« The Republican Party Comes Full Circle With Corsi's Obama Drama | normankelley's Blog | Colorblind Media in Denver »
A Gay Swimmer at the Olympics? NBC Ain't Saying So
It was interesting watching the Olympics. The Team USA won a total of 110 medals; of that number, 36 were gold medals. The host nation, China, won 100 medals; of that total number, 51 were gold.
Now, we do recognize that China, formally the People’s Republic of China is a police state; a Communist police state at that. The America media, including Bob Costas at NBC, constantly reminded people that China has problems despite putting on a spectacular show and hosting the event, and beating the Red, White and Blue in the total number of gold medals won. We all know that China does not brook dissent, mostly in regard to issues like Tibet and Darfur, etc. It has allowed its people to get rich but not have an overt say in the affairs that govern them.
For example the New York Times said this about China in a post-Olympics editorial:
Along the way, government critics were pre-emptively rounded up and jailed, domestic news outlets tightly controlled, foreign journalists denied full access to the Internet and thousands of Beijing’s least telegenic residents were evicted from their homes and out of camera range. On Friday, the Chinese police confirmed that six Americans protesting China’s rule in Tibet had been sentenced to 10 days of detention.
As stated above, China, after all, is a police state.
Given that the United States, the leader of the free world, is dedicated to liberty, freedom and basic democratic and human rights, an openness to a diverse array of people, how is it that NBC neglected to mention that a gold medal-winning swimmer was gay?
No, not Michael Phelps who has ADHD, but Australian diver Matthew Mitcham, who won the gold in the 10m platform diving event, scoring an upset over the Chinese team.
NBC, taking a page for China’s Thought Police, seems to have screened that out from its broadcast.
Censorship has its uses here in the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Advertisement





Mr. Kelley: Just to help me follow your argument, would you offer some indication of the relevance of the diver being gay with respect to Olympic coverage? To be honest, I'm not seeing it.
August 25, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
To Joe Pettit:
The relevance is this: if you watched the Olympics bios of the athletes there were numerous stories and comments about the athletes loved ones and significant others.
Also, the cameras often showed those athletes loved ones in the stand cheering them, rooting for them.
Why not Mr. Mitcham and his significant other. That's the relevance.
I find it odd that while China is routinely gotten after for its lack of human rights—and rightlty so—a US broadcasting outlet, NBC, would filter out any mentioning of Mitcham's background as a gay man.
If it's not relevant, why do I have to know about May-Treanor or Walsh wanting to have babies?
What's the point of that other than to round out the background of the athletes to viewers?
If you're going to do that for one set of athletes, you should do that for all.
August 25, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
But there were a lot of athletes who didn't have that personal part of their story told as well.
The most prominent example that leaps to mind is Usain Bolt.
I see what you're getting at, but personally, I don't think it should matter whether any athlete is gay or not. So, in that sense, it's not newsworthy.
August 25, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Due to technical error, please see the Times editorial referred to in the posting above at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/23/opinion/23sat1.html?ref=olympics
and the reference to NBC not reporting on Mattheew Mitcham can be seen at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/24/mitcham-olympics/
August 25, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
A gay high diver at the Olympics!?! What next, saying Greg Lougainis is gay?
Really, this is a complete non-story. Assuming NBC even knew Mitcham was gay, what does it have to do with his victory? Nothing. NBC didn't cover 90% of the athletes with touching stories about their loved ones etc, and that probably jumps to 99% of non-American athletes. Mitcham was also somewhat a surprise winner, so they probably didn't pay much attention until he won.
In other breaking news, NBC never referred to the Kenyan who won the marathon as straight.
August 25, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
what relevance is this to the games? personally if that matters to you fine, but i could care less about any of the athletes significant others...gay or non gay.
no story here.
August 25, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink