« A Huge Risk for Barack - Get Ready Now | MassDem's Blog | Holy Crap - I'll try this again »

A Question I'm Evidently Not Allowed To Ask


One of the items that Steve Schmidt finds to be afoul of his brand-spanking new standards of decency is a question that a reporter allegedly asked him (umm, off the record) about whether Sarah Palin had her amniotic fluid tested.

This question got lumped in with all of the other manufactured outrage about supposed attacks on Bristol, but I think it is entirely different and legitimate.  This question is the first thing that came to mind for me when as part of her official bio, the fact came to light that she chose to have her last baby even after discovering that he would be afflicted with Down's Syndrome. 

You see, when my wife and I were meeting with the OBGYN who would eventually deliver our daughter, we discovered through a blood test (AFP) that we had an elevated risk of our child having Down's.  We asked the next sensible question, which was - can we find out for sure?  We were told, accurately as I understand, that the only way to confirm Down's syndrome was by amniosintesis, a process by which a needle is inserted into the uterus and a sample of the fluid is extracted, then tested.  Our doctor then told us, VERY CLEARLY, that while it was our decision, the procedure carried risks for the baby.  The bottom line was that unless we were entertaining the possibility of aborting the pregnancy, this procedure was an unnecessary risk.

My questions to Sarah Palin on this subject are as follows: 

1.  Why did you elect to take the risk of an amniosintesis if your religious convictions completely preclude you from entertaining the possibility of an abortion? 

2.  How do you reconcile the fact that you claim to have "chosen" to carry the baby to term inspite of Down's with the fact that you do not believe that "choice" exists at all?

3.  You made this choice for yourself, do you not believe that others should be able to choose as well?

Also, I should add, in our case we elected not to take the risk of an amniosintesis, and my daughter (now three) is not afflicted with Down's, a fact that I am very thankful for. 

I'll also add, for the purposes of disclosure, that I am male, christian but not over-the-top, and I am staunchly pro-life and staunchly pro-choice.  What I mean is that in any case where my opinion is asked, I will always advise against abortion but I also recognize that in the vast majority of cases, MY OPINION IS NOT ASKED, and I should leave those people alone to make the most difficult decision of their lives in peace. 

5 Comments

| Leave a comment

Excellent.

user-pic

You've made an interesting point and on worth asking but only if she opens the door and uses her experiences this year to shore up her "pro-life" street cred; otherwise it's probably too personal really.

Except for the wording of your question #1, I think you have good questions.

1. Why did you elect to take the risk of an amniosintesis if your religious convictions completely preclude you from entertaining the possibility of an abortion?

Amniocentesis is performed for a variety of reasons. The American Pregnancy Association's website has a list of reasons for and against making the decision to have an amniocentesis procedure done. Some people opt for the procedure if they are at risk for having a special needs baby, and the test helps in determining whether fetal surgery is needed to address other birth defects, such as spina bifida. Also, the test helps by providing advance notice to parents who need preparation/planning time to deal with a special needs infant.

Except for the wording of your question #1, I think you have good questions.

1. Why did you elect to take the risk of an amniosintesis if your religious convictions completely preclude you from entertaining the possibility of an abortion?

Amniocentesis is performed for a variety of reasons. The American Pregnancy Association's website has a list of reasons for and against making the decision to have an amniocentesis procedure done. Some people opt for the procedure if they are at risk for having a special needs baby, and the test helps in determining whether fetal surgery is needed to address other birth defects, such as spina bifida. Also, the test helps by providing advance notice to parents who need preparation/planning time to deal with a special needs infant.

I like your "pro-choice, pro-life" formulation.
The vast majority of "pro-choice" people probably would as well.
There are a lot of questions Sarah Palin needs to answer, which she is trying her damndest not to answer.
But I think anything about her reproduction decisions -- repeat, ANYTHING -- should be off limits.
If you believe in a woman's right to choose, that's it. She gets to choose, and nobody has a right to second-guess her.
End of controversy. End of story.

Leave a comment

MassDem

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address