« The VP Choice that got away (Mark Warner) | Jonze's Blog | The McCain Trap, and how Obama fell for it... »

Should Obama Campaign preemptively bring up Rev. Wright Issue?


Snippet from today's Political Radar:
A Republican strategist speaking on the condition of anonymity reacted to the Caldwell comments by telling ABC News: "My advice to the Obama people: 'proceed with extreme caution.' They don't want to get into a discussion of character and background. They are opening a door that they will not be able to close. They are putting on the table issues and personalities that they do not want to discuss."

Asked which personalities? The GOP strategist cited the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Tony Rezko, and former Obama law partners.

Now I don't think anybody believes the McCain Camp is not going to bring up Rev. Wright, it's not a question of "if" but "when".  What about the Obama camp bringing it up themselves?  That way they control more of the story, as opposed to letting the McCain camp decide when to play it as an issue.  Because if you are hoping the McCain camp won't "go there" you are incredibly naive, and if you are waiting for him to play it, don't expect it until late October. 

Wouldn't it be better getting it out of the way as an issue now?  So it will lack the election day bite the McCain camp hopes it has by releasing it days before voting day. 

Ideally it would have been best to bring it up during the Olympics, but the media would have seen through that.  So going forward, when would be the best time? It would have to be post Dem Convention, but before the first debate.

What about during the week of the GOP convention? Still too transparent? Would that be giving too much of a potential bump to McCain?

When would be the best time?

Also how would you go about doing it? Have a speech titled "Reverend Wright, Tony Rezko and Bill Ayers" where he talked about each in length and depth?

I assume Obama will be asked about Wright tomorrow at the Rick Warren summit.  Maybe that could be the impetus for another address down the line

Or leave McCain to play the Rezko and Ayers card because you have the Keating Five and Liddy/Abortion Bombers counter attacks if necessary. 

Now McCain does have a Pastor problem of his own in Rod Parlsey and John Hagee.  However even the staunchest Obama supporter has to agree it's not nearly as damning as Rev. Wright is for Obama.  I think the best way to use Parsley and Hagee against McCain show him as using their endorsments as baldly political.  Using religion as nothing more than a tool to help him win an election.  

If Obama gets out in front of the Reverend Wright issue and plays it when he chooses to and on his own terms he really could mitigate the damage.  He could simply say he wants to address Reverend Wright to the much larger GE audience and get it out out the way.  It would take a huge bullet out of the McCain arsenal and at best Obama could get credit for bringing it up himself. 

So whaddaya think?  Good strategy?


14 Comments

| Leave a comment

No, Jonze, very bad strategy.
Not that I think there's a chance in hell Obama would go that route.
Wright himself has backed off on his book plans.
When he's desperate enough, McCain may well try to recycle Wright. But it's old stuff now.
Obama can then focus on how desperate he is.

I just think there was a small audience who was really paying attention. I just don't want to see this exposed to the GE audience a week before the vote. I know the dittoheads and the like know all about it and Limbaugh, Hannity and the rest have been beating this drum non-stop, but it was basically a Hillary vs Obama Democratic Primary issue.

Maybe they could push poll on the issue to get a better read.

Anyone who watches FauxNews, already knows about it. Anyone who watched CNN, already knows about it. Anyone who watched MSM -- i mean "msm" (that's the style du jour ne c'est pas?) -- knows about it. So the idea that it was just a few people paying attention is not really true.

Rest assured, they'll bring it up as the last ditch "surprise" but it's old news.

Obama guilt-tripped Democrats into believing there was some context where "God damn America!" sounds good, and his 20 years in the "God damn America!" church disappeared into smoke and mirrors.

In the general election, it may not be so easy.

Obamabots who think that playing longer excerpts from Jeremiah Wright's sermons can turn "God damn America!" into something more like "Swing Low, Sweet Chariot" are fooling themselves, which is easy, but it may not be so easy to fool 50,000,000 people into voting for their cynical and unprincipled candidate, Barack Obama, who used Jeremiah Wright's church to promote himself politically on the South Side of Chicago, and then threw it under the bus when it wasn't useful any more.

Wow, good thing Jerimiah Wright isn't the nominee.

I think so. I remember the shock value that looped tape (and no one yet knows who put it together, right?) had on folks around my office - Obama supporters (me), maybe thinking about him, and never will support him. We all believed, in our heart of hearts, that the primary was over: he could never win. Not with that kind of thing out there. ------------

Now that it's General Election time, there are going to be a entirely new group of people who have been paying NO attention up until now (and for that reason more likely to be impacted by the quite shocking sights and sounds).

I don't know when is best but there has to be time for folks to "go there" (i.e., assume that for that reason alone Obama is simply NOT going to win) .... and then let a bit of buyer's remorse set in as they really start looking at McCain and thinking about him being president .... and, on the other hand, become impressed as they watch Obama's handling of it and gradually start thinking again that he could win (and start developing faith in his ability to handle problems).

So I absolutely agree, although I have no brilliant ideas as to timing. I also suspect that the folks at Obama campaign have been thinking about this seriously as well.

Curious what others think.

If Obama can control the issue, he could maybe control the soundbytes a bit better, expanding them to give them context and in the one case "Chickens coming home to roost" explaining that Rev. Wright was quoting an American Ambassador.

If it comes out now it will be seen as a small part of Obama come the election, however if it comes out when the McCain camp wants it to, it will likely still be raw when voters head into the voting booths.

I think it would be a terribly bad idea. Also, how would Obama bring it up again? "Oh hey, I know nobody's talking about it but remember when my old pastor said that the Government tried to kill black people by making AIDS? And then he hilariously said 'God damn America.' Yeah that was something, wasn't it?"

Better now than November 1st.

He's talked about it. What more is there really to say?

Obama has no control of this issue because he has no adequate response for the people for whom it matters.
What he could never explain was why he was prepared to stay in a church, and take his little girls to a church, where the pastor could erupt in the coarse & shocking way the clips showed he was wont to do. Given the fact that Obama warned Wright that he might have to distance himself & said to Wright `you can get a bit rough sometimes`, given the rhetoric in the church's newsletter, it simply never passed the smell test that he `didn't know` and it never will.
Everyone just has to take deep breaths and hope fervently that the policy differences matter more to more people in the swing states than the chracter/associations.

I think that Obama's very public and emotional break-up with Wright greatly (not completely) immunizes him. It would be a much worse problem if that break-up had not occurred.

I love how that GOP strategist warns against bringing up questions of McCain's character with the threat of Rezko, Wright, etc. Oh, right, the GOP will only bring up those associations if McCain's character is attacked by Obama....yeah, sure.

user-pic

I honestly don't know, but it is a mistake to compare Wright to Hagee. McCain can just say, "I didn't sit in his church for 20 years and have my daughters baptised by him, etc, etc, etc."

I do think the only way Obama can react to this is to define specifically but briefly, what his beliefs are. I don't think it is a good thing to do from an intellectual point of view, but I think he can probably express himself in a way that will reassure religious voters.

He then needs to say how profoundly disappointed he is by Wright's behavior, but that he feels compassion for a man who was thrust into the spotlight over a tiny snippet of what he had publically spoken:

Wright was put in a negative light that never would have occured had it not been for Obama's run for the presidency, and Wright, being human, fought back against the press, and ultimately Obama as well. As wrenching as it was to dissociate himself and his family from this church, he really believes it is best for all involved. Obama needs to be careful not to provoke Wright into another speaking tour; by showing empathy he can let Wright off the hook and himself as well.

user-pic

.

Looking over my feathered shoulder...

Much gnashing of teeth and rending of garment.

It's amazing how all this became moot on November 4, 2008.

Just wandering, wondering and observing ...

~OGD~

*Paddlin' along in the Café' since June 2004*

Leave a comment

Jonze

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 2

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address