Conservative Columnist Kathleen Parker Calls for Palin To Drop Out
You just need to read this one for yourself. From the National Review Online:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDZiMDhjYTU1NmI5Y2MwZjg2MWNiMWMyYTUxZDkwNTE=
Is there a movement bubbling under on the Republican side? Did someone from the McCain campaign suggest she write this, now that Palin's debate with Biden appears to be on again?
This could be a lot of fun.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDZiMDhjYTU1NmI5Y2MwZjg2MWNiMWMyYTUxZDkwNTE=
Is there a movement bubbling under on the Republican side? Did someone from the McCain campaign suggest she write this, now that Palin's debate with Biden appears to be on again?
This could be a lot of fun.
Advertisement





I don't think she can go. It would require blinking.
September 26, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Silly! Everyone knows a deer caught in the headlights CAN'T blink.
September 26, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, her ex-brother-in-law tazed that deer, her daddy processed it, and she and the kiddies ate it. Then she filed a complaint saying he used her sister's permit to taze the deer from his state tropper airplane while drunkenly threatening to kill her father. But she did not pressure anyone to fire him. If you will turn off the headlights we can get on with the wedding.
September 26, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, no, no! -- you've got it wrong!
He doesn't blink because he was a POW!
September 26, 2008 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
After McCain's performance last night, I'm convinced it would be political suicide to let Palin debate Biden. I mean seriously, the only danger here is that Biden might appear that he's picking on the girl.
I suspect you will see a family emergency arise, and Palin, for the betterment of her family, will resign or whatever.
September 27, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
What will she do when Biden's head rears up, into her airspace, cuz that's where he will come first, to Alaska. She'll have to send those out, for protection.
Maybe she can debate Henry Kissinger? You know, expose his naivete.
September 26, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Everybody!!!
Let me tell ya, when Track was going there, you know, to defend the oil drilling from the Russians, he was doing it for them, and, and, I am just SO proud. Really proud of all those people expressing their appreciation for America, where it border, you know Russia, and, oh yeah, Canada too, and they those... those reporters, they... yeah me for saying it... and we.. werwpi .. .erewiersh................. SDFedre1!!!
Okay, by now,
Sarah
(2009-2010ish)
September 26, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
HEY SARAH! Welcome to TPM, I had no idea you were a reader!
How's Trig?
September 26, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think that's Sarah. I didn't hear "yup, yup." Not even once.
September 26, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I'll dig down an' get back to ya on that!" -- Palin/POW
September 26, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh god, did you have the same vision I did? Just incredible. In three short interviews Palin has given us a years worth of yuks. Even Shrub couldn't do that!!!
The head rears up!!!!!!!!
September 26, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read the blog on townhall.com and Palin admirers are throwing Parker under the bus---hee hee hee. You know how they're defending Palin? By smearing Obama, e.g. his misspeak is saying 57 states instead of 50, that he's a secret Muslim, Ayers, etc. By smearing Biden, e.g. hair plugs, veneer teeth, him asking a man in a wheelchair to stand up, etc.
If they can't hear, can't they take the time to read what she's saying? She's a joke. But I hope she doesn't drop out by saying her family/kids need her, McCain will get some sympathy vote.
September 26, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wingnuts will no doubt have a temper tantrum over Parker and others telling it like it is. But I think they protest too much. Now many conservatives are joining the rest of the country in admitting, this trophy veep is simply in over her beehive.
Can we say it now, now that she truly has had her deer-in-the-headlights moments? Sarah Quaylin
September 26, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Everybody!!!
I served with Dan Quayle, I knew Dan Quayle, Dan Quayle was a friend of mine. I am not Dan Quayle.
Okay, by now,
Sarah
(2009-2010ish)
September 26, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
tpm Sarah, you are so endearing. We will hate to lose you on Nov 5 - or sooner - but perhaps you could still grace us with your presence, possibly joining forces with our dear idiotic.
Consider it, tpm Sarah. Switch sides!
September 26, 2008 11:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sad to say, but she's hella lot worse that the Quaylester.
September 26, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know that I'd go that far. It's possible she could spell "potato" correctly -- it's a cold climate/frozen ground veggie.
And she's likely been coached on that talking point.
September 26, 2008 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the link, which I am circulating.
Good for Kathleen Parker for the courage she showed in writing that column.
September 26, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe she could just call for the republican ticket to "fold" now. And get out of the game!
September 26, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Am I the only one the link is not working for?
Sarah, dear, can you help? You're so "ready"!
September 26, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
It didn't work for me, either. Try this
September 26, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, sorry. What happened is, I pasted the link on the page then clicked the "Link" button and put a placeholder in the popup dialog. It's supposed to be the other way around. Duh. Life can be so confusing sometimes. Anyway, here's a working link:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MDZiMDhjYTU1NmI5Y2MwZjg2MWNiMWMyYTUxZDkwNTE=
September 26, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Washington Post has an article today about all the gifts Palin has accepted as Governor of Alaska. The article says "a spokeswoman for Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign said the gifts had no undue influence on her."
In response the Russian government announced Prime Minister Putin has suspended his practice of dropping Mardi Gras beads from his plane while in Alaskan airspace.
September 26, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
So THAT's what it is! --
From the outset I've believed Palin too close to the Ruskies for comfort. Now we learn its because she loves those cheap plastic beads with which the Commies have been showering her!?
September 26, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read that. I was quite surprised. Honestly. She loved Palin, absolutely loved her.
September 26, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah: a member of the Airheads for Airheads contingent of feminists.
September 26, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is remarkable that, despite the above quote, Kathleen Parker herself is apparently NOT questioning McCain's "executive decision-making ability!" She's right that it would be questioned if he dumped Palin... but it should be in question RIGHT NOW!
For everything she said in her article, John McCain's decision making and leadership qualities should be in question! Parker should be appalled at McCain's rank opportunism and genuine stupidity. That should be her next column!
Ugh!
September 26, 2008 2:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly, loki!
It just makes you wonder what kind of person McCain would put in charge of FEMA?
Good judgement or reckless? The American people know the answer to that.
September 27, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
CNN picked this up:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/26/palin-should-step-down-conservative-commentator-says/
September 26, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
DAMN! You beat me to it! Nice job. It's also on ABC, actually, which is where I originally read it. But it's quoted in a larger article about how McCain has to own the bailout at this point.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/Story?id=3105288&page=1
September 26, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's been a bad week for McCain/Palin when Rove, Buchanan and Parker are all heaping on. I get nauseated when I am forced to agree with Karl Rove...
September 26, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give me a brake! Rove can't hold a candle to McCain.
McCain, unlike Rove, was a POW!
September 26, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Elephant In The Room,
That Ms. Parker does not want any of you to notice.
The unqualified and unready Sarah Palin was picked by John McCain.
That makes him even a bigger risk than Sarah Palin, since he would be the actual President.
Ms. Parker is just covering her own arse, by trying to catch up with voters. They have been way ahead of her.
Ms. Parker even devised a way for Sarah Palin to be dropped from the ticket, that would make McCain look good, for making such a reckless and imbecilic selection.
Ms. Parker; put the blame where it belongs. Blame John McCain
September 26, 2008 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once it becomes universally accepted that Palin was a terrible choice, all eyes will turn to McCain.
His judgement will be openly questioned. Just give it some time.
September 26, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Que Sarah sera: always the beauty contestant answering serious questions with the knowledge of a blank slate.
September 26, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
The money quote:
Sarah Palin is George W. Bush without the education or political acumen.
Let that sink in for a moment.
September 26, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right!
September 26, 2008 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.boingboing.net/images/x_2008/putinrearshishead.jpg
September 26, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is amazing.
September 26, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's a prediction (and I'm not joking either): Palin drops out early next week for "family reasons". They simply can not allow her to attend the debate, and the word is now out that she's a clueless dimwit.
You heard it here first. Palin's out before the debate.
September 26, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would bet if I didn't think it was such a likely possibility.
September 26, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Watching this, recently up at the mother ship, has left me feeling as though the chances she will step aside are considerably higher than I thought they were earlier today.
Ouch. And wow. 117 recs already, as I write.
September 26, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's a slightly different scenario...(one suggested by a poster from elsewhere) Palin drops out because Democrats have hounded her out. This is totally believable knowing the rovians as we do. It might save mccain with the gop base, but would it save him from the obvious question about his judgment in choosing her to begin with?
September 26, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
If they blame it on the Dems., they lose more than they would gain by having her off the ticket. That would just bolster the argument that she was never prepared to begin with. If she drops out for her own personal, family reasons, she'll look like a good mother, and McCain might not lose as much as he would otherwise. Pointing the finger elsewhere will do no good.
September 26, 2008 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
One other possibility: the McCain staff wires her with explosives and a remote control detonator. Then they send her in to the debates...
September 26, 2008 6:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, there is one more possibility, and I would be willing to bet it's been discussed within the McCain campaign. They pull their legal support team from Alaska and allow the Troopergate thing to go forward. She drops out because it's becoming too much of a distraction, or they throw her under the bus and claim she lied to them.
September 26, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
From Andrew Sullivan:
I tend to agree with him here. But we'll see what happens.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/palin-is-gettin.html
September 26, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
The two of them are in a death grip... going down with the Titanic republican campaign.
September 26, 2008 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't say this is impossible, but I consider it to be highly unlikely. This would most likely be a big minus for McCain at this point. There's also the complication of meeting ballot deadlines. I've been doing some research to determine what that would look like, and I may write about it, but there would be complications in complying with the election laws in all 50 states.
September 27, 2008 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
If she drops out it won't be for family reasons, it will because the media--and in particular that big meanie, Katie Couric--are too sexist to accept a strong woman in the white house.
September 26, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
For once, I disagree with many of my favorite TPM'ers.
IMO, what y'all suffer from is a poignant combination of intelligence, logic and optimism.
But when did the Repugs ever worry about that?
Why present (a) prepared, reasonable candidate(s) when you can present (a) holigraph(s)? Why take responsibility for your own ambition-driven, histrionic decisions when you can project that behavior onto your reasonable, Presidential-acting opponent?
Why call black white when you can call half-black/half-white all black?
See what I mean? Palin will not drop out. Because in a reasonable world she would never have accepted the nod; therefore, she's in for the duration.
Circulate that wolf paw video. Because, if you'll pardon the pun, cut to the chase.
September 26, 2008 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Never said she would. Just saying the possibility is actually there. The possibility is apparent, and real. When you have people like Kathleen Parker calling for her to drop out, and K-Lo saying, "...that’s not a crazy suggestion", it's difficult to say it couldn't happen given the climate. But like I said above, I tend to agree with Andrew Sullivan, that it won't happen, because McCain would lose more by dropping her than he does by keeping her at this point. Still, the idea is floating around. I don't hear it floating around for any of the other candidates.
September 26, 2008 7:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin might be a beard for the REAL vice-presidential candidate: someone similar to Romney and not a fundamentalist female. Like Harriet Miers, Palin's real role may be generating support while serving as a symbolic placeholder.
September 26, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm experiencing utter befuddlement. I don't know whether to laugh or cry at this point.
At least everyone else is getting this as a disastrous joke. Again. utter befuddlement.
September 27, 2008 1:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain has to much honor to boot Sarah from the ticket.
He would rather lose an election than lose a soulmate.
September 27, 2008 1:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Parker hits the nail on the head: "If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself."
What do you call a hockey mom who advocates "abstinence only" education? -- Grandma!
(this is a bit unfair, but I couldn't help passing it along--compliments of a commenter at Politico.com--- because it's also, well.. a bit funny)
September 27, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
The election ended when the Reagan Revolution ended -- with the announcement of the Wall Street Bailout. Sarah Palin is the frosting on the cake already baked.
Interestingly, Palin as VP was the equivalent of deregulation: the wing-and-a-prayer theory that we can grow our way out of common sense and caution. Full speed ahead in the markets, and real estate values will always rise keeping us safe from our own mistakes. Full speed ahead with Sarah and her beauty and novelty will keep her afloat while we put her through presidential boot camp. Just need to stay in front of the curve, that's all.
In both cases, reality is the enemy of theory and time is reality's ally. We're paying now for mistakes first made decades ago. McCain is paying now for a mistake he made weeks ago. It's gonna catch up to you one way or another.
September 27, 2008 10:47 AM | Reply | Permalink