogate, but rather a well respected officer who retired from the Navy at the end of a successful career. For his service in Viet Nam he was awarded two purple hearts, two legion of merits, two bronze stars and two silver stars. He honors McCain's service for which McCain was awarded a bronze star and a purple heart. Please pass this article in "Today in the Military" on to all military families and others. The link:
http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,164859_1,00.html

Why not do both.

I agree with Wes Clark. When John McCain touts his war experience, in particular, being a POW, as making him more qualified to be President, making him "ready", then it becomes an issue that can rightly be debated. McCain lists it as one of his qualifications - something Obama lacks. So, does being a POW make you more qualified to be President? Should ALL POWs try to get on the ballot the next go round? I think not.

Should we ask some psychiatrists what being a POW for 5 years does to your personality? Will it affect him when there is a 3AM crisis? Does he get flashbacks? These are questions that McCain has opened himself up to by touting his experience as something that would make him better qualified to be President. But does it really?

I'm not being critical of his military experience. It happened to him and he should be proud of the way he handled it. But will it make him a better President? Let's see the proof.

McCain is acting like a cry baby. Too thin-skinned for the Presidency, for sure. Imagine if a journalist writes a negative article -- will s/he be kicked out of the press pool, just as testy, fragile Johnny kicks them off the bus now?

What a petty, insecure little jerk.

From today's Political Radar:

McCain became visibly angry when I asked him to explain how his Vietnam experience prepared him for the Presidency.

"Please," he said, recoiling back in his seat in distaste at the very question.

McCain allies Sen. Lindsey Graham stepped in to rescue him. Graham expressed admiration for McCain’s stance on the treatment of detainees in US custody.

"That to me is a classic example of how his military experience helped him shape public policy in a way no other senator could have done,’’ Graham said.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, also traveling on the trip, expressed admiration for McCain’s wartime service as well.

McCain then collected himself and apologized for his initial reaction.

"I kind of reacted the way I did because I have a reluctance to talk about my experiences," he said, noting that he has huge admiration for the "heroes" who served with him in the POW camp and said the experience taught him to love the U.S. because he missed it so much.

"I am always reluctant to talk about these things," McCain said.

Too bad a camera wasn't around to catch the expression on his face.

Dave, you should email this to the Obama camp. This is a great idea.