« BREAKING: McCain denies deal with the Devil | ☠enghis's Blog | Lead! »

Men of Honor


America is fortunate to have a choice between two men of honor this election year. In another election, the candidates might have tried to exploit the financial crisis for petty political gain. But not this year. John McCain has gone so far as to propose delaying the first debate with Barack Obama so that they can solve our crisis:

We must meet as Americans, not as Democrats or Republicans, and we must meet until this crisis is resolved...I am directing my campaign to work with the Obama campaign and the commission on presidential debates to delay Friday night's debate until we have taken action to address this crisis.

Now that, my friends, is honor. This is a time of crisis. The last thing that Americans need right now is to watch their leaders debate about how to end the crisis. Proposing this great delay required great political courage. Cynical Americans might have concluded that McCain was not quite ready to debate or that he was making a show for political gain. But John McCain is willing to risk the cynicism of the voters to do the right thing for the country.

Barack Obama is also a man of honor. Even before McCain's stunningly honorable proposal, Obama called John McCain to propose that they make a joint announcement. This is a time of crisis. What Americans need right now are joint statements reassuring us that our nation's financial health is in the hands of honorable men. According to the Obama campaign:

At 8:30 this morning, Senator Obama called Senator McCain to ask him if he would join in issuing a joint statement outlining their shared principles and conditions for the Treasury proposal and urging Congress and the White House to act in a bipartisan manner to pass such a proposal. At 2:30 this afternoon, Senator McCain returned Senator Obama's call and agreed to join him in issuing such a statement.

I'm sure the inclusion of the times of the phone calls was unintentional, but I had our crack statistician teams run the numbers. Apparently, Barack Obama is more honorable than John McCain by exactly 6 hours.* Now 6 hours may not seem like a lot of time, but it can mean the difference between honor and dishonor in the White House. For example, if John McCain were to receive a phone call at 3 AM, he might not respond with honor 9 AM.

But though he was slower out of the gate, John McCain has been leading the honor race ever since. He broached a debate delay to Obama during the 2:30 call, and Obama indicated that he would consider it:

I proposed putting out the joint statement. [John McCain] concurred with that. he then also said, 'I would like us to look at suspending the campaign and pushing the debates off.' I said, 'let's put out the joint statement first, and then get our campaigns to discuss this.'

But John McCain knew that the nation could not wait for honor. After the phone call, he immediately released the news of his courage to the press. Meanwhile, Barack Obama, while quick to honor, apparently lacks John McCain's honorable depth, as he is not willing to face the cynicism of the voters by agreeing to delay the debate, explaining, "I believe it makes sense for us to present ourselves to the American people."

Most analysts credit John McCain with winning this battle in the honor war, but we have a long 10 weeks ahead of us. We can expect many more honorable and completely non-political actions from both candidates during that time. Meanwhile, after 16 hours of nonstop meetings, the two candidates have produced an honorable joint statement which will surely make Americans weep with relief:

This is a time to rise above politics for the good of the country. We cannot risk an economic catastrophe. Now is our chance to come together to prove that Washington is once again capable of leading this country.

 

* Al Gore has claimed credit for proposing to issue a joint statement and to delay the debate back in 2005, which would giving him a 3-year honor jump on both candidates.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cross-posted at my new blog, DagBlog.com, a joint project with cohorts Articleman and Deadman. If you enjoy our work, please share the love by linking to our blog and Digging this post.


35 Comments

| Leave a comment

Frist!!

My fav line:

But John McCain knew that the nation could not wait for honor.

I think Honor and John McCain are no longer exchanging calling cards.

Yeah, me too. I was unfortunately trying to sip some very hot coffee at the time. Damn you, ☠enghis!

Heh. Nice.

There ain't nothing honorable in exploiting the financial "crisis" for political purposes.

Honor is good, but competence is maybe a bit more of a compelling issue this election, I'd say. A large part of being competent is knowing when to get out of the way, and let better qualified folks do their jobs. It's knowing that busy people don't need to accommodate your stump speeches and photo-ops, as well as your army of pundits during a National crisis. It's not suspending democracy for political gain. It's not hiding from hard questions from the press and dissing popular venues for the American public to hear what your plans are for the future.

Maybe most important, it's not honorable to make alarmist announcements and get the public in a tizzy when it is far better to to keep public panic to a minimum.

McCain isn't fit to be the President, and I'm not even sure he should be a Senator. He's acting like a wayward, self-involved, teenager.

Is that a rather insulting thing to say about wayward, self-involved teenagers?

Point.

My apologies.

If you enjoy our work, please share the love by linking to our blog and Digging this post.

Digg-whore.

Weren't you the same person that derided posters for asking for recommends in their posts?

user-pic

John McCain's sense of honor is an inspiration to me. I now understand that it doesn't matter what I have done and said in the past as long as I don't exhibit shame or contrition when I contradict myself.

(In truth, I don't recall deriding anyone for asking for recs--if you find any evidence to contrary, I will of course deny it. I don't usually do it myself, but I draw some fine distinctions which may appear arbitrary. For instance, I ask for recs for "good causes," e.g. fundraisers. And I'm cooler with whoring for diggs than for recs because with recs, I feel that I'm competing with other members of the site, whereas with diggs, I'm competing with the internet as a whole, to which I have no obligations of etiquette or, dare I say, "honor.")

There's no honor on teh internetz.

Another point. For what it's worth, I don't remember Genghis disparaging rec requests. I do remember Billy Glad doing it.

I thought this was a good piece. I think maybe it got pushed off a bit prematurely.

Even though Billy Glad's friendly Ghost does it constantly.

I know it's only 5 1/2 weeks to the election, but it seems like 10 for some reason.

Probably that 16 hour meeting has warped my sense of time.

user-pic

Question for ya'll to improve my writing. This post seems to be struggling to make this list, and I'm in need of come constructive criticism. Is the writing weaker than other posts or the subject overdone already? Is there not enough McCain hate in it? Talk to me.

My Friends, this shameless personal attack is a new low, and the question we really need to ask ourselves during this time of economic crisis, which incidentally I don't understand, is the one that can help Amercians the most: Is Barack Obama dishonorable?

I was a POW,
McCain 1908!

It's frankly a little smelly in here. I can't be surprised, since you haven't changed your shirt in months now....

Seriously, I don't think the piece is subpar. The issue of McCain's honor has been overdone, IMHO. Also, when there is so much low-hanging fruit in the debate debate, you seem to be grabbing for one of the upper branches. What are you, a giraffe?

Also, repeatedly and snarkily saying someone is honorable without any direct reference to Shakespeare's Julius Caesar seems pretty anti-elitist for this site.

user-pic

Au contraire, it's elitist. I figured that the smart ones would get it.

Saying "au contraire" convinces me of your elitist credentials.

user-pic

But McLame being a POW doesn't convince you of HIS elitist credentials!?

You, sir, have no honor!

Are you writing to express yourself, or for public love?

If you want to be popular, why are you writing on a political website? ;-)

user-pic

I consider recs to be a (very imperfect) measure of the quality of my writing, which I'm interested in improving. Usually, I can tell my good stuff from my bad stuff. I suppose that I thought that this one was decent, so in order to get better, I was curious about why people were underwhelmed.

Ghengis,

You get rec'd because you are part of that elite group who recommend each other regardless of the actual post. They see a name and click rec.

You and your clique are rec'd regularly. You say nice things about Obama, you pump up the troops, say everything is going to be OK and voila! C'mon! You've got to see this. You don't really think it is quality of writing that gets you rec'd, do you? For christ sakes, I've made the rec list a number of times! Heh!

You may be shocked by this comment but: I agree with much of what you say in your comment.

Most rec'ed posts fall around 15-30 or so. Given the presumed level of readership here, that's an exceedingly small number, and it wouldn't take much of a cabal to "hijack" the board, intentionally or otherwise.

user-pic

I expect that I get some indiscriminate recs by people who know me or people who just rec snark on policy. But it's not hard to tell the difference between a post that's OK and eventually gets 15 recs from one that's really good. The latter fly up the list immediately; the former grope their way up and peak at 15 or so. The comments are also noticeably different. This post is one of the latter. Of course, there are also sorts of random factors and pro-Obama biases, etc., which is why it's an imperfect measure. But it's really not that hard to tell when one's post is well-received.

See my comment to loki below.

In addition, I know I rec things that I think are (a) worthy of discussion (b) provide a new angle on an old discussion or (c) have an interesting comment section.

In other words, things I think that are worthy of other people's limited time.

You'll note that none of these reasons has anything to do with sending the author a message.

If you want the type feedback you are looking for, you'll need a real editor -- who many be brutal to you at times.

user-pic

Unfortunately, I can't afford an editor, so I figured that I'd go to the community. Hasn't gotten me too much. But one thing that I take from your comment is the providing a new angle point. I don't think that this post does. It's basically the same message that Josh and others have been posting since McCain made his proposal, though I tried to bring out more of the absurd back-and-forth between the campaigns.

Hasn't gotten me too much.

That's because some of us get paid to do it.

Man... I can't tell if this is irony or not! Are you and your cohort really that desperate? That insecure?

"Hey, nobody's recommended my post! What am I doing wrong?"

A little more heartfelt commentary with real conviction and a little less care for recs... also, a lot less self-promotion might go long way.

It's just lame.

{But hey, what do I know? It seems to work! 16 recs now, and on the rec board! Good for you. I sure do hope you feel better!}

user-pic

Bless you, loki. You're the sweetest person at the cafe. In this case, I requested constructive criticism, but when I need bitter derision, I know that you'll be there for me.

OK... now I know. It wasn't irony.

user-pic

No debating anything! We need to throw money at the problem. Now!

Yes, I agree.

Please send a check or money order to:

Clearthinker
c/o Clearthinking Enterprises
Box 350
Mind Estate, CA 90001

I think you meant: OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE NEED TO THROW MONEY AT THE PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

At least that's what I got from the Presidet's speech

Hey, I like Genghis' style of writing.

I think there's still something wrong with TPM's comment software. This is my second try. I came by last night and could not log on. I did rec. this post. Or tried to.

user-pic

Ha. Now I can blame it all on the bugs.

user-pic

But McLame being a POW doesn't convince you of HIS elitist credentials!?

You, sir, have no honor!

Leave a comment

☠enghis

user-pic

Following: 46
Followers: 57

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location New York
  • Party Yes
  • Politics No

Favorites

  • Favorite Books Everything You Ever Wanted to Ask About Willies and Other Boys' Bits by Tricia Kreitman, Dr Neil Simpson, and Dr Rosemary Jones
  • Favorite Quotes "I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news." S.P.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address