Obama is not like me, and I'm not like him.
There have been a couple/few memes vomited upon us by the McCain campaign that, for lack of better imagery, make me want to gouge my eyes out and punch puppies after naming them Johnny Mac (not necessarily in that order). I could go on ad nauseum about most, if not all, of them, but the one that's bothering me the most right now the recent derision of Obama's education, and the implicit (and really, explicit) condemnation by the right wing of education, critical thinking, original thought, and just plain intellectualism as somehow anti-American or dangerous or counterproductive to America's goals. In fact, all of those things are the epitome of what it is to be American, and are the reasons America is what it is. There is no greater American undertaking than to push oneself intellectually to the limit.
It seems clear to me that the recent attack by the right on Obama's eduction (trying to pigeonhole him as an elitist by highlighting his time at Punahoe, Columbia, and Harvard) is part of the overall strategy to portray Obama as "not like us." I'm guessing that strategy has been employed with the "less educated, salt of the earth" types of Americans in mind, because it shouldn't play well with anyone who's ever stood on the roof of the Hay Adams in Washington, DC sipping martinis or CEOs with MBAs or lawyers with JDs (and, perhaps, LLMs). Whatever the case may be, it also seems clear to me that the message is: intelligent is different; different is scary; and scary is unAmerican. Sort of a "fear leads to anger; anger leads to hatred; hatred leads to the dark side" sort of mentality.
So I'll say it. Yes, Obama is smarter than I. And yes, he's very different from me. He's not more educated, perhaps -- I have my own JD degree -- but no doubt he is much sharper intellectually than I ... by a country mile. And THANK GOD for that.
I don't know what Henry Ford's educational background was. But -- and putting aside his racist attitudes for the sake of this argument -- he was also much sharper than I. He thought outside the box. He didn't get locked in on the status quo, but thought forward and gave us his invention. An invention that is responsible for much of our nation's economic success. Not because he dumbed himself down. Not because he was content with horses and bicycles. Because he was intellectually sharp, precocious, driven, and different than almost everyone else with his peculiar acumen. Period.
The same goes for Marconi. The same goes for Bell. The same goes for Edison. The same goes for Jefferson, and Madison, and Hamilton, and Socrates, and Curie, and Kant, and Hume, and Einstein, and on and on. NONE of those men and women were "like me." They were, every last one of them, sharper than me; about that I have very little doubt. They were all "different" than me. Does that mean that the fruits of their intellect have not benefitted me greatly? Absolutely not. My life is richer, healthier, safer, and more productive because of them. Because of people "different" than me, because of people "smarter" than me. THANK GOD for that.
We didn't put a man on the moon with a gaggle of high school dropouts or an infinite number of monkeys on an infinite number of typewriters, praying for the right mathematical calculations to appear. I'm betting we didn't do it with people who graduated in the bottom 1% of their undergraduate classes, either. It is the smartest, the sharpest, the most original, who have made this country what it is. The very reason they have been able to do so is BECAUSE they aren't "like" most of the rest of us. We didn't get where we are because of stunted intellect; we didn't get where we are because of low-performing individuals; we didn't get where we are because of laziness, either physical or intellectual. America is (or was) what it is (or was) because of those once-in-a-while humans who came along and revolutionized how we think about things, who broke through intellectual barriers and shined their unique and fresh intellects on old problems.
I have a young son, ready to start kindergarten in less than a month. John McCain and his campaign are sending the message that if my son winds up finding his particular intellectual niche, and that if he winds up excelling in that niche above most others, that that is something about which he ought to be ashamed, that it's something he should suppress, because it will make him different and scary and, perhaps, unAmerican, just like Barack Obama. That disgusts me.
Being intellectually lazy or an academic failure isn't something to be proud of. It doesn't make a good leader. It doesn't make a good teacher. It doesn't make a good role model. But the right wing, with their recent attack on education an intellectual ability, would have us believe that it does, and that is shameful and, quite frankly, purely unAmerican.
I don't begrudge an athelete that can hit a 90 mph slider, just because I cannot. I don't begrudge a construction worker who can frame a beautiful house, just because I cannot. I don't begrudge a secretary who can keep a busy office organized to a tee, just becuase I cannot. I don't begrudge a chef who cooks a stunning meal, just because I cannot. And I certainly don't begrudge an intellectual who brings his mind to bear on the most serious intellectual issues, just because I cannot. To say that any of those people ought not to be doing what they do simply because I cannot would make me petty and egocentric -- the very antithesis of the UNITED States.
So I say THANK GOD that Obama is not like me. I am not too petty or egotistical to think that there are lots of people brighter than I on this planet, in this nation, in my state, or even on my block. I celebrate those people, not just for what they have brought me and the rest of my country, but for the example they set for the next generation. They are what makes America great. Barack Obama is one of those people -- it is BECAUSE he is as educated as he is, it is BECAUSE he is as bright as he is, it is BECAUSE he is as intellectually sharp and unique as he is, that I celebrate him, and hope that he leads this country in a few short months.
It seems clear to me that the recent attack by the right on Obama's eduction (trying to pigeonhole him as an elitist by highlighting his time at Punahoe, Columbia, and Harvard) is part of the overall strategy to portray Obama as "not like us." I'm guessing that strategy has been employed with the "less educated, salt of the earth" types of Americans in mind, because it shouldn't play well with anyone who's ever stood on the roof of the Hay Adams in Washington, DC sipping martinis or CEOs with MBAs or lawyers with JDs (and, perhaps, LLMs). Whatever the case may be, it also seems clear to me that the message is: intelligent is different; different is scary; and scary is unAmerican. Sort of a "fear leads to anger; anger leads to hatred; hatred leads to the dark side" sort of mentality.
So I'll say it. Yes, Obama is smarter than I. And yes, he's very different from me. He's not more educated, perhaps -- I have my own JD degree -- but no doubt he is much sharper intellectually than I ... by a country mile. And THANK GOD for that.
I don't know what Henry Ford's educational background was. But -- and putting aside his racist attitudes for the sake of this argument -- he was also much sharper than I. He thought outside the box. He didn't get locked in on the status quo, but thought forward and gave us his invention. An invention that is responsible for much of our nation's economic success. Not because he dumbed himself down. Not because he was content with horses and bicycles. Because he was intellectually sharp, precocious, driven, and different than almost everyone else with his peculiar acumen. Period.
The same goes for Marconi. The same goes for Bell. The same goes for Edison. The same goes for Jefferson, and Madison, and Hamilton, and Socrates, and Curie, and Kant, and Hume, and Einstein, and on and on. NONE of those men and women were "like me." They were, every last one of them, sharper than me; about that I have very little doubt. They were all "different" than me. Does that mean that the fruits of their intellect have not benefitted me greatly? Absolutely not. My life is richer, healthier, safer, and more productive because of them. Because of people "different" than me, because of people "smarter" than me. THANK GOD for that.
We didn't put a man on the moon with a gaggle of high school dropouts or an infinite number of monkeys on an infinite number of typewriters, praying for the right mathematical calculations to appear. I'm betting we didn't do it with people who graduated in the bottom 1% of their undergraduate classes, either. It is the smartest, the sharpest, the most original, who have made this country what it is. The very reason they have been able to do so is BECAUSE they aren't "like" most of the rest of us. We didn't get where we are because of stunted intellect; we didn't get where we are because of low-performing individuals; we didn't get where we are because of laziness, either physical or intellectual. America is (or was) what it is (or was) because of those once-in-a-while humans who came along and revolutionized how we think about things, who broke through intellectual barriers and shined their unique and fresh intellects on old problems.
I have a young son, ready to start kindergarten in less than a month. John McCain and his campaign are sending the message that if my son winds up finding his particular intellectual niche, and that if he winds up excelling in that niche above most others, that that is something about which he ought to be ashamed, that it's something he should suppress, because it will make him different and scary and, perhaps, unAmerican, just like Barack Obama. That disgusts me.
Being intellectually lazy or an academic failure isn't something to be proud of. It doesn't make a good leader. It doesn't make a good teacher. It doesn't make a good role model. But the right wing, with their recent attack on education an intellectual ability, would have us believe that it does, and that is shameful and, quite frankly, purely unAmerican.
I don't begrudge an athelete that can hit a 90 mph slider, just because I cannot. I don't begrudge a construction worker who can frame a beautiful house, just because I cannot. I don't begrudge a secretary who can keep a busy office organized to a tee, just becuase I cannot. I don't begrudge a chef who cooks a stunning meal, just because I cannot. And I certainly don't begrudge an intellectual who brings his mind to bear on the most serious intellectual issues, just because I cannot. To say that any of those people ought not to be doing what they do simply because I cannot would make me petty and egocentric -- the very antithesis of the UNITED States.
So I say THANK GOD that Obama is not like me. I am not too petty or egotistical to think that there are lots of people brighter than I on this planet, in this nation, in my state, or even on my block. I celebrate those people, not just for what they have brought me and the rest of my country, but for the example they set for the next generation. They are what makes America great. Barack Obama is one of those people -- it is BECAUSE he is as educated as he is, it is BECAUSE he is as bright as he is, it is BECAUSE he is as intellectually sharp and unique as he is, that I celebrate him, and hope that he leads this country in a few short months.
Advertisement





Excellent post!
August 12, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beyond Excellent...I made a similar point a few days ago, but you said it way, way better. Why anyone would want the leader of the free world to be Joe 6 pack is beyond me...
And tell me again how you get to be an elitist by getting scholarships and student loans to go to school, then making a couple of million (maybe)after you are over 40?
I will never understand how Mrs. 109+million and Mr. married a chick w/ gazzillions were able to call Obama elitist and make it stick...we live in a funny world.
August 12, 2008 9:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. Yes. Definitely yes.
I want to feel that the President is sharper enough than anyone I know that we all look like George W. Bush or John McCain by comparison. Obama gives us that once-in-a-lifetime chance. We (as a nation) better not blow it. The next such chance may never come.
August 12, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
this is a silly post.
nobody thinks Barack Obama is too smart. but a lot of people think he's too full of himself. or that he's too liberal. or too inexperienced.
none of those things has anything to do with IQ or education. sure, we'd like our president to be smart--it'd make a nice change--but look at the brainiacs among their ranks already: Carter? Nixon? both almost genius level--neither very good presidents.
the whole elitist rap doesn't have anything to do with smarts. it has to do with the Obama camp's vague but persistent condescension to the majority of Americans who have never had a martini at the Hay-Adams.
btw sir, it's "ad nauseAm"--accusative case.
August 12, 2008 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Point taken, but the route to emphasizing the asserted smugness is to imply high-level education is inherently elitist, not merely elite. And the Democrats have a decent point to make that the recent opposite of academic prowess, GWB, hasn't been a good approach.
I feel the "vague but persistent condescension" is imagined, but it is being actively suggested by the McCain campaign and supporters. If the statement at the time the Pennsylvania primary is the source of the hurt feelings it's a weak foundation for it.
August 12, 2008 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
It SHOULD be a silly post. We ought not to have to talk about it. However, the republican campaign has made it an issue, trumpeting McCain's poor performance at a public school as somehow qualifying him for office before an ivy-league graduate:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/10/gop-takes-aim-at-obamas-e_n_118005.html
Quite frankly, I don't care much which school a person attends, but I DO care very much how much effort they put in while they were there. Obama clearly put in effort, and either McCain did not, or he is simply ... simple. Either way, that isn't the person I want leading our nation.
I apologize for the misspelling of ad nauseam. At least you seem to know what I meant.
August 12, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank God, Obama would have gotten it right. ;)
August 12, 2008 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
just curious, troll, but do you know if Obama has ever had a martini at the Hay-Adams? for that matter, have you? and, no, I haven't. but i want someone with a high-intellect to tackle the problems that we face in this country for the next 4 years. thanks to uncaring fools like yourself we got Bush eight years ago, and look where that got us. pretty much nowhere. he's anti-curious and intellectual. with serious problems of these times, I'd think you'd want someone with an intellect and a serious temperament, not given to overt emotion, to handle those problems. perhaps you don't care enough about this country to want, or maybe never did. oh, and McCain won't bring that. if these are the two choices we have: Obama is the choice. i'll take his 'potential' over McCain's 'experience'.
August 12, 2008 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Carter was right about everything, despite being a democrat.
The fact that America wasn't ready for the changes he advocated, doesn't make him wrong. Had we been willing to follow his leadership on energy and diplomacy and education, we would be light-years beyond where we are now. Had we elected him to a second term, much of the pain and suffering and blight we are experiencing now would have never happened.
Nixon, for all his flaws, was actually the last affective republican president this country has had if you take Bill Clinton out of the mix.
August 13, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't seen much evidence that Obama is even all that smart. He doesn't seem to know how many states are in the union, he advocates idiotic, failed policies of the past, proving he can't learn from the mistakes of others. Other than graduating from an Ivy League school (like GWB?), where is the proof of his brilliance?
August 13, 2008 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I don't see any bears around here....my bear patrol must be working perfectly!
August 13, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
You should pay better attention to the news cycle. If you haven't heard or seen the attacks on Obama's education and the institutions he's attended, and the subsequent ridicule of those accomplishments out of the McCain camp, then why would you be commenting?
August 13, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great post. Concur and rec'd. Thanks.
August 12, 2008 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nova voter, thank god you posted that. thank you too.
August 12, 2008 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent post.
Like you I expect, want and need the president to be smarter than me. I want him/her to be statesmanlike and presidential. I do not want the president to be singing bomb bomb Iran at campaign events or making sexist jokes or running ads that are immature, racist and/or sexist. I want a leader who uses reasoned logic, accepts scientific results and embraces the entrepreneurial spirit to advance America and a host of other things. Equally important requirements include advancing social justice and bettering the human condition not just his/her BFF corporate lobbyists and CEOs.
Ever notice that Obama's "vague but persistent condescension" is never qualified nor supported by example. Probably because none exist.
With no thanks to those perpetuating fear, common sense, critical thinking and skepticism are exponentially declining in measure.
Electing Obama will help reverse that trend.
August 13, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent post. Thank you. "Elite" should not be a dirty word. Obama is clearly brighter, smarter and more accomplished than most of the rest of us. Thank God for that. I refuse to cede words like "elite" and "liberal" to the neo-cons to turn into virtual four letter words. I am proudly liberal and, were I smarter, would be proud to be considered part of the intellectual elite as well!
August 13, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
August 13, 2008 1:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's been going on for decades.
August 13, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
We have a very important choice this fall: moving forward into an economy that embraces and cultivates intelligence and creativity or more of the same. We have permanently lost our manufacturing base and even much of our information services. Many major companies pretty much only do their design work in-house anymore. (For example, most publishers don't actually print books anymore.) We have a small window of opportunity to get our economy on the right track, and the key factor will be fixing our broken educational system. If we do not, the income gap will get far wider than anyone could ever imagine as a huge percentage of the population is relegated to low-level service jobs for the rest of their lives. Do we really want to be the burger flippers of the world (with all due respect to burger flippers—just pretty sure that most of y'all don't plan to make a lifetime career out of it)?
August 13, 2008 5:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Brilliant post. Someone above pointed out that "we shouldn't even be talking about this," which is absolutely true. When did excelling at one's abilities become a negative? When did it become something of which one should be ashamed? Shame on John McCain and the Republicans for spinning things in such a way.
It is interesting to me that at this very time we are celebrating athletes excelling to their limits. We watch and cheer for Michael Phelps, and we applaud him when he excels above all the rest to win a gold medal. We know he's good at what he does, and we respect and adore him for it. There should be no difference with Obama.
Obama has achieved what he has through hard work and determination. Those are inherent American values. When did John McCain ever do anything by himself? He most likely got into Annapolis through his family, got his Navy position the same way; he got into the Senate thanks to his wife's pocketbook... If you actually look at his record, he has no real substantial accomplishments, especially not on his own merits. If you take away the "POW" and "war hero" meme projected on him from the media, what does he truly have left?
It's a sad day in our country when intellectualism, intelligence and education are looked upon as negatives, especially in the way in which the Republicans have portrayed them. Of course, seeing as finding an intellectual Republican is about as easy as winning the lottery these days, it makes sense that they would attack it so much. Envy and jealousy will do that to people.
August 13, 2008 8:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am an intellectual republican. There are many intellectual republicans. Most of them voting for Obama.
Problem is, it will likely take many years to change the expectations of the rank and file in the party. Patience and forgiveness of those republicans not at the center of power will be a huge help. Just because the power structures in the party dictate the messaging for the masses, doesn't mean a counter-narrative doesn't exist as well.
Kind of how progressives hated being lumped in with corporate democrats all these years. Reagan didn't get everything he wanted from a republican Congress. Newt Gingrich didn't get everything he wanted from a republican president. These things are rarely so black and white, which is why labels matter much less than individuals and their actions.
Take the GOP leadership and McCain's campaign to task for their actions, but please give the rest of the republican party a break, at least for a little while.
August 13, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Jason...I, too, would appreciate a little acknowledgment that we aren't ALL idiots...we've seen the light, so have others. MsJoanne made a post today about Republicans for Obama...isn't getting the rec's it deserves. You might consider jumping over there and seeing if it is worth your rec.
August 13, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
When you finish in the bottom of your class, like Bush and McCain did, you make yourself feel better by taking pride in being ignorant! Educated = people not like me!
August 13, 2008 10:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
REC'D.
The first thing that totalitarian regimes do is take all intellectuals and artists and shoot them up against a wall, unless they can take the scientists and force them to make weapons for them.
If you can't shoot them, marginalize them.
In this country, the Republicans have very successfully defined being intellectual as being dangerous and out of touch with the common man. There's a myth in this country that Americans are all NASCAR/NFL watching, beer drinking, construction workers and blue collar people - simple folk - who distrust intellectuals. I don't think that is entirely accurate, but it's not entirely untrue either. Where there is obvious racism in this campaign, there is also anti-intellectualism and anti-elitism.
Now, Bush and McCain are as elite as they come, both from privileged families, both filthy rich. In truth, the elite label is one that can be boomeranged back on them. But intellectually elite? Clearly not. Clearly their utter mediocrity is soothing to some voters. They never talk over anyone's head because they are incapable of doing so. Obama clearly can soar over the heads of many of the voters of this country, and that may scare them, especially with some help from the McCain campaign to portray him that way. What could be scarier than a really smart black dude, but one who is clearly not ready to lead, we might add?
Obama is smart. He's smart in the traditional sense of being highly educated. He's also smart in the street sense of being a canny politician. He's also smart in that he knows how to listen and evaluate and analyze and synthesize.
But being smart is sometimes scary. It's ironic that when you want someone to fix your computer, you hope they are smarter than you and know all the ins and outs of the machine, but when you elect a president, many people want someone who they think might be fun with a beer in his hand or who can put on a good barbecue.
Of course, I, like a lot of other people around this country - around the world - really do want an exceptional candidate - someone who is smart and elite in the best sense of the word. I want a true leader who can inspire people to create a better world. I certainly don't see anyone on the Republican side who can do that, and yet I do see someone right there who can. Obama '08.
August 13, 2008 12:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that both "conservatives" and "liberals" are both looking for a more progressive choice this year that can't be so neatly summed up. A choice that doesn't make us die a little bit inside when we pull the lever. Someone who treats our problems with the seriousness they deserve.
That is a bipartisan wish for most in this country, though the RNC has been every bit as successful at polluting the American political debate as the DNC has been at implementing horrible policies.
August 13, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
VERY well said...
August 13, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seems like much of American politics now revolves around cultivating the vote of the unwashed masses. A huge bloc, I suppose. Democrats promise better economic circumstances, while Republicans attempt to paint the Dems as Islamist, pedophilic homosexuals from the planet Grobnobulix. One might optimistically describe these machinations (from both parties) as populist, given their intended target. The corresponding assumption is that the educated minority can sort through the noise on their own and needn't be pandered to. Perhaps this is how it's always been, despite appearing increasingly base.
August 13, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
As Obama himself said, these people actually take pride in being ignorant. It is sickening, but only if it works. If it is repudiated decisively, maybe it will stop once and for all.
August 13, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The propaganda makes perfect sense. The uneducated already feel insecure. Feed on their fear by teaching them to eschew education and hate the educated. What better way to stifle critical and independent thought? The right whispers in the ear of working-class America like Grima Wormtongue.
Are Yale and Harvard School of Business not "elite" or "liberal"? Then again, maybe there's some finer criteria to this question of elitism that I don't understand.
Then again, probably not.
August 13, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great post. And in response to DF, nice Hicks reference. I think that one is usually followed by the Waffle House waitress in Nashville who approaches the table and says, "looks like we got ourselves a reader... what you readin' for?" Hicks replies "Not what am I reading, but what am I reading FOR! Gee, you stumped me!!! I guess I read for a lot of reasons. The main one is so that I don't end up a waffle waitress."
To nova, you're dead on. I'm 7 years out of high school (a good college prep school) and there's still all kinds of nerd memes. It's sad. I, personally, wasn't strong enough to choose social outcasting with academic success over social acceptance with academic failure. I did excell early on, but then you're stigmatized -- at 8 years old, you would rather anything than that. What a sick system.
August 13, 2008 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ugh! This post is horrible. You've completely misquoted. "Fear is the path to the Dark Side. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering. I sense much fear in you."
Rec'd
August 13, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
One important factor about Obama is that he will not fall victim to a VICE president that has him in his spell and manipulates every decision he makes. McCain would make another "shadow govt" very possible and more war profiteering very probable.
Its a relief to know that an intelligent president will align himself with intelligent advisers and that we will benefit from their intelligent choices. We might be able to exhale next year.
August 13, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is exactly the strategy that Bush used to win the 2004 election.
August 14, 2008 2:18 AM | Reply | Permalink