If the bill is $150b to start, then everything else to come later and it has room for adjustment, then he should probably sign-on. Too many people are saying that we have to do something and a small downpayment on something that he can fine tune at the start of his administration will probably keep the stock market from tanking before the election.
There can be no deal on the bailout. Wall Street and our governments financial regulators have to be taken out behind the woodshed. I don't know why we differentiate between these two groups of persons when in fact they are the same.
Without, at minimum, getting every penny repaid with interest, without equity in exchange for dollars, without accountability in exchange for dollars and direct relief for American homewoners on their mortgage interest Obama should not only vote NO but he should lead the charge against this obvious shakedown of the American taxpayer.
If it includes those objectives that he deemed necessary then, Aye!
"Present"
;-)
September 25, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the bill is $150b to start, then everything else to come later and it has room for adjustment, then he should probably sign-on. Too many people are saying that we have to do something and a small downpayment on something that he can fine tune at the start of his administration will probably keep the stock market from tanking before the election.
September 25, 2008 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
There can be no deal on the bailout. Wall Street and our governments financial regulators have to be taken out behind the woodshed. I don't know why we differentiate between these two groups of persons when in fact they are the same.
September 25, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Without, at minimum, getting every penny repaid with interest, without equity in exchange for dollars, without accountability in exchange for dollars and direct relief for American homewoners on their mortgage interest Obama should not only vote NO but he should lead the charge against this obvious shakedown of the American taxpayer.
September 25, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
If it includes those objectives that he deemed necessary then, Aye!
September 25, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink