Stop Going After Palin
Stop. Stop right now. The only way this is a positive for the McCain campaign is if Democrats cede the moral high ground.
This was an incredibly telling selection and I think it betrays a sense of absolute fear. How?
1. EXPERIENCE. The only way this is beneficial to Republicans is if Democrats continue to argue that Palin is inexperienced, which ultimately results in a comparison of Obama's experience to Palin's -- engaging the conversation is a validation of the comparison. Stop doing it. Now. Let the conversation take its own course.
2. FOREIGN POLICY. In seeking to neutralize Biden's strengths, the Republicans have effectively given up on any argument about the philosophy of America's role in the world. Obama laid out a very clear philosophy -- Biden was intended to be the experienced executor and point man for the Obama philosophy abroad, but Palin's complete lack of knowledge and experience makes the argument completely unnecessary. Obama should continue to make the case in direct, positive terms in the abstract. There is absolutely no reason to showcase Biden's experience here. It's only a loss if Democrats actually allow themselves to validate the simplicity of Palin's views by equating them as a counterargument to an Obama presidency. Let them stand on their own without rebuttal.
3. DIVERSITY. The Republicans have telegraphed somethng here -- their shallow attempt to take advantage of the Clinton (and Obama) phenomenon will backfire on its merits UNLESS Democrats are perceived as bullies and attack dogs. Stop thinking that you need to point out flaws in Palin's philosophies, experience, and views that women are smart enough to uncover themselves. In other words, let Clinton supporters and women in general come to their own decisons based on the actual merits and facts of the argument. This pick betrays an absolute lack of understanding of feminism -- the only way Democrats can subvert the mistake is again, by being bullies, and attacking unnecessarily, which effectively changes the discussion away from Palin's views to an analysis of the interaction between Obama supporters and McCain supporters. In other words, we're on the right side of every single issue and there is absolutely no reason to point this out or even counter McCain / Palin arguments.
OVERALL. I think the pick is astounding in what it telegraphs. The McCain campaign has abandoned every single argument and strategy it was attempting to execute prior to the convention. They've banked ENTIRELY on stealing women voters and secondarily, working class folks through a shallow misunderstanding of the actual concerns of those voters. The only thing that was successful about this strategy was the fact that it neutralized Biden's strengths by making them unnecessary. If he comes out swinging, he looks like a bully. However, there are absolutely NO NET POSITIVES. The obvious strategy here is that the Republicans think that a female VP candidate will peel off Hillary supporters. After this week's convention, I think that's absolutely impossible UNLESS Democrats create a sympathetic persona in Palin.
Ultimately, what we need here is the EXACT opposite of what we needed going into the convention. Obama needs to lay out the case in a positive manner for what an Obama/Biden presidency will look like, refuse to attack Palin in any matter whatsoever, and basically behave like a gentleman. There is no positive result from attacking. I think this choice telegraphs that the Republicans have effectively given up, and anything contrary to that attitude will evoke public sympathy.
Unless we ruin it for ourselves, the election is over.
This was an incredibly telling selection and I think it betrays a sense of absolute fear. How?
1. EXPERIENCE. The only way this is beneficial to Republicans is if Democrats continue to argue that Palin is inexperienced, which ultimately results in a comparison of Obama's experience to Palin's -- engaging the conversation is a validation of the comparison. Stop doing it. Now. Let the conversation take its own course.
2. FOREIGN POLICY. In seeking to neutralize Biden's strengths, the Republicans have effectively given up on any argument about the philosophy of America's role in the world. Obama laid out a very clear philosophy -- Biden was intended to be the experienced executor and point man for the Obama philosophy abroad, but Palin's complete lack of knowledge and experience makes the argument completely unnecessary. Obama should continue to make the case in direct, positive terms in the abstract. There is absolutely no reason to showcase Biden's experience here. It's only a loss if Democrats actually allow themselves to validate the simplicity of Palin's views by equating them as a counterargument to an Obama presidency. Let them stand on their own without rebuttal.
3. DIVERSITY. The Republicans have telegraphed somethng here -- their shallow attempt to take advantage of the Clinton (and Obama) phenomenon will backfire on its merits UNLESS Democrats are perceived as bullies and attack dogs. Stop thinking that you need to point out flaws in Palin's philosophies, experience, and views that women are smart enough to uncover themselves. In other words, let Clinton supporters and women in general come to their own decisons based on the actual merits and facts of the argument. This pick betrays an absolute lack of understanding of feminism -- the only way Democrats can subvert the mistake is again, by being bullies, and attacking unnecessarily, which effectively changes the discussion away from Palin's views to an analysis of the interaction between Obama supporters and McCain supporters. In other words, we're on the right side of every single issue and there is absolutely no reason to point this out or even counter McCain / Palin arguments.
OVERALL. I think the pick is astounding in what it telegraphs. The McCain campaign has abandoned every single argument and strategy it was attempting to execute prior to the convention. They've banked ENTIRELY on stealing women voters and secondarily, working class folks through a shallow misunderstanding of the actual concerns of those voters. The only thing that was successful about this strategy was the fact that it neutralized Biden's strengths by making them unnecessary. If he comes out swinging, he looks like a bully. However, there are absolutely NO NET POSITIVES. The obvious strategy here is that the Republicans think that a female VP candidate will peel off Hillary supporters. After this week's convention, I think that's absolutely impossible UNLESS Democrats create a sympathetic persona in Palin.
Ultimately, what we need here is the EXACT opposite of what we needed going into the convention. Obama needs to lay out the case in a positive manner for what an Obama/Biden presidency will look like, refuse to attack Palin in any matter whatsoever, and basically behave like a gentleman. There is no positive result from attacking. I think this choice telegraphs that the Republicans have effectively given up, and anything contrary to that attitude will evoke public sympathy.
Unless we ruin it for ourselves, the election is over.
Advertisement





This is good. I think we all just need to listen to Obama's speech from last night again and relax. #1 is a particularly valid point. If (and I disagree with this) Palin and Obama are determined to BOTH be equally too inexperienced then it is going to be worse for Obama/Biden than McCain/Palin.
August 30, 2008 4:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Two words: Karl Rove. She shores up the base with her extreme stance on abortion, she makes it look like the Repubs are finally giving a woman her due,unlike those nasty Dems, she opens a can of worms for Catholics who might want to support Biden, but whose priests will tell them he's the devil because he's not pro-life, she gets to shore up McCain's Maverick creds while standing beside him and gushing over what a fabulous leader he will be, something nobody else probably in the country could do with a straight face. I could go on, but...
Anyway, there is nobody in this country who has more to fear from an Obama presidency than Karl Rove and evil though he is, a malignant toad, you better believe he ran the numbers six ways from Sunday to come up with this woman. She's a winner for them, maybe in ways we'll only figure out later, but trust me, this was not just a bone-headed pick by McCain. Oh, did you see how pleased he was by her praise. I truly, for the first time, felt sorry for the old bastard, his preening vanity. My God, he's a joke and he doesn't even know it. God help us all if America doesn't know it either.
August 30, 2008 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that she is a problem IF Democrats are duped into attacking her.
Unfortunately, the probabilities of that are very high.
Also, McCain doesn't care if this is an apparent reversal of his "experience matters" meme. He won the primaries by being the maverick, after all.
Mavericks reverse themselves without warning.
August 30, 2008 10:36 AM | Reply | Permalink