« A Primer on Dealing with Congress (just the fax) | clearthinker's Blog | Destructive Forces of Success (Part #1: The Math) »
The USSR had the US beat all along
One of the problems of the upcoming economic crisis we will face (regardless of who wins the White House) is that we are woefully unprepared for it.
The duel demons of the end of cheap energy (peak oil) and the devaluation of the dollar (private debt) are converging to give us one hell of a shock.
It should be pointed out that we could have conserved fuel (we didn't) and we could have not gone into reams of private debt (despite government telling us to spend, spend, spend). It is hypocritical to blame the government, when the future was in our hands all along. After all, Republicans and Democrats and Independents alike have bought larger cars and taken out ridiculous amounts of credit.
Like the obese diabetic in the hospital, it's too late to think about what we should have done when we were busy shoveling in the fast food into our bodies -- it only makes sense to look ahead.
We aren't prepared. Not by a long shot. In fact, the best prepared people may be those living in Appalachia and similarly very rural areas who are so poor, they already know how to live off the land.
No one is going to need to know how to work the Windows OS registry in the future, or how to design a website.
They will need to know how to survive. And most of us count on an infrastructure, backed by a strong central government, that may not be there.
A recent book shows how the people of the USSR were better prepared for the collapse of their government than the US might be.
However, you don't need to read the book: an excellent summary of it is given by the author, Dmitry Orlov, here.
Happy scrounging.
The duel demons of the end of cheap energy (peak oil) and the devaluation of the dollar (private debt) are converging to give us one hell of a shock.
It should be pointed out that we could have conserved fuel (we didn't) and we could have not gone into reams of private debt (despite government telling us to spend, spend, spend). It is hypocritical to blame the government, when the future was in our hands all along. After all, Republicans and Democrats and Independents alike have bought larger cars and taken out ridiculous amounts of credit.
Like the obese diabetic in the hospital, it's too late to think about what we should have done when we were busy shoveling in the fast food into our bodies -- it only makes sense to look ahead.
We aren't prepared. Not by a long shot. In fact, the best prepared people may be those living in Appalachia and similarly very rural areas who are so poor, they already know how to live off the land.
No one is going to need to know how to work the Windows OS registry in the future, or how to design a website.
They will need to know how to survive. And most of us count on an infrastructure, backed by a strong central government, that may not be there.
A recent book shows how the people of the USSR were better prepared for the collapse of their government than the US might be.
However, you don't need to read the book: an excellent summary of it is given by the author, Dmitry Orlov, here.
Happy scrounging.
Advertisement





That Orlov sure is a downer.
You sorta hope he's wrong, but kinda suspect he's right.
July 6, 2008 4:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course we're more prepared. We've had the Mad Max movies to watch the last 30 years.
July 6, 2008 8:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I find Orlov's insights intriguing, but I have questioned his assertion that Americans should emulate the political apathy of the Soviet people as a strategy to survive energy collapse. They stoically survived a political and economic collapse, which to some extent was precipitated by a peak of national oil production, but during their rebound, Russia and the other republics have had substantial resources of oil and natural gas remaining. So they haven't really gone through what we're facing down the road.
I think only a few third world countries have started to experience energy collapse.
July 6, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Donal: I didn't mean to imply that the USSR collapsed because of energy. (Actually, part of the problem for them was collapsing energy prices which wrecked their economy.) However, collapse is collapse and the general point is that when the central government fails to provide, what does the citizenry do?
Besides panic.
Russia today is in an excellent position as they have some of the leading oil reserves left which leads some to speculate that an Asian Century is fast approaching as a high concentration of the oil left is either in, or bound to, Asia (Venezuela, for example, has cut several key deals with China).
Either way, the comparisons are sobering.
July 6, 2008 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a nation, Russia is well-positioned, but even though they have many millionaires, poorer Muscovites were left to freeze last winter. Thus I think the political strategy of keeping your head down only works when there is enough to go around.
July 6, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Conservation, while admirable from a point of purely personal responsibility, will not get us through this next one of a series of crises. Energy will be the first. The easy-to-find stuff is now diminishing. So let's all use CFL's and drive hybrids! It'll be great!
Ummm...wait. Unless we begin doing something now to devise the means of transport, heating, cooling, and lighting that are useful in a post-combustion-based energy infrastructure world, all we do is postpone the inevitable shutoff. It bears repeating as often as needed - we can not conserve our way out of this coming mess.
Next in line will be things like water, coastal inundation (roughly half the world's population lives within a couple meters of sea level) as sea levels continue to rise, food shortages of several types, and more. All these will not be solved by conserving, they will require vision, innovation, skill, and a great measure of what we might simply call political will. Few if any of these things are apparent in most of the conservation-based arguments and even less so in the body politic.
The peoples who demonstrate those qualities will in fact inherit the earth - although I'm not sure how thrilled they will be with that prospect.
July 6, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
CT,
When I took a course covering U.S. history during the Great Depression, we spent quite a bit of time discussing how well different people managed around the country. You're right--folks who were already accustomed to dealing with scarce resources and even privation fared better than did urban and suburban middle class people.
Demographics have changed greatly since then, haven't they? Heck, my mom grew up in Sherman Texas (not exactly a backwater podunk hamlet) during the Depression; and though her family didn't live on a farm (it was "in town"), they had a cow and chickens and probably a vegetable garden. Her father was a school teacher, so they were used to being poor. But they weren't in danger of starving.
How many "in town," heavily zoned, restricted neighborhoods allow cows and chickens these days??
July 6, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly right, LJ. People in NYC tend to get a bit too smug about how everything is close and how they don't need cars. But
a) where will they grow food locally? (Central Park is really the only place)
b) how will they move water around?
c) how will they survive without elevators?
I think you will find shifting attitudes about gun ownership when they become more important for hunting small mammals -- and defense. As we know from very recent experience how easily people will trade liberty for perceived security. And that's when we are already fairly secure.
July 6, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is where a conundrum comes into play. If you think the American public (supported by the military) will stop burning coal in the near future to the detriment of their life style, you are certainly idealistic. Regardless of rising temperatures. We have enough coal and NG resources to keep our fat asses going for quite a few years.
I think the real question will come about will be where do we get our water from. If I was a betting man, I would be building a desalination plant and lots of pipelines. Now that I think of it - T. Boone Pickens is building a 96 inch water pipeline through Texas - so I must not be the only guy thinking about it.
July 7, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's because the aquifer that supplies much of the central south is in dangerous depletion mode.
July 7, 2008 4:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was thinking about the probable collapse of the "more is more" America the other day. I had just seen the movie "Wale-E," and its animated images of a trash heap, rustbucket world were immediately echoed, in real life, by walking through a parking lot crammed with SUVs. It wasn't hard to picture them, in the not so distant future, as rusted behemoths abandoned there -- particularly when, to reach my own car (O.K., my mimi-SUV), I had to pass by a recently emptied national chain store. Was its sudden shutdown, a few months ago, a precursor of Wale-E world, I wondered? It already looks the part, as the letters of its name are still visible; rust stains behind the removed letters recall the name in ghost traces on the concrete facade.
That, together with reading the article you cited in your post this morning, and remembering the post you wrote the other day about railroads and infrastructure, makes me want to do something constructive with my remaining summer vacation. But the problems we face are so vast in number and so intertwined that where to begin? The posts I wrote to offer Midwest flood victims practical information, for example, were a drop in the proverbial bucket.
You, ClearThinker, are obviously knowledgable about these matters. So what do you think we can do, as individuals, to be useful in "concrete" ways? (I didn't intend that as a pun, but it works in context.)
July 6, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think, wwstaebler, that too often we offer the muscle with our time but not our brains. It's like if we aren't digging out, or handing out food, we really aren't volunteering.
In my view, right now the biggest issue is one of education of the problem. Most people on TPM are woefully ignorant of the issues or really don't accept the solutions (they prefer to dream about about technology saving them so they don't have to adjust their lifestyles or their expectations -- this includes having children).
My theory is that if someone who cares enough to read TPM is ignorant, the rest of the populace is as well.
One of the reasons I blog here is precisely to "get the word out". In addition, my blogs have attracted like minded individuals whom I then search for their posts because I learn from them as well. So that's just the start.
I am also of a mind where you need to educate your candidate and his campaign. Unlike many here, I believe it was correct to pressure Obama on FISA. Just as I believe that the candidates need to stop selling us bandages and start attacking the real problem:
Alternative fuels will not help us maintain our current lifestyle.
Now I know that Obama can't run on that platform, but he can talk about developing the rail system (he hasn't).
Notice that the GOP hasn't either. Why? Because the general populace believes that our current lifestyle is non-negotiable.
Yes: VP Cheney was speaking for the Dems as well as GOP when he said that.
Now that is an inconvenient truth.
So, at this point in time, I suggest spending efforts, both large and small to get people educated -- so that they will ask more of their elected officials, and that will give the elected officials the power to really lead.
Things to do:
Promote URLs/blogs/etc. to other boards (Kos, Huff, newspapers, etc)
Promote these within your circle of friends -- viral stuff works!
Promote these within your circle of people who don't agree with you politically. Remember, once upon a time, few really were environmentally aware.
Get the real answers, ask the hard questions.
I would love it if we brought the level of conversation about energy, etc. to a high level here. It would educate all of us and make us all missionaries of saving our species.
To start, here is a post from The Oil Drum which neatly shows how blaming speculators for the price of oil is not only pointless, but invalid:
http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/4224#more
Note, blaming others is the talking points for both the GOP and the Democrats. People who are currently left-of-center need to come to grips with these issues as well -- most haven't.
July 6, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
And raise our CHILDREN to be good stewards of our world and its precious resources.
Harumph!
July 6, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll get to that later this week, Carol.
For sure, you should expect not to be a grandmother.
July 6, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
CT,
But the population growth rate (without illegal immigration) in the U.S. would be close to, or approaching, zero by now, right CT?
I always thought the real worry was with developing nations. Won't we combat out-of-control population growth rates in those parts of the world by focusing on improving education, healthcare, and women's rights? It seems like education, human rights, and improved quality of life around the world would make this "problem" self-correcting.
Am I being too pollyanna about this?
July 6, 2008 6:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too Pollyanna, unfortunately. Americans have 4x the carbon footprint of the average world citizen; homeless Americans have 2x the footprint.
Moreover we (5%) of the world's population, use about 25% of the world's energy resources. As the rest of the world strives for our lifestyle, it's clear that ours will have to suffer, as the planet cannot support all of us at that level.
In addition, the US doesn't control the key resources for our lifestyle making us more dependent on others.
There are 3 things that humans need for survival, in order of importance:
a) water
b) food
c) shelter
Without cheap energy, even getting water to millions of people will start to ravage personal budgets. And if you think food riots are bad, thirst riots would have to be worse.
The Gordian knot is this: industrialization is why the environment is so ravaged, but without industrialization we can't support this many people in this lifestyle.
July 6, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I was thinking strictly of population growth rates here--I wasn't talking about how resources are conserved and used.
Population growth rates need to stabilize and level off since it's quite obvious the earth's carrying capacity (its finite material resources)is being stretched; and population growth, which shows no signs of slowing in the poorest parts of the world, will continue to tax the earth's resources.
But beyond addressing population growth, I just assume it's obvious we'll also have to start thinking differently about how resources are used (read wasted), how they're carelessly and needlessly degraded, and whether there are smarter, more efficient ways to provide for our well-being.
July 6, 2008 9:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting piece on Wall-E from Frank Rich today
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/opinion/06rich.html?ref=opinion
July 6, 2008 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
What the U.S. needs to wake up is another fairly powerful and Western country to collapse first. I think if we saw a Germany or a UK or a France falling apart, we might wake up and start closing Orlov's so-called "Collapse Gap."
Unfortunately, the U.S. is the country that seems worst off and most poised for a catastrophic collapse.
Don't look now, but the 21st Century might very see the inception of America's Northward Manifest Destiny..
July 6, 2008 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's long been predicted by the UN committees that by 2020, Canada will be the only country with enough fresh water to satisfy it's own population.
I'm sure there will be those that talk here about desalinization, but recognize that means that water is going to be more expensive.
First cheap energy, then cheap food, then cheap water.
All because of too many people. Which I will get to in a blog later this week.
July 6, 2008 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a society, we have terrible habits wrt water use. I think we'll have plenty of water to serve the needs of our country if we are willing to change our expectations and habits. That's the real challenge, isn't it CT? Trying to convince Americans (who are comfortable, spoiled, and careless) to change?
It seems there are always brilliant minds conceiving of good ideas for employing technology to stretch scarce resources to serve more humans. But social/political inertia kills a lot of ingenuity while it's still in the cradle.
July 6, 2008 6:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
LJ:
You are quiet correct that people will have to accept change, but in this case, it is clear change means doing with less -- and the good times aren't coming back.
A monumental task if ever there was one.
As regards to good ideas, etc., there are laws of physics that can't be gotten around. It's like this:
Without faster-than-light travel, you won't be seeing any of the type of sci-fi that Star Trek, Star Wars, etc offers. Now, it may be possible for us to go faster-than-light, but that would break the laws of physics as we know them today. So, we have to discover if we really do know the laws of physics (which work very well), or maybe there is a way to break them.
Same with energy: all known laws of physics back up the energy scenarios I talk about. It's not something you can engineer around. Therefore, we either thoroughly understand thermodynamics and the laws regarding energy, or there is some new physics out there that breaks this perception. However, there is no reason to believe that our present understanding isn't perfect -- no experiments break these laws and there is no theory showing that they would break.
That's why you can't "technology your was out" of this problem.
July 6, 2008 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
But this is part of what I'm thinking and trying to communicate. "The good times" are defined by our current values. And that's exactly what needs to change. Yes, we'll have to do with less stuff, but viewing that as a bad thing is entirely within our control. Personally, I don't see it as a bad thing. It's just something that will require adjustment.
I don't try to pretend that we can maintain our current gluttonous, resource-ravenous lifestyles, and I'm not trying to "technology (my) way out" of making meaningful lifestyle changes.
July 6, 2008 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with you. Until 10 years ago you could be happy without an iPod. And a cell phone.
Those days are coming back! ;-)
July 6, 2008 10:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think I have been with you for decades...or at least with you in terms of where I think you will go next... about the issue of population. I will stay tuned for your next blog and, in the meantime, I will look up the references you provided on all relevant topics. Thanks, ClearThinker. Then there is the issue of how to jump start a revitalization of spur railroad lines. So many issues, so little time.
July 6, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but I just found a way (you!) to double my efforts... so it's all good! ;-)
July 6, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
That country might be the UK. They've been on an oil export wealth bubble, but the North Sea fields are fading fast.
July 6, 2008 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Orlov says he's not an expert and he's right about that. The USSR collapsed but the rest of the world didn't collapse around them. They were isolated from the west while the USA is the lynchpin in the the world's economy. IF we stop buying 40% of what China makes China collapses. If the USA and China collapse it starts a cascade failure.
Why would suburbanites rush to the cities when food is scarce and/or expensive? There's a lot more space in suburbia than cities to grow truck gardens and put up food for the winter. If half of America winds up defaulting on their mortgages who's gonna enforce evictions? The big banks who fed us the mortgage mess will be forced out of business before they come anywhere near making us all homeless.
Communities will become more self sustaining. Neighbors will come to rely on each other more. We won't be spending our days in front of a blank computer screen or our nights in front of blank TV screens.
We won't be commuting to jobs that no longer exist 30 miles away in vehicles there's no fuel for. We'll go back to what our ancestors did 100 years ago and for eons before that, we'll farm. We either adapt and survive or we'll perish.
July 6, 2008 7:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not true. If you look at what China is doing, it is quite simple: they are presently hoarding their own currency while propping up ours. Why prop up ours? Because they want our markets to develop their manufacturing capabilities.
Guess what?
They've done it. Now they can sell to themselves -- one of the largest consumer markets in history.
As an example, look at their lust for cars:
http://caseyresearch.com/displayCcsPrint.php?id=13
Once upon a time, the US used to sell it's products to it's own citizens. But in the 1990's the transformation was complete: the finanical sector passed the manufacturing sector as the dominant one in the US economy.
Here's a simple question for you: do you know how to get enough food from an acre of land to not only feed yourself and a family -- including the wintertime? You will also have to defend yourself against prowlers and hunger victims. Do you know where your water will come from to irrigate that farm?
My guess is that you don't even know how to ride a horse -- a relatively simple task, must less care for one. That means, you will have to pull the plow yourself. Assuming that your suburban home sits on land that is even palatable for agriculture.
July 6, 2008 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually I do know how to raise and can vegetables and freeze-dry fruit.. and bake bread, assuming that I have an oven. Not so savvy about raising, much less being willing to butcher chickens or pigs. So I guess I would be looking at a vegetarian plus eggs plus fish diet.
I also know how to ride a horse -- although I am getting creaky enough that an injury from it could be a really bad thing; so if transporation depended on it, I would have to train a horse to a harness trap. But at least I have access to a horse, as I currently care for an aging, if gigantic and still strong one, which costs about $150 per month in supplies and medicines. But that cost is only if I do all the actual labor myself; otherwise, it would be $250 at least. In the dire circumstances we are discussing, how does one afford the horse?
July 6, 2008 9:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
By knowing enough to sell your services for it.
The time to learn such things is now.
Horses will be the new Hummers -- a real status symbol.
July 6, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know how to grow a reasonable variety of fruits and vegetables and I even have experience raising chickens for eggs and meat. I became quite expert at composting, making virtually everything that we ate from scratch, buying all of our goods and storing them in bulk, pretty much learning to live as efficiently as possible. I did this as a hobby when I took time off from working to stay home with my son when he was young (I say as a hobby, but also to get our income to stretch, since I wasn't earning any at the time). I bring this up because I learned all of this in my spare time. I imagine that if one's life depended on it, others could learn these skills, as well.
July 7, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
clearthinker you seem pretty cranky about your new pet theory. If all is lost and you think you can't make it then why not beat the rush and go commit suicide tonight?
I learned how to ride a horse as a kid, not that I'd ride one while plowing. The land in my yard was a farm decades ago. I found part of an old harness while digging up my mother's garden in the 1960s. This good black Illinois soil is why hundreds of thousands of people immigrated to this state for over a century. Water is more problematic but it is a big reason why 5 Great Lakes States and Canada have all signed on to an agreement to preserve our water supply. If you live on the Great Plains or the desert you're shit out of luck. We won't be piping water to you.
Oh and while we're at it you're also wrong about speculation in commodity markets like oil. It's making a bad situation much worse much faster.
Once upon a time, the US used to sell it's products to it's own citizens. But in the 1990's the transformation was complete: the finanical sector passed the manufacturing sector as the dominant one in the US economy.
You write as if none of this can ever change, we've already gone off the cliff, it's all irrevocable, all that's left for us to do is wait around to die.
Here's a simple question for you: do you know how to get enough food from an acre of land to not only feed yourself and a family -- including the wintertime?
My neighbors and I will learn if need be. Our ancestors lived that way from the advent of agriculture until about a century ago. My great grandfather owned a farm and his wife and kids including my grandfather worked it while he worked all day in the mine. Your ancestors probably did the same.
You will also have to defend yourself against prowlers and hunger victims.
We will do that too.
For all the sturm and drang about China we produce 20 tons of carbon per person in the US, while it's 5 tons in China and 2 tons in India.
As for Russians bearing proficies color me skeptical. I was married to a card carrying member of the communist party of the Soviet Union once. She had two masters degrees, one of their best and brightest and was just chock full of pessimism, dire predictions and dumb theories.
July 6, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, this certainly explains the emotional reaction you had to my post.
July 6, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check out RFK Jr.'s article in Vanity Fair
The Next President's First Task (A Manifesto)
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/rfk_manifesto200805
July 6, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is this the same RFK Jr that conveniently stopped a wind farm in his own backyard?
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/17/90822.shtml
This doesn't invalidate some of his points, but it undermines the true credibility of his leadership.
July 6, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent article, Pinot Noir; thanks for the reference.
July 7, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
clearthinker I'm not emotional, I'm repulsed by this stupidity. You on the other hand seem despondent.
You may be up to your ass in debt, buried financially in way more house than you ever could realistically afford and tooling around in a gas guzzler but I'm not. But here's the thing, in the event a total collapse occurs there won't be a bank to repossess your McMansion or collect on your debts. My little car will be just as useless as your Hummer, your ATV and your waverunner. You will pay no greater penalty than anybody else other than the humiliation of knowing you were part of the dumbest generation that destroyed America. I on the other hand have lived frugally without debt and put 100,000 miles on a car every 10 years because I work from home. I get to participate in the great collapse too without ever having enjoyed the pleasure of living like a profligate fool.
So WTF are you whining about? You're ahead of the game. If the game ends and leaves you with an assortment of useless booby prizes and skills you'll have to learn new rules for the new game that replaces it.
July 7, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know nothing about me, so it's pointless to even tell you how off you are.
Your style of discourse is interesting. When you make bold, sweeping statements about the Chinese economy, you don't back them. When I pointed out something in response, you went to the next topic. It's instructive that you don't reply to me, but start another post lower on the thread so people don't see your basic style of hit-and-run.
In 3 emails you have moved to the lowest level of arguing with an image of me that inhabits your head alone. And on top of it, all you can do is think of insults to fling.
You are welcome to scroll pasts my posts in the future if you think them dumb and irrelevant. No one forced you to read them.
July 7, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
This thread is starting to feel like an NRA/survivalist message board.
That great Canadian songwriter Bruce Cockburn said a friend once told him, "What do you need for the end of the world besides a bottle of champagne and some glasses?"
And so it goes.
Y2K and 9/11 really had me obsessing about this stuff, but no more.
What will be will be.
July 7, 2008 4:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exjournalist, speaking of Canadians:
In 2006, I spent several months doing research in the Maritimes of Canada -- half of them in a seaside village in Nova Scotia, and half in a seaside village on Prince Edward Island.
I met absolutely wonderful people, in both places; and, from them – because in both places, their principles were much the same -- I learned valuable lessons about how to better use the hours in any given day, as well as how to conserve some resources without any feeling of hardship.
There were many, many elements of humor in my learning curve. For example, I was initially horrified that, in the twenty-first century, no one I met used a clothes dryer. “Why use up power when you have wind?” I was asked, cheerfully, to which, in the summer, I had no ready answer. And, after sleeping on sheets that smelled of garden flowers and sea breezes, I didn’t want one. “But -- what about during the winter?” I later asked, perplexed. Gently, it was explained to me, as if to a slow child, that “the sun doesn’t stop shining, and the wind doesn’t stop blowing, no matter what the season, eh?”
Similarly, although each of my new acquaintances owned a dishwasher, not one of them used it unless they had large families or several people over for dinner. “Not much point in using all that power and water, when you can use just the one, is there?” (I wasn’t nearly as sanguine about that as I became about the dryer, but it was hard to refute the logic.)
In case you’re wondering, these were not down-on-their-luck lobstermen or potato farmers; on the contrary, in addition to the lobstermen and potato farmers I met who were doing very nicely, thank you, my neighbors included, among others: a CBC producer; a Swiss-trained chocolatier; a fine arts painter; a venture capitalist; a developer; an hotelier and a restaurateur.
So it was with further amazement that I learned that trips to the superstores, or to the farmer's market were, more often than not, pre-arranged shared events, each person taking a turn to buy gas and drive. Why? Because “it would be wasteful for each person to drive separately, and not nearly so much fun.”
Recycling, in both villages, was a de rigeur art form, and so meticulously followed that one of my neighbors on Prince Edward Island -- intent that I do it correctly -- showed up in the morning to make sure I had used the right color-coded bag or proper binding twine on the right day to ensure that everything I put out on the street would, in fact, be picked up. Was I offended? Not at all. “It’s Canada 101” she would explain, smiling, “and we’re obsessive about it, so it takes a while to get it right.”
In the first village, small houses were offset by beautiful gardens. And I, anxious not to let down my side, initially hired a lawn service to cut the grass and weed the well-established, luxuriant vegetable/flower garden of the place I rented -- at least I did until I was teased by new friends and neighbors who gently corrected the error of my ways. Were my arms or legs broken, encased in casts? No? What, then, was one glorious sunny day per week for, if not to personally beautify my “small” plot in the village -- with a push mower rather than one that used fuel – preferably before 9am? So I fired the service and borrowed a mower, which won beams of approval, because I borrowed it, rather than buying one.
At 9, it was time to settle down to serious work... in anticipation of a break for a group lunch that often consisted of fresh lobster or mussels purchased down at the dock early that morning. (This preponderance of lobster on the menu struck me as an incongruous decadence, until it was my turn to purchase them, and I discovered that I could buy enough lobster to feed six hungry people for @$8. For an additional dollar, the guys at the dock would do the spinal chord, dispatching thing for me, so that all I had to do was quickly boil water. And for $2 more, I could buy them fresh from the sea and cooked in vats just minutes before.)
Although it was a given that business hours had to be responsibly devoted to business -- including Saturdays, if necessary -- it was entirely shocking to these incredibly productive people to consider working beyond 5pm. Several times my phone rang, or there was a knock on my door, if I had not surfaced by 6. (They were fond of me as their token American, and they were sure, because of their stereotypes about us, that though I might have to be pressed to work in the garden, I would work on my research until midnight if left to my own devices.)
Of course, left undisturbed, both of those suppositions might have been true. But not after I discovered that village evenings were for sitting on the porch (or by the fire in the winter) sharing wine and dinner; or for going to the local government-funded playhouse; or for joining one's team (a melding of all ages) at the pub for a competitive, village-wide game of Trivia. (Or, in the winter, going to the village rink for skating or curling.)
As the weeks and months went by, I fell into the Maritime rhythms. And, day by day, I felt increasingly energized, and I slept better, content that I had accomplished a good day’s work, and that I had done something, everyday, to contribute at least to the amusement level of my host village. In short, through the Canadians I now treasure as friends, I learned what my American grandparents already knew: that a full and satisfying life can be had on a small scale, as long as there is balance in it:housekeeping, work and community interaction. Did I mention, by the way, that I watched practically no TV, even though full cable service, far better than ours, was available?
It should be noted that each community activity was either free, because it was subsidized by the government, or it was modestly priced –either because it was actually cheap, or because costs, like food and gasoline, were shared. The only real financial hit I took was the astronomical sales tax (14.5% in Nova Scotia and 16.5% in PEI) which, had I been Canadian, would have been more than offset by free medical care. Which I witnessed one day by taking a friend to the ER, where I observed that service was reasonably prompt, and only a precious blue ID card was required.
Anyway, I offer these lessons learned in the hopes that we may all see the positive rewards of a far less consuming, and far more connected lifestyle. Because making communal/conservation choices like these will become necessary in America, in the not too distant future.
Will making these simple adjustments correct any of the more sobering issues we face – replacing oil with alternative sources of energy, repairing the infrastructure, or building new light rail systems? Of course not. But, because Canadians are ahead of us in these matters, I will be consulting my friends north northeast of our border, to get an update on their ideas.
July 7, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. That deserves its own separate thread.
Thanks for the detailed description of life not so far away.
In the rush of 14-hour work days and no health insurance, it might as well be another planet.
July 7, 2008 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
CT when you write stuff like this:
It should be pointed out that we could have conserved fuel (we didn't) and we could have not gone into reams of private debt (despite government telling us to spend, spend, spend). It is hypocritical to blame the government, when the future was in our hands all along. After all, Republicans and Democrats and Independents alike have bought larger cars and taken out ridiculous amounts of credit.
I assume you're speaking for yourself because you surely aren't speaking for me. If that's an unfair attack I apologize. But how would I increase CAFE standards, other than trying to influence government leaders to increase them?
All the car companies foreign and domestic built and marketed gashog SUVS and pickups like there was no tomorrow. Not because Americans necessarily "wanted to buy them" but because there was a lot better profit margin for the car companies with the huge numbers they were cranking out. When they gave buyers in 2006 with a family of 4 the choice between a Tahoe with a V-8 or a Malibu with a basic 4 banger in it at about the same monthly payment when gas cost $2 a gallon what did you expect them to do?
Orlov says we should ignore politicians and elections. How's that working out in the Rodina? I happen to think democracy is the last best hope for this country. Your mileage, as they say may very.
Frankly wringing your hands about some smarmy Russian's silly power point presentation is beneath you CT. Let me remind you the Soviet Union collapsed because they had a lousy single party system that produced people like him who bailed out for the comforts of the west at the first opportunity instead of building a real democracy. I wonder what kind of car he drives, what he does for a living and where he gets his food.
I know other people who stayed in the former USSR, a long way from the salons of Moscow who saw opportunity and built real businesses providing real products and services out of the chaos and collapse that still cripples towns and cities all across their 10 time zones.
I look forward to the opportunity to fix our problems before it's too late, you seem to be throwing in the towel.
July 7, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
CT when you write stuff like this:
It should be pointed out that we could have conserved fuel (we didn't) and we could have not gone into reams of private debt (despite government telling us to spend, spend, spend). It is hypocritical to blame the government, when the future was in our hands all along. After all, Republicans and Democrats and Independents alike have bought larger cars and taken out ridiculous amounts of credit.
I assume you're speaking for yourself because you surely aren't speaking for me. If that's an unfair attack I apologize. But how would I increase CAFE standards, other than trying to influence government leaders to increase them?
All the car companies foreign and domestic built and marketed gashog SUVS and pickups like there was no tomorrow. Not because Americans necessarily "wanted to buy them" but because there was a lot better profit margin for the car companies with the huge numbers they were cranking out. When they gave buyers in 2006 with a family of 4 the choice between a Tahoe with a V-8 or a Malibu with a basic 4 banger in it at about the same monthly payment when gas cost $2 a gallon what did you expect them to do?
Orlov says we should ignore politicians and elections. How's that working out in the Rodina? I happen to think democracy is the last best hope for this country. Your mileage, as they say may very.
Frankly wringing your hands about some smarmy Russian's silly power point presentation is beneath you CT. Let me remind you the Soviet Union collapsed because they had a lousy single party system that produced people like him who bailed out for the comforts of the west at the first opportunity instead of building a real democracy. I wonder what kind of car he drives, what he does for a living and where he gets his food.
I know other people who stayed in the former USSR, a long way from the salons of Moscow who saw opportunity and built real businesses providing real products and services out of the chaos and collapse that still cripples towns and cities all across their 10 time zones.
I look forward to the opportunity to fix our problems before it's too late, you seem to be throwing in the towel.
July 7, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink