« Why do weak-ass hurrricanes deserve non-stop coverage? | freaktown's Blog | Slow News Day :Russia invaded another country today and nobody noticed »
Republicans Unfairly Branded Racist?
Douglas Mackinnon wrote something over at the Politico in which he takes issue with something Obama said:
Mackinnon goes on to talk about how he's got "black friends" and has a great respect for "black america".
While I don't doubt that Mr. Mackinnon is sincere in his respect and admiration, that doesn't mean his party shares those feelings.
First, there was something called "the southern strategy". Sure it was employed by republicans to play on racial tensions in the south to keep republicans (and white people) in political power, but that's certainly not racist, is it?
More recently, and more relevantly to this campaign, there was Republican State Senator Kevin Bryant who posted a picture on his website claiming that there really was no difference between Barack Obama, Democratic Nominee for President of the United States, and Osama Bin Laden, mass-murdering fuckhead.
At the Republican Convention in Texas they sold buttons asking if we could still call it the White House if Obama won. Surely, that had nothing to do with Obama's race.
And in Tennesee, the GOP seems to think that not only are attacks on candidate's spouses apparently ok, but so is bringing up the spector of a white woman with a black man. Because, as we all know, the GOP is not racist.
Other examples could be cited, and I invite you to do so in the comment section. But for now, I beleive i've proved my point so I'll stop.
“We know what kind of campaign [Republicans are] going to run. They’re going to make you afraid. They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. ‘He’s young and inexperienced, and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?’”Mackinnon seems to think Obama is unfairly painting the GOP as a racist organization. But his argument seems to boil down to nothing more than "I, myself, am not a racist, therefore the republican party isn't racist."
Other than his relative inexperience and some of his stated policy positions, I have zero problems with Barack Obama. His age does not bother me, his name does not bother me and the color of his skin most especially does not bother me. Quite the opposite. I’m proud of what he’s accomplished precisely because of the color of his skin. I’m proud of what he’s accomplished precisely because of his disadvantaged youth. His is an inspirational story, and his historic campaign has made America a better place to live.
Mackinnon goes on to talk about how he's got "black friends" and has a great respect for "black america".
As a Republican with a conservative point of view, I have written more on the greatness of black America, and the need for my party to reach out to that community, than just about anyone I know. Many of the single black moms I knew were some of the most “conservative” people I had ever met. They were death on a cracker when it came to law and order, going to church, staying in school, right and wrong, and personal responsibility, and it was and is my belief that their “real-life” success stories could only make the Republican Party a better and less hypocritical entity.
While I don't doubt that Mr. Mackinnon is sincere in his respect and admiration, that doesn't mean his party shares those feelings.
First, there was something called "the southern strategy". Sure it was employed by republicans to play on racial tensions in the south to keep republicans (and white people) in political power, but that's certainly not racist, is it?
The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats.
More recently, and more relevantly to this campaign, there was Republican State Senator Kevin Bryant who posted a picture on his website claiming that there really was no difference between Barack Obama, Democratic Nominee for President of the United States, and Osama Bin Laden, mass-murdering fuckhead.
At the Republican Convention in Texas they sold buttons asking if we could still call it the White House if Obama won. Surely, that had nothing to do with Obama's race.
And in Tennesee, the GOP seems to think that not only are attacks on candidate's spouses apparently ok, but so is bringing up the spector of a white woman with a black man. Because, as we all know, the GOP is not racist.
Other examples could be cited, and I invite you to do so in the comment section. But for now, I beleive i've proved my point so I'll stop.
Advertisement





The Republicans are still running on Nixon's Southern Strategy which was devised to convert White Democrats, who did not want to accept desegregation, into becoming Republicans. That is how Strom Thurmond became a Republican.
The Republicans, under Nixon, played the race card, and they have done so to this very day. That makes them a party of racists.
July 25, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republican Party will accept anyone, without regard for skin color, so long as the skin color is white.
And it will do so because it doesn't want to alienate and lose the votes of the extreme right-wing lunatic fringe white supremacists and Neo-Nazis, which migrated in droves to the Republican Party when the Democratic Party, under JFK and LBJ, ACTED on the issue of segregation.
"Conservative movement": Barry Goldwater voted against the "Civil Rights Act" of 1964. Yet you'll continue to see periodic efforts, during times of crisis and collapse for the Party of Racism, to obscure the actual nature of the Republican "brand" by making a big deal of Barry Goldwater as a "REAL" "conservative".
The rest of the time we'll be subjected to nauseating revisionst horsehit about St. Ronnie.
July 25, 2008 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The National GOP wants a white Protestant theocracy. Individual members might not want that, but as long as they continue to support the national GOP, they are just as guilty as Rove, Bush, Hagee, and Haggard.
July 25, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
oh come on, folks. the Republicans want a "white Protestant theocracy"? they'll accept anyone "as long as their skin color is white"?
who was the last Democratic president who appointed a black Secretary of State? oh, that's right--there wasn't one. but maybe Condi Rice and Colin Powell don't count as "black" to you because they don't tow the liberal line.
as far as "attacks on candidates' spouses" is concerned, the Obamas better get out of the kitchen if they can't stand the heat. it's especially ironic to hear about poor Michelle being attacked from you guys on TPM Cafe: when Hillary Clinton was a candidate I read the most savage and offensive attacks on her husband right here on this site. if you attack spouse Bill Clinton it's ok because he's a lying cheating ratbag and his wife killed Vince Foster...but if you attack spouse Michelle Obama you're a racist. great. that makes a lot of sense.
I'm a Democrat but I'm appalled by how you bend the truth. there are plenty of great reasons to dislike the Republicans: let's talk about some that are actually true.
July 25, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink