« The biggest national test of Obama's experience: winning the primary! | db66's Blog | Eyes on the ball »

The biggest national test of Obama's experience: winning the primary!


I am watching John McCain on Fox News right now. In response to questions about how Palin's experience matches up to Obama, he answered that she has much more executive experience, and that she's stood up to leaders of her own party, whereas Obama hasn't.

But Obama *has* demonstrated enormous capacity and experience in a very major test.

That's what national primaries are: they are difficult, nation-sized, presidential-sized, tests. Obama passed that national test. In the process, he stood up, for many months in a grueling and difficult campaign, against leaders of his party. He passed with flying colors: by all reports, he managed an extremely efficient and well-run major organization. He won millions of votes-- he won about 30 more votes than there are inhabitants in Alaska. Ultimately, he won the nomination.

Palin has never faced anything remotely like that.
No one, I don't think even Palin herself, believes that if Sarah Palin had run for president she would have gotten anywhere.

3 Comments

| Leave a comment

Actually Obama won 30 TIMES the amount of votes than there are habitants in Alaska.

I disagree a bit with the article. If Sarah Palin ran and succeeded THAT would have proven her worth. Obama did exactly that, by running one of the best campaigns of all time. If she ran and did well that would havbe been her test, however, at this moment she hasn't proven herself.

You're totally right, I meant to say 30 TIMES more votes.

And I also agree with you that the point is that Obama IS tested (he ran and won the nomination) whereas Palin has not been tested in any manner remotely comparable.

Leave a comment

db66

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address