Biding His Time Before the Uppercut
By now, no-one should assume that Barack Obama is a wimp. So why all the sturm und drang, Chicken Little wailing and swift boat predictions that dominate the media?
We’ve seen it before – John Kerry, Michael Dukakis, heck, even Al Gore – brilliant or at least viable candidates having their images skewered and reduced to quivering liberal bleeding hearts. Al Gore invented the internet; John Kerry was a coward who protested while his comrades were being killed; Michael Dukakis furloughed murderers and played make believe with a tank.
So why is this campaign different from all other campaigns?
Ok, dumb question. We all know the answer – the Republicans are a defunct brand. They’re a fast food restaurant with thumbs and fingers stuck in the burgers. They’re the emperors without any clothes. They’re George Bush – every last one of them, marching in lock step with the president for the past eight years as he’s destroyed the country, ran up the deficit, and made Ronald Reagon look like a Nobel prize winning physicist.
So what can the Republicans do to win? Well, it would help if they started by nominating an against the grain candidate who stood up against all of that bed wetting leadership. And they did that – almost to a T – and got the original maverick.
Slight problem – the Republicans can’t run on their record. Slight other problem – that’s exactly what McCain is doing.
Ok, take the surge. Take new Coke while you’re at it. No good if the old coke sucks.
How about ‘I’m against the tax cuts’. Na ah, not gonna’ go it. Now he’s for it.
Ok, well how about, ‘I’m going to run a clean campaign’. Na ah, not gonna’ do it.
If there’s anything that John McCain shouldn’t be doing, it’s running the campaign he’s running right now. You don’t have to run a low road campaign to have a shot at beating Barack Obama. But that’s what he’s doing.
In the process, he’s aligning himself with George Bush. The celebrity ad? Short term gain for long term pain. It will ultimately remind people that it was this kind of campaign that got them stuck with George Bush over Al Gore; and Bush again over John Kerry.
Is there any doubt that had either of those democratic candidates had won, the US would be better off now than it is? Come on. It wouldn’t be worse.
Here’s the kicker – if you think that Barack Obama isn’t storing up a slew of negative campaign ads to run in October, you’ve got to be kidding. October is going to be negative ad paradise for the Democrats. And, they’re not going to get slimed for it. All it will be seen as is hitting back.
And it will be done in a way that Obama couldn’t do against Hillary Clinton. She could hit him hard as the freshman who didn’t know his place. That wasn’t racist; it was fair game. He couldn’t hit her back as hard for a host of reasons, not to mention the least of which was that it went against his brand and he needed her supporters after he beat her.
But he can hit McCain back hard – and he will, especially on the issue of McCain’s temperament, his Achilles heal. Just wait for the quotes to come from fellow republicans who can’t stand him.
The worst thing for Obama would be to peak early – for all the negative ads against him, he’s solid neck in neck with the original maverick. The payback will come.





I've seen this Obama as the fighter waiting to deliver the knockout blow meme a number of times now. Unfortunately, Obama is no Ali and the Republicans are not going to punch themselves out. The first debate is going to be a real eye opener. Obama has compromised so many positions now that the entire race is going to come down to character. Obama needs to find some soon.
August 11, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I SOOOOOOOOOO disagree w/ you on this one, Billy...
His compromises are not a matter of character...they are evidence that he REALLY does want to be President of the United States, not President of the Democratic Party...
Here at last is a man who at last understands that, in a country as polarized as this one is, no one is going to get everything they want, and compromise is needed to get ANYTHING done. We can be hard asses and demand that everything go along with what we want (in which case nothing gets done) OR compromise and start heading in the right direction, then revisit later and get closer to what we want, then revisit later and get closer...you get the point.
I think it is brilliant and just what this country needs...
August 11, 2008 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I got the brainy part right. Very well said - comments should be recommended. Let the best rise to the top of each blog. Best line: President of the Democratic Party. We aren't electing one of those this year.
Barack needs all republicans of common sense and good will in order to actually tackle all our problems. Half a country won't get it done. That common sense has been lacking over the last 40 years in the GOP is beside the point, and our party can be grand once more if we demand more of our leaders.
The party that started with Jefferson and died with Eisenhower can be reborn. Are we strong enough? Given the staunch republicans I personally know who are waking up this year to our long abuse as an electorate and are supporting Obama, I think change is in the wind.
Helping to elect a democrat who can start the transformation on the other side of the aisle is the least we can do as Obamicans. We steady our fellow republicans when they waver under the influence of past behavior patterns and the Pavlov effect the modern GOP has when it comes to certain hot button social issues.
All Americans can be smarter this time around if we focus on solutions instead of divisions. It is long past time to jettison that shit.
August 11, 2008 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Jason...Your approval means a lot to me. I respect your ideas and opinions a lot!
Cool new avatar!
August 11, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks! That picture makes me want to smile when I see it.
August 11, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
He very well may be brilliant. And his compromises may not signal lack of character. My point was that by moving close to McCain on so many issues he's given McCain an opening to make the contest about character. I happen to think that's an area where Obama comes up short. Right now, the McCain campaign is doing a good job of cutting Obama down. I'm not sure that Axelrod, as brilliant as he is, has figured out yet exactly what the McCain people are doing. The possibility of construing the ads to be about race has been a distraction for him I think. When I look at the McCain campaign, I see they are willing to insult a lot of people to get their message out. I ask myself: Who is not insulted by those ads? Why not? Maybe we can identify the target audience that way and understand how Obama is being undercut with them.
August 12, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
William:
Though Obama has compromised "so many positions" - I assume you mean FISA, guns, drilling and...no, that's about it - has he compromised on 72 (and counting)?
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/flipflops
August 11, 2008 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
But McCain is not going to be President.
August 12, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
So you think that the attacks, despite Axelrod's failure to understand them, won't be effective enough for McCain to win anyway? I'm a little slow, not following that one.
August 12, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
In a nutshell. I don't think McCain can win this election. If Axelrod doesn't figure out the character issue and how it works, McCain may make it close. I just think this phase of the campaign is interesting. I don't think it will be decisive. I'm trying to be objective. I notice on the front page Tapper is counting the number of white women in the last ad. I'd be counting the number of ordinary looking Americans older than 45 or 50. Silent majority? Insiders? Not sure how to characterize them. It's the people who aren't in the ad that the ad is aimed at.
August 12, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the election were held today, McCain would win.
August 12, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
How's that old rope-a-dope and uppercut looking now?
August 12, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I notice on the front page Tapper is counting the number of white women in the last ad. I'd be counting the number of ordinary looking Americans older than 45 or 50. Silent majority? Insiders? Not sure how to characterize them. It's the people who aren't in the ad that the ad is aimed at.
Spot on comment in mho. Reminded me of the "invisible Americans" in the recently released Mark Penn memoes.
August 12, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
BTW, rec'd the post, Daniel...thank you.
August 11, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rec'd. The punches are being returned this week, on the DHL lobbying Ohio job-sellout, affecting both McCain and his lobbyist campaign manager, with the McCain as Washington's greatest celebrity ad, and now the pivot to McCain's celebrity ad by branding it as derisive to the voters.
The Obama camp allowed McCain a couple of weeks to dig its hole, now Obama can kick the dirt back into the hole while the McCain is still in there digging.
August 11, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I liked this post so much I reread it. This is what is called 'Straight Talk', maybe even brilliant, particularly if your kicker is correct & they don't get slimed.
Hope this gets the attention it deserves, great job!
August 11, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're exactly right. More toughness to come, and right now, we're up 3-5, and I'm sure have studied the matter sufficiently to understand that the current round of "attacks" on Obama have little traction. No need to spend capital and sully ourselves with negatives before the positive moment of the convention.
August 11, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
...we...ourselves...
Are you officially a part of Obama's campaign? You write like you are. If you're not, if you're just another voter like most others commenting on this site, it comes off as sort of presumptuous to this reader. Either that, or it gives off the impression that you have some kind of club going on here between commenters that has to be decoded before one can enter into commenting.
August 12, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's an interesting read up right now at DKos about how Obama's ad strategy is going to be attacking McCain on local radio and tv, and on locally-important issues.
So I wouldn't be surprised if we saw Obama's nationwide TV ad buys being largely positive, while the attack ads are tailored to specific markets.
August 11, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
agio,
It is an interesting read. Such a strategy makes for a counterweight to what Caraway description of the Obama campaign as tied to the DNC (Howard Dean) 50 state effort.
August 11, 2008 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome, thanks for the info!
August 11, 2008 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's called the "rope-a-dope." I'm not sure that Obama is consciously using it, but I think that's the effect - he's letting McCain tire himself. Most importantly, McCain is getting frustrated, so he's making mistakes, like running the original "Celebrity" ad. Obama is not getting rattled or frustrated, and neither should we. Obama is a much better candidate, with more money, more enthusiastic supporters, momentum, and a better strategy.
And he's the right candidate at the right time.
Believe in the rope-a-dope.
http://talentedearthquake.blogspot.com/2008/08/obama-and-rope-dope.html
August 11, 2008 7:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"This is why McCain keeps calling Obama arrogant. It's what the insecure call the self-confident when they can't get any traction. Obama's self-confidence drives the right nuts. Which, of course, is ultimately to Obama's advantage, because the crazier they get, the worse they act.
A key part of not letting yourself get frustrated is knowing that you have a great strategy, and having confidence in your team's ability to execute that strategy. This is a virtuous circle: the better your strategy, the better the people you will attract, and, as your strategy starts to pay dividends, the better your people will feel. As your team feels more confident, they will execute your strategy better, and, most important, they will feel less and less frustrated. "
Brilliant snippit from your link...
Absolutely spot on!
August 11, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Superb post! I have no doubt Barack is saving the *best* for last!
August 12, 2008 1:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Terrorist attack stagegy is always an attack on an opponents polical support whether some palistinian blowing themselves and those around them up or hit-job ads on TV. So long as the opponent doesn't overreact or alter their stratagy that is working, terrorist attacks will fail because they fail to cause sufficient fear and uncertainty.
Obaqma appears to be handling himself rather well.
August 12, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nicely written post and I agree with the logic of your points. But it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter how much logic you apply to the outcome of this election. People vote on emotion. I think McCain is tapping into the general population's emotion more effectively than Obama so far.
One of the emotions McCain is tapping into is dread. Dread of Democratic policies, dread of Democratic ineptitude (see the do-nothing Democratic Congress for the latest glaring example), dread of Obama himself (who is this guy?).
Every day that I turn on the Olympics in prime time, McCain hits Obama with an ad that induces dread, using two horror-movie techniques: dark, moody music and distorted, dream-state images.
At first I thought this strategy was going to utterly fail for McCain, but as I see the ads repeatedly over time, I now think the opposite. The ads contrast so sharply with the spirit and color of the Olympics and all of the other ads that they catch my attention every time. It's amazing. It's like entering a bad dream: You know it's a dream, but you are sucked in anyway. I know it's that McCain ad again, but I can't shift my gaze away from the surreal images. I'm instantly on alert. I think What's that? before I realize it's the McCain ad I've seen several times. Yet I don't recognize it at first because it doesn't belong in the context of the program I'm watching.
After experiencing this hit for a few days, I realized yesterday that the strategy is going to work. Why do I think this? Because I immediately felt dread when the ad came on.
August 12, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Interesting. When the Obama ad comes on I always get it mixed up with the energy company one. Very corporate. The last The One ad would be fun to deconstruct. On the text level I'd say the message is that no one has a "good" reason for supporting Obama. Subtext? I think Rove is driving the wedge on age this time.
August 12, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
While Obama was just getting warmed up, McCain played the age card and successfully called Obama on playing the race card.
For a young guy, Obama is too slow. McCain is running laps around him. The fall campaign is going to be unlike anything we've ever seen.
It suddenly occurs to me how stupid it is for the left to reveal Hillary's emails now. It's a big fat gift to Rove.
August 12, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, there is a theory that the Clinton people put them out to sabotage Obama. I think there is a lot of "sabotage" coming before November. Was musing about the Jeremiah Wright book deal this morning. I've always found it strange that he just shut up after Obama denounced him.
I guess you could argue that Obama would never screw the Democratic Party by going on with his campaign if he knew Wright had something on him. I would have argued that myself if I didn't know about John Edwards.
August 12, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the process, he’s aligning himself with George Bush
Though I don't agree with the linkage you draw to the ads, I agree that to date, he hasn't done well at all with this serious problem. Let's see what his campaign does with the GOP convention, there's the real rub. It's going to be an amazing feat if he can come out of that with an "I'm change from George Bush" image. Nearly impossible, but you never know.
August 12, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Be interesting all right. As gasket has noticed elsewhere, Bush had a good week on TV at the Olympics. Plus he got to get in Putin's face, which is something all real Americans :) love. Maybe Bush can throw out a first ball or two. Talk about being Commissioner Of Baseball someday. Hell, maybe the CIA wagged the dog in Georgia. As others have noticed, I'm clueless.
August 12, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink